🌟🌟🚀 [ANN] CRYPTOFLIX 🌟🌟🚀 Watch Movies. Fund Films. Get Cryptos. Repeat.

[wissy]

The idea is just brilliant ! Only the baddest thing is the 'Flix' at the end of the name, was it necessary because we doesn't need Netflix V2 !
But in general, i like the idea and the concept, this token might fly as soon as there's a working project available, well, good luck with that !

This made for marketing purposes specially I think. But there is nothing bad. May be this will attract more people to project.

As they say, bad publicity is still a publicity. Anyways, it was already explained couple of times how the cryptoflix platform is different from netflix, but I guess you're right saying that it still attract a lot of people, because they probably wanna know if there is a difference.

[1715685223]

1715685223

[1715685223]

1715685223

[Sozialtourist]

The idea is just brilliant ! Only the baddest thing is the 'Flix' at the end of the name, was it necessary because we doesn't need Netflix V2 !
But in general, i like the idea and the concept, this token might fly as soon as there's a working project available, well, good luck with that !

This made for marketing purposes specially I think. But there is nothing bad. May be this will attract more people to project.

Exactly. So if you ask me this 'flix'-ending was a great move. When you hear the name of the project, you instantly think of Netflix and start to get curious about the project.

[jonnytracker]

The idea is just brilliant ! Only the baddest thing is the 'Flix' at the end of the name, was it necessary because we doesn't need Netflix V2 !
But in general, i like the idea and the concept, this token might fly as soon as there's a working project available, well, good luck with that !

that is what i was thinking at the begin as well but as you dig deeper you see is not just a copy paste crypto clone of netflix

I think it's like Netflix in a way. But with advance feature or Netflix 2.0 as mentioned above

Just wanted to clarify the difference between the Netflix Model and the CRYPTOFLIX Model.

Netflix is mainly comparable to a Pay TV channel, except they do not have a fixed schedule. They pay license fees for the period where the content is on their platform up front and users can watch the movies as many times as they want, when they want.

In the film industry windows, Netflix is among the last stops in the income waterfall before free TV, but after VOD and DVD/BluRay. So Netflix will not have brand new movies, other than their own, because the content owners want income from the other windows first.

Also Netflix are producing their own content, which I believe they have re-allocated as many funds to as for licensing in 2018 so likely expect more of their own content going forward and less third party content.

The CRYPTOFLIX Model is more comparable to that of iTunes, which is a revenue sharing model where the content owners put their content on the platform against a share of the revenue and at no cost other than storage and administration to the platform.

CRYPTOFLIX will be different than the existing platforms in that it will be possible to use the platform without an Apple device and without a credit card (by using FLIX Tokens) and we will have more flexibility for the content owners in that the minimum quality requirements for entry onto the platform will be lower than the minimum standards for iTunes etc. and also our pricing structure will be more flexible. Also we can use smart contracts to share the revenue instantly with the content owners - in the current platforms this can take months or even years.

Thanks for clarifying about the two platform.  Why not cryptoflix own blockchain instead of token in ethereum?

[viljy]

    |\___/|
   /          \
  /_.~  ~,_\   - project has been successfully listed on FOXICO
       \@/

https://foxico.io/project/cryptoflix

The rating there is only 7 out of 10. Not enough for such a promising project. It is interesting with what it is connected. Probably with the fact that, according to experts, the idea does not contain something original. However, all these ratings are highly subjective.

[king_of_alts]

The idea is just brilliant ! Only the baddest thing is the 'Flix' at the end of the name, was it necessary because we doesn't need Netflix V2 !
But in general, i like the idea and the concept, this token might fly as soon as there's a working project available, well, good luck with that !

This made for marketing purposes specially I think. But there is nothing bad. May be this will attract more people to project.

Exactly. So if you ask me this 'flix'-ending was a great move. When you hear the name of the project, you instantly think of Netflix and start to get curious about the project.

I like the name too. It has a high brand recognition if you will. "Crypto" and "(net)"Flix".

[kraterion]

    |\___/|
   /          \
  /_.~  ~,_\   - project has been successfully listed on FOXICO
       \@/

https://foxico.io/project/cryptoflix

The rating there is only 7 out of 10. Not enough for such a promising project. It is interesting with what it is connected. Probably with the fact that, according to experts, the idea does not contain something original. However, all these ratings are highly subjective.

