BY_ATOM
|
|
March 04, 2018, 06:50:54 PM |
|
That is the beauty of ad supported video platforms. Nobody worries too much about piracy. Well, aside from the content creators who depend on advertising income. For the platform itself it is less of a problem.
I would not be surprised if one day another type of payment is invented that makes piracy pointless.
Piracy become pointless when you can pay something like $1 To watch a high quality movie rather then watching a low quality one full of ad and pop ups popping out of nowhere Yes its just matter to find the right price which makes the hassle and risk of going through illegal ways not worth anymore Yes, if the fees to get the services will be low, I am sure piracy can be decreased and gradually gone. Its almost impossible to be gone, because it can also be downloaded and widespreaded even without internet. Many people are collecting pirated movies in their Hardisk. Thats right, but as you can see with Itunes, there are millions of people who will pay for music or movies, if it is not so expensive. In apple's services, only high-quality content, which is why they are so popular. Plus, iPhone users have no alternative to watching movies and music.
|
|
|
|
Bolovich
Member
Offline
Activity: 224
Merit: 10
|
|
March 04, 2018, 06:55:05 PM |
|
I like the idea that tokens holders can invest in the offered film projects with the returns and conditions offered in a term sheet. Maybe we can create a own Serie when the ico collect enough If for example I had enough tokens then I invested some on a film project, that will be a new experience to me. The thing that till today is just a dream for me. Thanks to cryptoflix for offering such good stuff. Yes, investing in a film project you are convinced of and hopefully making good profit sounds just amazing. Had not thought on this side, really, after the platform delivered and working, we have the possibility to invest in the production of certain films and profit from its success? It is really something that will take the team to a continuous work, and its investors to many profits even after the initial phase But I think the risk of investing in series production is greater than investing in altcoins. For a serie to be profitable, both the serie and the platform that boradcasts it must be successful.
|
|
|
|
MandatoryOption
Member
Offline
Activity: 546
Merit: 12
|
|
March 04, 2018, 07:22:27 PM |
|
I like the idea that tokens holders can invest in the offered film projects with the returns and conditions offered in a term sheet. Maybe we can create a own Serie when the ico collect enough If for example I had enough tokens then I invested some on a film project, that will be a new experience to me. The thing that till today is just a dream for me. Thanks to cryptoflix for offering such good stuff. Yes, investing in a film project you are convinced of and hopefully making good profit sounds just amazing. Had not thought on this side, really, after the platform delivered and working, we have the possibility to invest in the production of certain films and profit from its success? It is really something that will take the team to a continuous work, and its investors to many profits even after the initial phase But I think the risk of investing in series production is greater than investing in altcoins. For a serie to be profitable, both the serie and the platform that boradcasts it must be successful. Sure, it's risky to invest in film projects, too. But I hope the Cryptoflix team will do a good job in selecting promising projects so that the risk for us investors is minimized.
|
|
|
|
ImTotya
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 168
Merit: 4
|
|
March 04, 2018, 07:28:59 PM |
|
I could easily argue that that not hitting the hard cap is a good thing. As long as they raise more than the softcap. After all it means the team had a good assessment of what they need, yet there is still room for growth.
I can't agree more. I always love projects reach soft cap not hard cap. Market cap is the most important thing for me and i always choose it to be lower at start. But doesn't it mean the development of the project is slowed down if raised amount is lower than hardcap? Probably still depends on how much is raised, but still. From my perspective, most icos are very ambitious with the targeted amounts of funds raised. Even if they don’t get all that they are aiming for, it is likely that they can continue on with the project In certain cases, some projects' devs seem to not have calculated the needed amount at all, therefore, their caps could be set very high, unreasonably high. Here, these things are more clear and transparent. sometimes there are projects that do not count the required amount but there are also projects that will extend the ico period if a certain amount is not earned can be drawn conclusions better all done transparently so all can know. Yes you are right many of the projects set too high hard caps. I sometimes get the impression that these figures are just made up. And the funniest thing about all this is that some of these projects have reached them!
|
|
|
|
niklasmato
|
|
March 04, 2018, 07:31:37 PM |
|
That is the beauty of ad supported video platforms. Nobody worries too much about piracy. Well, aside from the content creators who depend on advertising income. For the platform itself it is less of a problem.
