bal3wolf
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
Power to the people!
|
|
December 26, 2013, 03:22:07 AM Last edit: December 26, 2013, 06:41:30 AM by bal3wolf |
|
wish i could figure out why i get such bad getwork errors both the 5870 and 6950 are only running at 20-40% eff by cgwatcher but my 7970x2 runs at 98+ i played with alot of sittings none helped it seemed. Right now running on the eu server and seems to be doing good let it run for a hr and see just makes no sence sence the 5870 is on same network as the 7970s that have no problems.fixed my problem i think downgraded to cgminer 3.5 and removed the eu pool and now the 5870 and 6950 dont have so many getwork errors.
|
|
|
|
Firebug24k
Member
Offline
Activity: 66
Merit: 10
|
|
December 26, 2013, 03:27:52 AM |
|
Another great day on MC! Thanks H20!
|
|
|
|
|
Kluge
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1015
|
|
December 26, 2013, 09:04:15 AM |
|
After adding in a time difference check for python mdc watcher between local and server time, it appears middlecoin JSON data is always outdated by 5+ minutes and only updates roughly once per thirty minutes. Is this in line with others' findings?
|
|
|
|
foroplus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1212
Merit: 1052
|
|
December 26, 2013, 09:43:15 AM |
|
For me it's not working fine. Yesterday I've received half the previous day, and the lowest amount of the whole week.
|
|
|
|
coin123123
|
|
December 26, 2013, 09:48:25 AM |
|
For me it's not working fine. Yesterday I've received half the previous day, and the lowest amount of the whole week.
for me was the opposite, yesterday received more than previous day and definitely not lowest this week.
|
|
|
|
Chello
Member
Offline
Activity: 64
Merit: 10
|
|
December 26, 2013, 09:56:08 AM |
|
for me was the opposite, yesterday received more than previous day and definitely not lowest this week. +1
|
|
|
|
phrozenspite
|
|
December 26, 2013, 09:59:43 AM |
|
for me was the opposite, yesterday received more than previous day and definitely not lowest this week. +1 +2
|
|
|
|
mattd83
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 36
Merit: 0
|
|
December 26, 2013, 10:44:23 AM |
|
If you wish, your options are to investigate further, or try something like Multipool if you are around more and wish to be more in-control of your mining and trading. It's ultimately your choice, after all.
|
|
|
|
eric89
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 40
Merit: 0
|
|
December 26, 2013, 11:57:58 AM |
|
I think that if more people mine the same coin, it becomes less valuable because the market becomes saturated and therefore profits are reduced. (That's just my understanding of it, I'm not claiming to be an expert or anything) If you go to page 1, even H2o says: You should show the current mined coin.
Unfortunately I think that showing the current coin would make a bunch of people switch to mining that, lowering our profits. I have toyed with the idea of giving coins aliases. I might do that. If you can think of any ways to give miners more information, without spilling the beans on the coins, let me know. So by this logic, more users = less profit, correct? or am I misunderstanding? More hash rate to compete with us is what he meant. If someone else is finding the blocks it does us no good Another point is that hashcows and Middlecoin are probably both mining the same coin most of the time anyway so them coming over here probably won't change things too much
|
|
|
|
coin123123
|
|
December 26, 2013, 01:43:18 PM |
|
its no secret everyone mining doge now, it can be seen in all comparison sites and it can be seen by mining difficulty
|
|
|
|
CaptainBeck
|
|
December 26, 2013, 02:24:48 PM |
|
Doge is becoming stable and there is alot of talk about it so it makes sense to stay for a while.
|
|
|
|
ilpirata79
|
|
December 26, 2013, 03:21:40 PM |
|
Is it convienent to mine on this pool with low hashrate, say 300kh/s?
Best regards, ilpirata79
|
|
|
|
jamesc760
|
|
December 26, 2013, 03:23:33 PM |
|
Is it convienent to mine on this pool with low hashrate, say 300kh/s?
Best regards, ilpirata79
it's convenient to mine on this pool, just not with the low hash rig like yours. Diff on mc is 512, you won't benefit from the pool with 300KHs.
|
|
|
|
|
Gamer67
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
тσ ¢σιи σя иσт тσ ¢σιи?
|
|
December 26, 2013, 03:50:49 PM |
|
300kh/s is 300kh/s no matter where you mine.
It has been mentioned numerous times before in this thread that the 512 diff evens out in the long run.
Dare I say that the reason people might get slightly better results here as opposed to Hashcows is all down to the operator and his skills at exchanging and such.
Also your account is much more secure here than it would be at other multipools.
|
"I am not Dorian Nakamoto."
|
|
|
phrozenspite
|
|
December 26, 2013, 03:53:32 PM |
|
300kh/s is 300kh/s no matter where you mine.
It has been mentioned numerous times before in this thread that the 512 diff evens out in the long run.
Dare I say that the reason people might get slightly better results here as opposed to Hashcows is all down to the operator and his skills at exchanging and such.
Also your account is much more secure here than it would be at other multipools.
hashcows, security problems aside had server issues. i dont think they had any problems with the coins themselves.
|
|
|
|
coinGeek
|
|
December 26, 2013, 04:50:16 PM |
|
After adding in a time difference check for python mdc watcher between local and server time, it appears middlecoin JSON data is always outdated by 5+ minutes and only updates roughly once per thirty minutes. Is this in line with others' findings?
Are you sure about the thirty minute finding? Interesting. I'm not saying this isn't what's happening right now, but I've been collecting data from the JSON every ten minutes and I know I've seen changes happening at about that scale in the recent past.
|
Software Developer and Coin Geek
|
|
|
phzi
|
|
December 26, 2013, 04:55:16 PM |
|
After adding in a time difference check for python mdc watcher between local and server time, it appears middlecoin JSON data is always outdated by 5+ minutes and only updates roughly once per thirty minutes. Is this in line with others' findings?
Are you sure about the thirty minute finding? Interesting. I'm not saying this isn't what's happening right now, but I've been collecting data from the JSON every ten minutes and I know I've seen changes happening at about that scale in the recent past. Any reason my user chart hasn't updated in over 12 hours? Haven't seen anything mentioned in this thread.
|
|
|
|
coinGeek
|
|
December 26, 2013, 05:51:39 PM |
|
Any reason my user chart hasn't updated in over 12 hours? Haven't seen anything mentioned in this thread.
The continued growth in the number of users on Middlecoin in the last week is the short answer. Also, over the holidays there is less server babysitting going on. The graphs are updated in the order the data files were created and the JSON, like the home page, is sorted by hash rate. The newer users and users with lower hash rates will be processed later in each run. If the process hangs or the server needs a reboot, it's more likely that these users don't get run for several rounds. That's been happening lately so, if that's you, that's why. Sorry about that. I'm building out a new server this morning so look for improvement soon.
|
Software Developer and Coin Geek
|
|
|
|