ujinice
Member
 Offline
Activity: 574
Merit: 15
|
 |
May 12, 2018, 10:32:40 AM |
|
I think the ratings are needed for each project, but I saw a lot of projects with ratings of 5/5 that did not even earn soft cap. It turns out that they do not always reflect the real state of affairs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
DrYe5
|
|
May 12, 2018, 10:33:52 AM |
|
I think the ratings are needed for each project, but I saw a lot of projects with ratings of 5/5 that did not even earn soft cap. It turns out that they do not always reflect the real state of affairs.
I believe that ICO way of raising funds will become a significant concept in developing Blockchain and distributed business concepts as well as the industry. For the community to grow, the need for strategic investment and careful selection process becomes crucial. |
|
|
|
|
jlqueen
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 123
Merit: 0
|
|
May 12, 2018, 10:36:44 AM |
|
As the new comer, first you need improve your knowledge. Study the whitepapers of good ico's which came to the market and bad ico's. Find out the differences. Any good ico has a great, valuable concept. Solid project team should be there. ICO should have a huge community support. I choose AMLT because it fulfill all those things in a great way. I had the feeling that, it will have a bright future. Check & take your own decision.
|
|
|
|
|
|
AiwonOleh
|
|
May 12, 2018, 10:40:08 AM |
|
In my opinion, sometimes these assessments are so faithful and you can listen to their opinion, and sometimes it's just fake and purchased ratings that just pirate these projects.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dorvei
|
|
May 12, 2018, 01:05:59 PM |
|
Of course, Before taking part in any ICO, I look at these websites and their ratings. I for example, compare the ratings of 5-7 sources. I dont believe that all sources can be bought, I think that teams are working on the information they put on their website. Why should they risk their reputation?
|
|
|
|
|
rina141141
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 78
Merit: 1
|
|
May 12, 2018, 01:26:21 PM |
|
I do not believe it's better to double-check everything yourself, it's your money! To make it is not difficult enough to read about the team whether they are real people, whether there is a working product. If you have any doubts, it's better not to take risks
|
|
|
|
|
ashlyvash00
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 434
Merit: 2
|
|
May 12, 2018, 01:27:52 PM |
|
For me i didnt believe. I trust my own investegate. Because maybe there are website that accept payment order to get high rating. So it will be good if you do it yourself
|
|
|
|
|
hamdun
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 144
Merit: 0
|
|
May 12, 2018, 01:37:42 PM |
|
I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
Yes, I believe that this ico assessment has a reference value and shows good not to the ico, but you should also do some research to make sure. |
|
|
|
|
k-west
Member
Offline
Activity: 336
Merit: 10
|
|
May 12, 2018, 01:41:20 PM |
|
Not much,the thing is that all these ratings are fake and the owners of ICOs pay big money to experts and sites to be rated as high as possible,so I just have a look at them.
|
|
|
|
|
Ken Kamaruddin
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 294
Merit: 0
|
|
May 12, 2018, 01:43:30 PM |
|
actually I do not really believe that. several times i joined ico with perfect rating but in the end they ended up scam. so it's just an instrument not a fact of absolute truth.
|
|
|
|
|
Shame_Game
Member
Offline
Activity: 185
Merit: 10
|
|
May 12, 2018, 01:44:41 PM |
|
Of course, ICO ratings cannot be fully trusted. But these are the landmarks that help to separate good campaigns from scam. As for me concerns, I use ICO bench ratings.
|
|
|
|
|
pogpog10
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 251
Merit: 100
Presale is live!
|
|
May 12, 2018, 01:48:57 PM |
|
I believe in ico ratings for sure. I always check ico rating before investing or joining bounty campaigns. Because seaching earlier is important for me. So i generally check them on icobench which is a reliable rating platform for me after that then i decide about project.
|
|
|
|
|
Diablesfunis
|
|
May 12, 2018, 01:51:33 PM |
|
No I don't because every ico rating site use different factor that will determine the score for the ico, and I also have a different point that I must check in order to participate in ico. It's always better to do your own research for the ico because that way you can see directly what kind of ico it is and whether it is suitable for you as a long term investment.
|
|
|
|
GreatArkansas
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2506
Merit: 1394
|
|
May 12, 2018, 01:51:51 PM |
|
I believe on the ICO ratings but even they have high ratings, I still don't trust their ratings. Every ICO I participated is very full of research by mine, I just don't watching the ratings of every ICO, I also consider the technical side of the project and their technology behind also. Most of ICOs nowadays are scam.
|
|
|
|
Shawntastic
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
|
|
May 12, 2018, 01:54:12 PM |
|
To me, ICO ratings site just tells me what ICOs are coming up next and so on. Their ratings (x/5) doesn't matter to me. I'll normally join their telegram group after reading the whitepaper, and if i have any questions, i ask them and make the decision on my own. Shillers like Ian Balina, thegobone, etc. do play a part in my decision whether or not to invest, but just a small portion. The main factor is whether or not I think the project will succeed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greenrace
|
|
May 12, 2018, 01:56:06 PM |
|
ico rank only to make predictions in determining the course only and I do not think it shows the results to be achieved so surely there are benefits of the ico ranking made
|
|
|
|
MEGATRON_S
Member
Offline
Activity: 126
Merit: 10
|
|
May 12, 2018, 01:58:41 PM |
|
they are simply ratings sites, you do not need to blame them if your contributions are burned out, you yourself should evaluate the project in full and fully, see the team, goals
|
|
|
|
|
kucingpoi
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 26
Merit: 0
|
|
May 12, 2018, 02:08:17 PM |
|
I will Choose Quality than Quantity.. ICO's depends on the company paying the advertisement. But for me reading some blogs will boost my confident if i'm gonna invest on this coin or not.
|
|
|
|
|
|
JohnMacZeppelin
|
|
May 12, 2018, 02:11:49 PM |
|
To my great regret I no longer believe in such services and I can tell why, there were a lot of projects that were very well evaluated by such services, in the end they turned out to be scam projects, I think that this should not be forgotten and neglected.
|
|
|
|
|
|
geegaw
|
|
May 12, 2018, 02:15:02 PM |
|
I believe on the ICO ratings but even they have high ratings, I still don't trust their ratings. Every ICO I participated is very full of research by mine, I just don't watching the ratings of every ICO, I also consider the technical side of the project and their technology behind also. Most of ICOs nowadays are scam.
More accurately, comments and reviews from the ico ratings are only at the reference level, we can not completely trust because they are similar to us, they only rank based on analysis and some underground information but they are better than us in terms of experience and manpower. Although we can not compare with them but when we are an investor, we should have our own analysis then read the analysis from other people, it will help us more clearly determine the authenticity of an investment, instead of just hearing and believing from one side |
|
|
|
|
