countduckula
|
|
May 11, 2014, 02:58:30 AM |
|
Seriously thats way wrong, he never explained anything at all of this. I got paid 0.00004, 15 times less, without a single word on what he was planning.
0.0086 against 0.13 for those to accepted the shady unclear and unexplained new contract.
|
|
|
|
elitenoob
|
|
May 11, 2014, 03:02:12 AM |
|
I think something is not correct with my div...i got like 15 times more compared to last time.
|
|
|
|
grnbrg
|
|
May 11, 2014, 03:05:22 AM |
|
Seriously thats way wrong, he never explained anything at all of this. I got paid 0.00004, 15 times less, without a single word on what he was planning.
0.0086 against 0.13 for those to accepted the shady unclear and unexplained new contract.
Did you convert to the new contract? The original contract is fixed at 100 MH/s per contract, with no bonus. The April 25 contract, if you opt into it, pays divs for 100 MH/s, but may also have a bonus paid at LRM's option. grnbrg.
|
|
|
|
grnbrg
|
|
May 11, 2014, 03:08:45 AM |
|
I think something not correct with my div...i got like 15 times more compared to last time.
What's your per-contract payment? If you converted to the new contract, it should be roughly 0.000666 BTC. grnbrg.
|
|
|
|
countduckula
|
|
May 11, 2014, 03:10:00 AM |
|
I'm gonna refrain to post what i really think of Zach right now after weeks of NOT providing any kind of information but this crap contract, not even a line up on what we should expect, seriously, 100% sure now what piece of **** Zach is, an honest person doesnt act like this at all.
Way to screw everyone who invested, MY CONTRACT DOESNT SAY 100Mh PER contract, it says a portion of the mining speed, and that isnt 100mh, not if you're paying 15 times what you paid last week, that is at minimum 200 TH, why every person dealing with bitcoin its full of crap? why..
|
|
|
|
countduckula
|
|
May 11, 2014, 03:12:15 AM |
|
Bonds:
Each 1 bond of LabRatMining represents a portion of the total hashrate owned and operated by LabRatMining.
This initial amount is guaranteed to be a minimum of 100MH/s per bond, but with future installments of the company the hashrate per bond will also increase. Depending on the speed at which the initial offering of bonds is completed, the 100MH/s estimate could raise rather quickly. THAT IS WHAT THE CONTRACT I AGREE SAYS. I didnt agree to any change of it at all.
|
|
|
|
elitenoob
|
|
May 11, 2014, 03:14:27 AM |
|
I think something not correct with my div...i got like 15 times more compared to last time.
What's your per-contract payment? If you converted to the new contract, it should be roughly 0.000666 BTC. grnbrg. hmm yea that might be correct...but why around 15 times more compared to last time? whatever...
|
|
|
|
grnbrg
|
|
May 11, 2014, 03:17:37 AM |
|
I think something not correct with my div...i got like 15 times more compared to last time.
What's your per-contract payment? If you converted to the new contract, it should be roughly 0.000666 BTC. grnbrg. hmm yea that might be correct...but why around 15 times more compared to last time? whatever... Zach mentioned that at least some of the BitFury gear was installed and running during the AMA. <speculation>It is possible that he is paying out coin earned by that hardware over the last couple (or more) weeks.</speculation> NB: Previous comment is SPECULATION. He has not indicated to me that that is the case. But it does make sense. grnbrg.
|
|
|
|
countduckula
|
|
May 11, 2014, 03:18:47 AM |
|
15 times shows a hashrate 15 times bigger? or he was hiding all the coins that belong to us and sharing with those who indulge his whim of changing the contract as he pleases without even caring of what he offered to start?
Of course he hasnt indicated anything at all, my humble opinion, he's full of crap and a plain scumbag stealing from those who helped him to start this.
|
|
|
|
Flashman
|
|
May 11, 2014, 03:35:07 AM |
|
Zach mentioned that at least some of the BitFury gear was installed and running during the AMA. <speculation>It is possible that he is paying out coin earned by that hardware over the last couple (or more) weeks.</speculation> NB: Previous comment is SPECULATION. He has not indicated to me that that is the case. But it does make sense.
grnbrg.
I would concur that a bit of a "balloon" payment makes sense for the first bonus. Guess we will have to see a few weeks worth to see what it's averaging.
|
TL;DR See Spot run. Run Spot run. .... .... Freelance interweb comedian, for teh lulz >>> 1MqAAR4XkJWfDt367hVTv5SstPZ54Fwse6
Bitcoin Custodian: Keeping BTC away from weak heads since Feb '13, adopter of homeless bitcoins.
|
|
|
grnbrg
|
|
May 11, 2014, 04:19:52 AM |
|
Whether need to accept the new contract so as to receive the dividends. I have not received this week's dividends. And how to accept the new contract!
:sigh: Email labrat@labratmining.com (from a previously verified address) and state that you want to convert. Or PM me a signed message stating the same thing, and I will make sure Zach gets it. grnbrg. PS: For the love of the FSM, verify your signature. I have to have probably upwards of 30% of the signed messages I get redone, because they don't verify....
|
|
|
|
1247364403
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
|
|
May 11, 2014, 04:27:23 AM |
|
Whether need to accept the new contract so as to receive the dividends. I have not received this week's dividends. And how to accept the new contract!