I would not be surprised if one day another type of payment is invented that makes piracy pointless.
Piracy become pointless when you can pay something like $1 To watch a high quality movie rather then watching a low quality one full of ad and pop ups popping out of nowhere Yes its just matter to find the right price which makes the hassle and risk of going through illegal ways not worth anymore Yes, if the fees to get the services will be low, I am sure piracy can be decreased and gradually gone. Its almost impossible to be gone, because it can also be downloaded and widespreaded even without internet. Many people are collecting pirated movies in their Hardisk. Thats right, but as you can see with Itunes, there are millions of people who will pay for music or movies, if it is not so expensive. In apple's services, only high-quality content, which is why they are so popular. Plus, iPhone users have no alternative to watching movies and music. Off course they have ... all official app's from Netflix, Amazon etc.. are also available on IOS.
|
|
|
|
Frank37
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 770
Merit: 250
CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!
|
|
March 04, 2018, 07:49:49 PM |
|
That is the beauty of ad supported video platforms. Nobody worries too much about piracy. Well, aside from the content creators who depend on advertising income. For the platform itself it is less of a problem.
I would not be surprised if one day another type of payment is invented that makes piracy pointless.
Piracy become pointless when you can pay something like $1 To watch a high quality movie rather then watching a low quality one full of ad and pop ups popping out of nowhere Yes its just matter to find the right price which makes the hassle and risk of going through illegal ways not worth anymore Yes, if the fees to get the services will be low, I am sure piracy can be decreased and gradually gone. Its almost impossible to be gone, because it can also be downloaded and widespreaded even without internet. Many people are collecting pirated movies in their Hardisk. Thats right, but as you can see with Itunes, there are millions of people who will pay for music or movies, if it is not so expensive. In apple's services, only high-quality content, which is why they are so popular. Plus, iPhone users have no alternative to watching movies and music. Yes, of course, if i pay for a product, I expect high-quality content, even if I pay only 1 $. The distributer can earn thousands of dollars, because digital products which once produced can 1000times selled. I see no contradiction to my first statement, people are willing to pay for good content.
|
|
|
|
|
cmg12
|
|
March 04, 2018, 09:04:27 PM |
|
That is the beauty of ad supported video platforms. Nobody worries too much about piracy. Well, aside from the content creators who depend on advertising income. For the platform itself it is less of a problem.
I would not be surprised if one day another type of payment is invented that makes piracy pointless.
Piracy become pointless when you can pay something like $1 To watch a high quality movie rather then watching a low quality one full of ad and pop ups popping out of nowhere Yes its just matter to find the right price which makes the hassle and risk of going through illegal ways not worth anymore Yes, if the fees to get the services will be low, I am sure piracy can be decreased and gradually gone. Its almost impossible to be gone, because it can also be downloaded and widespreaded even without internet. Many people are collecting pirated movies in their Hardisk. Thats right, but as you can see with Itunes, there are millions of people who will pay for music or movies, if it is not so expensive. In apple's services, only high-quality content, which is why they are so popular. Plus, iPhone users have no alternative to watching movies and music. Yes, of course, if i pay for a product, I expect high-quality content, even if I pay only 1 $. The distributer can earn thousands of dollars, because digital products which once produced can 1000times selled. I see no contradiction to my first statement, people are willing to pay for good content. IPhone users have plenty of options to choose from if they want to watch movies
|
|
|
|
helloal
|
|
March 04, 2018, 09:13:01 PM |
|
Too bad it was just one small sentence relating to cryptoflix. I guess something is still better than no mention. The article even alludes to the similarity of the name to Netflix
|
|
|
|
matjas
|
|
March 04, 2018, 10:08:52 PM |
|
I like the idea that tokens holders can invest in the offered film projects with the returns and conditions offered in a term sheet. Maybe we can create a own Serie when the ico collect enough If for example I had enough tokens then I invested some on a film project, that will be a new experience to me. The thing that till today is just a dream for me. Thanks to cryptoflix for offering such good stuff. Yes, investing in a film project you are convinced of and hopefully making good profit sounds just amazing. Had not thought on this side, really, after the platform delivered and working, we have the possibility to invest in the production of certain films and profit from its success? It is really something that will take the team to a continuous work, and its investors to many profits even after the initial phase But I think the risk of investing in series production is greater than investing in altcoins. For a serie to be profitable, both the serie and the platform that boradcasts it must be successful. Sure, it's risky to invest in film projects, too. But I hope the Cryptoflix team will do a good job in selecting promising projects so that the risk for us investors is minimized. You will have to look at it like a business opportunity and spread your investments thought many movies. I am sure blockbusters dont need many small investors so we will have to search for our profits elsewhere
