[ANN] Signatum - New Algorithm - Fair Launch - No Premine

[DigeNarrator]

Craptopia how can you justify that all Qt based wallets are  created from the same base code and SIGT wallet is working fine on YObit with 300% more volume then you ever handled. It's look like you try to blackmail Dev. and essentially try to blackmail your customers to sell them and exchange their Holdings to other Coins.
Or better case is that you are Plainly lazy or out of resources to handle you exchange period.

While i'm not going to say one way or the other, I would point out that there are a few differences here.

1) Cryptopia's wallets have millions of transactions in SIGT in its history.  That could be a contributing factor (in fact, they mentioned that in their post).

2) Cryptopia probably has significantly more wallet addresses than YoBit, despite them having more volume RIGHT NOW.

3) More volume does not mean more transactions.  They could just be more value per transaction.

As such, I don't think you can compare an exchange that has only been trading in the coin for a short time, with one that's been doing so since the beginning.  Even if said new exchange does more volume.  It's an irrational argument.

Regardless, maybe the problem is with Cryptopia.. I just don't think it's useful to do such an unbalanced comparison.

as i said, signatum is not the only coin that exprenience issues with maitnance

[1714698071]

1714698071

[1714698071]

1714698071

[1714698071]

1714698071

[1714698071]

1714698071

[1714698071]

1714698071

[bryanayrb]

HELP!

Been from vacation and realize that online wallet is down, how can I withdraw my coin?

Thanks in advance for your help.

More power to Signatum!

[igotfits]

hey everyone im back with another question, i have my amd build up an running with each card (rx580) hashing out about 21 mh/s without pushing them too hard.
i have a nvidia build as well and was wondering what some of you are getting with your gtx1060s running ccminer 2.2
thanks again! last i checked when i ran it: 11 mh/s and it didnt seem worth it on 1060s

Hi Igotfits,

With CCMiner-x64 version 2.2.1, I'm mining Signatum on a single 970 GTX:

[2017-09-17 17:30:01] GPU #0: Gigabyte GTX 970, 18.08 MH/s

And on my mining rig i have four Zotac 1080 ti Amp! Extreme:

[2017-09-17 17:33:44] GPU #0: Zotac GTX 1080 Ti, 56.84 MH/s
[2017-09-17 17:33:45] GPU #1: Zotac GTX 1080 Ti, 55.13 MH/s
[2017-09-17 17:34:01] GPU #2: Zotac GTX 1080 Ti, 55.02 MH/s
[2017-09-17 17:34:02] GPU #3: Zotac GTX 1080 Ti, 56.28 MH/s

~SilverHash

ty good sir do u mind posting your line? this is what i have in mine, i dont think its correct for nvidia.
when i run it, it says intensity 20 but i dont know how to raise it.
FYI: im getting a steady 20.5 MH/s per card now gtx1060s

setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100

ccminer-x64 -a skunk -o stratum+tcp://sigt.suprnova.cc:7106 -u hidden.hidden -p hidden --cpu-priority=3
pause

[junior.masters]

HELP!

Been from vacation and realize that online wallet is down, how can I withdraw my coin?

Thanks in advance for your help.

More power to Signatum!

Sell it, buy another coin, withdraw to yobit, sell the other coin to rebuy Sigt and say good bye to craptopia

[m00n1ight]

HELP!

Been from vacation and realize that online wallet is down, how can I withdraw my coin?

Thanks in advance for your help.

More power to Signatum!

Sell it, buy another coin, withdraw to yobit, sell the other coin to rebuy Sigt and say good bye to craptopia

Like a God.

Bought 60k SIGTs. I am insane.

[bryanayrb]

HELP!

Been from vacation and realize that online wallet is down, how can I withdraw my coin?

Thanks in advance for your help.

More power to Signatum!

Sell it, buy another coin, withdraw to yobit, sell the other coin to rebuy Sigt and say good bye to craptopia

What I meant this online wallet https://wallet.signatum.io/ <-- need to withdraw my coin from this online wallet.

Thanks

[gurumeditation]

HELP!

Been from vacation and realize that online wallet is down, how can I withdraw my coin?

Thanks in advance for your help.

More power to Signatum!

