Bitcoin Forum
April 05, 2020, 10:32:41 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.19.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 [733] 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 ... 868 »
  Print  
Author Topic: BiblePay | 10% to Orphan-Charity | RANDOMX MINING | Sanctuaries (Masternodes)  (Read 212256 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (345 posts by 33 users deleted.)
tiras
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 229
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 27, 2019, 07:00:24 PM
 #14641

it's happening right now at the pool :



Whats happening?  Should we all sell?



probably

Thanks, thats what I was wondering about you.

you got me Rob , no kidding   Grin

instead of just commenting why most miners go with 99% errors .....


BiblePay (BBP) | Reddit - Twitter - Forum - Slack - Discord | C-CEX - CoinsMarkets | Love one another, be a good Samaritan, help those in distress and spread the gospel
1586082761
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1586082761

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1586082761
Reply with quote  #2

1586082761
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1586082761
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1586082761

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1586082761
Reply with quote  #2

1586082761
Report to moderator
bible_pay
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 994
Merit: 215


Jesus is the King of Kings and Lord of Lords


View Profile WWW
June 27, 2019, 07:10:47 PM
 #14642

So I took a look at the pool, and the reason most of the miners were showing a 99% error ratios is the pool went off on its own fork.

So I believe this happened because of the very low difficulty ABN affords us.

In light of that, I have decided to shut down ABN.

We have so many exciting things coming at the end of the year, ABN pales in comparison to those things anyway, and I really think we should not divert all of our attention and resources to ABN while we can improve BiblePay in those others areas, especially at the expense of security.  (Also, we have chain locks coming, and we can improve our security with chainlocks and accomplish the same thing - roughly in a different way, in September).

SECURITY IS #1 WITH BIBLEPAY


In light of this, ABN is being retired for the time being.

The ABN weight requirement will dissapear in a few more blocks.

In the mean time, Im going to run a report network wide to verify that we have one heavy chain.

The pool is resyncing.



🕇 BiblePay 🕇
🕇  Announcement | ForumSlackDiscordRedditTwitter | SouthXChange  🕇
🕇 A Christian cryptocurrency | Supporting orphans through a decentralized autonomous charity 🕇
eternalenvoy
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 27, 2019, 07:20:16 PM
 #14643

It’s unfortunate to hear this news, which means no  need to test the new mining function of ABN....
So now is using back the old model - POBH ?
tiras
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 229
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 27, 2019, 07:22:53 PM
 #14644

So I took a look at the pool, and the reason most of the miners were showing a 99% error ratios is the pool went off on its own fork.

So I believe this happened because of the very low difficulty ABN affords us.

In light of that, I have decided to shut down ABN.

We have so many exciting things coming at the end of the year, ABN pales in comparison to those things anyway, and I really think we should not divert all of our attention and resources to ABN while we can improve BiblePay in those others areas, especially at the expense of security.  (Also, we have chain locks coming, and we can improve our security with chainlocks and accomplish the same thing - roughly in a different way, in September).

SECURITY IS #1 WITH BIBLEPAY


In light of this, ABN is being retired for the time being.

The ABN weight requirement will dissapear in a few more blocks.

In the mean time, Im going to run a report network wide to verify that we have one heavy chain.

The pool is resyncing.

Rob,  could you post here the current top block hash ?

BiblePay (BBP) | Reddit - Twitter - Forum - Slack - Discord | C-CEX - CoinsMarkets | Love one another, be a good Samaritan, help those in distress and spread the gospel
bible_pay
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 994
Merit: 215


Jesus is the King of Kings and Lord of Lords


View Profile WWW
June 27, 2019, 07:24:17 PM
 #14645

It’s unfortunate to hear this news, which means no  need to test the new mining function of ABN....

Yes, I know.  I was hoping for a community known for advanced features, but each advanced feature is very elusive in the block chain world.  You have to create a feature in a decentralized way doing at least 10* the work, and debug it with 10 man years for it to pass enough tests vigorously to stay in prod.

But, Im still very very optimistic because Cameroon Ones feature is passing in the Sanc poll, and that alone will be very good to be known by - a community with 100 self sponsored orphans with pass through payments is pretty impressive.  (It also gives us 501c3 donations and tax deductions, and bitcoin miner donations capabilities, and makes us a DAC).

Let's look forward to that towards the end of July.



🕇 BiblePay 🕇
🕇  Announcement | ForumSlackDiscordRedditTwitter | SouthXChange  🕇
🕇 A Christian cryptocurrency | Supporting orphans through a decentralized autonomous charity 🕇
bible_pay
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 994
Merit: 215


Jesus is the King of Kings and Lord of Lords


View Profile WWW
June 27, 2019, 07:26:01 PM
 #14646

So I took a look at the pool, and the reason most of the miners were showing a 99% error ratios is the pool went off on its own fork.