So for the so called "experts" give to unbanked people a platform to watch non-pirated movies on demand and a platform for movies' crowdfuding, isn't original. Lol experts

[MissedBTCtrain]

The idea is just brilliant ! Only the baddest thing is the 'Flix' at the end of the name, was it necessary because we doesn't need Netflix V2 !
But in general, i like the idea and the concept, this token might fly as soon as there's a working project available, well, good luck with that !

that is what i was thinking at the begin as well but as you dig deeper you see is not just a copy paste crypto clone of netflix

I think it's like Netflix in a way. But with advance feature or Netflix 2.0 as mentioned above

Just wanted to clarify the difference between the Netflix Model and the CRYPTOFLIX Model.

Netflix is mainly comparable to a Pay TV channel, except they do not have a fixed schedule. They pay license fees for the period where the content is on their platform up front and users can watch the movies as many times as they want, when they want.

In the film industry windows, Netflix is among the last stops in the income waterfall before free TV, but after VOD and DVD/BluRay. So Netflix will not have brand new movies, other than their own, because the content owners want income from the other windows first.

Also Netflix are producing their own content, which I believe they have re-allocated as many funds to as for licensing in 2018 so likely expect more of their own content going forward and less third party content.

The CRYPTOFLIX Model is more comparable to that of iTunes, which is a revenue sharing model where the content owners put their content on the platform against a share of the revenue and at no cost other than storage and administration to the platform.

CRYPTOFLIX will be different than the existing platforms in that it will be possible to use the platform without an Apple device and without a credit card (by using FLIX Tokens) and we will have more flexibility for the content owners in that the minimum quality requirements for entry onto the platform will be lower than the minimum standards for iTunes etc. and also our pricing structure will be more flexible. Also we can use smart contracts to share the revenue instantly with the content owners - in the current platforms this can take months or even years.

Thanks for clarifying about the two platform.  Why not cryptoflix own blockchain instead of token in ethereum?

Thanks for explaining the main differences in the models of Netflix and Cryptoflix, is there a blog posted about this? If there is not, there should be one soon

[webwakko]

About the "flix" part : Flix is slang language... Allthough it's pretty close to the NetFlix name, the scope is in the same range... so I don't mind the "flix" in the name..
and if this takes of as it is supposed to, rebranding is always an option
People who remember Filmnet (mind the NET :p) should know that.. this one has been rebranded after several years to Canal+ and is still running on some providers.

Just wondering... will Cryptoflix also have limited available content?

[aveon]

About the "flix" part : Flix is slang language... Allthough it's pretty close to the NetFlix name, the scope is in the same range... so I don't mind the "flix" in the name..
and if this takes of as it is supposed to, rebranding is always an option
People who remember Filmnet (mind the NET :p) should know that.. this one has been rebranded after several years to Canal+ and is still running on some providers.

Just wondering... will Cryptoflix also have limited available content?

If they choose to offer pirate materials (which is highly unlikely), there will be virtually no limits. Otherwise, there surely be some limits at least in terms of movies currently in cinemas. And they definitely are not going to offer porn, at least on their main page))

[turkandjaydee]

The idea is just brilliant ! Only the baddest thing is the 'Flix' at the end of the name, was it necessary because we doesn't need Netflix V2 !
But in general, i like the idea and the concept, this token might fly as soon as there's a working project available, well, good luck with that !

This made for marketing purposes specially I think. But there is nothing bad. May be this will attract more people to project.

It looks a little bad when competing, but as we all know that Netflix name has become familiar to many people, so the flix word probably will be helpful to make this familiar to people too.

[the_donald]

The idea is just brilliant ! Only the baddest thing is the 'Flix' at the end of the name, was it necessary because we doesn't need Netflix V2 !
But in general, i like the idea and the concept, this token might fly as soon as there's a working project available, well, good luck with that !

This made for marketing purposes specially I think. But there is nothing bad. May be this will attract more people to project.

It looks a little bad when competing, but as we all know that Netflix name has become familiar to many people, so the flix word probably will be helpful to make this familiar to people too.

branding is important and this is made to be easily recognizable by the general public. you have to have something that resonates with people and they're able to associate it with movie streaming.

[levyashin]

About the "flix" thing it is probably purely for marketing reasons.

For example, i saw this ico because of the flix thing.

[king_of_alts]

About the "flix" thing it is probably purely for marketing reasons.

For example, i saw this ico because of the flix thing.

It looks like "flix" was a slang term for movies even before Netflix came around.

https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=flix

[Frickeladm]

The idea is just brilliant ! Only the baddest thing is the 'Flix' at the end of the name, was it necessary because we doesn't need Netflix V2 !
But in general, i like the idea and the concept, this token might fly as soon as there's a working project available, well, good luck with that !

