KS
|
|
October 22, 2013, 09:02:50 PM |
|
And where is the 1M share on the ask side gone? Everyone has been transferred to cryptostocks but no one is selling anymore...
If you believe that there is 3500 BTC unspent from the IPO and LC shares are worth .005, why would you sell at .002 or .003? well, i dont know how accurate is investors investigation to track ipo money, but labcoin never released any financial stuff. to believe or not to believe, i find my self in limbo, if u ask me well it was written more than 800 pages ago it was scam, and everybody who want to ignore and pump, is blinded by greed There is no volume to pump.
|
|
|
|
bitmoon
|
|
October 22, 2013, 09:05:38 PM |
|
And where is the 1M share on the ask side gone? Everyone has been transferred to cryptostocks but no one is selling anymore...
If you believe that there is 3500 BTC unspent from the IPO and LC shares are worth .005, why would you sell at .002 or .003? well, i dont know how accurate is investors investigation to track ipo money, but labcoin never released any financial stuff. to believe or not to believe, i find my self in limbo, if u ask me well it was written more than 800 pages ago it was scam, and everybody who want to ignore and pump, is blinded by greed There is no volume to pump. they got tired and waiting for so called estimation which is missed or until 30th october
|
|
|
|
bitmoon
|
|
October 22, 2013, 09:10:42 PM |
|
now labcoin got tired deleting in moderated thread, now he is back to being less online, and i feel he kinda stopped replying to normal investors, cuase of repeated flooding of same message.
|
|
|
|
kingcrimson
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1025
Merit: 1000
|
|
October 23, 2013, 07:01:19 AM |
|
The HK SFC has responded. Anyone want to help me with a response? Pls PM me. Also if anyone has contacted HK police about this let me know as well. I think we can delay replying until Nov 1st since people are still hoping for that deadline. Here are their questions: ... 1. Whether you are an investor of Labcoin. If so, please explain in details its operation and advise how you subscribed to the shares of Labcoin. 2. The detailed operation of the “virtual currency bitcoin”; 3. Whether the scheme is promoted in Hong Kong? If yes, how it is promoted in Hong Kong; 4. Whether you had reported the matter to Hong Kong Police; and 5. Please provide a copy of the prospectus of Labcoin as we are unable to access the file via the hyperlink provided in your email.
...
|
|
|
|
Puppet
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 1040
|
|
October 23, 2013, 07:09:18 AM |
|
The HK SFC has responded. Anyone want to help me with a response? Pls PM me. Also if anyone has contacted HK police about this let me know as well. I think we can delay replying until Nov 1st since people are still hoping for that deadline. Here are their questions: ... 1. Whether you are an investor of Labcoin. If so, please explain in details its operation and advise how you subscribed to the shares of Labcoin. 2. The detailed operation of the “virtual currency bitcoin”; 3. Whether the scheme is promoted in Hong Kong? If yes, how it is promoted in Hong Kong; 4. Whether you had reported the matter to Hong Kong Police; and 5. Please provide a copy of the prospectus of Labcoin as we are unable to access the file via the hyperlink provided in your email.
...
Regarding point 3, this may be useful: When are you subject to SFC regulation? As a general principle, the SFC has stated that it will not seek to regulate the provision of financial services that are conducted from outside Hong Kong and over the Internet, unless such activities are targeted at people residing in Hong Kong or are detrimental to the interests of the investing public in Hong Kong or to the market integrity of Hong Kong.
In determining whether or not an activity conducted over the Internet is targeted at people residing in Hong Kong, the SFC will consider the following factors:
• Whether the information is targeted, via ‘push’ technology, to people whom the financial services provider knows, or should reasonably know, reside in Hong Kong. ‘Push technology’ refers to any technology which broadcasts or directs information to a particular person or group of persons and includes e-mail, direct mailshots and the like.
• Whether the information available over the Internet is presented in a manner which gives the appearance that people residing in Hong Kong are targeted. Common examples cited by the SFC that may suggest Hong Kong people are targeted include the:
- use of local distribution agents in Hong Kong; - use of references to Hong Kong dollars; - use of Chinese language; and - publication in Hong Kong newspapers/magazines of the Internet address.
• Whether the information presented includes a disclaimer clearly indicating that the services or products are not available to people residing in Hong Kong. A general statement that the service or product is not being made available in any jurisdiction in which the service or product would or could be illegal is not sufficient (either for the SFC or for other regulators). What is required is either a positive statement of the countries in which the service or product is available (eg, this service/product is only available to Hong Kong residents) or a negative statement that the service or product is not available to Hong Kong residents.
