Topkras
|
|
September 26, 2017, 07:29:11 PM |
|
my wallet is not syncing again
Be specific. Have you tried modifying your conf file (or adding a conf file, if there isn't one)? I have been in staking mode for 4 days now, no issues. Head to the Discord channel for FAQs and ideas to get the wallet going. mac os wallet http://joxi.ru/ZrJjYKVF9y7jyrI don't have any conf file. So I just use what downloaded from official website
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
easyfl
|
|
September 26, 2017, 07:39:57 PM |
|
my wallet is not syncing again
Be specific. Have you tried modifying your conf file (or adding a conf file, if there isn't one)? I have been in staking mode for 4 days now, no issues. Head to the Discord channel for FAQs and ideas to get the wallet going. mac os wallet http://joxi.ru/ZrJjYKVF9y7jyrI don't have any conf file. So I just use what downloaded from official website just wait some time, i have standard one without adding nodes
|
|
|
|
coreshift
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
September 26, 2017, 07:43:33 PM |
|
my wallet is not syncing again
Be specific. Have you tried modifying your conf file (or adding a conf file, if there isn't one)? I have been in staking mode for 4 days now, no issues. Head to the Discord channel for FAQs and ideas to get the wallet going. mac os wallet http://joxi.ru/ZrJjYKVF9y7jyrI don't have any conf file. So I just use what downloaded from official website You would need to create a file called "signatum.conf" (I assume naming is same for mac), then. In whatever directory the mac os wallet stores the data for the wallet. In Windows it's: C:\Users\<user>\AppData\Roaming\Signatum Here's the contents of mine & it works, but it probably contains some nodes that aren't functional anymore. addnode=sigt.suprnova.cc addnode=104.197.159.83 addnode=104.197.145.21 addnode=104.197.80.61 addnode=146.148.55.27 addnode=162.222.176.74 addnode=104.154.95.6 addnode=104.154.94.55 addnode=104.154.76.142 addnode=104.211.186.5 addnode=52.172.209.58 addnode=52.174.102.46 addnode=52.187.13.149 addnode=54.175.225.242 addnode=122.129.64.13 addnode=122.129.64.14 addnode=122.129.64.15 addnode=122.129.64.16 addnode=203.128.6.219 addnode=104.154.193.236 addnode=104.198.232.113 addnode=104.199.11.56 addnode=130.211.127.202 addnode=35.184.49.142 addnode=35.189.14.132 addnode=35.185.18.85 addnode=35.184.121.184 addnode=6jsbbxzfd5wyhs5i.onion addnode=6fzxqhdvvevev75v.onion addnode=ab7vmf6j2rajwo33.onion addnode=z6guowp3wn3fnekm.onion addnode=tl3bna25hbr5r2eg.onion addnode=a4scscaet5aplljx.onion addnode=w3rimjo7drskmbbd.onion
You can try searching for a file named "wallet.dat" to help find the directory.
|
|
|
|
easyfl
|
|
September 26, 2017, 08:59:13 PM |
|
Adding nodes to OSX ~/Library/Application Support/Signatum/signatum.conf Vote for the addition Signatum to the exchange livecoin Гoлocyйтe зa Cигнaтyм нa биpжe Ливкoин пo ccылкe https://www.livecoin.net/voting/index?vote=SignatumPlease withdraw from the web-wallet then Devs can proceed with its next beta stage
|
|
|
|
unikaq
Member
Offline
Activity: 74
Merit: 11
|
|
September 26, 2017, 09:04:53 PM |
|
You can add node by the console of the qt-wallet one per one
addnode 104.197.159.83 add addnode 104.197.145.21 add addnode 104.197.80.61 add addnode 146.148.55.27 add addnode 162.222.176.74 add addnode 104.154.95.6 add addnode 104.154.94.55 add addnode 104.154.76.142 add addnode 104.211.186.5 add addnode 52.172.209.58 add addnode 52.174.102.46 add addnode 52.187.13.149 add addnode 54.175.225.242 add addnode 122.129.64.13 add addnode 122.129.64.14 add addnode 122.129.64.15 add addnode 122.129.64.16 add addnode 203.128.6.219 add addnode 104.154.193.236 add addnode 104.198.232.113 add addnode 104.199.11.56 add addnode 130.211.127.202 add addnode 35.184.49.142 add addnode 35.189.14.132 add addnode 35.185.18.85 add addnode 35.184.121.184 add addnode 45.77.51.253 add addnode 45.32.102.240 add
|
|
|
|
vanhalendlrband
|
|
September 26, 2017, 09:13:31 PM |
|
chainworks reports latency. Check if it is going up and down when you have poor poolside hash. Mine was doubling frequently when I had poor results. Statistics->graph on pool's gui looks reasonably healthy today. This can be your internet provider is my best guess, I could not fully rootcause it when mine degraded out of the blue. Anybody else getting like 50% of their hashrates on all the pools right now?