Sell it, buy another coin, withdraw to yobit, sell the other coin to rebuy Sigt and say good bye to craptopia

What I meant this online wallet https://wallet.signatum.io/ <-- need to withdraw my coin from this online wallet.

Thanks

use http://wallet.signatum.io/users/login
then withdraw your coins, a wallet upgrade is planned for PoS, and all coins have to be withdrawn from the web wallet.
Note : if you can reach the site, try to clear your cache, or use another browser

[igotfits]

is it me or is suprnova moving SLOWWWW as heck, my earnings is crawling......

[Decker]

use http://wallet.signatum.io/users/login

You are right. Difference in protocol, HTTPS - don't work, HTTP is work. For example:

• https://wallet.signatum.io/ - won't open.
• http://wallet.signatum.io/ - opens succefully.

[bryanayrb]

HELP!

Been from vacation and realize that online wallet is down, how can I withdraw my coin?

Thanks in advance for your help.

More power to Signatum!

Sell it, buy another coin, withdraw to yobit, sell the other coin to rebuy Sigt and say good bye to craptopia

What I meant this online wallet https://wallet.signatum.io/ <-- need to withdraw my coin from this online wallet.

Thanks

use http://wallet.signatum.io/users/login
then withdraw your coins, a wallet upgrade is planned for PoS, and all coins have to be withdrawn from the web wallet.
Note : if you can reach the site, try to clear your cache, or use another browser

Waiting my coin to be reflected in my desktop wallet

Thanks!

[qualialibre]

is it me or is suprnova moving SLOWWWW as heck, my earnings is crawling......

Yeah I noticed that also. Since this 7H ago, my deposit speed wend down 20% !?!?! Then I saw the workers count where up  >25%...
I say latecomers are regretting not having started sooner.

[SilverHash]

hey everyone im back with another question, i have my amd build up an running with each card (rx580) hashing out about 21 mh/s without pushing them too hard.
i have a nvidia build as well and was wondering what some of you are getting with your gtx1060s running ccminer 2.2
thanks again! last i checked when i ran it: 11 mh/s and it didnt seem worth it on 1060s

Hi Igotfits,

With CCMiner-x64 version 2.2.1, I'm mining Signatum on a single 970 GTX:

[2017-09-17 17:30:01] GPU #0: Gigabyte GTX 970, 18.08 MH/s

And on my mining rig i have four Zotac 1080 ti Amp! Extreme:

[2017-09-17 17:33:44] GPU #0: Zotac GTX 1080 Ti, 56.84 MH/s
[2017-09-17 17:33:45] GPU #1: Zotac GTX 1080 Ti, 55.13 MH/s
[2017-09-17 17:34:01] GPU #2: Zotac GTX 1080 Ti, 55.02 MH/s
[2017-09-17 17:34:02] GPU #3: Zotac GTX 1080 Ti, 56.28 MH/s

~SilverHash

ty good sir do u mind posting your line? this is what i have in mine, i dont think its correct for nvidia.
when i run it, it says intensity 20 but i dont know how to raise it.
FYI: im getting a steady 20.5 MH/s per card now gtx1060s

setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100

ccminer-x64 -a skunk -o stratum+tcp://sigt.suprnova.cc:7106 -u hidden.hidden -p hidden --cpu-priority=3
pause

Since this card is on my main PC, I lowered the CPU priority to reduce the stuttering effect while performing other tasks.  For me the biggest increase in hashes occurred when I went from version 2.2 to v2.2.1.  I also received another bump in the hashrate when I OC'd the GPU with AfterBurner, but just a little one.

ccminer-x64 -a skunk -o stratum+tcp://sigt.suprnova.cc:7106 -u x.x -p x --cpu-priority=2  -i 20

CCMiner v2.2.1:
https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer/releases

[igotfits]

hey everyone im back with another question, i have my amd build up an running with each card (rx580) hashing out about 21 mh/s without pushing them too hard.
i have a nvidia build as well and was wondering what some of you are getting with your gtx1060s running ccminer 2.2
thanks again! last i checked when i ran it: 11 mh/s and it didnt seem worth it on 1060s

