francojon
Member
 Offline
Activity: 238
Merit: 11
|
 |
July 11, 2018, 05:53:31 PM |
|
As reference of proper pages for people reaching for this effective tokens offerings tend to be cryptocompare and renewed likely technical places.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Bitcoin: mining our own business since 2009" -- Pieter Wuille
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
Early_Waffle
|
|
July 11, 2018, 06:11:03 PM |
|
Yes, the ratings can provide useful background information. But in any case, you need to analyze the situation, do not rush to draw quick conclusions.
|
|
|
|
|
udana123
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 196
Merit: 0
|
|
July 11, 2018, 06:18:10 PM |
|
Actually I do not believe that lot of sites give the correct ratings. There are lot of scam projects which had more than 4/5 ratings in many ICO ratings sites. Most of the times, ICO holding people pay for those sites in and they manipulate the actual results. Therefore I do not believe and do not depend on those information.
|
|
|
|
|
Wildskull
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 238
Merit: 0
|
|
July 11, 2018, 06:19:16 PM |
|
I would say I do, but not totally. I say that because whenever I choose projects or ICOs to enroll in for campaigns, I check some sites in order to check how the community views and rates the project. It shows me at least how many seasoned users, which can be a reliable pieces of information to guide with the projects I join. I value the experience of the people there, but I don't totally and immediately believe it. I usually compare and contrast the information I get from one site with another, plus the information I get from this forum and from other sources.
|
|
|
|
|
ryanfromrethink
Member
Offline
Activity: 294
Merit: 10
|
|
July 11, 2018, 06:26:49 PM |
|
As they say - trust, but check. Yes, you can take into account the valuable information of reliable ratings, but in any case you need to be able to independently evaluate the situation.
|
|
|
|
|
davcro22
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 210
Merit: 0
|
|
July 11, 2018, 06:29:57 PM |
|
I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
I think that these ratings on the sites are true and fair. Sites with ISO ratings are important to their reputation, as the deception will quickly open. |
|
|
|
|
temilade200
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 378
Merit: 2
|
|
July 11, 2018, 07:05:55 PM |
|
There are times that good projects, yet with good products, but might sell low, just because of poor marketing. We should not always judge from the point of hardcap and softcap. I know of some projects that sold all their tokens, yet they are no more. Should we still call them good projects.
|
|
|
|
|
Mikell556
Member
Offline
Activity: 434
Merit: 10
|
|
July 11, 2018, 08:03:16 PM |
|
I do not believe the ICO ratings because I myself once worked in such a rating agency, though not in crypto. All these ratings are sold.
|
|
|
|
|
|
superscommessebitcoin
|
|
July 11, 2018, 09:31:03 PM |
|
Honestly believe the ratings, I do not see sense, as there are a lot of projects that have a rating of approximately one level. That is, there is no sense to look at the ICO rating.
|
|
|
|
|
|
membis
|
|
July 11, 2018, 09:39:18 PM |
|
Nothing is 100% right there most ratings might be wrong or might not go as planned. Some ICOs can be rated very high and yet at the end of the tokensale event, there won't be listed on any major exchange or they won't yield any profit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
sammyp
|
|
July 11, 2018, 09:47:54 PM |
|
The rating may not always be a true reflection of the project but it at least gives some little information about the project. Besides basing on the ratings by such websites, we also need to do our diligent research before we proceed with whatever we want to do.
|
|
|
|
|
cotton ball
|
|
July 11, 2018, 10:10:23 PM |
|
No, I will never trust the ratings on ICO because many projects with high ratings but failed to do project development even many are involved in fraud because with a high rating so that investors are not suspicious at all, so I have not measured the project by looking at the rating.
|
|
|
|
|
Cryptomania098
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 140
Merit: 0
|
|
July 11, 2018, 10:12:09 PM |
|
I don't really believe in ico ratings 100% but I use it as a yardstick to invest in the most rated ICOs thereby doing my own research about those ICOs also
|
|
|
|
|
nulan
Member
Offline
Activity: 393
Merit: 17
|
|
July 11, 2018, 10:16:07 PM |
|
Do not believe 100% can only be used as literature, because no one is able to predict exactly, but at least approaching and referring to expert opinion will be very good I am often wrong in choosing a project but keep learning until Now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
costgranda
|
|
July 11, 2018, 10:26:24 PM |
|
At ICO choice I first of all study the project. I used ratings on these websites for ICO search earlier. But over time I began to understand that rating on these websites at all not an indicator. A large number of projects which have good rating on these websites are very unsuccessful.
|
|
|
|
|
ofeefee
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1023
Merit: 1001
Tokenize Fantasy Sports
|
|
July 11, 2018, 10:26:39 PM |
|
No, I will never trust the ratings on ICO because many projects with high ratings but failed to do project development even many are involved in fraud because with a high rating so that investors are not suspicious at all, so I have not measured the project by looking at the rating.
I don't trust the ratings as well, but like to read them, because I may find something I have missed. And don't forget that ratings are just for information. It is somebody's opinion, nothing more. |
|
|
|
AliveBuda
Member
Offline
Activity: 206
Merit: 10
|
|
July 11, 2018, 10:39:33 PM |
|
I think it can be a good indication of a few things, but I would also not only invest due to ICO ratings. Remember that most of the ICO rating websites are pay to play, meaning that an ICO has to pay to be on there, I've heard to have an analysis is thousands of dollars as well. Therefore only the ICOs that are back by big investors or have a large marketing budget will truly get seen on there, and good interesting projects that are bootstrapping will not be. I would use it to find ICOs that interest you and then look deeper into the project, look at their whitepaper, their team and ask questions on here. If you are satisfied with the responses, then proceed by investing or taking part in their bounty campaigns. I recommend that you pay attention to https://eloncity.io/ |
|
|
|
|
|
whaawh
|
|
July 11, 2018, 10:51:36 PM |
|
At ICO choice I first of all study the project. I used ratings on these websites for ICO search earlier. But over time I began to understand that rating on these websites at all not an indicator. A large number of projects which have good rating on these websites are very unsuccessful.
You should also take into account the fact that all these ratings can be purchased. All the same, these resources are managed by people, and people can buy or negotiate certain results. |
|
|
|
|
zaizaiqa
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
|
|
July 11, 2018, 10:53:40 PM |
|
the rating just for reference based on people thinking.
But mostly all ICO now is the scam
|
|
|
|
|
|
nightwishx
|
|
July 11, 2018, 11:36:36 PM |
|
the rating just for reference based on people thinking.
But mostly all ICO now is the scam
That's right, it depends on the point of view of the person giving the rating, but for marketing and everything depends on the project team. I guess the ratng is not that important as long as it's not objective |
|
|
|
|