I have 6 cards 4 in 1 right 2 XFX 480 8GB and 2 GTX 1060 in the other another 2 480 8GB XFX
I should be getting 99MH/s but get nowhere near that. I even had one pool get me down to 8MH/s which is like more than 10X less what my power actually is.
Does anybody know whats happening?
My theory so far is the blocks are moving too fast for me to report a share.
For anyone that might be reading my Chainworks pool improved greatly but was doing the same thing as MN and Suprnova almost worse for a bit. Can say after trying each tho somehow the Chainworks is correcting itself a bit but still lower mostly like I mentioned but not quite as low and I've actually seen it hit 99MH/s for the first time out of all the pools I tried for 24 hours Can't be my internet I have a 75Mbps connection and I have had no issues with at least ten other coins that I've mined. I find that those other coins are very accurate on how much I get too and I've double checked it with sites for months and are within maybe 10% this coin tho i'm getting 50% less than what whattomine says I should get on average between all the difficulty changes of 5k-10k. So it doesn't make much sense that with this coin and this coin only I get 50% less coins than what whattomine says but no other coin has that kind of discrepancy.
|
|
|
|
coreshift
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
September 26, 2017, 09:45:23 PM |
|
chainworks reports latency. Check if it is going up and down when you have poor poolside hash. Mine was doubling frequently when I had poor results. Statistics->graph on pool's gui looks reasonably healthy today. This can be your internet provider is my best guess, I could not fully rootcause it when mine degraded out of the blue. Anybody else getting like 50% of their hashrates on all the pools right now?
I have 6 cards 4 in 1 right 2 XFX 480 8GB and 2 GTX 1060 in the other another 2 480 8GB XFX
I should be getting 99MH/s but get nowhere near that. I even had one pool get me down to 8MH/s which is like more than 10X less what my power actually is.
Does anybody know whats happening?
My theory so far is the blocks are moving too fast for me to report a share.
For anyone that might be reading my Chainworks pool improved greatly but was doing the same thing as MN and Suprnova almost worse for a bit. Can say after trying each tho somehow the Chainworks is correcting itself a bit but still lower mostly like I mentioned but not quite as low and I've actually seen it hit 99MH/s for the first time out of all the pools I tried for 24 hours Can't be my internet I have a 75Mbps connection and I have had no issues with at least ten other coins that I've mined. I find that those other coins are very accurate on how much I get too and I've double checked it with sites for months and are within maybe 10% this coin tho i'm getting 50% less than what whattomine says I should get on average between all the difficulty changes of 5k-10k. So it doesn't make much sense that with this coin and this coin only I get 50% less coins than what whattomine says but no other coin has that kind of discrepancy. Don't rely on WTM to give accurate estimates. Did your hashrate suddenly drop or do you just think you should be getting a higher hashrate based on....whatever? Is there a huge difference between the hashrate your mining program reports and what the pool reports? Your hashrate, reported by the mining program or pool, have nothing to do with the SIGT network. That's just between you and the pool.
|
|
|
|
jimboscott
|
|
September 26, 2017, 09:55:05 PM |
|
chainworks reports latency. Check if it is going up and down when you have poor poolside hash. Mine was doubling frequently when I had poor results. Statistics->graph on pool's gui looks reasonably healthy today. This can be your internet provider is my best guess, I could not fully rootcause it when mine degraded out of the blue. Anybody else getting like 50% of their hashrates on all the pools right now?
I have 6 cards 4 in 1 right 2 XFX 480 8GB and 2 GTX 1060 in the other another 2 480 8GB XFX
I should be getting 99MH/s but get nowhere near that. I even had one pool get me down to 8MH/s which is like more than 10X less what my power actually is.
Does anybody know whats happening?
My theory so far is the blocks are moving too fast for me to report a share.