|
|
|
|
aveon
Member
Offline
Activity: 434
Merit: 10
|
|
March 04, 2018, 10:13:07 PM |
|
I like the idea that tokens holders can invest in the offered film projects with the returns and conditions offered in a term sheet. Maybe we can create a own Serie when the ico collect enough If for example I had enough tokens then I invested some on a film project, that will be a new experience to me. The thing that till today is just a dream for me. Thanks to cryptoflix for offering such good stuff. Yes, investing in a film project you are convinced of and hopefully making good profit sounds just amazing. Had not thought on this side, really, after the platform delivered and working, we have the possibility to invest in the production of certain films and profit from its success? It is really something that will take the team to a continuous work, and its investors to many profits even after the initial phase But I think the risk of investing in series production is greater than investing in altcoins. For a serie to be profitable, both the serie and the platform that boradcasts it must be successful. Sure, it's risky to invest in film projects, too. But I hope the Cryptoflix team will do a good job in selecting promising projects so that the risk for us investors is minimized. You will have to look at it like a business opportunity and spread your investments thought many movies. I am sure blockbusters dont need many small investors so we will have to search for our profits elsewhere The more we invest, the more films within this platform we will be able to later watch, right? I would strongly prefer this platform has all the movies I am usually looking for
|
|
|
|
crazyfrog01
Member
Offline
Activity: 308
Merit: 12
|
|
March 04, 2018, 10:43:35 PM |
|
I think it will need a code ass that can only be used when on uses the platform, then when a recorder of some kind is used, the video go with the watermark, when is legit, it is hidden from the screen, but is there, so there is no way around it, but to have the code, soi can think how that ca work using the blockchain.
Is something like this even possible? And what about someone is using the platform legally but make a video capture of the fullscreen video. In this case it would produce a new video file from a screen capture. No way you can be protected from this, but in case somebody will really decide to record from another screen, the picture is probably no good and sound is even worse. Viewers nowadays are quite picky. Where is the problem? You take a direct capture of the screen. If you watch it in 1080p or so the capture is also in that quality, isn't it? Yeah you are right, you CAN actually record the tv itself from the outside, there is no way somebody could avoid doing that, though the quality will always be less than the original, you could use a high-resolution camera and a studio microphone, but there is not much one can do with just sound an images, while the original file has way more data than just that,still, we will know that is a pirate, so that can be denounce. I am not talking about a camera... There is software to capture videos from your screen directly.
|
|
|
|
belechau
|
|
March 04, 2018, 10:50:36 PM |
|
I think it will need a code ass that can only be used when on uses the platform, then when a recorder of some kind is used, the video go with the watermark, when is legit, it is hidden from the screen, but is there, so there is no way around it, but to have the code, soi can think how that ca work using the blockchain.
Is something like this even possible? And what about someone is using the platform legally but make a video capture of the fullscreen video. In this case it would produce a new video file from a screen capture. No way you can be protected from this, but in case somebody will really decide to record from another screen, the picture is probably no good and sound is even worse. Viewers nowadays are quite picky. Where is the problem? You take a direct capture of the screen. If you watch it in 1080p or so the capture is also in that quality, isn't it? Yeah you are right, you CAN actually record the tv itself from the outside, there is no way somebody could avoid doing that, though the quality will always be less than the original, you could use a high-resolution camera and a studio microphone, but there is not much one can do with just sound an images, while the original file has way more data than just that,still, we will know that is a pirate, so that can be denounce. I am not talking about a camera... There is software to capture videos from your screen directly. The team has already quoted something like the watermark, which would give the assurance that it would not be pirated with facilities, for the recordings directly from the screen is more complicated, but the tip is valid for Time to work on it, it would be even better to have legal means in the future.
