|
rumax
|
 |
October 29, 2018, 07:24:49 PM |
|
I am waiting for enteral exchange system which will bring more exposure towards this platform. They are more active on telegram it seems ongoing 100 development plan will put this in very good position.
Unfortunately, the term of the 100 day plan is coming to an end, but much of the promise has not been done. Let's hope to speed up development in the future. I believe we should consider the 100 days plan as a rough timeframe with guesstimated milestones to be done sometimes in advance or later that the timeframes states. Yes, the team always emphasizes that the 100 day plan is not a deadline. But for some tokenholders, this causes a negative. I hope all our plans will be implemented. How many people have many opinions, I think if they can not support the project in the implementation of the plan, is there any point in pouring out the negative? Thus they spoil the reputation of the project and reduce the likelihood of growth of their own investments! |
|
|
|
|
cryptocreap
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 95
Merit: 0
|
|
October 29, 2018, 08:02:17 PM |
|
How do you know about this? By market? Are you 100% sure that all nodes are going to different hands especially when we are talking about new projects?
We are talking about the network building model. And, in my opinion, a system that anyone can enter is more honest and decentralized. It does not depend on one person. Agree with you partially, mate. But in those systems anyone can have a majority of nodes especially when you need to make 50+ consensus. When it is 90%+ it is much harder to get control over such a system. 90% + system is undoubtedly more reliable. But I'm not talking about that. I talked about making a decision by a single person. Monarchy say so. Maybe it is responsibility when you know who makes decision. Yes, it is a responsibility. But we have already encountered in the cryptocurrency the fact that even famous people say one thing and do another. This problem is very serious. With all my respect but it looks like you are focused on a problem with is not exists. In "open systems" (with really don't exist) it is easier to get control over. You just take 50% nodes and that's all. No license, no control. If license is given by organization it is controlled and we know who gives license and to whom. In that point it is hard to take control over the system. |
|
|
|
|
|
timpum
|
|
October 29, 2018, 08:44:31 PM |
|
With all my respect but it looks like you are focused on a problem with is not exists. In "open systems" (with really don't exist) it is easier to get control over. You just take 50% nodes and that's all. No license, no control. If license is given by organization it is controlled and we know who gives license and to whom. In that point it is hard to take control over the system.
If the blockchain is large and popular, then taking over the majority is not very easy and very expensive. And if someone has captured 51%+ in the top blockhains, then it is more profitable for these people to continue earning than to sabotage. |
|
|
|
|
|
ampirebus (OP)
|
|
October 29, 2018, 09:30:44 PM |
|
With all my respect but it looks like you are focused on a problem with is not exists. In "open systems" (with really don't exist) it is easier to get control over. You just take 50% nodes and that's all. No license, no control. If license is given by organization it is controlled and we know who gives license and to whom. In that point it is hard to take control over the system.
If the blockchain is large and popular, then taking over the majority is not very easy and very expensive. And if someone has captured 51%+ in the top blockhains, then it is more profitable for these people to continue earning than to sabotage. But it is the same for the licensed system to. The profit is more important than control just for control. |
|
|
|
|
McInzy
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 123
Merit: 0
|
|
October 30, 2018, 11:50:05 AM |
|
With all my respect but it looks like you are focused on a problem with is not exists. In "open systems" (with really don't exist) it is easier to get control over. You just take 50% nodes and that's all. No license, no control. If license is given by organization it is controlled and we know who gives license and to whom. In that point it is hard to take control over the system.
If the blockchain is large and popular, then taking over the majority is not very easy and very expensive. And if someone has captured 51%+ in the top blockhains, then it is more profitable for these people to continue earning than to sabotage. Every Blockchain has a starting point. Bitcoin and Ethereum were not popular ones once. However, they are widely used now. Universa, I believe, will be popular in future. So The network will also be trusted. I see no problems here. I think you gave the answer to all your previous questions on your own, my friend. Everything starts some day... |
|
|
|
|
|
timpum
|
|
October 30, 2018, 12:48:25 PM |
|
With all my respect but it looks like you are focused on a problem with is not exists. In "open systems" (with really don't exist) it is easier to get control over. You just take 50% nodes and that's all. No license, no control. If license is given by organization it is controlled and we know who gives license and to whom. In that point it is hard to take control over the system.
If the blockchain is large and popular, then taking over the majority is not very easy and very expensive. And if someone has captured 51%+ in the top blockhains, then it is more profitable for these people to continue earning than to sabotage. Every Blockchain has a starting point. Bitcoin and Ethereum were not popular ones once. However, they are widely used now. Universa, I believe, will be popular in future. So The network will also be trusted. I see no problems here. I think you gave the answer to all your previous questions on your own, my friend. Everything starts some day... Yes, everything has a beginning. But I still do not like the monarchy. Borodich is not a king. By the way, why are they still not considering requests for node installations? |
|
|
|
|
|
ampirebus (OP)
|
|
October 30, 2018, 02:29:42 PM |
|
With all my respect but it looks like you are focused on a problem with is not exists. In "open systems" (with really don't exist) it is easier to get control over. You just take 50% nodes and that's all. No license, no control. If license is given by organization it is controlled and we know who gives license and to whom. In that point it is hard to take control over the system.
