Do you believe in ICO Ratings?

[cchub]

I don't believe in any rating that can be biased. ICO companies pay ICO rating comapnies for their ratings, so they probably got biased reviews.

[1715258707]

1715258707

[1715258707]

1715258707

[Victorik]

I do use the ratings as one of my parameters but do not totally bank on the rating. I do still do my research, because at the end, I will be responsible for my actions. Some ratings are just a possible guide.

[alexhunter54]

Right now ico ratings are important for short term because people are investing to raitings not to projects but for long term project is more important.

[Aggioni]

I think it can be useful to read opinions of other people but anyway i always try to do my own research before investing.

[ofeefee]

A lot of the ratings are not honest 100%. And some are selling the rating. But I still check them and if I find any useful information, I use it to form my own opinion.

[parlament9]

All this purchased ratings! There is a huge number of information and proofs when projects and campaigns contact "experts" and suggest to give good marks for their efforts and projects to receive the money and "to say hello" to investors from Bali

[TiffanyLien23]

Well for me ICO Ratings it can be used as a reference only and it was the last factor in ICO research. Sometimes it was just an information to show if the ICO was good or bad.  But we cannot actually say that the ICO was good or bad even if it has a high score on ratings because we still have to use a lot of resources just to make sure that it is really good or not. Mostly ratings based on the info provided by the ICO to specific website. Therefore we can't rely just only on the ratings

[Melody2]

I have participated in several ICOs since January and before going in I check out their ratings on some of these ICO rating sites. So far only maybe one or two ICOs have performed well. The several otherICOs have flopped massively upon listing on exchanges. It might be caused by the general bloodbath though.

[Asmertafitov]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

i thinknthat there is no reason to not believe in those ratings, but i think that you have to do ypur own researches

[Asmertafitov]

I have participated in several ICOs since January and before going in I check out their ratings on some of these ICO rating sites. So far only maybe one or two ICOs have performed well. The several otherICOs have flopped massively upon listing on exchanges. It might be caused by the general bloodbath though.

ico ratings are good but i seldom see them, so i think think that they can not protectvyou from failures and scammmers

[RAAAMA]

I do believe in ICO rating. I'm using it as part of my factor in joining any projects. Well, the team in ICO rating did there homework before marking the project publicly. There are project who failed as well even ICO rating is high and there are project who succeed even ICO score is low. End of the day, I use it as part of my decision but not as a whole.

[mellorbo]

Yes i believe in ICO ratings because it makes some coins legit and it will serve as an assurance for all the investors in the community. But sometimes it is nonsense because some of the rating sites are just being paid to make a good review.

[Aniwura]

I do not need anyone to talk to me before i can discover the genuineness of a project. Although, some times, we need to be careful of our findings by also seeking the view of some developer, but i do not depend solely on listing sites.

[WonkaLuisAL]

The websites that dedicate to it are mostly sites that get paid to promote certain ICO, so you don't have a warranty, you don't know if the top ico would be good or a scam.

[kliown]

In most cases, the ICO ratings are set at approximately the same level and therefore they do not help me personally, except that if you want to see a project is not a Scam, although even this you can not understand based on the ICO rating.

[Ravenzy666]

I'm quite confident with the ICO rating, because usually the rating is obtained from the assessment of some people who understand about ICO and can assess the success rate. To see the rating, we do not see from one website only because sometimes good at website A is not necessarily good at website B. In ICObench usually there is also a low rating and no expert judge, but ICO was a great success. This is what makes us not 100% make rating as a benchmark of the success rate of an ICO. Moreover, even successful ICOs are not necessarily when the price listings are stable and are above the ICO price.

[expekto]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

io ratings are good, but i see no reason why you shoud not trust them, though it is so stupid to rely only on them

[expekto]

I'm quite confident with the ICO rating, because usually the rating is obtained from the assessment of some people who understand about ICO and can assess the success rate. To see the rating, we do not see from one website only because sometimes good at website A is not necessarily good at website B. In ICObench usually there is also a low rating and no expert judge, but ICO was a great success. This is what makes us not 100% make rating as a benchmark of the success rate of an ICO. Moreover, even successful ICOs are not necessarily when the price listings are stable and are above the ICO price.

ico ratings are grweat, but i know that you can rely on them and i think you can trust them and there are a lot good

[alimarh]

I don't really believe in ICO ratings most of them are financial induced and some people have provided an evidence about the induced ratings on the most of the ico listing site,

[goatpo]

No are useless some ICO Scammed even if had good rate on those websites.