|
|
|
|
Trrrt
|
|
March 05, 2018, 12:42:25 AM |
|
I don’t know too how it’s possible to protect from copy or something like that, there is always a way to copy movies I think. Maybe something is possible to change that but i think it’s not that easy, if cryptoflix can offer that the potential is insane ...
|
|
|
|
saintkamei
Member
Offline
Activity: 210
Merit: 10
|
|
March 05, 2018, 01:24:53 AM |
|
I don’t know too how it’s possible to protect from copy or something like that, there is always a way to copy movies I think. Maybe something is possible to change that but i think it’s not that easy, if cryptoflix can offer that the potential is insane ...
No technology has ever been developed that can successfully stop piracy without affecting the user experience. I hope you guys remember DRM. Whatever measure CRYPTOFLIX takes up, it would be pertinent to focus ease of use, easy availability and entry. Majority of people who download pirated stuff are into it because of the problems in payment and accessibility ...especially in developing countries. People do not want the hassle of going through disease ridden websites just to watch a movie.
|
|
|
|
Voltaje
|
|
March 05, 2018, 04:26:48 AM |
|
I don’t know too how it’s possible to protect from copy or something like that, there is always a way to copy movies I think. Maybe something is possible to change that but i think it’s not that easy, if cryptoflix can offer that the potential is insane ...
No technology has ever been developed that can successfully stop piracy without affecting the user experience. I hope you guys remember DRM. Whatever measure CRYPTOFLIX takes up, it would be pertinent to focus ease of use, easy availability and entry. Majority of people who download pirated stuff are into it because of the problems in payment and accessibility ...especially in developing countries. People do not want the hassle of going through disease ridden websites just to watch a movie. That is correct if the prices and the way one enters the platform is not so user-friendly and even a little difficult, then most people will just use the usual services like neetflix or just download pirate ones, let's hope criptoflix can solve these problems in their products.
|
|
|
|
omwibya
Member
Offline
Activity: 434
Merit: 10
|
|
March 05, 2018, 05:58:52 AM |
|
I don’t know too how it’s possible to protect from copy or something like that, there is always a way to copy movies I think. Maybe something is possible to change that but i think it’s not that easy, if cryptoflix can offer that the potential is insane ...
No technology has ever been developed that can successfully stop piracy without affecting the user experience. I hope you guys remember DRM. Whatever measure CRYPTOFLIX takes up, it would be pertinent to focus ease of use, easy availability and entry. Majority of people who download pirated stuff are into it because of the problems in payment and accessibility ...especially in developing countries. People do not want the hassle of going through disease ridden websites just to watch a movie. That is correct if the prices and the way one enters the platform is not so user-friendly and even a little difficult, then most people will just use the usual services like neetflix or just download pirate ones, let's hope criptoflix can solve these problems in their products. when you compete with pirates, your best bet is to offer a better service for an acceptable price.
|
|
|
|
crazyfrog01
Member
Offline
Activity: 308
Merit: 12
|
|
March 05, 2018, 06:28:05 AM |
|
I think it will need a code ass that can only be used when on uses the platform, then when a recorder of some kind is used, the video go with the watermark, when is legit, it is hidden from the screen, but is there, so there is no way around it, but to have the code, soi can think how that ca work using the blockchain.
Is something like this even possible? And what about someone is using the platform legally but make a video capture of the fullscreen video. In this case it would produce a new video file from a screen capture. No way you can be protected from this, but in case somebody will really decide to record from another screen, the picture is probably no good and sound is even worse. Viewers nowadays are quite picky. Where is the problem? You take a direct capture of the screen. If you watch it in 1080p or so the capture is also in that quality, isn't it? Yeah you are right, you CAN actually record the tv itself from the outside, there is no way somebody could avoid doing that, though the quality will always be less than the original, you could use a high-resolution camera and a studio microphone, but there is not much one can do with just sound an images, while the original file has way more data than just that,still, we will know that is a pirate, so that can be denounce. I am not talking about a camera... There is software to capture videos from your screen directly. The team has already quoted something like the watermark, which would give the assurance that it would not be pirated with facilities, for the recordings directly from the screen is more complicated, but the tip is valid for Time to work on it, it would be even better to have legal means in the future. But that was my question in the first place. If this is possible to prevent. Then it drifted apart to camera stuff, which was not my intention. So once again: Is it possible to prevent such captures?
