CaptDero (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 308
Merit: 33
|
|
February 21, 2018, 07:41:09 PM |
|
my daemon does no sync past 35700 , what to do ?
2018-02-21 08:59:39.033 [P2P6] INFO global src/cryptonote_core/blockchain.cpp:893 REORGANIZE SUCCESS! on height: 35699, new blockchain size: 35700 2018-02-21 09:01:27.583 [P2P8] INFO global src/cryptonote_protocol/cryptonote_protocol_handler.inl:305 [94.177.179.229:58202 INC] Sync data returned a new top block candidate: 35700 -> 36903 [Your node is 1203 blocks (0 days) behind]
Please provide more information than this. From the supplied logs everything still looks normal. Is it stuck there? What does your daemon conf file look like? Build from current guthub. Started with no special options, but the --add-priority-node list from the forum. always repeating those lines: 2018-02-21 08:59:38.961 [P2P6] ERROR blockchain src/cryptonote_core/blockchain.cpp:1406 insertion of new alternative block returned as it already exist 2018-02-21 08:59:38.961 [P2P6] ERROR blockchain src/cryptonote_core/blockchain.cpp:878 Failed to push ex-main chain blocks to alternative chain 2018-02-21 08:59:38.961 [P2P6] WARN blockchain.db.lmdb src/blockchain_db/lmdb/db_lmdb.cpp:2674 WARNING: batch transaction mode already enabled, but asked to enable batch mode 2018-02-21 08:59:38.993 [P2P6] INFO global src/cryptonote_core/blockchain.cpp:893 REORGANIZE SUCCESS! on height: 35699, new blockchain size: 35700 2018-02-21 08:59:38.993 [P2P6] WARN blockchain.db.lmdb src/blockchain_db/lmdb/db_lmdb.cpp:2674 WARNING: batch transaction mode already enabled, but asked to enable batch mode 2018-02-21 08:59:39.033 [P2P6] INFO global src/cryptonote_core/blockchain.cpp:893 REORGANIZE SUCCESS! on height: 35699, new blockchain size: 35700 2018-02-21 09:01:27.583 [P2P8] INFO global src/cryptonote_protocol/cryptonote_protocol_handler.inl:305 [94.177.179.229:58202 INC] Sync data returned a new top block candidate: 35700 -> 36903 [Your node is 1203 blocks (0 days) behind] SYNCHRONIZATION started 2018-02-21 09:02:54.170 [P2P7] INFO global src/cryptonote_protocol/cryptonote_protocol_handler.inl:305 [198.13.58.131:56578 INC] Sync data returned a new top block candidate: 35700 -> 36904 [Your node is 1204 blocks (0 days) behind] For blockchain sync issues Pls check: https://forum.dero.io/t/dero-blockchain-sync-problem/21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Bitcoin network protocol was designed to be extremely flexible. It can be used to create timed transactions, escrow transactions, multi-signature transactions, etc. The current features of the client only hint at what will be possible in the future.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
sebseb7
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 137
Merit: 0
|
|
February 21, 2018, 07:43:07 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
--Serena--
Member
Offline
Activity: 224
Merit: 11
|
|
February 21, 2018, 09:02:48 PM |
|
Hello, can you delete the "imbd" folder and then resync without the priority node (for now) - (C:\ProgramData\dero\lmdb for most people) You may need to show hidden items in the C drive if you don't have that option enabled to show the "ProgramData" folder. Sorry for my slow response, I usually check this post every 3-4 hours (even at night) but both Capt.Dero and I (separately) are slightly less available for communication for the next 48 hours roughly. With that being said, someone will get back to you as soon as we get a chance.
|
|
|
|
|
CaptDero (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 308
Merit: 33
|
|
February 22, 2018, 02:26:27 AM |
|
Pls visit on slack for real-time discussion, also pls post some details/screens of the problem.
|
|
|
|
danspasiva
|
|
February 22, 2018, 03:14:35 AM |
|
Pls visit on slack for real-time discussion, also pls post some details/screens of the problem. Hey dev, would you be willing to switch over the official chat from slack to Discord? Slack is far less user friendly and extremely vulnerable to spammers. Generally Discord is a lot more convenient in many ways, and i think you'll find it more convenient for the dev team as well.
|
|
|
|
purgs08
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 232
Merit: 0
|
|
February 22, 2018, 04:09:31 AM |
|
The code is a work in progress and I understand that cryptocurrency can be a polarizing topic at times. So with that being said, I would like to ask that we keep the focus of discussions on the code, functionality, and utility as much as possible.
