Do you believe in ICO Ratings?

[nonkinto]

I sometimes look at ico scores, but never follow them to make a decision . you have to make your own decision.

[1713953069]

1713953069

[1713953069]

1713953069

[1713953069]

1713953069

[tulezua]

In my opinion, ICO Rating sites, ICO BENCH evaluate projects very good, we should trust and update. Also consider the other content in the projects to see if there is strong development or not.

[rami.alkhakimi]

Not all resources. For example, on the ICE Drops, the ratings of often true. Such a project as  Spotcoin adequately assessed and the assessment corresponds to reality.

[ttking]

I believe ratings and have no reasons not to believe because they  have been really helpful for me when I wanted to choose the best ico. i have checked ratings and reviews and made the right decision. I always check them now

[Sungoku]

I believe ratings and have no reasons not to believe because they  have been really helpful for me when I wanted to choose the best ico. i have checked ratings and reviews and made the right decision. I always check them now

Well, we have to check the truth. But we also believe all the ratings are there. But one thing, the success of each project is not based on how they rate the website. They are part of a stepping stone to have a good record and good value.

[Ndubades]

I actually use these ratings for judgement on bounty campaigns to participate in. Although, for me these rating sites give subjective information-their opinion about the project,sometimes this opinion is paid,  but it can be seen. I always read these opinions, sometimes you can find there interesting and needful information. And on these sites  you can find the latest information on funds raised on the moment.

[GriTBitS]

I sometimes look at ico scores, but never follow them to make a decision . you have to make your own decision.

You can sometimes listen to ICO ratings, but you must make your own decisions based on the knowledge of the project that you have. Only you are responsible for your mistake.

[Nancy2k4]

No gain saying, ICO ratings are very important. it is a rating where the future ICO is being explained and rate, most people which are future investors of the ICO are reading it. Most of them based their decision on whether to invest or not and how much. ICO ratings are really important, they are the one who understands all corners of the prospective project. they study the presentations and make reviews of it. Though these ratings can't tell the outcome of the ICO.

[Offece]

ICO opinions are simply objective exams. I think these checks are only for beginners and are the place to discover the quickest ICOs. The actual development of the project must be primarily based on community, improvement ideas, and improvement group.

[EzatorFI]

Personally, I use such search engines only to find new ICO projects that appear. I think that such sites as ICOdrops or ICObench can conduct an independent evaluation, but for the money they will put such an estimate which is needed.

[iknowitsme]

I don't trust, when it comes to money. Analytics in ICO ratings are useful indicator because they show what people will think about the project. But they are not to be trusted. On the other hand information from such wevbsites like soft and hard caps, is there MVP and how much hype there is is worth checking and analysing.

[Wend]

Actually if ill need some good ICO's i'm going to search them in the ICO ratings.
Because some them that have a high rate it will have a chance to be success of their project.

[beautifulliar240]

I use Ico rating as a factor to research a project. But i recommend you use your knowledge to do that, give your opinion to decide that ICO is potential or not, and then invest  Grin Be independent, you need it more on this crypto world

[Disculinair]

I'd rather not let myself go for ratings on some websites, because I think they may get paid just for promoting the top ICOs without even checking if the project is a scam.

[CapnBDL]

I'd rather not let myself go for ratings on some websites, because I think they may get paid just for promoting the top ICOs without even checking if the project is a scam.

I do not believe the ratings, as I have seen for a long time in the market and how many ICO with a high rating became a bench or could not realize their idea. Many more investors did not receive their tokens. I determine ICO quality on my own, and I have many criteria for selection.

[Pirlolrip2018]

I do not often believe in reviews of web sites. The rating of icobench is often very sketchy and reference.

[kewlc3s]

Actually good question.
From one side we all know that ICO´s pay for project promotion, I sure for many rating agencies and web sites as well.
From other side, at least 2 making independent review and rating. (Won´t tell, not to promote  )
But, I would rather make my own investigation about project before invest.

[swaggerkeme]

I trust  most of these ICO rating companies since most of them are really reliable. Although there are not 100% right in their predictions like the author stated in the case of Lalaworld. Most often than not they are right in their predictions despite the few deviations.

[coinbergh]

ICO rating sites are good option for having information about project. I suggest you always think of your decision, when you follow the ICO project that you can from the ICO rating sites.

There is a key point in investing imo. Do Your Own Research. (DYOR) Read whitepaper, examine social media accounts, look out the team's past works, linkedin accounts etc... Don't trust to any website or person for investing. It doesn't make any sense.

[zmeddy]

Hi, personally, I compare data from various sources. If a particular project has good rating on various web sites, then most likely, such a project deserves to be trusted.