Do you believe in ICO Ratings?

[van jones2594]

Such ratings, as well as any rating systems in the world are indicative things. They should be paid attention, but do not make decisions based solely on these ratings

[DrYe5]

ICOdrops.com gives good ratings on ICOs. The amount raised, and whether or not they have gotten to their minimum target(soft cap). It is sometimes an effective guide.

The competition for ICO investors’ money is now much bigger. Bounty managers have to get creative and find new ways to stand out, attract attention, beat the competition and bring investor money for the project. While some practices are completely legit and help early contributors earn fair and deserved tokens, others are pretty shady.

[Silver_Wost]

I do believe in ICO rating but we can not fully trust it. because in my opinion this rating only as a general description only. Actually there are other factors that are more important is whether the ICO has a team and a good background, if necessary have a product will be great. But if we look at ICO with a low rating, then often we have a doubt whether the project can be successful later.

ico rating indeed affects some ico and can be a consideration for choosing a good ico project,
because the ico rating is affecting in the investment

[Fippy]

I believe in ICO rating but always you need to think with your own head. Because all those ico rating websites can sell there ratings and votes for good allocations . Always think where you invest your money and be ready to loose everything because it is very young market.

Good Luck.

[BitcoinTurk]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

No, I do not really trust it. Such sites often make many reviews, so some carelessness can result in different assessments. In addition, although the sector is known as reliable sites, money can prepare a nice review writing and scoring. Moreover, these web sites do not invest in projects that are rated 4 stars or above. For this reason, we do not trust and it is always useful to be precautionary.

[jhon pantau]

In my opinion, ratting obtained by ICO is not only based on the project concept is good. The success of a project can be viewed by a team that is involved in it. If the project has a team that is diligent and always compact in finding and providing information about the project. And usually, before I follow ICO, I usually do an investigation first, starting from ICO rankings, ICO communities, and potentials owned by ICO. That's what I need to do so that I can choose ICO properly, not scam, and investment can continue to grow.

[bitcoinmux]

As an investor the ico rating and ico bench both the portals are most beneficial for me because before investing in any ico first of all i will check the ratings and reviews of that particular ico and then i will invest and according to me 90% of rating is valid.

[Tirdok]

no, I don't believe the ratings. I myself conduct research and choose a good ICO.

[IMAR]

There are many ico rating websites out there. What I very much familiar is ICO bench. Well, it provides a good deal of information and provide as the benchmark on what are the good ICO in the market currently. I use the benchmch as part of the factor for me to decide to get involve on something. Thank you ICO bench.

[Vandemos]

There are many ico rating websites out there. What I very much familiar is ICO bench. Well, it provides a good deal of information and provide as the benchmark on what are the good ICO in the market currently. I use the benchmch as part of the factor for me to decide to get involve on something. Thank you ICO bench.

I believe in ICO ratings but if they have high rankings, I still do not trust their ratings. Every ICO I really meet by me, I only see the ratings of each ICO, I also see the side of their projects and technology behind. Most ICOs today are scams.

[tangsanzang7]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

Do not believe

[zedaq]

No. I categorically do not believe in similar services, like many people in this branch, I think that all these services are very well bought, I can say that there was such a project Graphen power, which was evaluated very well, but in the end the project generally turned out to be scam.

[Syunusa]

I think ICO ratings should be one of the criteria we should look out for because it tells how genuinely a project is. For me personally, I am cool with any ratings above 4.

[DmitriyBorisov91]

I'm watching ratings on ICOdrops only. They doesn't make any hidden advertisements.99% of high interest projects made a really good profit for me. Except of Refereum =)

[Abugbilla]

It is actually true.Sometimes you just decide to join an ICO simply because it has been highly rated, only for it to fail at the end.But some actually work fine. I think most investors are attracted by these stuff, expecially if it is coming from a site they trust well.

[lehnelora]

I hope you always think of your decision when you follow the ICO project that you can from the ICO site rating. because now not all sites rating can be believed. You still have to do a check on the website, social media and the participants join the ICO.

[TCTDev]

I do not believe in ratings. It seems to me that they are interested in advertising their own project. Or a project that paid them money.

[stalin2517]

in fact, few platforms with ratings are really honest with the user. Personally, I want to create my own independent platform for project evaluation.

[mediocre777]

I know exactly what the project is icodrops.com is a private product and they do not post a rating for money.

[sidodadii]

I do not believe in ico rating because all websites that rated an ico are not necessarily very credible, and proved a lot of good ratings they provide but the fact that the project gets a good rating is not even a success or even a scam, so we better believe with our own analysis .