For anyone that might be reading my Chainworks pool improved greatly but was doing the same thing as MN and Suprnova almost worse for a bit. Can say after trying each tho somehow the Chainworks is correcting itself a bit but still lower mostly like I mentioned but not quite as low and I've actually seen it hit 99MH/s for the first time out of all the pools I tried for 24 hours Can't be my internet I have a 75Mbps connection and I have had no issues with at least ten other coins that I've mined. I find that those other coins are very accurate on how much I get too and I've double checked it with sites for months and are within maybe 10% this coin tho i'm getting 50% less than what whattomine says I should get on average between all the difficulty changes of 5k-10k. So it doesn't make much sense that with this coin and this coin only I get 50% less coins than what whattomine says but no other coin has that kind of discrepancy. What miner are you using again? When I was using the KERNLX versions I was seeing huge differences. Been mining since 8/7. That is 50 days with some down time of about 5 days - so call it 45 days. Have 12150 coins. That's 270 per day. WTM has told me over 400 at times and under 250 at times. The projected is often much higher than the 24 hour number. if you are using the KRNLX version of ccminer, I recommend ditching it. It seems to report too high a hashrate while delivering fewer coins than other versions. So much so that I have wondered if there was something going on under the table that people like you and I might not see... maybe a little hidden 'dev fee'? I don't know. I just know it looked like it was the fastest while for me it was actually the slowest in real world results.
|
|
|
|
Dark12
Member
Offline
Activity: 100
Merit: 10
|
|
September 27, 2017, 12:06:54 AM Last edit: September 27, 2017, 12:30:04 AM by Dark12 |
|
Copied from user _wtfwtf_ on reddit: Signatum's command line interface (signatumd) has been 'dockerized'.Running a full node is as simple as running a one-line command on a vps running linux
Latest LevelDB version update is pushed and merged in master source.
Just pushed the Signatum binary for ARM64 bit Allwinner H5 SoC.
Updated binary for Raspberry Pi 2 and 3 is pushed on github.
Now both explorers have been seperated across two different servers.
Signatum's website has been relocated to a VPS in Germany.
Windows QT Wallet update has been pushed on github.
Latest blockchain data "bootstrap" file updated.
Web wallet beta2 "PoS-ready" under development and will be released soon.
Started Signatum Swarm development.
Masternode implementation, next local wallet update and network features discuss.
Website update in progress.
Marketplace update in progress. New stats website https://signatum.network/ (daily bootstrap at bootstrap.signatum.network ) News site is up https://signatum.news/The Discord channels have been organized to keep conversations on topic. The community is still very active and very excited for the future of Signatum. We are currently holding a poll regarding masternode implementation. Swarm was announced. This thing looks absolutely awesome. Short video on upcoming Swarm: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4GhIuu6aZosAn AIO (all in one) device under development that will have your personal staking and web wallet, a wireless access point, a firewall with Denial of Service mitigation and a single sign on for all Signatum service. We call it the Signatum Swarm. PUMPED for proof of stake starting in just a couple days!
|
|
|
|
dodopool
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
dodopool.com operator
|
|
September 27, 2017, 12:24:34 AM |
|
Copied from user _wtfwtf_ on reddit: Signatum's command line interface (signatumd) has been 'dockerized'.Running a full node is as simple as running a one-line command on a vps running linux
Latest LevelDB version update is pushed and merged in master source.
Just pushed the Signatum binary for ARM64 bit Allwinner H5 SoC.
Updated binary for Raspberry Pi 2 and 3 is pushed on github.
Now both explorers have been seperated across two different servers.
Signatum's website has been relocated to a VPS in Germany.
Windows QT Wallet update has been pushed on github.
Latest blockchain data "bootstrap" file updated.
Web wallet beta2 "PoS-ready" under development and will be released soon.
Started Signatum Swarm development.
Masternode implementation, next local wallet update and network features discuss.
Website update in progress.
Marketplace update in progress. The Discord channels have been organized to keep conversations on topic. The community is still very active and very excited for the future of Signatum. We are currently holding a poll regarding masternode implementation. Swarm was announced. This thing looks absolutely awesome. Short video on upcoming Swarm: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4GhIuu6aZosAn AIO (all in one) device under development that will have your personal staking and web wallet, a wireless access point, a firewall with Denial of Service mitigation and a single sign on for all Signatum service. We call it the Signatum Swarm. PUMPED for proof of stake starting in just a couple days! where is the master node poll?
|
|
|
|
Dark12
Member
Offline
Activity: 100
Merit: 10
|
|
September 27, 2017, 12:28:30 AM |
|
Copied from user _wtfwtf_ on reddit: Signatum's command line interface (signatumd) has been 'dockerized'.Running a full node is as simple as running a one-line command on a vps running linux
Latest LevelDB version update is pushed and merged in master source.