This made for marketing purposes specially I think. But there is nothing bad. May be this will attract more people to project.

Exactly. So if you ask me this 'flix'-ending was a great move. When you hear the name of the project, you instantly think of Netflix and start to get curious about the project.

Thats because "flix" was a big release group for pirated movies. So you flix'd that new title in the cinemas. Netflix grabbed that and put it into their name - today it is kind of a slang for movies and series. And sounds waaaay better than "CryptoMov" (reminds me somehow of apples .mov quicktime files lol)

[Voltaje]

If we choose to back a film, will our names or nicks will be on after credits?

Wouldn't that be cool? I can just throw some Money just for this.

That is a good question. But I think some people would prefer not to be mentioned as investors in a particular film or else they will be tracked by IRS.

It depends on whether cryptoflix decides to release your details. Many people could have the same name, so having your first and last name isn’t that much information for the irs

I could imagine it to be pretty cool to watch a movie which is funded with the help of cryptocurrency investors.

It could bring a weird feeling for me when that time comes, remembering that we have witnessed to CRYPTOFLIX early development.

Well, it will also means that cryptoflix in a long term investment, at least if you want to make a good profit, by the end of 2019 at least, if no more, so when a couple of films are made with crypto investors, and the profits are made when said film or series are live, THEN this platform will truly moon, so q1 2020 will be the sweet time to sell all your holding form now, at least to the patient, this project can bring a lot of profits before, at the end of the year, but the money will be at 2020, so i recommend to consider this a long term investment.

[CHRISBIN702]

About the "flix" thing it is probably purely for marketing reasons.

For example, i saw this ico because of the flix thing.

It looks like "flix" was a slang term for movies even before Netflix came around.

https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=flix

I will verify that info. We've been sayin "flix" here in USA for ages. long before the internet even.

[crazyfrog01]

The idea is just brilliant ! Only the baddest thing is the 'Flix' at the end of the name, was it necessary because we doesn't need Netflix V2 !
But in general, i like the idea and the concept, this token might fly as soon as there's a working project available, well, good luck with that !

This made for marketing purposes specially I think. But there is nothing bad. May be this will attract more people to project.

Exactly. So if you ask me this 'flix'-ending was a great move. When you hear the name of the project, you instantly think of Netflix and start to get curious about the project.

I like the name too. It has a high brand recognition if you will. "Crypto" and "(net)"Flix".

That is where people think totally different. I don't like the similarity to Netflix in the name because it looks that someone tries to use it for getting fast money. I would like to see an original name, but well, you can't have everything.

[huutertools]

    |\___/|
   /          \
  /_.~  ~,_\   - project has been successfully listed on FOXICO
       \@/

https://foxico.io/project/cryptoflix

The rating there is only 7 out of 10. Not enough for such a promising project. It is interesting with what it is connected. Probably with the fact that, according to experts, the idea does not contain something original. However, all these ratings are highly subjective.

So for the so called "experts" give to unbanked people a platform to watch non-pirated movies on demand and a platform for movies' crowdfuding, isn't original. Lol experts

I am also a bit surprised about the rating of 7 out of 10. There are no infomation why they gave a 7.
Interestin is that the category "idea" is marked as "usual". In my opinion it is a awesome idea with much portential.
The Team is rated as "Mid-Level-Team". If they do so. I am looking forward if there are changes in idea and team if the project goes on.

[crazyfrog01]

    |\___/|
   /          \
  /_.~  ~,_\   - project has been successfully listed on FOXICO
       \@/

https://foxico.io/project/cryptoflix

The rating there is only 7 out of 10. Not enough for such a promising project. It is interesting with what it is connected. Probably with the fact that, according to experts, the idea does not contain something original. However, all these ratings are highly subjective.

So for the so called "experts" give to unbanked people a platform to watch non-pirated movies on demand and a platform for movies' crowdfuding, isn't original. Lol experts

I am also a bit surprised about the rating of 7 out of 10. There are no infomation why they gave a 7.
Interestin is that the category "idea" is marked as "usual". In my opinion it is a awesome idea with much portential.
The Team is rated as "Mid-Level-Team". If they do so. I am looking forward if there are changes in idea and team if the project goes on.

Well I also think a 7 out of 10 is a bit low here, more like a 8.5 in my eyes. There are some weak points but this project looks really solid and they have a real vision at least.

[Token Williams]

I am puzzled about Cryptoflix' business model. How can they do all those things promised in the whitepaper, undercut competitors and yet be self-sustainable?

That's something I wonder with lots of projects. They are all 100% dream scenarios wherein EVERYTHING goes right and there is no competition.