[ANN] KICKICO - PLATFORM FOR FUNDRAISING ON CRYPTOCURRENCY

[BurhanPSG]

Are there any high visibility projects that have chosen KickICO already?
I've seen the poker ico on the website but i was wondering if there are any other ones planned?

Addionally to the current project - Magisters of Magic - and three waiting projects they apparently have already 250 requests, as it was said in some interview. So, not bad for a start  .  
Only the German translation of website and projects description isn't really good... sounds a bit weird  

Not a bad start? It's amazing start. Actually i have seen lots of ico, which is nothing to show and raised millions of dolars. Kickico is already working and icos are on the line. Funds will pile on them 6 days later

That was just English understatement   Of course, I totally agree with you... Kickico is already working + they have further projects in the pipeline. Compared with them a lot of other ICOs are just hot air.

There is not so much projects with working product I would say that it is rare these days.

Very well put!

Kickico already has a crowdfunding campaign up and running on their platform during their ICO!

Magisters of Magic - check it out.

Dang, that is fast!  Kickico already has a working platform in use.  Magisters of Magic is in the pre-ico phase and has already met over half of their goal.  The Kickico platform looks like it will be popular to use among new projects.  I see there are 3 more project campaigns waiting to launch soon.

It does not feel that sales in this Pre ico phase have reached half of the targeted goal is really remarkable  with this way kikcico platform will be more familiar and certainly can compete with other projects. But sorry can i know the 3 projects you mean?  

[Islapdonkey]

am going to be honest, the only thing am not happy about, and maybe i might be out of line and someone could correct me, is that Kick is utilizing an ico to start a crowd-funding website, then they going to charge other companies 4% to utilize the aforementioned site for their own ico. Seems unfair to me, given that kick will be community funded from the ico while others pay them to use it. I know they have to turn profit somehow, but it seem unfair. Anyway, just my observation, i could be wrong in so many way, and if so, am open to be educated.

[toolucky98]

It does not feel that sales in this Pre ico phase have reached half of the targeted goal is really remarkable  with this way kikcico platform will be more familiar and certainly can compete with other projects. But sorry can i know the 3 projects you mean?  

You can see them here : www.kickico.com

[toolucky98]

am going to be honest, the only thing am not happy about, and maybe i might be out of line and someone could correct me, is that Kick is utilizing an ico to start a crowd-funding website, then they going to charge other companies 4% to utilize the aforementioned site for their own ico. Seems unfair to me, given that kick will be community funded from the ico while others pay them to use it. I know they have to turn profit somehow, but it seem unfair. Anyway, just my observation, i could be wrong in so many way, and if so, am open to be educated.

"while others pay them to use it".
What is that mean?

[Islapdonkey]

am going to be honest, the only thing am not happy about, and maybe i might be out of line and someone could correct me, is that Kick is utilizing an ico to start a crowd-funding website, then they going to charge other companies 4% to utilize the aforementioned site for their own ico. Seems unfair to me, given that kick will be community funded from the ico while others pay them to use it. I know they have to turn profit somehow, but it seem unfair. Anyway, just my observation, i could be wrong in so many way, and if so, am open to be educated.

"while others pay them to use it".
What is that mean?

I mean for every other company that utilizes their platform to run an ico, they will keep 4% of the raised amount, and if am not mistaken, if a token is issued,  they also keep 4% of it. Again, my observation might be wrong/jaded and if so, am open to be educated.

[toolucky98]

am going to be honest, the only thing am not happy about, and maybe i might be out of line and someone could correct me, is that Kick is utilizing an ico to start a crowd-funding website, then they going to charge other companies 4% to utilize the aforementioned site for their own ico. Seems unfair to me, given that kick will be community funded from the ico while others pay them to use it. I know they have to turn profit somehow, but it seem unfair. Anyway, just my observation, i could be wrong in so many way, and if so, am open to be educated.

"while others pay them to use it".
What is that mean?

I mean for every other company that utilizes their platform to run an ico, they will keep 4% of the raised amount, and if am not mistaken, if a token is issued,  they also keep 4% of it. Again, my observation might be wrong/jaded and if so, am open to be educated.

ya its true, and you can get the explanation about it from whitepaper at "Financial Benefits" section.
Go here https://www.kickico.com/whitepaper , and search Financial Benefits

[pynetx]

pynetx

Devs are from Russia. So this interview in russian. Im speaking russian and watched this interwiew. If you have some question, may be I can answer  
Also may be they ll make interview in english, or may be someone just translate this ...