We encourage you to follow the code as it evolves on GitHub. We welcome thoughtful and constructive discussion about this project as it grows.
|
|
|
|
CaptDero (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 308
Merit: 33
|
|
February 22, 2018, 04:39:31 AM |
|
Pls visit on slack for real-time discussion, also pls post some details/screens of the problem. Hey dev, would you be willing to switch over the official chat from slack to Discord? Slack is far less user friendly and extremely vulnerable to spammers. Generally Discord is a lot more convenient in many ways, and i think you'll find it more convenient for the dev team as well. Thanks, Will try to evaluate.
|
|
|
|
miner.rocks
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 180
Merit: 2
|
|
February 22, 2018, 10:03:27 AM |
|
always repeating those lines:
2018-02-21 08:59:38.961 [P2P6] ERROR blockchain src/cryptonote_core/blockchain.cpp:1406 insertion of new alternative block returned as it already exist 2018-02-21 08:59:38.961 [P2P6] ERROR blockchain src/cryptonote_core/blockchain.cpp:878 Failed to push ex-main chain blocks to alternative chain 2018-02-21 08:59:38.961 [P2P6] WARN blockchain.db.lmdb src/blockchain_db/lmdb/db_lmdb.cpp:2674 WARNING: batch transaction mode already enabled, but asked to enable batch mode 2018-02-21 08:59:38.993 [P2P6] INFO global src/cryptonote_core/blockchain.cpp:893 REORGANIZE SUCCESS! on height: 35699, new blockchain size: 35700 2018-02-21 08:59:38.993 [P2P6] WARN blockchain.db.lmdb src/blockchain_db/lmdb/db_lmdb.cpp:2674 WARNING: batch transaction mode already enabled, but asked to enable batch mode 2018-02-21 08:59:39.033 [P2P6] INFO global src/cryptonote_core/blockchain.cpp:893 REORGANIZE SUCCESS! on height: 35699, new blockchain size: 35700 2018-02-21 09:01:27.583 [P2P8] INFO global src/cryptonote_protocol/cryptonote_protocol_handler.inl:305 [94.177.179.229:58202 INC] Sync data returned a new top block candidate: 35700 -> 36903 [Your node is 1203 blocks (0 days) behind] SYNCHRONIZATION started 2018-02-21 09:02:54.170 [P2P7] INFO global src/cryptonote_protocol/cryptonote_protocol_handler.inl:305 [198.13.58.131:56578 INC] Sync data returned a new top block candidate: 35700 -> 36904 [Your node is 1204 blocks (0 days) behind]
Had the same issue, at the same height. Used daily snapshot of ".dero" folder to recover.
