Do you believe in ICO Ratings?

[Coroline]

it depends on the rating of the web ico rating, and you definitely know that, why every ico website differs in different value on an ico project. there is a judging from the sale of tokens, or from the team. and I do not really understand that yet. why every ico rating site is different judging.

[1714675990]

1714675990

[1714675990]

1714675990

[1714675990]

1714675990

[Luna0120]

I always take into account the ICO ratings because they allow to reduce the number of projects necessary for consideration and analysis. So I find them useful and recommend to use them to my friends.

[sunX3]

There are some sites that I trust partly due to their past and unbiased reviews, but even then at the end of the day, only you can make a decision alone.

[jankekek]

I don't totally believe in ICO ratings because based on my experiences as a bounty hunter, some ICOs with good conduct and ratings are not all the time becomes successful when they enter the crypto world. But sometimes ICO ratings can help us to choose good ICOs where can we invest our money with.

[yukihirasouma]

i look at the ICO ratings, but at the same time you must look at the project, study the project, and other information. After that you can decide whether  should participate in this project. You can not rely solely on the rating.

[itssawai]

I do check out ICO ratings for ICOs and also check out their team, websites, whitepaper and other stuff to determine the potential of an ICO, there are a lot  of ICO are coming into market and most of them fails to reach soft cap. It's better to do proper research before investing.

[leow]

Personally, my opinion does not make sense to make such ratings ICO projects, because all the ratings on many sites are only informational. You can make a rating of already passed ICO based on the amount of funds collected. This information can be useful for investors who want to buy tokens of a promising project on the exchange.

[entr]

There was  project that i watch for a while and they got some avarage points on a popular ico rating website. After a while those reviews changed to positive for no reason. So, i  am not trusting them but they are good place for quick review.

[Kjara]

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website.

I don't trust ICO ratings that much. I prefer to choose the ICO independently by studying their team, white paper and another public docs , their web resources.

[moni44]

maybe hard to say. your opinion is right and i agree with you. ICO have rating not good can be release on market even ICO have a great rating is not even come out on market. maybe in my opinion the ICO ratings just tell us about how good they team they product so its depend on us to believe or not.

[aiviaa485]

it could be a reference for you more trust in ICO, but I suggest it to check again ICO coin website is.

if it reaches softcap it may still be good, but it will be even better when ICO reach Hardcap.

and look at the network she's wearing, whether she's using the Ethereum network or not, if my Ethereum network is confident and more trusting when she creates her own network.

[fitty]

it could be a reference for you more trust in ICO, but I suggest it to check again ICO coin website is.

if it reaches softcap it may still be good, but it will be even better when ICO reach Hardcap.

and look at the network she's wearing, whether she's using the Ethereum network or not, if my Ethereum network is confident and more trusting when she creates her own network.

Yeah, its your money so basically this ico reviews has nothing to do if the ico is really realistic and reasonable to trust at the end of the day they are only a guide and reference for your research before investing, its your money and if you scammed because of their reviews you cannot blame them.

[shamanrer]

I had tables with ratings and comments from different gurus. But in fact, with a table with twenty ico there are only two that are not scam. You must look at the team yourself and what kind of product the project offers.

[change7]

Most ratings might be wrong or might not go as planned. Some ICOs can be rated very high and yet at the end of the tokensale event, there won't be listed on any major exchange or they won't yield any profit.

[arthur304]

Definitely yes. I use their ratings before doing my personal research on icos I want to invest in.

[karma_project]

No I do not believe. I trust, only my personal analysis of projects and experience. Ratings can be corrupt, so they can not be trusted.

[Adidas3]

Of course i do if i dont belive
I dont unter on this

[thoerz18]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

not only from the ICO rating ,, I do not believe it if I just look at it. I'd rather look at the websites, roadmaps and the project community. Successful ICO depends not only on the rating on a website, even if it's a popular website. because in a project everything is possible.

[coinporch]

no, i don't believe with any ICO ratings site
i believe with my personal review and research to any ICO project mate
and i will invest or buy an ICO with my own predictions  

[mybtcasset]

in my view and articles which i have read icorating.com is one of the best site in ico rating analysis ico companies and ico investors and even nasdaq too impressed with their services