Well I didn't understand a bit so, no questions as of now 

[chichidori]

4% of the raised amount and another 4% in the hosted token its a bit too much, i saw a video but its in german, somebody has explained to me that the platform is ready but it needs more funding for the development and launch.

[subG]

am going to be honest, the only thing am not happy about, and maybe i might be out of line and someone could correct me, is that Kick is utilizing an ico to start a crowd-funding website, then they going to charge other companies 4% to utilize the aforementioned site for their own ico. Seems unfair to me, given that kick will be community funded from the ico while others pay them to use it. I know they have to turn profit somehow, but it seem unfair. Anyway, just my observation, i could be wrong in so many way, and if so, am open to be educated.

"while others pay them to use it".
What is that mean?

I mean for every other company that utilizes their platform to run an ico, they will keep 4% of the raised amount, and if am not mistaken, if a token is issued,  they also keep 4% of it. Again, my observation might be wrong/jaded and if so, am open to be educated.

Yeah that is the correct amount 4% of raised and 4% of tokens created.  This is a reasonable price to pay for using the kickico platform.  Some exchanges also host ICO's and the percentage they take are much greater regardless if your ICO raised the minimum amount or not.  

[Islapdonkey]

am going to be honest, the only thing am not happy about, and maybe i might be out of line and someone could correct me, is that Kick is utilizing an ico to start a crowd-funding website, then they going to charge other companies 4% to utilize the aforementioned site for their own ico. Seems unfair to me, given that kick will be community funded from the ico while others pay them to use it. I know they have to turn profit somehow, but it seem unfair. Anyway, just my observation, i could be wrong in so many way, and if so, am open to be educated.

"while others pay them to use it".
What is that mean?

I mean for every other company that utilizes their platform to run an ico, they will keep 4% of the raised amount, and if am not mistaken, if a token is issued,  they also keep 4% of it. Again, my observation might be wrong/jaded and if so, am open to be educated.

Yeah that is the correct amount 4% of raised and 4% of tokens created.  This is a reasonable price to pay for using the kickico platform.  Some exchanges also host ICO's and the percentage they take are much greater regardless if your ICO raised the minimum amount or not.  

The idea is great and does have it benefits, I just think it's unfair that the community supports the creation of their platform and other ico's that transverse thru the platform is bleed twice. I can understand 4% of the collected funding but also 4% of the token is little absurd. Sure the price is cheaper than say going thru Kickstarter but kickstarter doesn't ask for a share of the company that utilizes their service. In reality, kick will own a share in every company that utilizes the platform, and I didn't see any mention of sharing dividends with investors on the whitepaper. I might have overlooked it and if so plz let me know.  Again am not intentionally kicking up dust, just asking questions that a real investor would be concerned with. Hopefully, an admin can guide me thru their thought process on making certain decisions.

[cantdecide]

4% of the raised amount and another 4% in the hosted token its a bit too much, i saw a video but its in german, somebody has explained to me that the platform is ready but it needs more funding for the development and launch.

I am not sure, but I don't think it is so much compared to sites for for example crowdfunding something. The fees there are much higher and KickIco is also giving help with different thinks regarding the campaign.

[areschen]

the presale already got a big success,  let 's make it big.
This ico platform is awesome , the fee is low, looks trustable

[Cauchy]

Seems like alot of ppl in the thread endorses this platform. Will definately check it out. As more traditional funded startups move into crypto space the demand for capital rise through ICO will increase.
Best of luck

[toolucky98]

The idea is great and does have it benefits, I just think it's unfair that the community supports the creation of their platform and other ico's that transverse thru the platform is bleed twice. I can understand 4% of the collected funding but also 4% of the token is little absurd. Sure the price is cheaper than say going thru Kickstarter but kickstarter doesn't ask for a share of the company that utilizes their service. In reality, kick will own a share in every company that utilizes the platform, and I didn't see any mention of sharing dividends with investors on the whitepaper. I might have overlooked it and if so plz let me know.  Again am not intentionally kicking up dust, just asking questions that a real investor would be concerned with. Hopefully, an admin can guide me thru their thought process on making certain decisions.

