coin123123
|
 |
December 26, 2013, 09:48:25 AM |
|
For me it's not working fine. Yesterday I've received half the previous day, and the lowest amount of the whole week.
for me was the opposite, yesterday received more than previous day and definitely not lowest this week.
|
|
|
|
Chello
Member

Offline
Activity: 64
Merit: 10
|
 |
December 26, 2013, 09:56:08 AM |
|
for me was the opposite, yesterday received more than previous day and definitely not lowest this week. +1
|
|
|
|
phrozenspite
|
 |
December 26, 2013, 09:59:43 AM |
|
for me was the opposite, yesterday received more than previous day and definitely not lowest this week. +1 +2
|
|
|
|
mattd83
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 36
Merit: 0
|
 |
December 26, 2013, 10:44:23 AM |
|
If you wish, your options are to investigate further, or try something like Multipool if you are around more and wish to be more in-control of your mining and trading. It's ultimately your choice, after all.
|
|
|
|
eric89
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 40
Merit: 0
|
 |
December 26, 2013, 11:57:58 AM |
|
I think that if more people mine the same coin, it becomes less valuable because the market becomes saturated and therefore profits are reduced. (That's just my understanding of it, I'm not claiming to be an expert or anything) If you go to page 1, even H2o says: You should show the current mined coin.
Unfortunately I think that showing the current coin would make a bunch of people switch to mining that, lowering our profits. I have toyed with the idea of giving coins aliases. I might do that. If you can think of any ways to give miners more information, without spilling the beans on the coins, let me know. So by this logic, more users = less profit, correct? or am I misunderstanding? More hash rate to compete with us is what he meant. If someone else is finding the blocks it does us no good Another point is that hashcows and Middlecoin are probably both mining the same coin most of the time anyway so them coming over here probably won't change things too much
|
|
|
|
coin123123
|
 |
December 26, 2013, 01:43:18 PM |
|
its no secret everyone mining doge now, it can be seen in all comparison sites and it can be seen by mining difficulty
|
|
|
|
CaptainBeck
|
 |
December 26, 2013, 02:24:48 PM |
|
Doge is becoming stable and there is alot of talk about it so it makes sense to stay for a while.
|
|
|
|
ilpirata79
|
 |
December 26, 2013, 03:21:40 PM |
|
Is it convienent to mine on this pool with low hashrate, say 300kh/s?
Best regards, ilpirata79
|
|
|
|
jamesc760
|
 |
December 26, 2013, 03:23:33 PM |
|
Is it convienent to mine on this pool with low hashrate, say 300kh/s?
Best regards, ilpirata79
it's convenient to mine on this pool, just not with the low hash rig like yours. Diff on mc is 512, you won't benefit from the pool with 300KHs.
|
|
|
|
|
Gamer67
Sr. Member
  
Offline
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
тσ ¢σιи σя иσт тσ ¢σιи?
|
 |
December 26, 2013, 03:50:49 PM |
|
300kh/s is 300kh/s no matter where you mine.
It has been mentioned numerous times before in this thread that the 512 diff evens out in the long run.
Dare I say that the reason people might get slightly better results here as opposed to Hashcows is all down to the operator and his skills at exchanging and such.
Also your account is much more secure here than it would be at other multipools.
|
"I am not Dorian Nakamoto."
|
|
|
phrozenspite
|
 |
December 26, 2013, 03:53:32 PM |
|
300kh/s is 300kh/s no matter where you mine.
It has been mentioned numerous times before in this thread that the 512 diff evens out in the long run.
Dare I say that the reason people might get slightly better results here as opposed to Hashcows is all down to the operator and his skills at exchanging and such.
Also your account is much more secure here than it would be at other multipools.
hashcows, security problems aside had server issues. i dont think they had any problems with the coins themselves.
|
|
|
|
coinGeek
|
 |
December 26, 2013, 04:50:16 PM |
|
After adding in a time difference check for python mdc watcher between local and server time, it appears middlecoin JSON data is always outdated by 5+ minutes and only updates roughly once per thirty minutes. Is this in line with others' findings?
Are you sure about the thirty minute finding? Interesting. I'm not saying this isn't what's happening right now, but I've been collecting data from the JSON every ten minutes and I know I've seen changes happening at about that scale in the recent past.
|
Software Developer and Coin Geek
|
|
|
phzi
|
 |
December 26, 2013, 04:55:16 PM |
|
After adding in a time difference check for python mdc watcher between local and server time, it appears middlecoin JSON data is always outdated by 5+ minutes and only updates roughly once per thirty minutes. Is this in line with others' findings?
Are you sure about the thirty minute finding? Interesting. I'm not saying this isn't what's happening right now, but I've been collecting data from the JSON every ten minutes and I know I've seen changes happening at about that scale in the recent past. Any reason my user chart hasn't updated in over 12 hours? Haven't seen anything mentioned in this thread.
|
|
|
|
coinGeek
|
 |
December 26, 2013, 05:51:39 PM |
|
Any reason my user chart hasn't updated in over 12 hours? Haven't seen anything mentioned in this thread.
The continued growth in the number of users on Middlecoin in the last week is the short answer. Also, over the holidays there is less server babysitting going on. The graphs are updated in the order the data files were created and the JSON, like the home page, is sorted by hash rate. The newer users and users with lower hash rates will be processed later in each run. If the process hangs or the server needs a reboot, it's more likely that these users don't get run for several rounds. That's been happening lately so, if that's you, that's why. Sorry about that. I'm building out a new server this morning so look for improvement soon.
|
Software Developer and Coin Geek
|
|
|
CaptainBeck
|
 |
December 26, 2013, 05:55:57 PM |
|
300kh/s is 300kh/s no matter where you mine.
It has been mentioned numerous times before in this thread that the 512 diff evens out in the long run.
Dare I say that the reason people might get slightly better results here as opposed to Hashcows is all down to the operator and his skills at exchanging and such.
Also your account is much more secure here than it would be at other multipools.
Completely agree, the diff means it takes longer to find, but u get a better reward. In the long run it evens out, 300k is fine. This pool makes everyone good returns because H20 is doing a good job.
|
|
|
|
ugrash
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
|
 |
December 26, 2013, 06:05:04 PM |
|
Just want to say THANKS to h2o. This pool has everything I want : - h2o is better than I could become, and if I wanted to upgrade my trading skills, I would have to spend more time than I can afford
- the website is so web 1.0. Fewer ways to hack.
- I really don't care if I don't have realtime statistics as long as my miners mine
So I think your fee is totally ok. So thank you (and other people who participate in the pool I don't know about), and if I can help for coding something (I do not want access to anything, or a part of the fee !), I'd be glad to help.
|
|
|
|
slavo
|
 |
December 26, 2013, 06:13:15 PM |
|
Hi,
is the frontend down ? i'm mining since 18 hours and i'm not seing my adress listed.
afraid of mining for free as my miners are at work and connects.
cheers
|
|
|
|
envy2010
|
 |
December 26, 2013, 06:24:23 PM |
|
Hi,
is the frontend down ? i'm mining since 18 hours and i'm not seing my adress listed.
afraid of mining for free as my miners are at work and connects.
cheers
Seems to be working for me. Whats your address? How many accepted shares is your miner showing in the last hour?
|
|
|
|
slavo
|
 |
December 26, 2013, 06:42:28 PM |
|
edit : sovled 
|
|
|
|
|