:sigh: Email labrat@labratmining.com (from a previously verified address) and state that you want to convert. Or PM me a signed message stating the same thing, and I will make sure Zach gets it. grnbrg. PS: For the love of the FSM, verify your signature. I have to have probably upwards of 30% of the signed messages I get redone, because they don't verify.... I got .000666 BTC per bond. srsly
why did I get 0.00012543 BTC per bond?
|
|
|
|
grnbrg
|
|
May 11, 2014, 04:28:42 AM |
|
Whether need to accept the new contract so as to receive the dividends. I have not received this week's dividends. And how to accept the new contract!
:sigh: Email labrat@labratmining.com (from a previously verified address) and state that you want to convert. Or PM me a signed message stating the same thing, and I will make sure Zach gets it. grnbrg. PS: For the love of the FSM, verify your signature. I have to have probably upwards of 30% of the signed messages I get redone, because they don't verify.... I got .000666 BTC per bond. srsly
why did I get 0.00012543 BTC per bond? Have you notified Lab_Rat that you wished to convert to the new contract? grnbrg.
|
|
|
|
countduckula
|
|
May 11, 2014, 04:29:27 AM |
|
You've been lab_rated... basically, you fund a proyect in good faith and you get scammed by the Honest Zach and coerced to switch to new contracts if you want to be paid what it was yours to start with.
|
|
|
|
1247364403
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
|
|
May 11, 2014, 05:49:06 AM |
|
Whether need to accept the new contract so as to receive the dividends. I have not received this week's dividends. And how to accept the new contract!
:sigh: Email labrat@labratmining.com (from a previously verified address) and state that you want to convert. Or PM me a signed message stating the same thing, and I will make sure Zach gets it. grnbrg. PS: For the love of the FSM, verify your signature. I have to have probably upwards of 30% of the signed messages I get redone, because they don't verify.... I got .000666 BTC per bond. srsly
why did I get 0.00012543 BTC per bond? Have you notified Lab_Rat that you wished to convert to the new contract? grnbrg. I have notified lab_rat today!
|
|
|
|
|
karusloom
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
|
|
May 11, 2014, 06:47:28 AM |
|
I think something not correct with my div...i got like 15 times more compared to last time.
What's your per-contract payment? If you converted to the new contract, it should be roughly 0.000666 BTC. grnbrg. hmm yea that might be correct...but why around 15 times more compared to last time? whatever... Seriously thats way wrong, he never explained anything at all of this. I got paid 0.00004, 15 times less, without a single word on what he was planning.
0.0086 against 0.13 for those to accepted the shady unclear and unexplained new contract.
Just wanted to come here to APPLAUSE for LabLatMining, what a true fuc*ing awesome way to treat investors. If someone should start a legal issue against LRM i would be glad to finance the action. From this day on i would like to see LRM closed for good, hardware distributed and remaining funds returned to they're rightful owners.
|
|
|
|
VinceSamios
|
|
May 11, 2014, 06:52:45 AM |
|
I think something not correct with my div...i got like 15 times more compared to last time.
What's your per-contract payment? If you converted to the new contract, it should be roughly 0.000666 BTC. grnbrg. hmm yea that might be correct...but why around 15 times more compared to last time? whatever... Seriously thats way wrong, he never explained anything at all of this. I got paid 0.00004, 15 times less, without a single word on what he was planning.
0.0086 against 0.13 for those to accepted the shady unclear and unexplained new contract.
Just wanted to come here to APPLAUSE for LabLatMining, what a true fuc*ing awesome way to treat investors. If someone should start a legal issue against LRM i would be glad to finance the action. From this day on i would like to see LRM closed for good, hardware distributed and remaining funds returned to they're rightful owners. lol why? because you didn't follow the correspondence, and you didn't consider the issues, what lab rat was trying to achieve, and the obvious action he (and you) had to take. Folks who are butthurt are butthurt through their own arrogance or ignorance. Folks who had faith in Zach and read about the problems and the possible solutions have been justly rewarded. Thanks Zach - I knew you'd come good.
|
|
|
|
karusloom
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
|
|
May 11, 2014, 07:05:53 AM |
|
Thanks Zach - I knew you'd come good.
WOW lol, ignorance is bliss!!
|
|
|
|
PoUpA
Member
Offline
Activity: 93
Merit: 10
|
|
May 11, 2014, 07:44:31 AM |
|
Seriously thats way wrong, he never explained anything at all of this. I got paid 0.00004, 15 times less, without a single word on what he was planning.
0.0086 against 0.13 for those to accepted the shady unclear and unexplained new contract.
First contract wasn't more clear than the new one. see for yourself : Each 1 bond of LabRatMining represents a portion of the total hashrate owned and operated
by LabRatMining.
This initial amount is guaranteed to be a minimum of 100MH/s per bond, but with future
installments of the company the hashrate per bond will also increase. Depending on the
speed at which the initial offering of bonds is completed, the 100MH/s estimate could raise
rather quickly. It never mention that the portion of the hardware is proportionnal to the total number of bond sold, it's just a portion. Also the inscrease is guaranted ... but not how much so if he add just 1 MH/s he fills his contract. I think lots of ppl including me didn't read the first contract carefully enough. The new contract is not there to screw us, he could have done this with the old one "My 2 centimes of CHF "
|
|
|
|
|