[ANN] Signatum - New Algorithm - Fair Launch - No Premine

[cryptodevil]

..ad hominem..
A: He may of been agreeing with sarcasm

FFS, it is not "may of" it is "may have".

Ignoramus.

[Epicyclic]

..ad hominem..
A: He may of been agreeing with sarcasm

FFS, it is not "may of" it is "may have".

Ignoramus.

Well done you, I would hazard a guess, that you are real proud of that find. 

Sad individual indeed.

Keep going Crypto, the whole community is laughing at you, you provide the comedy around here.

[coreshift]

Cryptodevil claimed SIGT is a clone-coin. When asked what coin it's a clone of he finally looks at the code and sees it's derived from Blakecoin. He had no idea before then. Being a "clone-coin" is a meaningless standard for claiming SIGT is a scam since EVERY coin is derived from BTC or a derivative of BTC. Every coin is a "clone-coin". Nobody is going to rewrite the blockchain code from scratch. That would be idiotic.

He claims the exchange is being manipulated by bots and that this is evidence that SIGT is a scam. Even if it was being manipulated that is not evidence the devs are manipulating it. It's not evidence of scam. Almost every coin's price gets manipulated by bots or whales at various times.

He claims that a new algorithm is not "innovative" because SIGT has a short PoW timeframe. A new algorithm IS innovative regardless of the length of time it's used. Regardless, lack of innovation would not be evidence of a scam.

He claims anyone that questions his "evidence" is somehow in on the scam he has no evidence of.

EDIT: And of course I just got negative trust ratings. LOL This forum is a joke when people like Cryptodevil get to run around unchecked. He should be banned.

[borderline]

Cryptodevil claimed SIGT is a clone-coin. When asked what coin it's a clone of he finally looks at the code and sees it's derived from Blakecoin. He had no idea before then. Being a "clone-coin" is a meaningless standard for claiming SIGT is a scam since EVERY coin is derived from BTC or a derivative of BTC. Every coin is a "clone-coin". Nobody is going to rewrite the blockchain code from scratch. That would be idiotic.

He claims the exchange is being manipulated by bots and that this is evidence that SIGT is a scam. Even if it was being manipulated that is not evidence the devs are manipulating it. It's not evidence of scam. Almost every coin's price gets manipulated by bots or whales at various times.

He claims that a new algorithm is not "innovative" because SIGT has a short PoW timeframe. A new algorithm IS innovative regardless of the length of time it's used. Regardless, lack of innovation would not be evidence of a scam.

He claims anyone that questions his "evidence" is somehow in on the scam he has no evidence of.

the problem it's nota clone coin the problem is i ask about this image thi avatare and i was banned from discord and telegram.. in if you see my last post i always  defenden signatum... this is...

[coreshift]

Cryptodevil claimed SIGT is a clone-coin. When asked what coin it's a clone of he finally looks at the code and sees it's derived from Blakecoin. He had no idea before then. Being a "clone-coin" is a meaningless standard for claiming SIGT is a scam since EVERY coin is derived from BTC or a derivative of BTC. Every coin is a "clone-coin". Nobody is going to rewrite the blockchain code from scratch. That would be idiotic.

He claims the exchange is being manipulated by bots and that this is evidence that SIGT is a scam. Even if it was being manipulated that is not evidence the devs are manipulating it. It's not evidence of scam. Almost every coin's price gets manipulated by bots or whales at various times.

He claims that a new algorithm is not "innovative" because SIGT has a short PoW timeframe. A new algorithm IS innovative regardless of the length of time it's used. Regardless, lack of innovation would not be evidence of a scam.

He claims anyone that questions his "evidence" is somehow in on the scam he has no evidence of.

the problem it's nota clone coin the problem is i ask about this image thi avatare and i was banned from discord and telegram.. in if you see my last post i always  defenden signatum... this is...

I seriously doubt the (very out of context) exchange quoted was why you were banned.

[Dark12]

Cryptodevil claimed SIGT is a clone-coin. When asked what coin it's a clone of he finally looks at the code and sees it's derived from Blakecoin. He had no idea before then. Being a "clone-coin" is a meaningless standard for claiming SIGT is a scam since EVERY coin is derived from BTC or a derivative of BTC. Every coin is a "clone-coin". Nobody is going to rewrite the blockchain code from scratch. That would be idiotic.

He claims the exchange is being manipulated by bots and that this is evidence that SIGT is a scam. Even if it was being manipulated that is not evidence the devs are manipulating it. It's not evidence of scam. Almost every coin's price gets manipulated by bots or whales at various times.

He claims that a new algorithm is not "innovative" because SIGT has a short PoW timeframe. A new algorithm IS innovative regardless of the length of time it's used. Regardless, lack of innovation would not be evidence of a scam.

He claims anyone that questions his "evidence" is somehow in on the scam he has no evidence of.

the problem it's nota clone coin the problem is i ask about this image thi avatare and i was banned from discord and telegram.. in if you see my last post i always  defenden signatum... this is...

