blc
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
|
|
November 19, 2017, 07:37:05 AM |
|
This article is there to spread FUD. Pure BS. Okay, I like to believe it, but could somebody counter the article with something more substantial than just saying it is BS? Why The Red Flag Post is a Red Herring The NEO "red flag" post makes some accurate statements, but are they relevant? Seems to me the post twists context to a pre-desired outcome. Remembering that tokenised money systems (eg Fiat and crypto) and religion have a strange common element in that they only work if you believe in them, what are the key aspects that make a good crypto? 1) Genuine use case or utility value. 2) Strong community and minimum critical mass of believers and adopters. 3) Active devs with credibility and that foster and follow the "greater good" of a flourishing [Suspicious link removed]munity. 4) Usability for the relevant use case, eg BTC has lost usability for spending, but due to the belief system and relatively mature tech still has use case for store of value. 5) Lack of impacting regulatory issues. 6) Stability of base parameters - eg number of coins to be circulated etc. If you examine NEO in this context, it looks OK to me, worth a punt, as we say in Australia. Anything can happen in crypto but the red flags raised are not really relevant in the context of the criteria I list.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Once a transaction has 6 confirmations, it is extremely unlikely that an attacker without at least 50% of the network's computation power would be able to reverse it.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
vbn19
Member
Offline
Activity: 256
Merit: 10
|
|
November 19, 2017, 09:22:46 AM |
|
NEO these two days the price is very happy, very strong growth, I hope I can break through the old high point, only to the moon
not sell neo will rise more 60$
|
|
|
|
easyrimka
|
|
November 19, 2017, 09:37:16 AM |
|
whats the next announcement in 2 days ? do you have an idea?
|
|
|
|
Call_Me_Bambi
|
|
November 19, 2017, 10:11:59 AM |
|
HI All,
So, i invested in the ICO, I made a ton of money however now i have no idea how to prove i purchased the NEO, I can;t remember the bitcoin wallet i used/address i used.. At the time i only threw in a couple thousand dollars, not enough for me to have thought to remember to keep a good record. I only know my NEO ICO receiving address. Is there anyway to prove or find out which BTC adderss i sent the funds too in order to get the neo using just my NEO recieving address? I need to know for taxation records. If anyone has any ideas,please let me know. I hope you all were succesful with your NEO investment like me, Thanks
There was no NEO ICO (unless you are refering to the Antshares ICO). Knowing your Bitcoin address will not help you, and knowing your NEO address will not help either. Unless you have the private key for the NEO (Antshares) wallet you had then you have just lost all your NEO..sorry
|
|
|
|
Branko
|
|
November 19, 2017, 10:26:14 AM |
|
NEO these two days the price is very happy, very strong growth, I hope I can break through the old high point, only to the moon
$100 by the end of the year (if not sooner) 2018 = moon I see this on every coin announcement posted in this forum...so far most failed
|
|
|
|
|
CryptoGorilla
|
|
November 19, 2017, 10:49:50 AM |
|
I sure hope so but unless you know the news that is going to be announced tomorrow AND if it's huge, there will be no moon, only a dump of the value but also a big loss in the NEO-credibility. A fox is not caught twice in the same snare. Unless he is blind off course.
|
Join the Oyster Revolution! Oyster enables anonymous file storage and traffic monetization.
|
|
|
revelacaogr
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1021
2009 Alea iacta est
|
|
November 19, 2017, 10:59:36 AM Last edit: November 19, 2017, 11:49:01 AM by revelacaogr |
|
This article is there to spread FUD. Pure BS. Okay, I like to believe it, but could somebody counter the article with something more substantial than just saying it is BS? Why The Red Flag Post is a Red Herring The NEO "red flag" post makes some accurate statements, but are they relevant? Seems to me the post twists context to a pre-desired outcome. Remembering that tokenised money systems (eg Fiat and crypto) and religion have a strange common element in that they only work if you believe in them, what are the key aspects that make a good crypto? 1) Genuine use case or utility value. 2) Strong community and minimum critical mass of believers and adopters. 3) Active devs with credibility and that foster and follow the "greater good" of a flourishing [Suspicious link removed]munity. 4) Usability for the relevant use case, eg BTC has lost usability for spending, but due to the belief system and relatively mature tech still has use case for store of value. 5) Lack of impacting regulatory issues. 6) Stability of base parameters - eg number of coins to be circulated etc. If you examine NEO in this context, it looks OK to me, worth a punt, as we say in Australia. Anything can happen in crypto but the red flags raised are not really relevant in the context of the criteria I list. A Response to Investor Warning: Major NEO Redflags - NEO FUD https://steemit.com/neo/@saltyskip/a-response-to-investor-warning-major-neo-redflags-neo-fud
|
|
|
|
revelacaogr
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1021
2009 Alea iacta est
|
|
November 19, 2017, 11:48:46 AM |
|
