foodies123
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 19, 2014, 12:00:09 AM |
|
The chinamen was speaking of 4mh he had. Yes, that would lead to a decrease in earnings. Now, if 3 or 4 others decide to have the same idea they will learn what this chinamen learned - the margins are only profitable under specific circumstances and that is met when hashing power < opportunity. Once you have more hashing power than the opportunity for it, you are left with coins you must dump below market value - that makes it less profitable for everyone. Why do you think the guy left? He realized that in such a small market like alt coin arbitrage, he is his own worse enemy with that much hash power.
you do realize 'chinamen' makes you sound as uneducated as if you still called people 'negroes'. The term has no negative connotations in older dictionaries. This is just some myth substantiated by neo-liberals and such looking to eliminate distinctions between peoples. I think i know where you're coming from. welcome to 2014. Heck... welcome to the 1990s. I seriously have not heard anyone use that term in twenty years. I encourage you to find an english speaking friend of chinese decent, and have him explain why that term is awful. While you are at it, you can ask him about the term oriental, which is almost as awful and comes from the sameish timeframe and is also associated with imperialism. Anyway... back on topic, has anyone tried switchercoin? How does the profit between the two pools differ? Any thoughts on why middlecoin might be better, aside from it giving payouts in bitcoin? Against my better judgement, I'm simply going to say, it gets really tiresome having to worry about what somebody else thinks is offensive. -- Using "you" in the generic sense -- The world is not your pearl, you have no right not to be offended, and if you are, then it says a heck of a lot more about you than it does the person from whose action or words you take offense. Political correctness is destroying this world. Everyone takes offense at everything so the truth can't be stated. If you can't speak about a problem and it's causes, then you will never solve it. It is nothing more than censorship. Now back to mining. it's a matter of respect.. by that sentiment, respective is destroying the world.. you're able to voice your opinion, hence no censorship.. ignorance, however, could be considered a contributing factor to "destroying the world".. http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/liberalmarked by generosity : openhanded ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fi3.kym-cdn.com%2Fphotos%2Fimages%2Fnewsfeed%2F000%2F491%2F680%2F171.jpg&t=665&c=YpaBs1bWPHmDtA)
|
nope
|
|
|
bitter_miner
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 39
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 19, 2014, 12:17:44 AM |
|
This is the Middlecoin Thread, can we get back to talking about that?
this is more fun.. the thread has lost it's purpose many moons ago..
|
|
|
|
Catswold
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 19, 2014, 12:42:07 AM |
|
Against my better judgement, I'm simply going to say, it gets really tiresome having to worry about what somebody else thinks is offensive.
-- Using "you" in the generic sense -- The world is not your pearl, you have no right not to be offended, and if you are, then it says a heck of a lot more about you than it does the person from whose action or words you take offense. i merely pointed out that to use words like that was to portray himself as uneducated. who said they're offended? You're the first person to claim offense. You're fighting a strawman. Sorry, did I address you? Nevermind, both Your and bitter-miner's comments were intellectually dishonest. The implied sense of offense is in the original comment taking exception to the word "chinamen." So the absence of the precise word is irrelevant. And using the dictionary definition of "liberal" reveals nothing of the modern connotation of the word with which everyone in the Western world, at least, is familiar. Sophistry won't fly here. NOW, How about those profit numbers today, kiddies?
|
|
|
|
dgross0818
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 19, 2014, 12:44:06 AM |
|
On startup or while it was running? If it's "only" a VRAM ripple capacitor that blew, then you might be able to still run the card fine :] On topic - Payout looks to be good today (or at least in-line with current exchange rates), however, my rejects have been up quite a bit in the past 12 hours or so... I don't see too many others around me with similar issues, so most likely it's a latency thing Edit: and now they're trending back down... guess the issue resolved iteself
The computer shut down. Then sparks flew when I started it. Yup, sounds like you blew one or more caps on startup. If you have a Gigabyte card and only one cap blew, there's a good chance the card will probably still work. I have 2 or 3 cards like this now, and they are still hashing fine. Poor design means the back of the PCB in this area can reach 100C+ very easily, ultimately leading to what you experienced. OT: Payout looks decent today... long live DOGE :]
|
|
|
|
Dawes
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 19, 2014, 12:48:50 AM |
|
The last week or so I averaged 13.5 mBTC/Mh, which is fine by me. ty h20 ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
|
zneww
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 19, 2014, 12:50:53 AM |
|
Just hooked up to this ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) looks promising. everyone seems happy?
|
|
|
|
bitter_miner
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 39
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 19, 2014, 12:51:06 AM |
|
Against my better judgement, I'm simply going to say, it gets really tiresome having to worry about what somebody else thinks is offensive.