Hi Igotfits,

With CCMiner-x64 version 2.2.1, I'm mining Signatum on a single 970 GTX:

[2017-09-17 17:30:01] GPU #0: Gigabyte GTX 970, 18.08 MH/s

And on my mining rig i have four Zotac 1080 ti Amp! Extreme:

[2017-09-17 17:33:44] GPU #0: Zotac GTX 1080 Ti, 56.84 MH/s
[2017-09-17 17:33:45] GPU #1: Zotac GTX 1080 Ti, 55.13 MH/s
[2017-09-17 17:34:01] GPU #2: Zotac GTX 1080 Ti, 55.02 MH/s
[2017-09-17 17:34:02] GPU #3: Zotac GTX 1080 Ti, 56.28 MH/s

~SilverHash

ty good sir do u mind posting your line? this is what i have in mine, i dont think its correct for nvidia.
when i run it, it says intensity 20 but i dont know how to raise it.
FYI: im getting a steady 20.5 MH/s per card now gtx1060s

setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100

ccminer-x64 -a skunk -o stratum+tcp://sigt.suprnova.cc:7106 -u hidden.hidden -p hidden --cpu-priority=3
pause

Since this card is on my main PC, I lowered the CPU priority to reduce the stuttering effect while performing other tasks.  For me the biggest increase in hashes occurred when I went from version 2.2 to v2.2.1.  I also received another bump in the hashrate when I OC'd the GPU with AfterBurner, but just a little one.

ccminer-x64 -a skunk -o stratum+tcp://sigt.suprnova.cc:7106 -u x.x -p x --cpu-priority=2  -i 20

CCMiner v2.2.1:
https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer/releases

yea i noticed a great jump also with 2.2.1 i went from 11 to 20.5mh/s on my 1060s 6gb.
is there any reason u put it on --cpu-priority=2 i noticed the -i doesnt do anything.

[TMacLaughlin]

Don't worry. On the official site it says: "Signatum is designed to be easily integrated into several applications, including payment platforms, exchanges, and marketplaces." - and that's the tech behind SIGT, as I was answered here - "designed to be easily integrated". So it should be integrated easily. Not more than 2 weeks I guess, or a month maybe. Actually, the windows QT wallet is the same as most of other wallets I've seen so far - same interface, same RTC, etc, etc - they're all copycats.

And based on the level of questions people ask and answers in this thread - I see that there are 30% of bots, shouting "buy SIGT it's the future of donald trump would bought!", then 30% of Witnesses Of The SIGT sect who should "it's the future tech! can't you read? it says - easily integrated, yupi! no other coin has that!". 30% of investors who bought in and don't know how to exchange to BTC to withdraw their money from (not worth to mention) craptopia. And 5-10% of real users, who are sometimes questioning themselves - "what the hell am I doing in this circus?..."

So I'm not worrying anymore. It's a perfectly normal example of discussion here, as I understood.

They also list the estimated block time as two minutes in the announcement and white paper, but it has been averaging at 63 seconds for the last 80000 blocks.  Just saying it doesn't make it true. 

Still, it has a better return than nearly every lotto ticket I have ever bought and you never know this might be the one.  That is worth 10 more days of mining and circus. 

[dieselfrank]

hey everyone im back with another question, i have my amd build up an running with each card (rx580) hashing out about 21 mh/s without pushing them too hard.
i have a nvidia build as well and was wondering what some of you are getting with your gtx1060s running ccminer 2.2
thanks again! last i checked when i ran it: 11 mh/s and it didnt seem worth it on 1060s

Hi Igotfits,

With CCMiner-x64 version 2.2.1, I'm mining Signatum on a single 970 GTX:

[2017-09-17 17:30:01] GPU #0: Gigabyte GTX 970, 18.08 MH/s

And on my mining rig i have four Zotac 1080 ti Amp! Extreme:

[2017-09-17 17:33:44] GPU #0: Zotac GTX 1080 Ti, 56.84 MH/s
[2017-09-17 17:33:45] GPU #1: Zotac GTX 1080 Ti, 55.13 MH/s
[2017-09-17 17:34:01] GPU #2: Zotac GTX 1080 Ti, 55.02 MH/s
[2017-09-17 17:34:02] GPU #3: Zotac GTX 1080 Ti, 56.28 MH/s

