FiniteTentum
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
|
|
October 02, 2017, 11:32:26 PM |
|
I remember everyone on the telegram was laughing and telling people that selling at 4000 sats was a stupid idea because it was the absolute bottom. People are so delusional.
|
|
|
|
vikingchild
|
|
October 02, 2017, 11:50:50 PM |
|
Cryptopia delisting Signatum because they have always trouble with the signatum wallet...the web wallet https://wallet.signatum.iodoesn not work for over 7 days at least maybe more... such a shame! That is not true. Cryptopia blamed the earlier version of LevelDB as being the reason. This however was never the case. They blamed similar reasons on Siacoin and VISIO delisting (well established projects!).
|
|
|
|
vikingchild
|
|
October 02, 2017, 11:52:15 PM |
|
The developers had no premine, no ICO, no crowdfunding. They mined at the same time as everyone else: when the coin went live to everyone. I also know personally the developers and I can confirm that their coin-holding is not significant at all. They are no bathing in money at all. Developers are also still active 3 months in.
|
|
|
|
vikingchild
|
|
October 03, 2017, 12:34:26 AM |
|
New Article Out! Past, Present, Future - This is Signatum - The Complete Status Update http://cryptovore.com/2017/10/02/signatum-and-its-future-overview/Sections of the Article include: - Why is Signatum Unique?
- Committed Developers
- Continuous Progress or Roadmap Deliverables
- Raw Community Numbers
- Community Driven
- What is the deal with Masternodes?
- What is the Maximum coin supply?
- When will Signatum be listed on Bittrex?
- Developers Commit Regular Updates
- Why did Crowetic as a core member leave Signatum?
- Why did the Development Team Split?
- What happened to Cryptopia
- Reglar Q&A sessions with Developers
- What is Signatum Swarm?
http://cryptovore.com/2017/10/02/signatum-and-its-future-overview/
|
|
|
|
oslak
|
|
October 03, 2017, 12:39:14 AM |
|
This coin was promising when it was on crowetic hands.This coin showed its true market perception when they parted ways. That also shows the skills of both sides.
Crow's image may be tainted with his previous affiliations but show his skills on marketing. Look at most of us, still waiting for that same glory crowetic showed this coin.
All waiting to dump coin at 3k, 4k, 5k or even 10k satoshi. Is it going to happen again? I don't know. All I know is this coin present handlers' doesn't have the skills to make it back there.
|
|
|
|
vikingchild
|
|
October 03, 2017, 01:05:52 AM |
|
This coin was promising when it was on crowetic hands.This coin showed its true market perception when they parted ways. That also shows the skills of both sides.
Crow's image may be tainted with his previous affiliations but show his skills on marketing. Look at most of us, still waiting for that same glory crowetic showed this coin.
All waiting to dump coin at 3k, 4k, 5k or even 10k satoshi. Is it going to happen again? I don't know. All I know is this coin present handlers' doesn't have the skills to make it back there.
In hindsight Crowetic added no value to Signatum, quite the contrary.
|
|
|
|
Dark12
Member
Offline
Activity: 100
Merit: 10
|
|
October 03, 2017, 01:28:35 AM |
|
New Article Out! Past, Present, Future - This is Signatum - The Complete Status Update http://cryptovore.com/2017/10/02/signatum-and-its-future-overview/Sections of the Article include: - Why is Signatum Unique?
- Committed Developers
- Continuous Progress or Roadmap Deliverables
- Raw Community Numbers
- Community Driven
- What is the deal with Masternodes?
- What is the Maximum coin supply?
- When will Signatum be listed on Bittrex?
- Developers Commit Regular Updates
- Why did Crowetic as a core member leave Signatum?
- Why did the Development Team Split?
- What happened to Cryptopia
- Reglar Q&A sessions with Developers
- What is Signatum Swarm?
http://cryptovore.com/2017/10/02/signatum-and-its-future-overview/Awesome article. Thanks for sharing!
|
|
|
|
oslak
|
|
October 03, 2017, 01:34:53 AM |
|
This coin was promising when it was on crowetic hands.This coin showed its true market perception when they parted ways. That also shows the skills of both sides.
