Bitcoin Forum
May 05, 2024, 03:47:54 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 [319] 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 ... 538 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] profit switching auto-exchanging pool - www.middlecoin.com  (Read 829874 times)
foodies123
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 322
Merit: 250


View Profile
January 19, 2014, 12:00:09 AM
 #6361

The chinamen was speaking of 4mh he had. Yes, that would lead to a decrease in earnings. Now, if 3 or 4 others decide to have the same idea they will learn what this chinamen learned - the margins are only profitable under specific circumstances and that is met when hashing power < opportunity. Once you have more hashing power than the opportunity for it, you are left with coins you must dump below market value - that makes it less profitable for everyone. Why do you think the guy left? He realized that in such a small market like alt coin arbitrage, he is his own worse enemy with that much hash power.
you do realize 'chinamen' makes you sound as uneducated as if you still called people 'negroes'.

The term has no negative connotations in older dictionaries. This is just some myth substantiated by neo-liberals and such looking to eliminate distinctions between peoples.
I think i know where you're coming from.  

welcome to 2014.

Heck... welcome to the 1990s.  I seriously have not heard anyone use that term in twenty years.  I encourage you to find an english speaking friend of chinese decent,  and have him explain why that term is awful.   While you are at it,  you can ask him about the term oriental,  which is almost as awful and comes from the sameish timeframe and is also associated with imperialism.  

Anyway... back on topic,  has anyone tried switchercoin? How does the profit between the two pools differ?  Any thoughts on why middlecoin might be better,  aside from it giving payouts in bitcoin?
Against my better judgement, I'm simply going to say, it gets really tiresome having to worry about what somebody else thinks is offensive.

-- Using "you" in the generic sense -- The world is not your pearl, you have no right not to be offended, and if you are, then it says a heck of a lot more about you than it does the person from whose action or words you take offense.

Political correctness is destroying this world.  Everyone takes offense at everything so the truth can't be stated.  If you can't speak about a problem and it's causes, then you will never solve it.  It is nothing more than censorship.

Now back to mining.

it's a matter of respect.. by that sentiment, respective is destroying the world.. you're able to voice your opinion, hence no censorship.. ignorance, however, could be considered a contributing factor to "destroying the world"..

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/liberal
marked by generosity :  openhanded


nope
The block chain is the main innovation of Bitcoin. It is the first distributed timestamping system.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714880874
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714880874

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714880874
Reply with quote  #2

1714880874
Report to moderator
bitter_miner
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 39
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 19, 2014, 12:17:44 AM
 #6362

This is the Middlecoin Thread, can we get back to talking about that?

this is more fun.. the thread has lost it's purpose many moons ago..
Catswold
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 251



View Profile
January 19, 2014, 12:42:07 AM
 #6363

Against my better judgement, I'm simply going to say, it gets really tiresome having to worry about what somebody else thinks is offensive.

-- Using "you" in the generic sense -- The world is not your pearl, you have no right not to be offended, and if you are, then it says a heck of a lot more about you than it does the person from whose action or words you take offense.
i merely pointed out that to use words like that was to portray himself as uneducated.

who said they're offended?  You're the first person to claim offense. You're fighting a strawman.
Sorry, did I address you?  Nevermind, both Your and bitter-miner's comments were intellectually dishonest.  The implied sense of offense is in the original comment taking exception to the word "chinamen."  So the absence of the precise word is irrelevant.
And using the dictionary definition of "liberal" reveals nothing of the modern connotation of the word with which everyone in the Western world, at least, is familiar.

Sophistry won't fly here.

NOW, How about those profit numbers today, kiddies?
dgross0818
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 308
Merit: 146



View Profile
January 19, 2014, 12:44:06 AM
 #6364

On startup or while it was running? If it's "only" a VRAM ripple capacitor that blew, then you might be able to still run the card fine :]
On topic - Payout looks to be good today (or at least in-line with current exchange rates), however, my rejects have been up quite a bit in the past 12 hours or so...
I don't see too many others around me with similar issues, so most likely it's a latency thing
Edit: and now they're trending back down... guess the issue resolved iteself

The computer shut down. Then sparks flew when I started it.
Yup, sounds like you blew one or more caps on startup. If you have a Gigabyte card and only one cap blew, there's a good chance the card will probably still work. I have 2 or 3 cards like this now, and they are still hashing fine. Poor design means the back of the PCB in this area can reach 100C+ very easily, ultimately leading to what you experienced.

OT: Payout looks decent today... long live DOGE :]
Dawes
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 13
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 19, 2014, 12:48:50 AM
 #6365

The last week or so I averaged 13.5 mBTC/Mh, which is fine by me. ty h20 Smiley
zneww
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 250



View Profile
January 19, 2014, 12:50:53 AM
 #6366

Just hooked up to this Smiley looks promising. everyone seems happy?
bitter_miner
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 39
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 19, 2014, 12:51:06 AM
 #6367

Against my better judgement, I'm simply going to say, it gets really tiresome having to worry about what somebody else thinks is offensive.

