Bitcoin Forum
November 05, 2024, 06:56:26 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  

Warning: Moderators do not remove likely scams. You must use your own brain: caveat emptor. Watch out for Ponzi schemes. Do not invest more than you can afford to lose.

Pages: « 1 ... 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 [152] 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 ... 261 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [HAVELOCK] PETAMINE - 1,150 TH/S HASH RATE (1GH/S per Unit)  (Read 565817 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
NotLambchop
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 254


View Profile
May 23, 2014, 04:37:26 PM
 #3021

...
Sidenote on people referring to CryptX as a 'him': CryptX is a team of two, registered as a company in Belgium and a datacenter that's on a map. It would be nice if we could stop talking about them as if they were a dodgy and traceless individual (e.g. pbmining so far).

Another totally not dodgy team:

aasl
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 250



View Profile
May 23, 2014, 04:40:47 PM
 #3022

what does NEO do?

For security, your account has been locked. Email acctcomp15@theymos.e4ward.com
NotLambchop
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 254


View Profile
May 23, 2014, 04:49:28 PM
 #3023

^
NEO tells you to stop running with scissors.

altoidmintz
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 180
Merit: 100


After Economics: Learning is just the first step.


View Profile WWW
May 23, 2014, 04:57:17 PM
 #3024

what does NEO do?

exactly

if you need to ask, don't invest.

and you need to ask

stompysteve
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574
Merit: 500


View Profile
May 23, 2014, 05:02:16 PM
 #3025

This whole market/ipo thing is a bit unfortunate. But havelock has had opening/closing market at inopportune times before...

As for the second (planned, unlike what some users seem to think) IPO batch, I'm sure it'll go pretty well once hardware comes online on Monday. People are sceptical to the extreme with this kind of project, but once some sort of assurance is given (e.g. CryptX buy-in) the sales go up very fast.

On the note of hardware, sure it's unfortunate that we're under 500, but with larger hardware quantity comes greater variance. It'll be the same when we deploy 1100-1500 TH/s.

Sidenote on people referring to CryptX as a 'him': CryptX is a team of two, registered as a company in Belgium and a datacenter that's on a map. It would be nice if we could stop talking about them as if they were a dodgy and traceless individual (e.g. pbmining so far).
WHY ARE WE ONLY HASHING AT 1400 TH IN THE LAST 15 MIN, CRYPTX NEEDS TO GIVE DIV COMPENSATION THIS WEEK!!

 Tongue
_biO_
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 174
Merit: 102


View Profile
May 23, 2014, 05:22:10 PM
 #3026

I'd say the code behind havelock is about mtgox level quality Tongue
What do you mean?

It looks like a lot is managed manually, which would mean the code is not doing what it's supposed to do. The things I can see from the outside are not very promising. Website written in PHP, ajax requests with html as response, mixed spaces/tabs formatting, the overall html/js/css structure... all indicative of a low quality codebase.

This signature refers to itself.
Aireun
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 113
Merit: 10

Perpetual optimism is a force multiplier.


View Profile
May 23, 2014, 05:34:19 PM
 #3027

So we have a total of 199'ish bitcoins mined this week. And if we sell out of this IPO (at current) we should only need about 486 BTC to invest more to start reciving dividends. Am I right?

In Bitcoin We Trust! Your link: https://hashie.co/t?p=30630&v=85f
pleiotropik
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 144
Merit: 100


View Profile
May 23, 2014, 06:05:42 PM
 #3028

So we have a total of 199'ish bitcoins mined this week. And if we sell out of this IPO (at current) we should only need about 486 BTC to invest more to start reciving dividends. Am I right?
Depends.
CBGuy
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 6
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 23, 2014, 06:10:54 PM
 #3029

This whole market/ipo thing is a bit unfortunate. But havelock has had opening/closing market at inopportune times before...

As for the second (planned, unlike what some users seem to think) IPO batch, I'm sure it'll go pretty well once hardware comes online on Monday. People are sceptical to the extreme with this kind of project, but once some sort of assurance is given (e.g. CryptX buy-in) the sales go up very fast.

On the note of hardware, sure it's unfortunate that we're under 500, but with larger hardware quantity comes greater variance. It'll be the same when we deploy 1100-1500 TH/s.

Sidenote on people referring to CryptX as a 'him': CryptX is a team of two, registered as a company in Belgium and a datacenter that's on a map. It would be nice if we could stop talking about them as if they were a dodgy and traceless individual (e.g. pbmining so far).
+1
havelock
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 328
Merit: 250



View Profile WWW
May 23, 2014, 07:20:31 PM
 #3030

We also know who they are buying their equipment from as we release funds from escrow to cover the cost.

By Monday the PETA Fund will live up to its name and start hashing above Peta.

Thank you for everyone who have supported this Fund.

Collider
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714
Merit: 500



View Profile
May 23, 2014, 07:22:40 PM
 #3031

Food for thought:

With BTC rising, would it be possible to deploy a little more hardware, as delivery contracts are probably in USD?
I mean, cryptx should be raising more money than initially anticipated, which could be passed on to investors for slightly more GH/share.
Morguk
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 595
Merit: 506



View Profile
May 23, 2014, 07:41:57 PM
 #3032

How stable is the future of peta-mine?