~SilverHash

ty good sir do u mind posting your line? this is what i have in mine, i dont think its correct for nvidia.
when i run it, it says intensity 20 but i dont know how to raise it.
FYI: im getting a steady 20.5 MH/s per card now gtx1060s

setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100

ccminer-x64 -a skunk -o stratum+tcp://sigt.suprnova.cc:7106 -u hidden.hidden -p hidden --cpu-priority=3
pause

Since this card is on my main PC, I lowered the CPU priority to reduce the stuttering effect while performing other tasks.  For me the biggest increase in hashes occurred when I went from version 2.2 to v2.2.1.  I also received another bump in the hashrate when I OC'd the GPU with AfterBurner, but just a little one.

ccminer-x64 -a skunk -o stratum+tcp://sigt.suprnova.cc:7106 -u x.x -p x --cpu-priority=2  -i 20

CCMiner v2.2.1:
https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer/releases

Thanks for the link, I heard earlier that there are some paid software to mine sigt for better hashrate I am not sure if that was true. or it still the same now for the free version?

Yes there are a few modded ccminer apps that hash much better than stock ccminer. However the degree to which its better depends on the gpu your using. My 1070's dont benefit all that much from the modded miner, but my 1080ti got a massive upgrade. Went from 36Mh stock miner to 52Mh with modded miner. Some are claiming  54Mh but I leave my core and clock at 0 with signatum. Not enough benefit to bother with changing. Just power is all I change. I have a rig of 6 1080ti's that can crank up to 315Mh, I run them at 70% power and get 285Mh. I run my 1070's on other coins like Eth/Sia, Eth/Lbc, Zcash, Hush.

Dont waste your money paying for a modded app, not much time left to mine anyway. Plenty of free modded miners that are just as good, possibly even copycats of the paid versions. Just do a google search for it, the one I've been using is called "ccminer-skunk-krnlx-80" and another that works close to same is "ccminer-skunk-jha-master". I downloaded from github...Unfortunately if you just getting into mining sigt now, you are far too late to the show. Its about over and your probably better off buying into sigt than mining at this point.

[dieselfrank]

hey everyone im back with another question, i have my amd build up an running with each card (rx580) hashing out about 21 mh/s without pushing them too hard.
i have a nvidia build as well and was wondering what some of you are getting with your gtx1060s running ccminer 2.2
thanks again! last i checked when i ran it: 11 mh/s and it didnt seem worth it on 1060s

Hi Igotfits,

With CCMiner-x64 version 2.2.1, I'm mining Signatum on a single 970 GTX:

[2017-09-17 17:30:01] GPU #0: Gigabyte GTX 970, 18.08 MH/s

And on my mining rig i have four Zotac 1080 ti Amp! Extreme:

[2017-09-17 17:33:44] GPU #0: Zotac GTX 1080 Ti, 56.84 MH/s
[2017-09-17 17:33:45] GPU #1: Zotac GTX 1080 Ti, 55.13 MH/s
[2017-09-17 17:34:01] GPU #2: Zotac GTX 1080 Ti, 55.02 MH/s
[2017-09-17 17:34:02] GPU #3: Zotac GTX 1080 Ti, 56.28 MH/s

~SilverHash

ty good sir do u mind posting your line? this is what i have in mine, i dont think its correct for nvidia.
when i run it, it says intensity 20 but i dont know how to raise it.
FYI: im getting a steady 20.5 MH/s per card now gtx1060s

setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100

ccminer-x64 -a skunk -o stratum+tcp://sigt.suprnova.cc:7106 -u hidden.hidden -p hidden --cpu-priority=3
pause

Since this card is on my main PC, I lowered the CPU priority to reduce the stuttering effect while performing other tasks.  For me the biggest increase in hashes occurred when I went from version 2.2 to v2.2.1.  I also received another bump in the hashrate when I OC'd the GPU with AfterBurner, but just a little one.

ccminer-x64 -a skunk -o stratum+tcp://sigt.suprnova.cc:7106 -u x.x -p x --cpu-priority=2  -i 20

CCMiner v2.2.1:
https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer/releases

Thanks for the link, I heard earlier that there are some paid software to mine sigt for better hashrate I am not sure if that was true. or it still the same now for the free version?