If the blockchain is large and popular, then taking over the majority is not very easy and very expensive. And if someone has captured 51%+ in the top blockhains, then it is more profitable for these people to continue earning than to sabotage. Every Blockchain has a starting point. Bitcoin and Ethereum were not popular ones once. However, they are widely used now. Universa, I believe, will be popular in future. So The network will also be trusted. I see no problems here. I think you gave the answer to all your previous questions on your own, my friend. Everything starts some day... Yes, everything has a beginning. But I still do not like the monarchy. Borodich is not a king. By the way, why are they still not considering requests for node installations? But nobody speaks about monarchy. All is about technology and security. And by the way you can apply for node here: https://kb.universa.io/node_owner_central/31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
frcat
|
|
October 30, 2018, 06:55:21 PM |
|
When will be token swap from UTNp to native UTN? Any exact date? Project was looks promising but there are many competitors which developing more quickly  |
|
|
|
|
|
ampirebus (OP)
|
|
October 30, 2018, 07:01:20 PM |
|
When will be token swap from UTNp to native UTN? Any exact date? Project was looks promising but there are many competitors which developing more quickly UTN-P to UTN swap is already exists, from the first day of the swap. Please check: beta.universa.io |
|
|
|
|
hihelen
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 126
Merit: 0
|
|
October 30, 2018, 07:47:57 PM |
|
With all my respect but it looks like you are focused on a problem with is not exists. In "open systems" (with really don't exist) it is easier to get control over. You just take 50% nodes and that's all. No license, no control. If license is given by organization it is controlled and we know who gives license and to whom. In that point it is hard to take control over the system.
If the blockchain is large and popular, then taking over the majority is not very easy and very expensive. And if someone has captured 51%+ in the top blockhains, then it is more profitable for these people to continue earning than to sabotage. Every Blockchain has a starting point. Bitcoin and Ethereum were not popular ones once. However, they are widely used now. Universa, I believe, will be popular in future. So The network will also be trusted. I see no problems here. I think you gave the answer to all your previous questions on your own, my friend. Everything starts some day... Yes, everything has a beginning. But I still do not like the monarchy. Borodich is not a king. By the way, why are they still not considering requests for node installations? But nobody speaks about monarchy. All is about technology and security. And by the way you can apply for node here: https://kb.universa.io/node_owner_central/31Completely agree. Universa is not a monarchy. You are trying to make discussion just for discussion itself. |
|
|
|
|
|
timpum
|
|
October 30, 2018, 09:36:12 PM |
|
With all my respect but it looks like you are focused on a problem with is not exists. In "open systems" (with really don't exist) it is easier to get control over. You just take 50% nodes and that's all. No license, no control. If license is given by organization it is controlled and we know who gives license and to whom. In that point it is hard to take control over the system.
If the blockchain is large and popular, then taking over the majority is not very easy and very expensive. And if someone has captured 51%+ in the top blockhains, then it is more profitable for these people to continue earning than to sabotage. Every Blockchain has a starting point. Bitcoin and Ethereum were not popular ones once. However, they are widely used now. Universa, I believe, will be popular in future. So The network will also be trusted. I see no problems here. I think you gave the answer to all your previous questions on your own, my friend. Everything starts some day... Yes, everything has a beginning. But I still do not like the monarchy. Borodich is not a king. By the way, why are they still not considering requests for node installations? But nobody speaks about monarchy. All is about technology and security. And by the way you can apply for node here: https://kb.universa.io/node_owner_central/31Is there an approximate date when requests for installation of nodes will be considered? I have heard of over 600 requests, but why isn't it being considered? |
|
|
|
|
|
ampirebus (OP)
|
|
October 30, 2018, 10:26:35 PM |
|
With all my respect but it looks like you are focused on a problem with is not exists. In "open systems" (with really don't exist) it is easier to get control over. You just take 50% nodes and that's all. No license, no control. If license is given by organization it is controlled and we know who gives license and to whom. In that point it is hard to take control over the system.
If the blockchain is large and popular, then taking over the majority is not very easy and very expensive. And if someone has captured 51%+ in the top blockhains, then it is more profitable for these people to continue earning than to sabotage. Every Blockchain has a starting point. Bitcoin and Ethereum were not popular ones once. However, they are widely used now. Universa, I believe, will be popular in future. So The network will also be trusted. I see no problems here. I think you gave the answer to all your previous questions on your own, my friend. Everything starts some day... Yes, everything has a beginning. But I still do not like the monarchy. Borodich is not a king. By the way, why are they still not considering requests for node installations? But nobody speaks about monarchy. All is about technology and security. And by the way you can apply for node here: https://kb.universa.io/node_owner_central/31Is there an approximate date when requests for installation of nodes will be considered? I have heard of over 600 requests, but why isn't it being considered? Your requests were redirected to the appropriate service of our company, we will contact you if interested. |
|
|
|
|
|
ampirebus (OP)
|
|
October 30, 2018, 10:27:33 PM |
|
With all my respect but it looks like you are focused on a problem with is not exists. In "open systems" (with really don't exist) it is easier to get control over. You just take 50% nodes and that's all. No license, no control. If license is given by organization it is controlled and we know who gives license and to whom. In that point it is hard to take control over the system.