Global ID Identification Leader THEKEY Hosts IBM WATSON Health and Discuss Global Partnership in Beijing Beijing, Nov. 16, 2017: THEKEY ( www.thekey.vip) the global leader in ID verification today hosted IBM Watson Health leaders in its Beijing office. Dr. Kyu Rhee, the Vice President and Chief Health Officer of IBM Watson Health and other high- ranking officials of IBM Watson Health visited THEKEY Beijing office in his last leg to China. By way of the background THEKEY has been working with IBM on global, regional and local level since 2009 on identity verification (IDV) related areas. IBM has worked closely with THEKEY in setting the company’s data processing and data warehouse solutions of the existing IDV product of THEKEY. “ID verification is extremely important for patient safety. After many years of working with IBM, we believe the time is right for a deeper cooperation and partnership with IBM Watson Health,” says Catherine Li, founder and CEO of THEKEY. “As we expand globally we look forward to a deeper collaboration with IBM.” Mr. Jianshe Lv, Vice President of China Social Insurance Society; Dr. Jian Fan, the Chief Scientist of China Unicom, and Zhishan Wang, CEO of Xicheng Unisplendour, as senior management of China Unicom and UNIS, long-term working partners of THEKEY also participated the meeting. Currently, THEKEY is combining blockchain technology to their DMI (Dynamic Multi-Dimension Identification) solution and developing a second-generation IDV solution for the internet via BDMI “Blockchain based Dynamic Multi-Dimension Identification” technology. DMI has already passed its development stage and is currently applied to THEKEY’s existing first-generation IDV solutions, which includes: 23 copyrights have been obtained, 15 patents have been accepted by SIPO (State Intellectual Property office of the P.R.C) and start attestation process. THEKEY’s first-generation IDV solution is currently in use for mobile social insurance pay in two pilot cities, which people can receive their payment for their pension, or healthcare insurance reimbursement. The IDV solution is currently being deployed in another 41 cities, covering more than 130 million people. Personal identity data of 210 million people in 66 citiesin China, authenticated by the relevant government authorities, are connected on a real-time basis. This constitutes a solid foundation of IDV. Commercial contracts signed with world-leading firms and the business model of our IDV products in this White Paper have been partly proven. Six relevant national laboratories have been set up together with government agencies, banks, insurance companies and one university. In China and globally, IDV is extremely important for healthcare service to ensure patient’s safety. During the life of healthcare service, the ID of both the patients and service providers must be validated and documented each and every time when the service is given. THEKEY plans to continue its collaboration with IBM Watson Health and globally roll out its solution. For more information, please visit THEKEY official website www.thekey.vip or join THEKEY telegram group for discussion: https://t.me/joinchat/FkZtERGQ1qUEU7iAzC6xVQhttps://www.cryptoninjas.net/2017/11/19/global-id-leader-thekey-hosts-ibm-watson-health-beijing-discuss-partnership/https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/global-id-identification-leader-thekey-hosts-ibm-watson-health-discuss-global-partnership-beijing/
|
|
|
|
|
BARADED
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 788
Merit: 176
Bitcoin Artist and Fashion Designer
|
|
November 19, 2017, 03:37:43 PM |
|
This article is there to spread FUD. Pure BS. Okay, I like to believe it, but could somebody counter the article with something more substantial than just saying it is BS? Why The Red Flag Post is a Red Herring The NEO "red flag" post makes some accurate statements, but are they relevant? Seems to me the post twists context to a pre-desired outcome. Remembering that tokenised money systems (eg Fiat and crypto) and religion have a strange common element in that they only work if you believe in them, what are the key aspects that make a good crypto? 1) Genuine use case or utility value. 2) Strong community and minimum critical mass of believers and adopters. 3) Active devs with credibility and that foster and follow the "greater good" of a flourishing [Suspicious link removed]munity. 4) Usability for the relevant use case, eg BTC has lost usability for spending, but due to the belief system and relatively mature tech still has use case for store of value. 5) Lack of impacting regulatory issues. 6) Stability of base parameters - eg number of coins to be circulated etc. If you examine NEO in this context, it looks OK to me, worth a punt, as we say in Australia. Anything can happen in crypto but the red flags raised are not really relevant in the context of the criteria I list. A Response to Investor Warning: Major NEO Redflags - NEO FUD https://steemit.com/neo/@saltyskip/a-response-to-investor-warning-major-neo-redflags-neo-fudResponse to baseless FUD https://medium.com/@MalcolmLerider/response-to-baseless-fud-9b7e5e2eeeea
|
🎭 ₿𝗶𝘁𝗰𝗼𝗶𝗻 𝗔𝗿𝘁𝗶𝘀𝘁 & 👗𝗙𝗮𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗱𝗲𝘀𝗶𝗴𝗻𝗲𝗿
|
|
|
Neobuyer121
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
|
|
November 19, 2017, 03:50:09 PM |
|
HI All,
So, i invested in the ICO, I made a ton of money however now i have no idea how to prove i purchased the NEO, I can;t remember the bitcoin wallet i used/address i used.. At the time i only threw in a couple thousand dollars, not enough for me to have thought to remember to keep a good record. I only know my NEO ICO receiving address. Is there anyway to prove or find out which BTC adderss i sent the funds too in order to get the neo using just my NEO recieving address? I need to know for taxation records. If anyone has any ideas,please let me know. I hope you all were succesful with your NEO investment like me, Thanks
There was no NEO ICO (unless you are refering to the Antshares ICO). Knowing your Bitcoin address will not help you, and knowing your NEO address will not help either. Unless you have the private key for the NEO (Antshares) wallet you had then you have just lost all your NEO..sorry Hi and thankyou for the response, Yes i was speaking about the antshares ICO I have the private keys so i havn;t lost anything ! I am just looking to prove that i purchased the ANTSHARES. Sometimes people ask for proof of purchase especially if an asset has appreciated loads. So i am just asking how you can sort of prove the purchase.