-- Using "you" in the generic sense -- The world is not your pearl, you have no right not to be offended, and if you are, then it says a heck of a lot more about you than it does the person from whose action or words you take offense. i merely pointed out that to use words like that was to portray himself as uneducated. who said they're offended? You're the first person to claim offense. You're fighting a strawman. Sorry, did I address you? Nevermind, both Your and bitter-miner's comments were intellectually dishonest. The implied sense of offense is in the original comment taking exception to the word "chinamen." So the absence of the precise word is irrelevant. And using the dictionary definition of "liberal" reveals nothing of the modern connotation of the word with which everyone in the Western world, at least, is familiar. Sophistry won't fly here. NOW, How about those profit numbers today, kiddies? i totally agree, meanings of words are completely irrelevant.. no point in reading a dictionary.. they're also "intellectually dishonest" and don't cover the meaning of liberalism..
|
|
|
|
Catswold
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 19, 2014, 12:59:42 AM |
|
Against my better judgement, I'm simply going to say, it gets really tiresome having to worry about what somebody else thinks is offensive.
-- Using "you" in the generic sense -- The world is not your pearl, you have no right not to be offended, and if you are, then it says a heck of a lot more about you than it does the person from whose action or words you take offense. i merely pointed out that to use words like that was to portray himself as uneducated. who said they're offended? You're the first person to claim offense. You're fighting a strawman. Sorry, did I address you? Nevermind, both Your and bitter-miner's comments were intellectually dishonest. The implied sense of offense is in the original comment taking exception to the word "chinamen." So the absence of the precise word is irrelevant. And using the dictionary definition of "liberal" reveals nothing of the modern connotation of the word with which everyone in the Western world, at least, is familiar. Sophistry won't fly here. NOW, How about those profit numbers today, kiddies? i totally agree, meanings of words are completely irrelevant.. no point in reading a dictionary.. they're also "intellectually dishonest" and don't cover the meaning of liberalism.. A person who only knows the dictionary definitions of words is an illiterate in the real world. ARe you "gay," happy, or "gay," homosexual? The second is quite recent in dictionaries, but most of us knew the second definition as everyday speech long before.
|
|
|
|
kalus
Sr. Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 420
Merit: 263
let's make a deal.
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 19, 2014, 01:01:27 AM |
|
who said they're offended? You're the first person to claim offense. You're fighting a strawman.
Sorry, did I address you? Nevermind, both Your and bitter-miner's comments were intellectually dishonest. The implied sense of offense is in the original comment taking exception to the word "chinamen." So the absence of the precise word is irrelevant. you seem to be far more offended by 'political correctness' than anything said here. in fact, that was the first time that offense was raised. and my profitability is great today, thanks for asking.
|
DC2ngEGbd1ZUKyj8aSzrP1W5TXs5WmPuiR wow need noms
|
|
|
zneww
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 19, 2014, 01:01:56 AM |
|
middlecoin.com seems to have some drama
|
|
|
|
Catswold
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 19, 2014, 01:03:32 AM |
|
middlecoin.com seems to have some drama
Nah, just entertainment.
|
|
|
|
Catswold
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 19, 2014, 01:05:25 AM |
|
who said they're offended? You're the first person to claim offense. You're fighting a strawman.
Sorry, did I address you? Nevermind, both Your and bitter-miner's comments were intellectually dishonest. The implied sense of offense is in the original comment taking exception to the word "chinamen." So the absence of the precise word is irrelevant. you seem to be far more offended by 'political correctness' than anything said here. in fact, that was the first time that offense was raised. and my profitability is great today, thanks for asking. Yeah, probably am. anyway, someone attributed the profits to DOGE, but I don't see how he could know.
|
|
|
|
ButterBread
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 19, 2014, 01:06:11 AM |
|
Please people, just treat the rock with respect and we'll all be fine.
|
|
|
|
bitter_miner
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 39
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 19, 2014, 01:09:15 AM |
|
Against my better judgement, I'm simply going to say, it gets really tiresome having to worry about what somebody else thinks is offensive.