Yes there are a few modded ccminer apps that hash much better than stock ccminer. However the degree to which its better depends on the gpu your using. My 1070's dont benefit all that much from the modded miner, but my 1080ti got a massive upgrade. Went from 36Mh stock miner to 52Mh with modded miner. Some are claiming  54Mh but I leave my core and clock at 0 with signatum. Not enough benefit to bother with changing. Just power is all I change. I have a rig of 6 1080ti's that can crank up to 315Mh, I run them at 70% power and get 285Mh. I run my 1070's on other coins like Eth/Sia, Eth/Lbc, Zcash, Hush.

Great I have x5 1070 not sure how much difference between CCMiner v2.2.1 and modded one. I am thinking to mine signatum until it switches to POS. but I am worrying to pause my eth/sia, still confusing.

Like I said not much difference with 1070's on modded miner. I have lots of 1070's and best I get is about 30Mh even with modded miner. I dont waste my 1070's on sigt. I've already got hundreds of thousands of Sia, so I have my 1070's set to Zcash and Eth/Lbc right now.

[Bumbr]

While i'm not going to say one way or the other, I would point out that there are a few differences here.

1) Cryptopia's wallets have millions of transactions in SIGT in its history.  That could be a contributing factor (in fact, they mentioned that in their post).

2) Cryptopia probably has significantly more wallet addresses than YoBit, despite them having more volume RIGHT NOW.

3) More volume does not mean more transactions.  They could just be more value per transaction.

As such, I don't think you can compare an exchange that has only been trading in the coin for a short time, with one that's been doing so since the beginning.  Even if said new exchange does more volume.  It's an irrational argument.

Regardless, maybe the problem is with Cryptopia.. I just don't think it's useful to do such an unbalanced comparison.

Sigt using leveldb to manage data. Like most other coins. So there is no coin problem, it's just volume & leveldb engine problem. A lot of people mined and sold their coins on cryptopia cuz "What to mine" main page says this. Mining pools creates bunch of small payments. So any other coins with good volume and popularity like signatum can be delisted by cryptopia, just because they can't scale theirs wallets.
Just read this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shard_(database_architecture)
If the problem in amount of transactions\user wallets, than they can be splitted to 2\3\4\5 databases. Technically this is very simple. but for cryptopia it's easily to delist something than solve their technical problems.

[VeeTeaSee]

While i'm not going to say one way or the other, I would point out that there are a few differences here.

1) Cryptopia's wallets have millions of transactions in SIGT in its history.  That could be a contributing factor (in fact, they mentioned that in their post).

2) Cryptopia probably has significantly more wallet addresses than YoBit, despite them having more volume RIGHT NOW.

3) More volume does not mean more transactions.  They could just be more value per transaction.

As such, I don't think you can compare an exchange that has only been trading in the coin for a short time, with one that's been doing so since the beginning.  Even if said new exchange does more volume.  It's an irrational argument.

Regardless, maybe the problem is with Cryptopia.. I just don't think it's useful to do such an unbalanced comparison.

Sigt using leveldb to manage data. Like most other coins. So there is no coin problem, it's just volume & leveldb engine problem. A lot of people mined and sold their coins on cryptopia cuz "What to mine" main page says this. Mining pools creates bunch of small payments. So any other coins with good volume and popularity like signatum can be delisted by cryptopia, just because they can't scale theirs wallets.
Just read this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shard_(database_architecture)
If the problem in amount of transactions\user wallets they can be splitted to 2\3\4\5 databases. Technically this is very simple. but for cryptopia it's easily to delist something than solve their technical problems.

what do you mean delist?
are they planning to delist signatum? :/

[Bumbr]

what do you mean delist?
are they planning to delist signatum? :/

Read this https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1669443.msg21883430#msg21883430
They called this "Plan B"

[altfinance]

Very nice combined trading volume  (88 BTC for the past 24 hrs) for SIGT from all the exchanges. I hope this keeps up so the big exchanges notice again.  We can still dream of being listed in bittrex and binance. Hey, dreaming is free.