• Whether reasonable precautions are taken to guard against the acceptance of purchases from, or provision of services to, people residing in Hong Kong. These precautions may include checking the mailing addresses of potential clients and the use of blocking technology to restrict access to the information and services provided. As a matter of practice, blocking technology is likely to be only partially effective at best and so other precautions will need to be adopted.
A simple check box on a website for a person to indicate that he or she is, or is not, a Hong Kong resident would not by itself be a sufficient precaution. The SFC’s Guidance Note on Internet Regulation makes it clear that the use of precautions or disclaimers will not necessarily preclude the SFC from exercising its powers of enforcement if the conduct of the people who are responsible for the particular activity over the Internet or some other circumstances so warrant.
If a website is considered to be targeted at Hong Kong investors, the person responsible for the website needs to be licensed for the relevant regulated activity carried on via the website. http://www.worldservicesgroup.com/publications.asp?action=article&artid=2358Since Labcoin is now listed on cryptostocks, the above will get cryptostocks in trouble with the SFC, but thats unavoidable, just like its unavoidable they will get in trouble with the SEC and just about any other commission in the world.
|
|
|
|
Sou
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
(Bitcoin related text here)
|
|
October 23, 2013, 07:53:18 AM |
|
The HK SFC has responded. Anyone want to help me with a response? Pls PM me. Also if anyone has contacted HK police about this let me know as well. I think we can delay replying until Nov 1st since people are still hoping for that deadline. Here are their questions: ... 1. Whether you are an investor of Labcoin. If so, please explain in details its operation and advise how you subscribed to the shares of Labcoin. 2. The detailed operation of the “virtual currency bitcoin”; 3. Whether the scheme is promoted in Hong Kong? If yes, how it is promoted in Hong Kong; 4. Whether you had reported the matter to Hong Kong Police; and 5. Please provide a copy of the prospectus of Labcoin as we are unable to access the file via the hyperlink provided in your email.
...
If anyone can supply the original prospectus that will be a great place to start.
|
|
|
|
KSGuy
|
|
October 23, 2013, 01:26:47 PM |
|
Has anyone found out when havelock will pay dividends?
|
|
|
|
Alphi
|
|
October 23, 2013, 02:56:23 PM |
|
Has anyone found out when havelock will pay dividends?
erm.. when LABCOIN gives them the BTC to pay out
|
KARMA: KSc9oGgGga1TS4PqZNFxNS9LSDjdSgpC1B VERT: VgKaooA5ZuLLUXTUANJigH9wCPuzBUBv9H DOGE: DRN7pXid34o6wQgUuK8BoSjWJ5g8jiEs4e
|
|
|
pedrog
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2786
Merit: 1031
|
|
October 23, 2013, 05:12:53 PM |
|
Has anyone found out when havelock will pay dividends?
erm.. when LABCOIN gives them the BTC to pay out No, on Havelock it's just a passthru, dividends have been paid on BTCTC and now are paid on Crypto::Stocks, who controls the passthru is the one who has to pass the dividends.
|
|
|
|
Alphi
|
|
October 23, 2013, 06:32:59 PM |
|
Has anyone found out when havelock will pay dividends?
erm.. when LABCOIN gives them the BTC to pay out No, on Havelock it's just a passthru, dividends have been paid on BTCTC and now are paid on Crypto::Stocks, who controls the passthru is the one who has to pass the dividends. OK when LABCOIN gives the BTC to the Pass through operator to pass them out to Havelock shareholders.. happy now? we R still waiting on labcoin bro
|
KARMA: KSc9oGgGga1TS4PqZNFxNS9LSDjdSgpC1B VERT: VgKaooA5ZuLLUXTUANJigH9wCPuzBUBv9H DOGE: DRN7pXid34o6wQgUuK8BoSjWJ5g8jiEs4e
|
|
|
Alphi
|
|
October 23, 2013, 06:34:41 PM |
|
we R still waiting on labcoin bro
no wait, ill correct myself again... WHEN Sam/Fabrizzio wins money on Just Dice and then cashes out to give to the pass through operators to pay as dividends.
|
KARMA: KSc9oGgGga1TS4PqZNFxNS9LSDjdSgpC1B VERT: VgKaooA5ZuLLUXTUANJigH9wCPuzBUBv9H DOGE: DRN7pXid34o6wQgUuK8BoSjWJ5g8jiEs4e
|
|
|
KSGuy
|
|
October 23, 2013, 07:23:42 PM |
|
ah, very interesting oh well.. looks like my .03 btc in labscam stocks isn't going to make me rich anytime soon..