-- Using "you" in the generic sense -- The world is not your pearl, you have no right not to be offended, and if you are, then it says a heck of a lot more about you than it does the person from whose action or words you take offense. i merely pointed out that to use words like that was to portray himself as uneducated. who said they're offended? You're the first person to claim offense. You're fighting a strawman. Sorry, did I address you? Nevermind, both Your and bitter-miner's comments were intellectually dishonest. The implied sense of offense is in the original comment taking exception to the word "chinamen." So the absence of the precise word is irrelevant. And using the dictionary definition of "liberal" reveals nothing of the modern connotation of the word with which everyone in the Western world, at least, is familiar. Sophistry won't fly here. NOW, How about those profit numbers today, kiddies? i totally agree, meanings of words are completely irrelevant.. no point in reading a dictionary.. they're also "intellectually dishonest" and don't cover the meaning of liberalism.. A person who only knows the dictionary definitions of words is an illiterate in the real world. ARe you "gay," happy, or "gay," homosexual? The second is quite recent in dictionaries, but most of us knew the second definition as everyday speech long before. stupid words.. i had no idea.. no idea..
|
|
|
|
Catswold
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 19, 2014, 01:09:43 AM |
|
Please people, just treat the rock with respect and we'll all be fine.
The rock is good. The rock is wise. The rock is life.
|
|
|
|
Catswold
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 19, 2014, 01:11:26 AM |
|
Against my better judgement, I'm simply going to say, it gets really tiresome having to worry about what somebody else thinks is offensive.
-- Using "you" in the generic sense -- The world is not your pearl, you have no right not to be offended, and if you are, then it says a heck of a lot more about you than it does the person from whose action or words you take offense. i merely pointed out that to use words like that was to portray himself as uneducated. who said they're offended? You're the first person to claim offense. You're fighting a strawman. Sorry, did I address you? Nevermind, both Your and bitter-miner's comments were intellectually dishonest. The implied sense of offense is in the original comment taking exception to the word "chinamen." So the absence of the precise word is irrelevant. And using the dictionary definition of "liberal" reveals nothing of the modern connotation of the word with which everyone in the Western world, at least, is familiar. Sophistry won't fly here. NOW, How about those profit numbers today, kiddies? i totally agree, meanings of words are completely irrelevant.. no point in reading a dictionary.. they're also "intellectually dishonest" and don't cover the meaning of liberalism.. A person who only knows the dictionary definitions of words is an illiterate in the real world. ARe you "gay," happy, or "gay," homosexual? The second is quite recent in dictionaries, but most of us knew the second definition as everyday speech long before. stupid words.. i had no idea.. no idea.. Not a response, sport, a cop-out. See it all the time, people who can't respond reasonably, so they attempt to be dismissive. Won't wash.
|
|
|
|
RickJamesBTC
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 19, 2014, 01:18:14 AM |
|
Why don't you two go hug it out.
MODS!! Cleanup aisle 10.
|
|
|
|
|
bitter_miner
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 39
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 19, 2014, 01:25:02 AM |
|
Against my better judgement, I'm simply going to say, it gets really tiresome having to worry about what somebody else thinks is offensive.
-- Using "you" in the generic sense -- The world is not your pearl, you have no right not to be offended, and if you are, then it says a heck of a lot more about you than it does the person from whose action or words you take offense. i merely pointed out that to use words like that was to portray himself as uneducated. who said they're offended? You're the first person to claim offense. You're fighting a strawman. Sorry, did I address you? Nevermind, both Your and bitter-miner's comments were intellectually dishonest. The implied sense of offense is in the original comment taking exception to the word "chinamen." So the absence of the precise word is irrelevant. And using the dictionary definition of "liberal" reveals nothing of the modern connotation of the word with which everyone in the Western world, at least, is familiar. Sophistry won't fly here. NOW, How about those profit numbers today, kiddies? i totally agree, meanings of words are completely irrelevant.. no point in reading a dictionary.. they're also "intellectually dishonest" and don't cover the meaning of liberalism.. A person who only knows the dictionary definitions of words is an illiterate in the real world. ARe you "gay," happy, or "gay," homosexual? The second is quite recent in dictionaries, but most of us knew the second definition as everyday speech long before. stupid words.. i had no idea.. no idea.. Not a response, sport, a cop-out. See it all the time, people who can't respond reasonably, so they attempt to be dismissive. Won't wash. i walk away, humbled and ashamed.. sometimes in life, a circle has no end..
|
|
|
|
bal3wolf
Sr. Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
Power to the people!
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 19, 2014, 01:26:06 AM |
|
Why don't you two go hug it out.
MODS!! Cleanup aisle 10.
lol mods could clean up 99.9% of the posts here that arent helping at all and on another note a great day today last 2 weeks have been pretty good for me only about 2-3 days i didnt go over 0.03 for 2-2.4mhash In 24 days on middlecoin i made .70 btc.
|
|
|
|
|