|
https://miner.rocks pplns cryptonote pools with email alerts and workers stats
|
|
|
sb054
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 159
Merit: 1
|
|
February 22, 2018, 11:41:44 AM |
|
------------------------------------------ Total supply 18 millions coins group ------------------------------------------ Estimate Mining Profits 1Kh/s per day 1.IRIDIUM ----> 181 IRD/day....@29.01.18 --> 131.91 IRD/day 2.B2BCOIN --> 147 B2B/day.... @29.01.18 --> 239.14 B2B/day 3.FONERO ----> 43 FNO/day....@29.01.18 --> 51.42 FNO/day 4.MASARI -----> 14 MSR/day....@29.01.18 --> 23.01 MSR/day 5.DERO ------> 2.81 DERO/day....@02.02.18 -->4.46 DERO/day ----------------------------------------- PRICE https://stocks.exchange 24hr Max 1.DERO ---------> 6197 sat 2.MASARI ------> 1199 sat. 3.FONERO ------ > 350 sat 4.B2BCOIN ------> 121 sat 5.IRIDIUM --------> ----------------------------------------- BUY ORDERS https://stocks.exchange1.DERO ---------> Total: 2.142468 BTC ....@02.02.18 -->Total: 1.59 BTC 2.B2BCOIN -----> Total: 0.385259 BTC.... @29.01.18 --> Total: 0.24 BTC 3.MASARI ------> Total: 0.189459 BTC.... @29.01.18 --> Total: 0.05 BTC 4.FONERO ------> Total: 0.079054 BTC.... @29.01.18 --> Total: 0.16 BTC 5.IRIDIUM ------> ------------------------------------------ Network Hash Rate: 1.DERO -------> 7,500 KH/sec 2.MASARI -------> 940 KH/sec 3.FONERO -------> 453 KH/sec 4.B2BCOIN -----> 214 KH/sec 5.IRIDIUM -------> 188 KH/sec ------------------------------------------ telegram 1.B2BCOIN --> 366 members --> https://t.me/joinchat/Fxlb2Qw8ivAta7iYgM0Wiw2.FONERO ---> 344 members --> https://t.me/fonero_en3.MASARI ---> 132 members --> https://t.me/masaricurrency4.IRIDIUM ---> 60 members --> https://t.me/joinchat/AAAAAFFYZHVsFzYRtn_Dbw5.DERO -----> ---------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
banshren
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
|
|
February 22, 2018, 04:26:26 PM |
|
------------------------------------------ Total supply 18 millions coins group ------------------------------------------ Estimate Mining Profits 1Kh/s per day 1.IRIDIUM ----> 181 IRD/day....@29.01.18 --> 131.91 IRD/day 2.B2BCOIN --> 147 B2B/day.... @29.01.18 --> 239.14 B2B/day 3.FONERO ----> 43 FNO/day....@29.01.18 --> 51.42 FNO/day 4.MASARI -----> 14 MSR/day....@29.01.18 --> 23.01 MSR/day 5.DERO ------> 2.81 DERO/day....@02.02.18 -->4.46 DERO/day ----------------------------------------- PRICE https://stocks.exchange 24hr Max 1.DERO ---------> 6197 sat 2.MASARI ------> 1199 sat. 3.FONERO ------ > 350 sat 4.B2BCOIN ------> 121 sat 5.IRIDIUM --------> ----------------------------------------- BUY ORDERS https://stocks.exchange1.DERO ---------> Total: 2.142468 BTC ....@02.02.18 -->Total: 1.59 BTC 2.B2BCOIN -----> Total: 0.385259 BTC.... @29.01.18 --> Total: 0.24 BTC 3.MASARI ------> Total: 0.189459 BTC.... @29.01.18 --> Total: 0.05 BTC 4.FONERO ------> Total: 0.079054 BTC.... @29.01.18 --> Total: 0.16 BTC 5.IRIDIUM ------> ------------------------------------------ Network Hash Rate: 1.DERO -------> 7,500 KH/sec 2.MASARI -------> 940 KH/sec 3.FONERO -------> 453 KH/sec 4.B2BCOIN -----> 214 KH/sec 5.IRIDIUM -------> 188 KH/sec ------------------------------------------ telegram 1.B2BCOIN --> 366 members --> https://t.me/joinchat/Fxlb2Qw8ivAta7iYgM0Wiw2.FONERO ---> 344 members --> https://t.me/fonero_en3.MASARI ---> 132 members --> https://t.me/masaricurrency4.IRIDIUM ---> 60 members --> https://t.me/joinchat/AAAAAFFYZHVsFzYRtn_Dbw5.DERO -----> --------------------------------------- which coin have good profit for miners?