Crow's image may be tainted with his previous affiliations but show his skills on marketing. Look at most of us, still waiting for that same glory crowetic showed this coin.
All waiting to dump coin at 3k, 4k, 5k or even 10k satoshi. Is it going to happen again? I don't know. All I know is this coin present handlers' doesn't have the skills to make it back there.
In hindsight Crowetic added no value to Signatum, quite the contrary. In hindsight everything has no value. but if you pair it with bitcoin that is growing in value then its valuable. Signatum's pairing with bitcoin is growing on crowetic's time. Signatum worth now is less compared to his. 5000 is always more than 500 in every language, in every dialect in every country, Satoshi that is.
|
|
|
|
d3athgu1s3
|
|
October 03, 2017, 02:03:58 AM |
|
Bloody sad watching the coin going down the drain now.
|
|
|
|
oslak
|
|
October 03, 2017, 02:05:52 AM |
|
Bloody sad watching the coin going down the drain now.
Indeed.
|
|
|
|
xtraelv
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1926
฿ear ride on the rainbow slide
|
|
October 03, 2017, 02:41:29 AM |
|
Cryptopia delisting Signatum because they have always trouble with the signatum wallet...the web wallet https://wallet.signatum.iodoesn not work for over 7 days at least maybe more... such a shame! That is not true. Cryptopia blamed the earlier version of LevelDB as being the reason. This however was never the case. They blamed similar reasons on Siacoin and VISIO delisting (well established projects!). SIA coin had known wallet problem. Even tge devs released this statement regarding wallet issues on Poloniex : I wanted to give you guys an update about Poloniex. We were hoping to have the issues resolved a lot quicker, but given that withdrawals are still somewhat flaky, we want to reassure everyone that we're focused on fixing the issue quickly, and that to the best of our knowledge coins are not missing. What we know about the issue Poloniex is having issues where they are submitting transactions to the network, but the transactions are not appearing in the blockchain. I think that this problem covers 90%+ of all withdrawal issues that people are having with Poloniex. The Sia wallet has a transaction pool. Transactions are put in the pool and sent to miners, and then miners use the pool to pick transactions to put into blocks. When we created the transaction pool, there was some issue that prevented us from making a large transaction pool - it started having significant performance issues once the pool got to something like 2mb in size (the size of one block). Rather than fix the issues, we capped the size of the pool to 2mb and decided we would fix it later, once we had more users. This decision was made more than 2 years ago, and we did not expect to hit the block size limit as fast as we did. Bitcoin for example did not start to have problems with full blocks until a few years ago. https://cryptorum.com/threads/sia-coin-wallet-problems-on-poloniex.176/
|
|
|
|
DroidR17A
|
|
October 03, 2017, 02:49:07 AM |
|
Proof of Stake is a joke. 8000 coins 5 days staking, nothing. Time went from 3 days to 7, increasing every day, instead of going down.
Sig PoS=Sig Proof of Shitcoin
Sold a couple of days ago, thankfully before it dropped even more.
Buy this coin is you like. Unless you hold 100k Sig PoS is pointless.
|
|
|
|
oslak
|
|
October 03, 2017, 03:14:16 AM |
|
Cryptopia delisting Signatum because they have always trouble with the signatum wallet...the web wallet https://wallet.signatum.iodoesn not work for over 7 days at least maybe more... such a shame! That is not true. Cryptopia blamed the earlier version of LevelDB as being the reason. This however was never the case. They blamed similar reasons on Siacoin and VISIO delisting (well established projects!). SIA coin had known wallet problem. Even tge devs released this statement regarding wallet issues on Poloniex : I wanted to give you guys an update about Poloniex. We were hoping to have the issues resolved a lot quicker, but given that withdrawals are still somewhat flaky, we want to reassure everyone that we're focused on fixing the issue quickly, and that to the best of our knowledge coins are not missing. What we know about the issue Poloniex is having issues where they are submitting transactions to the network, but the transactions are not appearing in the blockchain. I think that this problem covers 90%+ of all withdrawal issues that people are having with Poloniex. The Sia wallet has a transaction pool. Transactions are put in the pool and sent to miners, and then miners use the pool to pick transactions to put into blocks. When we created the transaction pool, there was some issue that prevented us from making a large transaction pool - it started having significant performance issues once the pool got to something like 2mb in size (the size of one block). Rather than fix the issues, we capped the size of the pool to 2mb and decided we would fix it later, once we had more users. This decision was made more than 2 years ago, and we did not expect to hit the block size limit as fast as we did. Bitcoin for example did not start to have problems with full blocks until a few years ago. https://cryptorum.com/threads/sia-coin-wallet-problems-on-poloniex.176/Cryptopia and signatum devs both have attitude problem. Instead of settling in gentleman's manner, both raised their schlong to see who's longer. Hodlers are suffering.