If the blockchain is large and popular, then taking over the majority is not very easy and very expensive. And if someone has captured 51%+ in the top blockhains, then it is more profitable for these people to continue earning than to sabotage. Every Blockchain has a starting point. Bitcoin and Ethereum were not popular ones once. However, they are widely used now. Universa, I believe, will be popular in future. So The network will also be trusted. I see no problems here. I think you gave the answer to all your previous questions on your own, my friend. Everything starts some day... Yes, everything has a beginning. But I still do not like the monarchy. Borodich is not a king. By the way, why are they still not considering requests for node installations? But nobody speaks about monarchy. All is about technology and security. And by the way you can apply for node here: https://kb.universa.io/node_owner_central/31Is there an approximate date when requests for installation of nodes will be considered? I have heard of over 600 requests, but why isn't it being considered? Please, keep in touch! You are also welcome to ask any questions here https://t.me/uninode |
|
|
|
|
|
timpum
|
|
October 31, 2018, 11:57:09 AM |
|
Your requests were redirected to the appropriate service of our company, we will contact you if interested.
Strange, such mystery. Token holders are waiting for the results of the company. For a massive launch node is one of the results. Therefore, I consider this question to be quite natural. |
|
|
|
|
Mertalot
Member
Offline
Activity: 157
Merit: 10
|
|
October 31, 2018, 12:01:28 PM |
|
Your requests were redirected to the appropriate service of our company, we will contact you if interested.
Strange, such mystery. Token holders are waiting for the results of the company. For a massive launch node is one of the results. Therefore, I consider this question to be quite natural. According to what I have heard, they are collecting requests currently and they are going to offer licenses in the nearest future. |
|
|
|
|
|
timpum
|
|
October 31, 2018, 04:23:58 PM |
|
Your requests were redirected to the appropriate service of our company, we will contact you if interested.
Strange, such mystery. Token holders are waiting for the results of the company. For a massive launch node is one of the results. Therefore, I consider this question to be quite natural. According to what I have heard, they are collecting requests currently and they are going to offer licenses in the nearest future. That's exactly what I ask. The nearest future is a rather vague concept. It can be a week or two years. I would like to know this date more precisely. |
|
|
|
|
amoredore
Member
Offline
Activity: 168
Merit: 10
|
|
October 31, 2018, 05:08:50 PM |
|
Your requests were redirected to the appropriate service of our company, we will contact you if interested.
Strange, such mystery. Token holders are waiting for the results of the company. For a massive launch node is one of the results. Therefore, I consider this question to be quite natural. According to what I have heard, they are collecting requests currently and they are going to offer licenses in the nearest future. That's exactly what I ask. The nearest future is a rather vague concept. It can be a week or two years. I would like to know this date more precisely. In the AMA, I think I heard something about 100-150 nodes this/next year |
|
|
|
|
amoredore
Member
Offline
Activity: 168
Merit: 10
|
|
November 01, 2018, 12:46:46 PM |
|
With all my respect but it looks like you are focused on a problem with is not exists. In "open systems" (with really don't exist) it is easier to get control over. You just take 50% nodes and that's all. No license, no control. If license is given by organization it is controlled and we know who gives license and to whom. In that point it is hard to take control over the system.
If the blockchain is large and popular, then taking over the majority is not very easy and very expensive. And if someone has captured 51%+ in the top blockhains, then it is more profitable for these people to continue earning than to sabotage. Every Blockchain has a starting point. Bitcoin and Ethereum were not popular ones once. However, they are widely used now. Universa, I believe, will be popular in future. So The network will also be trusted. I see no problems here. I think you gave the answer to all your previous questions on your own, my friend. Everything starts some day... Yes, everything has a beginning. But I still do not like the monarchy. Borodich is not a king. By the way, why are they still not considering requests for node installations? But nobody speaks about monarchy. All is about technology and security. And by the way you can apply for node here: https://kb.universa.io/node_owner_central/31Completely agree. Universa is not a monarchy. You are trying to make discussion just for discussion itself. Monarchy?  I don't think so. Borodich is just the CEO, not a monarch here. |
|
|
|
|
|
timpum
|
|
November 01, 2018, 07:08:42 PM |
|
Your requests were redirected to the appropriate service of our company, we will contact you if interested.
Strange, such mystery. Token holders are waiting for the results of the company. For a massive launch node is one of the results. Therefore, I consider this question to be quite natural. According to what I have heard, they are collecting requests currently and they are going to offer licenses in the nearest future. That's exactly what I ask. The nearest future is a rather vague concept. It can be a week or two years. I would like to know this date more precisely. In the AMA, I think I heard something about 100-150 nodes this/next year Why only 100-150 nodes, if requests more than 600? Permissions will not get all applicants so far? By what criteria Borodich will choose the owners of the nodes? |
|
|
|
|
|