So I believe this happened because of the very low difficulty ABN affords us.

In light of that, I have decided to shut down ABN.

We have so many exciting things coming at the end of the year, ABN pales in comparison to those things anyway, and I really think we should not divert all of our attention and resources to ABN while we can improve BiblePay in those others areas, especially at the expense of security.  (Also, we have chain locks coming, and we can improve our security with chainlocks and accomplish the same thing - roughly in a different way, in September).

SECURITY IS #1 WITH BIBLEPAY


In light of this, ABN is being retired for the time being.

The ABN weight requirement will dissapear in a few more blocks.

In the mean time, Im going to run a report network wide to verify that we have one heavy chain.

The pool is resyncing.

Rob,  could you post here the current top block hash ?



I ran my global report, and see no forks at all, so maybe I jumped the gun, but the decision is already complete, I can't go back on it.  Let's stay with pure POBH for now.


So the hash is :
getblockhash 128163
e83e3cd93e304e259b3adf287e79f08f058e9ae4fcc7633722d0146c2a3375fe

Agreeing with our explorer:

https://chainz.cryptoid.info/bbp/block.dws?128163.htm

The pool has resynced to the same block as the explorer; so we don't actually have any forks.







🕇 BiblePay 🕇
🕇  Announcement | ForumSlackDiscordRedditTwitter | SouthXChange  🕇
🕇 A Christian cryptocurrency | Supporting orphans through a decentralized autonomous charity 🕇
capulo
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 492
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 27, 2019, 07:35:22 PM
 #14647

so whats now? Smiley
i see that all my machines started mining now
POG is also retired?
bible_pay
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 994
Merit: 215


Jesus is the King of Kings and Lord of Lords


View Profile WWW
June 27, 2019, 07:37:50 PM
 #14648

so whats now? Smiley
i see that all my machines started mining now
POG is also retired?

No, just ABN is retired.  I just want to make sure we have a high difficulty and we have a fork-free life.

We still have our GSCs, POG, Healing, and Cameroon One coming soon.

Next smart contract is @ 128350.


🕇 BiblePay 🕇
🕇  Announcement | ForumSlackDiscordRedditTwitter | SouthXChange  🕇
🕇 A Christian cryptocurrency | Supporting orphans through a decentralized autonomous charity 🕇
tiras
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 229
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 27, 2019, 07:38:01 PM
 #14649

So I took a look at the pool, and the reason most of the miners were showing a 99% error ratios is the pool went off on its own fork.

So I believe this happened because of the very low difficulty ABN affords us.

In light of that, I have decided to shut down ABN.

We have so many exciting things coming at the end of the year, ABN pales in comparison to those things anyway, and I really think we should not divert all of our attention and resources to ABN while we can improve BiblePay in those others areas, especially at the expense of security.  (Also, we have chain locks coming, and we can improve our security with chainlocks and accomplish the same thing - roughly in a different way, in September).

SECURITY IS #1 WITH BIBLEPAY


In light of this, ABN is being retired for the time being.

The ABN weight requirement will dissapear in a few more blocks.

In the mean time, Im going to run a report network wide to verify that we have one heavy chain.

The pool is resyncing.

Rob,  could you post here the current top block hash ?



I ran my global report, and see no forks at all, so maybe I jumped the gun, but the decision is already complete, I can't go back on it.  Let's stay with pure POBH for now.


So the hash is :
getblockhash 128163
e83e3cd93e304e259b3adf287e79f08f058e9ae4fcc7633722d0146c2a3375fe

Agreeing with our explorer:

https://chainz.cryptoid.info/bbp/block.dws?128163.htm

The pool has resynced to the same block as the explorer; so we don't actually have any forks.

does it mean my sanctuary is out of sync ?

Code:
 "protocolversion": 70733,
  "balance": 0.00032649,
  "blocks": 128158,


# biblepay-cli getblockhash 128163
error code: -8
error message:
Block height out of range

 biblepay-cli getblockhash 128158
8fb8d976f0f16150a851605a5ea444ab5c6cf3ca014eea785508ac8e8959d1e7


BiblePay (BBP) | Reddit - Twitter - Forum - Slack - Discord | C-CEX - CoinsMarkets | Love one another, be a good Samaritan, help those in distress and spread the gospel
bible_pay
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 994
Merit: 215


Jesus is the King of Kings and Lord of Lords


View Profile WWW
June 27, 2019, 07:41:27 PM
 #14650

So I took a look at the pool, and the reason most of the miners were showing a 99% error ratios is the pool went off on its own fork.