|
|
|
|
zero_sight
Member
Offline
Activity: 71
Merit: 10
|
|
October 03, 2017, 03:16:39 AM |
|
Proof of Stake is a joke. 8000 coins 5 days staking, nothing. Time went from 3 days to 7, increasing every day, instead of going down.
Sig PoS=Sig Proof of Shitcoin
Sold a couple of days ago, thankfully before it dropped even more.
Buy this coin is you like. Unless you hold 100k Sig PoS is pointless.
Time between staking increases as more coins in the network is staked. This is good as it means more people are putting the currency to use in the network. I have less than you staked and have received small payouts, similar to another coin i stake in based on my stake weight At the day - staking is still luck based. Consider it solo mining with more or less hashrate than others
|
|
|
|
Dark12
Member
Offline
Activity: 100
Merit: 10
|
|
October 03, 2017, 03:34:31 AM |
|
Proof of Stake is a joke. 8000 coins 5 days staking, nothing. Time went from 3 days to 7, increasing every day, instead of going down.
Sig PoS=Sig Proof of Shitcoin
Sold a couple of days ago, thankfully before it dropped even more.
Buy this coin is you like. Unless you hold 100k Sig PoS is pointless.
You staked for 5 days and sold a couple days ago? Weird!
|
|
|
|
longestday3030
Member
Offline
Activity: 132
Merit: 10
|
|
October 03, 2017, 05:27:12 AM |
|
Proof of Stake is a joke. 8000 coins 5 days staking, nothing. Time went from 3 days to 7, increasing every day, instead of going down.
Sig PoS=Sig Proof of Shitcoin
Sold a couple of days ago, thankfully before it dropped even more.
Buy this coin is you like. Unless you hold 100k Sig PoS is pointless.
Staking is 5% per annum. You'll get around 400 coins in a year, a little more if the interest is compounded.
|
|
|
|
Surging Chaos
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 46
Merit: 0
|
|
October 03, 2017, 06:26:41 AM |
|
I mentioned this in a post a while back, but SIGT needs something more than just PoS. PoS has been done before, and masternodes probably won't be enough. Many coins have their own take on balancing staking and mining. See: Ark, Decred, Neo, etc. Otherwise you're probably going to be holding onto PoS coin #34 that will probably go nowhere.
|
|
|
|
Ginzink
|
|
October 03, 2017, 06:29:00 AM |
|
Two days since i got reward from POS, but i have gotten my share a few times. 14k coins. Dont see an issue with not getting micro rewards daily, id rather have some time in between and at least get a couple sigt.
It uses near zero extra power, so the only reason to complain is if you sold and want to buy cheaper imo.
|
|
|
|
Ginzink
|
|
October 03, 2017, 06:31:12 AM |
|
I mentioned this in a post a while back, but SIGT needs something more than just PoS. PoS has been done before, and masternodes probably won't be enough. Many coins have their own take on balancing staking and mining. See: Ark, Decred, Neo, etc. Otherwise you're probably going to be holding onto PoS coin #34 that will probably go nowhere.
I would be very suprised if we do not get more than this POS. The developers just needs time. They have jobs outside signatum, it is more a hobby. But without a ICO that is how it is. And i would prefer this way. Also when you add how little most ICOs do in 3 months i would give the devs thumbs up on development.
|
|
|
|
Ergo_Proxy
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
|
|
October 03, 2017, 06:57:18 AM |
|
I hope Signatum will be OK
|
|
|
|
|