Whitepaper :
"For ICO campaigns, the platform fee will be 4% of collected ETH, and 4% of the campaign's tokens. In return, we provide from 4 to 8% of the KickCoins (in effect, selling our KickCoins to the campaign creator in exchange for the fee). Those KickCoins will be given to backers, together with the campaign tokens.
For crowdfunding campaigns, we give backers from 4% to 20% of the value of their investment as KickCoins, depending on their reputation on the site (Karma scores). This rate is being taken from exchanges, but will never be less than 0.0005 ETH per KickCoin."

[pynetx]

The idea is great and does have it benefits, I just think it's unfair that the community supports the creation of their platform and other ico's that transverse thru the platform is bleed twice. I can understand 4% of the collected funding but also 4% of the token is little absurd. Sure the price is cheaper than say going thru Kickstarter but kickstarter doesn't ask for a share of the company that utilizes their service. In reality, kick will own a share in every company that utilizes the platform, and I didn't see any mention of sharing dividends with investors on the whitepaper. I might have overlooked it and if so plz let me know.  Again am not intentionally kicking up dust, just asking questions that a real investor would be concerned with. Hopefully, an admin can guide me thru their thought process on making certain decisions.

Whitepaper :
"For ICO campaigns, the platform fee will be 4% of collected ETH, and 4% of the campaign's tokens. In return, we provide from 4 to 8% of the KickCoins (in effect, selling our KickCoins to the campaign creator in exchange for the fee). Those KickCoins will be given to backers, together with the campaign tokens.
For crowdfunding campaigns, we give backers from 4% to 20% of the value of their investment as KickCoins, depending on their reputation on the site (Karma scores). This rate is being taken from exchanges, but will never be less than 0.0005 ETH per KickCoin."

It is good for raising value of Kickcoin but, I think it will be a hurdle for the project owners to have 2 different coins.

[niklasmato]

Are there any high visibility projects that have chosen KickICO already?
I've seen the poker ico on the website but i was wondering if there are any other ones planned?

Addionally to the current project - Magisters of Magic - and three waiting projects they apparently have already 250 requests, as it was said in some interview. So, not bad for a start  . 
Only the German translation of website and projects description isn't really good... sounds a bit weird   

Not a bad start? It's amazing start. Actually i have seen lots of ico, which is nothing to show and raised millions of dolars. Kickico is already working and icos are on the line. Funds will pile on them 6 days later

250 requests? Ok that's huge. I hope they get added soon, so the project gets more visibility and media attention. This will help fund the ICO.

[BurhanPSG]

Thanks @subG  
For those who do not know are 3 projects that will soon be launched:
1. ENVIENTA-The affordable and self-sustaining living space of the future.
2. Royal Flush Poker becomes a DAO Poker!
3. Star-Lord: let's play together!
For more details its you can check in www.kickico.com  

[areschen]

Are there any high visibility projects that have chosen KickICO already?
I've seen the poker ico on the website but i was wondering if there are any other ones planned?

Addionally to the current project - Magisters of Magic - and three waiting projects they apparently have already 250 requests, as it was said in some interview. So, not bad for a start  . 
Only the German translation of website and projects description isn't really good... sounds a bit weird   

Not a bad start? It's amazing start. Actually i have seen lots of ico, which is nothing to show and raised millions of dolars. Kickico is already working and icos are on the line. Funds will pile on them 6 days later

250 requests? Ok that's huge. I hope they get added soon, so the project gets more visibility and media attention. This will help fund the ICO.

Such a large number of requests, Please look at their abilities and credibility carefully

[niklasmato]

Thanks @subG  
For those who do not know are 3 projects that will soon be launched:
1. ENVIENTA-The affordable and self-sustaining living space of the future.
2. Royal Flush Poker becomes a DAO Poker!
3. Star-Lord: let's play together!
For more details its you can check in www.kickico.com  

These are very nice. Although i'd like to see some more listed.
250 as stated previously is huge and it shows the possibilities of the platform.

[levyashin]

Thanks @subG  
For those who do not know are 3 projects that will soon be launched:
1. ENVIENTA-The affordable and self-sustaining living space of the future.
2. Royal Flush Poker becomes a DAO Poker!
3. Star-Lord: let's play together!
For more details its you can check in www.kickico.com  

The projects are good too. Probably they are picking very carefully which project will be on their platform. That's very good for investors of future projects, they will only see good projects. I personally liked poker project, maybe i can contribute.