Just pushed the Signatum binary for ARM64 bit Allwinner H5 SoC.
Updated binary for Raspberry Pi 2 and 3 is pushed on github.
Now both explorers have been seperated across two different servers.
Signatum's website has been relocated to a VPS in Germany.
Windows QT Wallet update has been pushed on github.
Latest blockchain data "bootstrap" file updated.
Web wallet beta2 "PoS-ready" under development and will be released soon.
Started Signatum Swarm development.
Masternode implementation, next local wallet update and network features discuss.
Website update in progress.
Marketplace update in progress. The Discord channels have been organized to keep conversations on topic. The community is still very active and very excited for the future of Signatum. We are currently holding a poll regarding masternode implementation. Swarm was announced. This thing looks absolutely awesome. Short video on upcoming Swarm: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4GhIuu6aZosAn AIO (all in one) device under development that will have your personal staking and web wallet, a wireless access point, a firewall with Denial of Service mitigation and a single sign on for all Signatum service. We call it the Signatum Swarm. PUMPED for proof of stake starting in just a couple days! where is the master node poll? In the Discord channel labeled 'polls'
|
|
|
|
mystere_miner
Member
Offline
Activity: 121
Merit: 10
|
|
September 27, 2017, 02:12:53 AM |
|
not over exaggerated on NOVAs issues. Ive been trying for two months. Cant contact support at NOVA because contact not allowed by anyone who doesnt have an account. Reached out them on twitter and met with silence. So glad you were able to get in that small window and register but some of us cant. And as far as YOBIT, I posted the message received when I tried to deposit, have ticket in for it so its not working "prefectly well". My other issue with YOBIT is their horribly slow UI, some of which could be solved if their main screen didnt have so much refreshing at one time. Thats an issue they could fix but most likely wont. That's an issue with the Microsoft Edge browser. It works in Chrome and Firefox. I reported it to them, their response "Use a different browser". Seems no interest in fixing it.
|
|
|
|
civilufo
|
|
September 27, 2017, 04:48:21 AM |
|
Copied from user _wtfwtf_ on reddit: Signatum's command line interface (signatumd) has been 'dockerized'.Running a full node is as simple as running a one-line command on a vps running linux
Latest LevelDB version update is pushed and merged in master source.
Just pushed the Signatum binary for ARM64 bit Allwinner H5 SoC.
Updated binary for Raspberry Pi 2 and 3 is pushed on github.
Now both explorers have been seperated across two different servers.
Signatum's website has been relocated to a VPS in Germany.
Windows QT Wallet update has been pushed on github.
Latest blockchain data "bootstrap" file updated.
Web wallet beta2 "PoS-ready" under development and will be released soon.
Started Signatum Swarm development.
Masternode implementation, next local wallet update and network features discuss.
Website update in progress.
Marketplace update in progress. The Discord channels have been organized to keep conversations on topic. The community is still very active and very excited for the future of Signatum. We are currently holding a poll regarding masternode implementation. Swarm was announced. This thing looks absolutely awesome. Short video on upcoming Swarm: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4GhIuu6aZosAn AIO (all in one) device under development that will have your personal staking and web wallet, a wireless access point, a firewall with Denial of Service mitigation and a single sign on for all Signatum service. We call it the Signatum Swarm. PUMPED for proof of stake starting in just a couple days! where is the master node poll? Wow, this is a good news to implement masternode, I will buy more signatum and waiting to setup a masternode for it. And it is also great to know a lot of projects planned in the roadmap.
|
|
|
|
Mahiro11
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 48
Merit: 0
|
|
September 27, 2017, 05:10:54 AM |
|
Just by reading the recent post in this thread makes me excited for the PoS! I've seen a lot of negative comments about signatum before due to its price but now I'm all hyped. Good luck team!
|
|
|
|
forstik
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
|
|
September 27, 2017, 05:46:13 AM |
|
chainworks reports latency. Check if it is going up and down when you have poor poolside hash. Mine was doubling frequently when I had poor results. Statistics->graph on pool's gui looks reasonably healthy today. This can be your internet provider is my best guess, I could not fully rootcause it when mine degraded out of the blue. Anybody else getting like 50% of their hashrates on all the pools right now?