|
|
|
|
krypt0id
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 148
Merit: 2
|
|
February 22, 2018, 04:31:50 PM |
|
------------------------------------------ Total supply 18 millions coins group ------------------------------------------ Estimate Mining Profits 1Kh/s per day 1.IRIDIUM ----> 181 IRD/day....@29.01.18 --> 131.91 IRD/day 2.B2BCOIN --> 147 B2B/day.... @29.01.18 --> 239.14 B2B/day 3.FONERO ----> 43 FNO/day....@29.01.18 --> 51.42 FNO/day 4.MASARI -----> 14 MSR/day....@29.01.18 --> 23.01 MSR/day 5.DERO ------> 2.81 DERO/day....@02.02.18 -->4.46 DERO/day ----------------------------------------- PRICE https://stocks.exchange 24hr Max 1.DERO ---------> 6197 sat 2.MASARI ------> 1199 sat. 3.FONERO ------ > 350 sat 4.B2BCOIN ------> 121 sat 5.IRIDIUM --------> ----------------------------------------- BUY ORDERS https://stocks.exchange1.DERO ---------> Total: 2.142468 BTC ....@02.02.18 -->Total: 1.59 BTC 2.B2BCOIN -----> Total: 0.385259 BTC.... @29.01.18 --> Total: 0.24 BTC 3.MASARI ------> Total: 0.189459 BTC.... @29.01.18 --> Total: 0.05 BTC 4.FONERO ------> Total: 0.079054 BTC.... @29.01.18 --> Total: 0.16 BTC 5.IRIDIUM ------> ------------------------------------------ Network Hash Rate: 1.DERO -------> 7,500 KH/sec 2.MASARI -------> 940 KH/sec 3.FONERO -------> 453 KH/sec 4.B2BCOIN -----> 214 KH/sec 5.IRIDIUM -------> 188 KH/sec ------------------------------------------ telegram 1.B2BCOIN --> 366 members --> https://t.me/joinchat/Fxlb2Qw8ivAta7iYgM0Wiw2.FONERO ---> 344 members --> https://t.me/fonero_en3.MASARI ---> 132 members --> https://t.me/masaricurrency4.IRIDIUM ---> 60 members --> https://t.me/joinchat/AAAAAFFYZHVsFzYRtn_Dbw5.DERO -----> --------------------------------------- Nice work as always! I was wondering if you were going to post this info again, very useful.
|
DERO - Secure. Private. Smart Contracts.
|
|
|
PesoAmericano
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 71
Merit: 1
|
|
February 22, 2018, 05:05:03 PM |
|
Is it vaible to have a "deposits" option like XDN has? It pays you for having coins deposited like some kind of strange yet useful PoS.
|
|
|
|
MagicSmoker
|
|
February 22, 2018, 06:04:20 PM |
|
Is it vaible to have a "deposits" option like XDN has? It pays you for having coins deposited like some kind of strange yet useful PoS.
You seem to be fixated on earning interest from your (shit-)coin and trying to get DERO to be something it isn't; might I suggest Bitbeans (BITB)/Beancash (BEAN) or Trezarcoin (TZC) instead?
|
|
|
|
krypt0id
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 148
Merit: 2
|
|
February 22, 2018, 06:19:11 PM |
|
Is it vaible to have a "deposits" option like XDN has? It pays you for having coins deposited like some kind of strange yet useful PoS.
You seem to be fixated on earning interest from your (shit-)coin and trying to get DERO to be something it isn't; might I suggest Bitbeans (BITB)/Beancash (BEAN) or Trezarcoin (TZC) instead? Be nice.
|
DERO - Secure. Private. Smart Contracts.
|
|
|
MagicSmoker
|
|
February 22, 2018, 06:59:37 PM |
|
Is it vaible to have a "deposits" option like XDN has? It pays you for having coins deposited like some kind of strange yet useful PoS.