|
|
|
|
CryptoGorilla
|
|
November 19, 2017, 05:02:27 PM |
|
This article is there to spread FUD. Pure BS. Okay, I like to believe it, but could somebody counter the article with something more substantial than just saying it is BS? Why The Red Flag Post is a Red Herring The NEO "red flag" post makes some accurate statements, but are they relevant? Seems to me the post twists context to a pre-desired outcome. Remembering that tokenised money systems (eg Fiat and crypto) and religion have a strange common element in that they only work if you believe in them, what are the key aspects that make a good crypto? 1) Genuine use case or utility value. 2) Strong community and minimum critical mass of believers and adopters. 3) Active devs with credibility and that foster and follow the "greater good" of a flourishing [Suspicious link removed]munity. 4) Usability for the relevant use case, eg BTC has lost usability for spending, but due to the belief system and relatively mature tech still has use case for store of value. 5) Lack of impacting regulatory issues. 6) Stability of base parameters - eg number of coins to be circulated etc. If you examine NEO in this context, it looks OK to me, worth a punt, as we say in Australia. Anything can happen in crypto but the red flags raised are not really relevant in the context of the criteria I list. A Response to Investor Warning: Major NEO Redflags - NEO FUD https://steemit.com/neo/@saltyskip/a-response-to-investor-warning-major-neo-redflags-neo-fudResponse to baseless FUD https://medium.com/@MalcolmLerider/response-to-baseless-fud-9b7e5e2eeeeaNice! That is how a community should be: involved by both sides!
|
Join the Oyster Revolution! Oyster enables anonymous file storage and traffic monetization.
|
|
|
stupid_seb
|
|
November 19, 2017, 05:03:50 PM |
|
NEO + Loopring announcement tomorrow ?
|
|
|
|
LazyBitInvestor
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 350
Merit: 101
Your professional profile on the blockchain
|
|
November 19, 2017, 06:21:40 PM |
|
NEO community is increasing and ecosystem grows, it`s very nice. But we that`s a really problem for the whole NEO blockchain:
NEO is incredibly centralized. The entire network only has 13 validating nodes. Developers whitelist who can run validating nodes
|
|
|
|
GekkoTrade
Member
Offline
Activity: 61
Merit: 10
|
|
November 19, 2017, 06:44:32 PM |
|
NEO community is increasing and ecosystem grows, it`s very nice. But we that`s a really problem for the whole NEO blockchain:
NEO is incredibly centralized. The entire network only has 13 validating nodes. Developers whitelist who can run validating nodes
Please read the whitepaper and you'll realize this is absolute FUD. Continue believing what people write on the interwebz bruh.
|
|
|
|
Zontop
|
|
November 19, 2017, 07:58:38 PM |
|
Someone was showing some shared chart over the social media where it is signaling clearly that market looks ready to explode anytime. I am prepared already even today there was some pull back after some increase but this can be temporary. NEO in spite of the lack of regular updates is on top trading list of big traders.
|
|
|
|
eazent
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
|
|
November 19, 2017, 08:47:52 PM |
|
I heard the announcement was going to involve Microsoft dapp competition? Anyone hear otherwise?
|
|
|
|
smartJEV
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
HODL
|
|
November 20, 2017, 01:43:42 AM |
|
I heard the announcement was going to involve Microsoft dapp competition? Anyone hear otherwise?
Nothing actually special. One more announcement tomorrow. But im not expectaing anything big.
|
|
|
|
Call_Me_Bambi
|
|
November 20, 2017, 07:21:49 AM |
|
NEO Boom or Bust? New Announcements and FUD. https://cointelegraph.com/news/neo-boom-or-bust-new-announcements-and-fudIn spite of the announcement and the subsequent price bump, NEO has faced some relatively harsh criticism, particularly regarding its centralized nodes. One article appeared on GitHub, offering at least six reasons why NEO is not a particularly good investment before the weekend, only to be responded to via Medium by NEO insider, Malcolm Lerider.
|
|
|
|
|