I have 6 cards 4 in 1 right 2 XFX 480 8GB and 2 GTX 1060 in the other another 2 480 8GB XFX
I should be getting 99MH/s but get nowhere near that. I even had one pool get me down to 8MH/s which is like more than 10X less what my power actually is.
Does anybody know whats happening?
My theory so far is the blocks are moving too fast for me to report a share.
For anyone that might be reading my Chainworks pool improved greatly but was doing the same thing as MN and Suprnova almost worse for a bit. Can say after trying each tho somehow the Chainworks is correcting itself a bit but still lower mostly like I mentioned but not quite as low and I've actually seen it hit 99MH/s for the first time out of all the pools I tried for 24 hours Can't be my internet I have a 75Mbps connection and I have had no issues with at least ten other coins that I've mined. I find that those other coins are very accurate on how much I get too and I've double checked it with sites for months and are within maybe 10% this coin tho i'm getting 50% less than what whattomine says I should get on average between all the difficulty changes of 5k-10k. So it doesn't make much sense that with this coin and this coin only I get 50% less coins than what whattomine says but no other coin has that kind of discrepancy. Don't rely on WTM to give accurate estimates. Did your hashrate suddenly drop or do you just think you should be getting a higher hashrate based on....whatever? Is there a huge difference between the hashrate your mining program reports and what the pool reports? Your hashrate, reported by the mining program or pool, have nothing to do with the SIGT network. That's just between you and the pool. Can't agree more. I am amazed that people are still using WhatToMine. That page is a joke. Half of the coins are completely off. It is especially inaccurate in Skunkhash algo (SIGT). If you mine based on results on this page, you are wasting your mining potential. Big time! You can easily achive 180-300% higher income if you do your own research and ignore whattomine.
|
|
|
|
Topkras
|
|
September 27, 2017, 06:22:45 AM |
|
my wallet is not syncing again
Be specific. Have you tried modifying your conf file (or adding a conf file, if there isn't one)? I have been in staking mode for 4 days now, no issues. Head to the Discord channel for FAQs and ideas to get the wallet going. mac os wallet http://joxi.ru/ZrJjYKVF9y7jyrI don't have any conf file. So I just use what downloaded from official website You would need to create a file called "signatum.conf" (I assume naming is same for mac), then. In whatever directory the mac os wallet stores the data for the wallet. In Windows it's: C:\Users\<user>\AppData\Roaming\Signatum Here's the contents of mine & it works, but it probably contains some nodes that aren't functional anymore. addnode=sigt.suprnova.cc addnode=104.197.159.83 addnode=104.197.145.21 addnode=104.197.80.61 addnode=146.148.55.27 addnode=162.222.176.74 addnode=104.154.95.6 addnode=104.154.94.55 addnode=104.154.76.142 addnode=104.211.186.5 addnode=52.172.209.58 addnode=52.174.102.46 addnode=52.187.13.149 addnode=54.175.225.242 addnode=122.129.64.13 addnode=122.129.64.14 addnode=122.129.64.15 addnode=122.129.64.16 addnode=203.128.6.219 addnode=104.154.193.236 addnode=104.198.232.113 addnode=104.199.11.56 addnode=130.211.127.202 addnode=35.184.49.142 addnode=35.189.14.132 addnode=35.185.18.85 addnode=35.184.121.184 addnode=6jsbbxzfd5wyhs5i.onion addnode=6fzxqhdvvevev75v.onion addnode=ab7vmf6j2rajwo33.onion addnode=z6guowp3wn3fnekm.onion addnode=tl3bna25hbr5r2eg.onion addnode=a4scscaet5aplljx.onion addnode=w3rimjo7drskmbbd.onion
You can try searching for a file named "wallet.dat" to help find the directory. Thank you!
|
|
|
|
MetaSk
|
|
September 27, 2017, 06:27:53 AM |
|
Any info on needed coins to run a masternode?
|
|
|
|
Dark12
Member
Offline
Activity: 100
Merit: 10
|
|
September 27, 2017, 06:35:32 AM |
|
Any info on needed coins to run a masternode?
They will be discussing it after PoS begins. Getting down to the wire, folks. Hope everyone is holding as much as they want to stake!
|
|
|
|
|
easyrimka
|
|
September 27, 2017, 06:53:26 AM |
|
Any info on needed coins to run a masternode?
do you know how much it cost ?
|
|
|
|
|