|
|
|
|
Makkara
|
|
March 05, 2018, 07:43:27 AM |
|
I think it will need a code ass that can only be used when on uses the platform, then when a recorder of some kind is used, the video go with the watermark, when is legit, it is hidden from the screen, but is there, so there is no way around it, but to have the code, soi can think how that ca work using the blockchain.
Is something like this even possible? And what about someone is using the platform legally but make a video capture of the fullscreen video. In this case it would produce a new video file from a screen capture. No way you can be protected from this, but in case somebody will really decide to record from another screen, the picture is probably no good and sound is even worse. Viewers nowadays are quite picky. Where is the problem? You take a direct capture of the screen. If you watch it in 1080p or so the capture is also in that quality, isn't it? Yeah you are right, you CAN actually record the tv itself from the outside, there is no way somebody could avoid doing that, though the quality will always be less than the original, you could use a high-resolution camera and a studio microphone, but there is not much one can do with just sound an images, while the original file has way more data than just that,still, we will know that is a pirate, so that can be denounce. I am not talking about a camera... There is software to capture videos from your screen directly. The team has already quoted something like the watermark, which would give the assurance that it would not be pirated with facilities, for the recordings directly from the screen is more complicated, but the tip is valid for Time to work on it, it would be even better to have legal means in the future. But that was my question in the first place. If this is possible to prevent. Then it drifted apart to camera stuff, which was not my intention. So once again: Is it possible to prevent such captures? No there is no way to prevent people for capturing the video itself, whatever you see on screen can be copied.
|
|
|
|
viljy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1862
Merit: 1084
|
|
March 05, 2018, 07:51:17 AM |
|
I think it will need a code ass that can only be used when on uses the platform, then when a recorder of some kind is used, the video go with the watermark, when is legit, it is hidden from the screen, but is there, so there is no way around it, but to have the code, soi can think how that ca work using the blockchain.
Is something like this even possible? And what about someone is using the platform legally but make a video capture of the fullscreen video. In this case it would produce a new video file from a screen capture. No way you can be protected from this, but in case somebody will really decide to record from another screen, the picture is probably no good and sound is even worse. Viewers nowadays are quite picky. Where is the problem? You take a direct capture of the screen. If you watch it in 1080p or so the capture is also in that quality, isn't it? Yeah you are right, you CAN actually record the tv itself from the outside, there is no way somebody could avoid doing that, though the quality will always be less than the original, you could use a high-resolution camera and a studio microphone, but there is not much one can do with just sound an images, while the original file has way more data than just that,still, we will know that is a pirate, so that can be denounce. I am not talking about a camera... There is software to capture videos from your screen directly. The team has already quoted something like the watermark, which would give the assurance that it would not be pirated with facilities, for the recordings directly from the screen is more complicated, but the tip is valid for Time to work on it, it would be even better to have legal means in the future. But that was my question in the first place. If this is possible to prevent. Then it drifted apart to camera stuff, which was not my intention. So once again: Is it possible to prevent such captures? It is impossible to prevent. The watermark can be closed with something in the video editor, or it can be blurred. To prevent illegal copying, you need to place a watermark on the entire frame diagonally or in the middle. Then no one will watch this video. Therefore, we must accept the inevitable piracy. And build your business model so that the damage from piracy was insignificant.
|
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
| ██▄▄██████████▄▄█████████ █▄██████████████▄████████ ███████▀▀▀▀███████▄▄▄▄███ █████████████████████████ █████████████████████████ ████████████▀▀▀▀▀████████ █████████████████████████ █████████████████████████ ████████████▄▄▄▄▄████████ █████████████████████████ █████████████████████████ ███████▄▄▄▄███████▀▀▀▀███ █▀██████████████▀████████ ██▀▀██████████▀▀█████████ | | | I © I |
|
|
|
|