|
|
|
|
bitmoon
|
|
October 23, 2013, 07:32:06 PM |
|
Has anyone found out when havelock will pay dividends?
properly havelock labco might switched back to per week,still no clue. havelock could be busy or something.
|
|
|
|
SebastianJu
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2674
Merit: 1083
Legendary Escrow Service - Tip Jar in Profile
|
|
October 23, 2013, 08:16:55 PM |
|
Has anyone found out when havelock will pay dividends?
properly havelock labco might switched back to per week,still no clue. havelock could be busy or something. I believe havelock only can pay out when labcoin paid divs. But labcoin didnt yet. Havelock only has a passthrough, thats no original share.
|
Please ALWAYS contact me through bitcointalk pm before sending someone coins.
|
|
|
pedrog
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2786
Merit: 1031
|
|
October 23, 2013, 08:41:36 PM |
|
Has anyone found out when havelock will pay dividends?
erm.. when LABCOIN gives them the BTC to pay out No, on Havelock it's just a passthru, dividends have been paid on BTCTC and now are paid on Crypto::Stocks, who controls the passthru is the one who has to pass the dividends. OK when LABCOIN gives the BTC to the Pass through operator to pass them out to Havelock shareholders.. happy now? we R still waiting on labcoin bro Dividends paid on Crypto::Stocks: 23 Oct 13:23 16.75526103 8,094,329 0.00000207 BTC 21 Oct 15:09 11.25111731 8,094,329 0.00000139 BTC 20 Oct 15:36 11.08923073 8,094,329 0.00000137 BTC 19 Oct 09:32 11.17017402 8,094,329 0.00000138 BTC 18 Oct 04:32 11.97960692 8,094,329 0.00000148 BTC Dividends paid on Havelock: 2013-10-18 2013-10-18 0.00000123 2013-10-16 2013-10-16 0.00000052 2013-10-04 2013-10-04 0.00000098 2013-09-24 2013-09-24 0.00000146 You have to check this situation with Havelock passthru operator, he might be paying only once a week to save on fees or something like that...
|
|
|
|
Ytterbium
|
|
October 24, 2013, 12:10:31 AM |
|
Dividends paid on Crypto::Stocks:
23 Oct 13:23 16.75526103 8,094,329 0.00000207 BTC 21 Oct 15:09 11.25111731 8,094,329 0.00000139 BTC 20 Oct 15:36 11.08923073 8,094,329 0.00000137 BTC 19 Oct 09:32 11.17017402 8,094,329 0.00000138 BTC 18 Oct 04:32 11.97960692 8,094,329 0.00000148 BTC
So from ..137 per 24 hours, we've gone to ...0207 over 48? Implying a reduced hashrate?
|
|
|
|
pedrog
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2786
Merit: 1031
|
|
October 24, 2013, 12:13:09 AM |
|
Dividends paid on Crypto::Stocks:
23 Oct 13:23 16.75526103 8,094,329 0.00000207 BTC 21 Oct 15:09 11.25111731 8,094,329 0.00000139 BTC 20 Oct 15:36 11.08923073 8,094,329 0.00000137 BTC 19 Oct 09:32 11.17017402 8,094,329 0.00000138 BTC 18 Oct 04:32 11.97960692 8,094,329 0.00000148 BTC
So from ..137 per 24 hours, we've gone to ...0207 over 48? Implying a reduced hashrate? Apparently there was some downtime... http://eligius.st/~wizkid057/newstats/userstats.php/17psAW21J4twanAFWmbcd5WdX2pKeX3trm
|
|
|
|
Ytterbium
|
|
October 24, 2013, 03:38:39 AM |
|
Dividends paid on Crypto::Stocks:
23 Oct 13:23 16.75526103 8,094,329 0.00000207 BTC 21 Oct 15:09 11.25111731 8,094,329 0.00000139 BTC 20 Oct 15:36 11.08923073 8,094,329 0.00000137 BTC 19 Oct 09:32 11.17017402 8,094,329 0.00000138 BTC 18 Oct 04:32 11.97960692 8,094,329 0.00000148 BTC
So from ..137 per 24 hours, we've gone to ...0207 over 48? Implying a reduced hashrate? Apparently there was some downtime... http://eligius.st/~wizkid057/newstats/userstats.php/17psAW21J4twanAFWmbcd5WdX2pKeX3trmOn Eligius. Most of his hash is on ghash.io. allegedly
|
|
|
|
|
Zubilica
|
|
October 24, 2013, 12:54:51 PM |
|
The rest are payed from IPO money
|
|
|
|
|