I seriously doubt the (very out of context) exchange quoted was why you were banned.

[Epicyclic]

..ad hominem..
A: He may of been agreeing with sarcasm

Lets be totally honest here, take a look through his posts.

He loosely learnt the the meaning of these words;

Ignoramus.
ad hominem
Rebute
affirmative
reductio
fallacies
Scammer
Sock-puppet

Now he spams every post with the same repetitive words, in an attempt to look intelligent, or insulting to drive his argument forward, for the simple reason that it lacks substance, he hopes people will listen.

I mean he uses ad hominem for no apparent reason in the quote above.

Constantly banging on about fallacies......boring.

I think he has an obsession with the phonetic sound of that word to be clear.

Maybe it is because he has a phallus up his ass, pushing the shit out of his mouth.

[borderline]

Cryptodevil claimed SIGT is a clone-coin. When asked what coin it's a clone of he finally looks at the code and sees it's derived from Blakecoin. He had no idea before then. Being a "clone-coin" is a meaningless standard for claiming SIGT is a scam since EVERY coin is derived from BTC or a derivative of BTC. Every coin is a "clone-coin". Nobody is going to rewrite the blockchain code from scratch. That would be idiotic.

He claims the exchange is being manipulated by bots and that this is evidence that SIGT is a scam. Even if it was being manipulated that is not evidence the devs are manipulating it. It's not evidence of scam. Almost every coin's price gets manipulated by bots or whales at various times.

He claims that a new algorithm is not "innovative" because SIGT has a short PoW timeframe. A new algorithm IS innovative regardless of the length of time it's used. Regardless, lack of innovation would not be evidence of a scam.

He claims anyone that questions his "evidence" is somehow in on the scam he has no evidence of.

the problem it's nota clone coin the problem is i ask about this image thi avatare and i was banned from discord and telegram.. in if you see my last post i always  defenden signatum... this is...

I seriously doubt the (very out of context) exchange quoted was why you were banned.

perfect my game !!!

[borderline]

why don't ask at your dev why use a image from another person??

[Epicyclic]

why don't ask at your dev why use a image from another person??

Because it is just an image, nobody cares.

[borderline]

who are the dev?? ask at tis question and i go out!!!

edit:
come one man we don t tal about a candy..... but a coin whit 2 milion dollar of marketpalce... so...

[coreshift]

why don't ask at your dev why use a image from another person??

Why? It's a very, very common thing on social media. People use pictures of people & things they like or admire. Just hop on Twitter for a while. Almost nobody uses their real picture. It's meaningless.

[Epicyclic]

who are the dev?? ask at tis question and i go out!!!

You asked Signatumd, however, he was not online to respond.

It was not Dev who kicked you, it was a Discord moderator,

you was by no means kicked for asking a question, you was kicked for the ensuing FUD you decided to throw at the community.

[borderline]

why don't ask at your dev why use a image from another person??

Why? It's a very, very common thing on social media. People use pictures of people & things they like or admire. Just hop on Twitter for a while. Almost nobody uses their real picture. It's meaningless.

i don't think so..if you use a nick from another perons i don't think people belivie you....

[aagert]

Jesus, this thread became a thrashcan. It should have been self-moderated, to kick out trolls of here for forever. Maybe devs should create new thread?

[Epicyclic]

why don't ask at your dev why use a image from another person??

Why? It's a very, very common thing on social media. People use pictures of people & things they like or admire. Just hop on Twitter for a while. Almost nobody uses their real picture. It's meaningless.

i don't think so..if you use a nick from another perons i don't think people belivie you....

Is that your theory?, oh well that must be why nobody believes CryptoDevil, because his picture is just a badge.

Silly me, and there was me thinking all this time, that nobody believed him because he chats shit.

What an ignoramus I am.

[Epicyclic]

Jesus, this thread became a thrashcan. It should have been self-moderated, to kick out trolls of here for forever. Maybe devs should create new thread?

I totally agree with this idea.

[coreshift]

Jesus, this thread became a thrashcan. It should have been self-moderated, to kick out trolls of here for forever. Maybe devs should create new thread?

I totally agree with this idea.

Nothing would stop Cryptodevil and his fans/sockpuppets from causing the same disruption. He'd keep throwing around accusations without evidence and ruining reputations of people that question it. Seriously, why hasn't this guy been banned?

[project earth]

Now picture is a problem   next what,nickname,and what those numbers mean,42,is it age,year when he born,door number? house? ask him,if he wont answer,its a scam   , i think we have fbi peoples here,and they want to know info,or no no,that finance police,yes yes,looking for taxes of 2million marketcap coin.

[Epicyclic]

Jesus, this thread became a thrashcan. It should have been self-moderated, to kick out trolls of here for forever. Maybe devs should create new thread?

I totally agree with this idea.

Nothing would stop Cryptodevil and his fans/sockpuppets from causing the same disruption. He'd keep throwing around accusations without evidence and ruining reputations of people that question it. Seriously, why hasn't this guy been banned?

Because ironically, he is the sock puppet of someone higher, or cock sock.