-- Using "you" in the generic sense -- The world is not your pearl, you have no right not to be offended, and if you are, then it says a heck of a lot more about you than it does the person from whose action or words you take offense.
i merely pointed out that to use words like that was to portray himself as uneducated.

who said they're offended?  You're the first person to claim offense. You're fighting a strawman.
Sorry, did I address you?  Nevermind, both Your and bitter-miner's comments were intellectually dishonest.  The implied sense of offense is in the original comment taking exception to the word "chinamen."  So the absence of the precise word is irrelevant.
And using the dictionary definition of "liberal" reveals nothing of the modern connotation of the word with which everyone in the Western world, at least, is familiar.

Sophistry won't fly here.

NOW, How about those profit numbers today, kiddies?

i totally agree, meanings of words are completely irrelevant.. no point in reading a dictionary.. they're also "intellectually dishonest" and don't cover the meaning of liberalism..
Catswold
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 251



View Profile
January 19, 2014, 12:59:42 AM
 #6368

Against my better judgement, I'm simply going to say, it gets really tiresome having to worry about what somebody else thinks is offensive.

-- Using "you" in the generic sense -- The world is not your pearl, you have no right not to be offended, and if you are, then it says a heck of a lot more about you than it does the person from whose action or words you take offense.
i merely pointed out that to use words like that was to portray himself as uneducated.

who said they're offended?  You're the first person to claim offense. You're fighting a strawman.
Sorry, did I address you?  Nevermind, both Your and bitter-miner's comments were intellectually dishonest.  The implied sense of offense is in the original comment taking exception to the word "chinamen."  So the absence of the precise word is irrelevant.
And using the dictionary definition of "liberal" reveals nothing of the modern connotation of the word with which everyone in the Western world, at least, is familiar.

Sophistry won't fly here.

NOW, How about those profit numbers today, kiddies?

i totally agree, meanings of words are completely irrelevant.. no point in reading a dictionary.. they're also "intellectually dishonest" and don't cover the meaning of liberalism..
A person who only knows the dictionary definitions of words is an illiterate in the real world.  ARe you "gay," happy, or "gay," homosexual?  The second is quite recent in dictionaries, but most of us knew the second definition as everyday speech long before.
kalus
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420
Merit: 263

let's make a deal.


View Profile
January 19, 2014, 01:01:27 AM
 #6369

who said they're offended?  You're the first person to claim offense. You're fighting a strawman.
Sorry, did I address you?  Nevermind, both Your and bitter-miner's comments were intellectually dishonest.  The implied sense of offense is in the original comment taking exception to the word "chinamen."  So the absence of the precise word is irrelevant.
you seem to be far more offended by 'political correctness'  than anything said here. 

in fact, that was the first time that offense was raised. 

and my profitability is great today, thanks for asking.

DC2ngEGbd1ZUKyj8aSzrP1W5TXs5WmPuiR wow need noms
zneww
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 250



View Profile
January 19, 2014, 01:01:56 AM
 #6370

middlecoin.com seems to have some drama


Catswold
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 251



View Profile
January 19, 2014, 01:03:32 AM
 #6371

middlecoin.com seems to have some drama



Nah, just entertainment.
Catswold
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 251



View Profile
January 19, 2014, 01:05:25 AM
 #6372

who said they're offended?  You're the first person to claim offense. You're fighting a strawman.
Sorry, did I address you?  Nevermind, both Your and bitter-miner's comments were intellectually dishonest.  The implied sense of offense is in the original comment taking exception to the word "chinamen."  So the absence of the precise word is irrelevant.
you seem to be far more offended by 'political correctness'  than anything said here. 

in fact, that was the first time that offense was raised. 

and my profitability is great today, thanks for asking.
Yeah, probably am.

anyway, someone attributed the profits to DOGE, but I don't see how he could know.
ButterBread
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84
Merit: 10


View Profile
January 19, 2014, 01:06:11 AM
 #6373

Please people, just treat the rock with respect and we'll all be fine.
bitter_miner
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 39
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 19, 2014, 01:09:15 AM
 #6374

Against my better judgement, I'm simply going to say, it gets really tiresome having to worry about what somebody else thinks is offensive.

-- Using "you" in the generic sense -- The world is not your pearl, you have no right not to be offended, and if you are, then it says a heck of a lot more about you than it does the person from whose action or words you take offense.
i merely pointed out that to use words like that was to portray himself as uneducated.

who said they're offended?  You're the first person to claim offense. You're fighting a strawman.
Sorry, did I address you?  Nevermind, both Your and bitter-miner's comments were intellectually dishonest.  The implied sense of offense is in the original comment taking exception to the word "chinamen."  So the absence of the precise word is irrelevant.
And using the dictionary definition of "liberal" reveals nothing of the modern connotation of the word with which everyone in the Western world, at least, is familiar.