I ask because a few days ago people were selling and leaving and there was a lot of talk that peta was a waste of time.

I held my shares, but can someone explain how peta will sustain itself in say 6 months?

Calculate the chance of hitting a bitcoin block when solo mining at
naaktslak
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 219
Merit: 100


View Profile
May 23, 2014, 08:09:40 PM
 #3033

when can we expect dividends?

Anonymousg64
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 250


View Profile
May 23, 2014, 08:44:35 PM
 #3034

when can we expect dividends?

we will know better when we start getting hardware online and after the ipo
altoidmintz
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 180
Merit: 100


After Economics: Learning is just the first step.


View Profile WWW
May 23, 2014, 09:05:34 PM
 #3035

We also know who they are buying their equipment from as we release funds from escrow to cover the cost.

By Monday the PETA Fund will live up to its name and start hashing above Peta.

Thank you for everyone who have supported this Fund.

+++++

kenmomotaro
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 66
Merit: 10


View Profile
May 23, 2014, 10:54:24 PM
 #3036

How stable is the future of peta-mine?

I ask because a few days ago people were selling and leaving and there was a lot of talk that peta was a waste of time.

I held my shares, but can someone explain how peta will sustain itself in say 6 months?

IMO, we are not going to see the plateau period of difficulty in a short period of time. Yes, I'm saying we might keep 15%+ difficulty rising for months. So, in order to make PETA more competitive, I think we should increase our hashrate as fast as we can. So that Cryptx is able to reduce hosting fee further. Let's say PETA hit 3 PH/s or more, maybe hosting fee will reduce to $0.2/kWh or something. So I totally agree Cryptx expands our hashrate at full speed. Maybe some of us didn't see that point and sell their shares too early. For long term profit, I support dividends/reinvestment adjusts to 10%/90% until we can reduce hosting fee further. Smiley
Though that might crush the yield and share price?
NotLambchop
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 254


View Profile
May 23, 2014, 11:13:21 PM
 #3037

... For long term profit, I support dividends/reinvestment adjusts to 10%/90% until we can reduce hosting fee further. Smiley
Though that might crush the yield and share price?

Here's an idea:  If everyone just sends all their dividends back to cryptx, PETA will be able to grow its hashrate faster than network difficulty increase, and eventually will control 200% of the network.

Yeah, I think up smart stuff like this all the time.  Mom wasn't kidding when she told me I'm one of God's special chosen ones.
kenmomotaro
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 66
Merit: 10


View Profile
May 24, 2014, 12:15:14 AM
 #3038

... For long term profit, I support dividends/reinvestment adjusts to 10%/90% until we can reduce hosting fee further. Smiley
Though that might crush the yield and share price?

Here's an idea:  If everyone just sends all their dividends back to cryptx, PETA will be able to grow its hashrate faster than network difficulty increase, and eventually will control 200% of the network.

Yeah, I think up smart stuff like this all the time.  Mom wasn't kidding when she told me I'm one of God's special chosen ones.


Did you do the calculation?
If we send all the dividends back to Cryptx, we can just merely catch up with the difficulty grows since the reinvestment  ghs/$ is not cheap...
what i'm saying is with enough hashrate we could reduce hosting fee and become more competitive. Did you get that point?
NotLambchop
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 254


View Profile
May 24, 2014, 12:33:05 AM
 #3039

... For long term profit, I support dividends/reinvestment adjusts to 10%/90% until we can reduce hosting fee further. Smiley
Though that might crush the yield and share price?

Here's an idea:  If everyone just sends all their dividends back to cryptx, PETA will be able to grow its hashrate faster than network difficulty increase, and eventually will control 200% of the network.

Yeah, I think up smart stuff like this all the time.  Mom wasn't kidding when she told me I'm one of God's special chosen ones.


Did you do the calculation?
If we send all the dividends back to Cryptx, we can just merely catch up with the difficulty grows since the reinvestment  ghs/$ is not cheap...

So tell cryptx to issue more shares, have more IPOs, and withhold all the divs 'til PETA controls 200% of the network.
If it makes sense this time, it makes 3.14 times as much sense to do it again.

Bonus: Keep increasing the hashrate 'til hosting fees start getting negative -- moar profit.
JstnPwll
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 92
Merit: 10


View Profile
May 24, 2014, 01:04:17 AM
 #3040

So tell cryptx to issue more shares, have more IPOs, and withhold all the divs 'til PETA controls 200% of the network.
If it makes sense this time, it makes 3.14 times as much sense to do it again.

Bonus: Keep increasing the hashrate 'til hosting fees start getting negative -- moar profit.

How to tell when you should move along to another thread: when legitimate critical thinking and skepticism are traded for trolling.

Developer, entrepreneur, idea-seeker.
BTC: 14MP75VG3Nf53pSEjowmA9gVPVvEvNpabz
Pages: « 1 ... 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 [152] 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 ... 261 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!