So I believe this happened because of the very low difficulty ABN affords us.

In light of that, I have decided to shut down ABN.

We have so many exciting things coming at the end of the year, ABN pales in comparison to those things anyway, and I really think we should not divert all of our attention and resources to ABN while we can improve BiblePay in those others areas, especially at the expense of security.  (Also, we have chain locks coming, and we can improve our security with chainlocks and accomplish the same thing - roughly in a different way, in September).

SECURITY IS #1 WITH BIBLEPAY


In light of this, ABN is being retired for the time being.

The ABN weight requirement will dissapear in a few more blocks.

In the mean time, Im going to run a report network wide to verify that we have one heavy chain.

The pool is resyncing.

Rob,  could you post here the current top block hash ?



I ran my global report, and see no forks at all, so maybe I jumped the gun, but the decision is already complete, I can't go back on it.  Let's stay with pure POBH for now.


So the hash is :
getblockhash 128163
e83e3cd93e304e259b3adf287e79f08f058e9ae4fcc7633722d0146c2a3375fe

Agreeing with our explorer:

https://chainz.cryptoid.info/bbp/block.dws?128163.htm

The pool has resynced to the same block as the explorer; so we don't actually have any forks.

does it mean my sanctuary is out of sync ?

Code:
 "protocolversion": 70733,
  "balance": 0.00032649,
  "blocks": 128158,


# biblepay-cli getblockhash 128163
error code: -8
error message:
Block height out of range

 biblepay-cli getblockhash 128158
8fb8d976f0f16150a851605a5ea444ab5c6cf3ca014eea785508ac8e8959d1e7



Yes - please re-sync.

Please, anyone else that disagrees with the 128163 hash posted - please post.  Id like to know that no one else other than Tiras' sanctuary disagrees.

Because I ran a report that showed 100% were in agreement to the 128163 hash - not one was out of sync across the world in all datacenters.

I emailed SX to check also. 

🕇 BiblePay 🕇
🕇  Announcement | ForumSlackDiscordRedditTwitter | SouthXChange  🕇
🕇 A Christian cryptocurrency | Supporting orphans through a decentralized autonomous charity 🕇
tiras
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 229
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 27, 2019, 07:48:43 PM
 #14651

So I took a look at the pool, and the reason most of the miners were showing a 99% error ratios is the pool went off on its own fork.

So I believe this happened because of the very low difficulty ABN affords us.

In light of that, I have decided to shut down ABN.

We have so many exciting things coming at the end of the year, ABN pales in comparison to those things anyway, and I really think we should not divert all of our attention and resources to ABN while we can improve BiblePay in those others areas, especially at the expense of security.  (Also, we have chain locks coming, and we can improve our security with chainlocks and accomplish the same thing - roughly in a different way, in September).

SECURITY IS #1 WITH BIBLEPAY


In light of this, ABN is being retired for the time being.

The ABN weight requirement will dissapear in a few more blocks.

In the mean time, Im going to run a report network wide to verify that we have one heavy chain.

The pool is resyncing.

Rob,  could you post here the current top block hash ?



I ran my global report, and see no forks at all, so maybe I jumped the gun, but the decision is already complete, I can't go back on it.  Let's stay with pure POBH for now.


So the hash is :
getblockhash 128163
e83e3cd93e304e259b3adf287e79f08f058e9ae4fcc7633722d0146c2a3375fe

Agreeing with our explorer:

https://chainz.cryptoid.info/bbp/block.dws?128163.htm

The pool has resynced to the same block as the explorer; so we don't actually have any forks.

does it mean my sanctuary is out of sync ?

Code:
 "protocolversion": 70733,
  "balance": 0.00032649,
  "blocks": 128158,


# biblepay-cli getblockhash 128163
error code: -8
error message:
Block height out of range

 biblepay-cli getblockhash 128158
8fb8d976f0f16150a851605a5ea444ab5c6cf3ca014eea785508ac8e8959d1e7



Yes - please re-sync.

Please, anyone else that disagrees with the 128163 hash posted - please post.  Id like to know that no one else other than Tiras' sanctuary disagrees.

Because I ran a report that showed 100% were in agreement to the 128163 hash - not one was out of sync across the world in all datacenters.

I emailed SX to check also. 

resyncing controller MN

In the miners wallet though top block is matching your hash but 128158 is different from that on  my sanctuary ...

it's unlikely sanctuary went on the fork , right ?