You seem to be fixated on earning interest from your (shit-)coin and trying to get DERO to be something it isn't; might I suggest Bitbeans (BITB)/Beancash (BEAN) or Trezarcoin (TZC) instead? Be nice. That *is* nice for me... Also, I actually have 2500 of Bitbean and have mined >800 and counting of Trezarcoin, so I wasn't recommending anything I didn't find at least marginally worthwhile myself.
|
|
|
|
cpmcgrat
Member
Offline
Activity: 223
Merit: 21
DCAB
|
|
February 22, 2018, 11:40:59 PM |
|
Is it vaible to have a "deposits" option like XDN has? It pays you for having coins deposited like some kind of strange yet useful PoS.
You seem to be fixated on earning interest from your (shit-)coin and trying to get DERO to be something it isn't; might I suggest Bitbeans (BITB)/Beancash (BEAN) or Trezarcoin (TZC) instead? Be nice. That *is* nice for me... Also, I actually have 2500 of Bitbean and have mined >800 and counting of Trezarcoin, so I wasn't recommending anything I didn't find at least marginally worthwhile myself. That is a completely counter-productive attitude. Dero is so new it can still be foundationally changed by discourse between the devs and stakeholders or directly by technical stakeholders themselves. With any new organization it is important to be nimble and find product-market fit as fast as possible. If the market (users) are saying they want a new feature, they're much more likely to get it in a newer coin than an established one as their word has more clout. When I do DD, I don't look at what the coin promises to offer (*cough* bitconnect *cough*). I instead look at the team and their commitment to making the project as a whole a success. This is the investment strategy used by top VC firms (Sequoia, Lightspeed, Andreesen-Horowitz, Kliener-Perkins, etc) in the Valley and by many successful institutional investors. You invest in the people, not the project. CaptDero has proven to be an active and engaged developer offering new code and ideas to the crypto world. That is why I have turned all of my hashpower and attention to Dero now while it is still in its infancy.
|
Member, Dero Community Advisory Board (DCAB)
|
|
|
MagicSmoker
|
|
February 23, 2018, 12:08:03 AM |
|
Is it vaible to have a "deposits" option like XDN has? It pays you for having coins deposited like some kind of strange yet useful PoS.
You seem to be fixated on earning interest from your (shit-)coin and trying to get DERO to be something it isn't; might I suggest Bitbeans (BITB)/Beancash (BEAN) or Trezarcoin (TZC) instead? Be nice. That *is* nice for me... Also, I actually have 2500 of Bitbean and have mined >800 and counting of Trezarcoin, so I wasn't recommending anything I didn't find at least marginally worthwhile myself. That is a completely counter-productive attitude. Perhaps, but I take the rather reasonable position that no one coin can be all things to all people. DERO already has an interesting set of features that make it a promising prospect - not least of which is a dev who is active here - so why saddle on more crap like masternodes? The point of my previous rebuttal was quite simple: invest in a variety of coins that serve different functions or market niches. In other words, don't ask Satoshi - if you can even find him/her - to implement smart, anonymous contracts on the BTC blockchain. I think DERO has real promise, but I am also sanguine about this nascent crypto market with its menagerie of >1000 coins; one might even say a little cynical, due in no small part to my experience actively trading stocks/options during the dotcom bubble... and bust. For every Amazon.com there were a hundred webvan and pets.com and other ill-fated dot bombs. Mind you, I've not only pointed a majority of my Cryptonight hashrate at DERO for most of the last 2 months, I've even been buying more GPUs specifically for it, but I am not allocating /every/ GPU and CPU I have at mining DERO because I never go all in on one bet.
|
|
|
|
|
--Serena--
Member
Offline
Activity: 224
Merit: 11
|
|
February 23, 2018, 02:29:03 AM |
|
The code is a work in progress and I understand that cryptocurrency can be a polarizing topic at times. So with that being said, I would like to ask that we keep the focus of discussions on the code, functionality, and utility as much as possible.
We encourage you to follow the code as it evolves on GitHub. We welcome thoughtful and constructive discussion about this project as it grows.
That was a comment I posted on Reddit ( https://www.reddit.com/r/golang/comments/7y9vjw/dero_cryptonote_protocol_smart_contracts_using/dueqkfs/) I don't understand the purpose of your post?
|
|
|
|
|