Sophistry won't fly here.

NOW, How about those profit numbers today, kiddies?

i totally agree, meanings of words are completely irrelevant.. no point in reading a dictionary.. they're also "intellectually dishonest" and don't cover the meaning of liberalism..
A person who only knows the dictionary definitions of words is an illiterate in the real world.  ARe you "gay," happy, or "gay," homosexual?  The second is quite recent in dictionaries, but most of us knew the second definition as everyday speech long before.

stupid words.. i had no idea.. no idea..
Catswold
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 251



View Profile
January 19, 2014, 01:09:43 AM
 #6375

Please people, just treat the rock with respect and we'll all be fine.

The rock is good.  The rock is wise.  The rock is life.
Catswold
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 251



View Profile
January 19, 2014, 01:11:26 AM
 #6376

Against my better judgement, I'm simply going to say, it gets really tiresome having to worry about what somebody else thinks is offensive.

-- Using "you" in the generic sense -- The world is not your pearl, you have no right not to be offended, and if you are, then it says a heck of a lot more about you than it does the person from whose action or words you take offense.
i merely pointed out that to use words like that was to portray himself as uneducated.

who said they're offended?  You're the first person to claim offense. You're fighting a strawman.
Sorry, did I address you?  Nevermind, both Your and bitter-miner's comments were intellectually dishonest.  The implied sense of offense is in the original comment taking exception to the word "chinamen."  So the absence of the precise word is irrelevant.
And using the dictionary definition of "liberal" reveals nothing of the modern connotation of the word with which everyone in the Western world, at least, is familiar.

Sophistry won't fly here.

NOW, How about those profit numbers today, kiddies?

i totally agree, meanings of words are completely irrelevant.. no point in reading a dictionary.. they're also "intellectually dishonest" and don't cover the meaning of liberalism..
A person who only knows the dictionary definitions of words is an illiterate in the real world.  ARe you "gay," happy, or "gay," homosexual?  The second is quite recent in dictionaries, but most of us knew the second definition as everyday speech long before.

stupid words.. i had no idea.. no idea..
Not a response, sport, a cop-out.  See it all the time, people who can't respond reasonably, so they attempt to be dismissive.  Won't wash.
RickJamesBTC
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 250


View Profile
January 19, 2014, 01:18:14 AM
 #6377

Why don't you two go hug it out.

MODS!! Cleanup aisle 10.
jedimstr
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 798
Merit: 1000



View Profile
January 19, 2014, 01:20:42 AM
 #6378


bitter_miner
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 39
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 19, 2014, 01:25:02 AM
 #6379

Against my better judgement, I'm simply going to say, it gets really tiresome having to worry about what somebody else thinks is offensive.

-- Using "you" in the generic sense -- The world is not your pearl, you have no right not to be offended, and if you are, then it says a heck of a lot more about you than it does the person from whose action or words you take offense.
i merely pointed out that to use words like that was to portray himself as uneducated.

who said they're offended?  You're the first person to claim offense. You're fighting a strawman.
Sorry, did I address you?  Nevermind, both Your and bitter-miner's comments were intellectually dishonest.  The implied sense of offense is in the original comment taking exception to the word "chinamen."  So the absence of the precise word is irrelevant.
And using the dictionary definition of "liberal" reveals nothing of the modern connotation of the word with which everyone in the Western world, at least, is familiar.

Sophistry won't fly here.

NOW, How about those profit numbers today, kiddies?

i totally agree, meanings of words are completely irrelevant.. no point in reading a dictionary.. they're also "intellectually dishonest" and don't cover the meaning of liberalism..
A person who only knows the dictionary definitions of words is an illiterate in the real world.  ARe you "gay," happy, or "gay," homosexual?  The second is quite recent in dictionaries, but most of us knew the second definition as everyday speech long before.

stupid words.. i had no idea.. no idea..
Not a response, sport, a cop-out.  See it all the time, people who can't respond reasonably, so they attempt to be dismissive.  Won't wash.


i walk away, humbled and ashamed.. sometimes in life, a circle has no end..
bal3wolf
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 250

Power to the people!


View Profile
January 19, 2014, 01:26:06 AM
 #6380

Why don't you two go hug it out.

MODS!! Cleanup aisle 10.

lol mods could clean up 99.9% of the posts here that arent helping at all and on another note a great day today last 2 weeks have been pretty good for me only about 2-3 days i didnt go over 0.03 for 2-2.4mhash In 24 days on middlecoin i made .70 btc.
Pages: « 1 ... 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 [319] 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 ... 538 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!