Miner:
Code:
15:43:45

getblockhash 128163
15:43:45
e83e3cd93e304e259b3adf287e79f08f058e9ae4fcc7633722d0146c2a3375fe
15:44:09

 getblockhash 128158
15:44:09
92c5bb76c6c01fe1e2582452a223b6273a72cc0c8936c717f2b39c47fdf4161c


Sanc:
Code:

 biblepay-cli getblockhash 128158
8fb8d976f0f16150a851605a5ea444ab5c6cf3ca014eea785508ac8e8959d1e7

BiblePay (BBP) | Reddit - Twitter - Forum - Slack - Discord | C-CEX - CoinsMarkets | Love one another, be a good Samaritan, help those in distress and spread the gospel
bible_pay
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 994
Merit: 215


Jesus is the King of Kings and Lord of Lords


View Profile WWW
June 27, 2019, 07:58:09 PM
 #14652

So I took a look at the pool, and the reason most of the miners were showing a 99% error ratios is the pool went off on its own fork.

So I believe this happened because of the very low difficulty ABN affords us.

In light of that, I have decided to shut down ABN.

We have so many exciting things coming at the end of the year, ABN pales in comparison to those things anyway, and I really think we should not divert all of our attention and resources to ABN while we can improve BiblePay in those others areas, especially at the expense of security.  (Also, we have chain locks coming, and we can improve our security with chainlocks and accomplish the same thing - roughly in a different way, in September).

SECURITY IS #1 WITH BIBLEPAY


In light of this, ABN is being retired for the time being.

The ABN weight requirement will dissapear in a few more blocks.

In the mean time, Im going to run a report network wide to verify that we have one heavy chain.

The pool is resyncing.

Rob,  could you post here the current top block hash ?



I ran my global report, and see no forks at all, so maybe I jumped the gun, but the decision is already complete, I can't go back on it.  Let's stay with pure POBH for now.


So the hash is :
getblockhash 128163
e83e3cd93e304e259b3adf287e79f08f058e9ae4fcc7633722d0146c2a3375fe

Agreeing with our explorer:

https://chainz.cryptoid.info/bbp/block.dws?128163.htm

The pool has resynced to the same block as the explorer; so we don't actually have any forks.

does it mean my sanctuary is out of sync ?

Code:
 "protocolversion": 70733,
  "balance": 0.00032649,
  "blocks": 128158,


# biblepay-cli getblockhash 128163
error code: -8
error message:
Block height out of range

 biblepay-cli getblockhash 128158
8fb8d976f0f16150a851605a5ea444ab5c6cf3ca014eea785508ac8e8959d1e7



Yes - please re-sync.

Please, anyone else that disagrees with the 128163 hash posted - please post.  Id like to know that no one else other than Tiras' sanctuary disagrees.

Because I ran a report that showed 100% were in agreement to the 128163 hash - not one was out of sync across the world in all datacenters.

I emailed SX to check also. 

resyncing controller MN

In the miners wallet though top block is matching your hash but 128158 is different from that on  my sanctuary ...

it's unlikely sanctuary went on the fork , right ?

Miner:
Code:
15:43:45

getblockhash 128163
15:43:45
e83e3cd93e304e259b3adf287e79f08f058e9ae4fcc7633722d0146c2a3375fe
15:44:09

 getblockhash 128158
15:44:09
92c5bb76c6c01fe1e2582452a223b6273a72cc0c8936c717f2b39c47fdf4161c


Sanc:
Code:

 biblepay-cli getblockhash 128158
8fb8d976f0f16150a851605a5ea444ab5c6cf3ca014eea785508ac8e8959d1e7

The correct hash for 128158 was 92c5bb it looks like.  I don't know why that sanc went off on a fork (unless it has a strange error in its log right before 128158 height).

But yeah looks like that 128158 sanc needs resynced.


🕇 BiblePay 🕇
🕇  Announcement | ForumSlackDiscordRedditTwitter | SouthXChange  🕇
🕇 A Christian cryptocurrency | Supporting orphans through a decentralized autonomous charity 🕇
sunk818
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 952
Merit: 111



View Profile WWW
June 27, 2019, 10:00:54 PM
Last edit: June 27, 2019, 11:15:18 PM by sunk818
 #14653

It’s unfortunate to hear this news, which means no  need to test the new mining function of ABN....

Yes, I know.  I was hoping for a community known for advanced features, but each advanced feature is very elusive in the block chain world.  You have to create a feature in a decentralized way doing at least 10* the work, and debug it with 10 man years for it to pass enough tests vigorously to stay in prod.

But, Im still very very optimistic because Cameroon Ones feature is passing in the Sanc poll, and that alone will be very good to be known by - a community with 100 self sponsored orphans with pass through payments is pretty impressive.  (It also gives us 501c3 donations and tax deductions, and bitcoin miner donations capabilities, and makes us a DAC).

Let's look forward to that towards the end of July.

I encourage you to stay persistent. I think ABN can work with more testing. We were ramping up the cores being able to mine. I think if you had a requirement of 1 input of 256k BBP w/ 205 confirmation and the output generates 1 x 256k BBP, this is makes it easier to communicate to other people and easier to calculate I assume. Not as fancy as the current setup, but probably easier to troubleshoot and explain to others.

Or other ideas like this that is test on another altcoin:

After executing a single SHA256 hash on the miner’s reward address, the last character found must match the last character of the block hash value submitted by the miner in the candidate block. This randomizes who can actually win the block. Even the fastest miner can’t be guaranteed to win the block or a series of blocks in succession. The chances are 1 in 16 that the miner will be able to win the block (http://cdn.getlynx.io/2019-03-17_Lynx_Whitepaper_v1.1.pdf page 16)

macko20
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 94
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 27, 2019, 10:34:20 PM
 #14654

Macko said he's forking BiblePay.  Does anyone have any info on the ticker or OP post?



I saw the problem before, I wrote ...
bible_pay
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 994
Merit: 215


Jesus is the King of Kings and Lord of Lords


View Profile WWW
June 27, 2019, 11:25:33 PM
 #14655

Macko said he's forking BiblePay.  Does anyone have any info on the ticker or OP post?



I saw the problem before, I wrote ...

No, you didn't.  (So far, I have learned that you do not know anything about blockchains or programming via e-mail).

Please give us info on your planned fork, we want to see this fork Smiley.


🕇 BiblePay 🕇
🕇  Announcement | ForumSlackDiscordRedditTwitter | SouthXChange  🕇
🕇 A Christian cryptocurrency | Supporting orphans through a decentralized autonomous charity 🕇
bible_pay
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 994
Merit: 215


Jesus is the King of Kings and Lord of Lords


View Profile WWW
June 28, 2019, 12:59:49 AM
 #14656

Can we have some help in TestNet please?

https://forum.biblepay.org/index.php?topic=391.new#new


We are close to testing Cameroon One, and I would like good coverage of the Dash 0.14 branch features also.


🕇 BiblePay 🕇
🕇  Announcement | ForumSlackDiscordRedditTwitter | SouthXChange  🕇
🕇 A Christian cryptocurrency | Supporting orphans through a decentralized autonomous charity 🕇
bible_pay
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 994
Merit: 215


Jesus is the King of Kings and Lord of Lords


View Profile WWW
June 28, 2019, 01:28:51 AM
 #14657

Dear Gogogadget,

Please don't enter diary entries like that in our public wallet.  The purpose is for bearing Christian fruit (not mocking or scoffing).

Note that people who abuse - or add - non-Christian entries may lose their entire CPK (Christian public key).




🕇 BiblePay 🕇
🕇  Announcement | ForumSlackDiscordRedditTwitter | SouthXChange  🕇
🕇 A Christian cryptocurrency | Supporting orphans through a decentralized autonomous charity 🕇
bible_pay
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 994
Merit: 215


Jesus is the King of Kings and Lord of Lords


View Profile WWW
June 28, 2019, 02:06:04 AM
 #14658

I have no clue if this is the case but I have a sneaky suspicion CCEX might be the big seller on SX - as they had about 20 mil in the wallet.


🕇 BiblePay 🕇
🕇  Announcement | ForumSlackDiscordRedditTwitter | SouthXChange  🕇
🕇 A Christian cryptocurrency | Supporting orphans through a decentralized autonomous charity 🕇
togoshigekata
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 966
Merit: 115



View Profile
June 28, 2019, 04:14:40 AM
Last edit: June 28, 2019, 04:35:09 AM by togoshigekata
 #14659

Starting to update things,
What is the current block reward breakdown?

===

Is the Issues feature enabled on the latest github?
https://github.com/biblepay/biblepay-evolution
miningguru
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 980
Merit: 103


SPYCE | Rise of Web 3.0 - www.decenternet.com


View Profile
June 28, 2019, 04:59:35 AM
 #14660

I have no clue if this is the case but I have a sneaky suspicion CCEX might be the big seller on SX - as they had about 20 mil in the wallet.



Why it seems you cannot manage to list the coin in higher volume exchanges because if you won't bother listing then it will really hurt, the price will keep going down in the market.

Pages: « 1 ... 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 [733] 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 ... 868 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!