Bounty and too many participants

[zynan]

I think a bounty campaign that has many participants is fine, it helps the project to be known more, many people will help to promote it. And I agree that unfortunately there will be a less reward. I think the best thing to do is to limit the number of participants in a certain bounty, so it will not be so overfill and so that the campaign manager can manage it properly.

[1715000014]

1715000014

[1715000014]

1715000014

[bascinsto]

I advise you not to waste time on the bounty, where there are many participants.  You will get few coins.  I advise you to look for a bounty with a small number of participants.

[alaricoin]

It is true there are campaigns with 4 5 thousand participants. But there is no control there are dozens of duplicate profiles. There are people with 50 twitter profiles. Few are those who work effectively to promote the ico

[Lyinman]

I think Everyone likes free.

[HSRP]

This is because there is no commercialized bounty forum. BTT is not a special bounty forum, but many ICOs have come to this forum to promote their products because of the number of BTT cryptocurrency players.

Having too many people involved in Bounty will make our income drop dramatically. I think in the future perhaps the Bounty participants will get less value. If the Bounty Manager specifies the number of participants, it will probably be better. It is not advisable for many participants to affect the income of many.

[bboyjohn]

Do you remember the bounty campaign named envion? There were thousands of participants in this campaign and no reward distribution has been made so far. Do not think that crowded places always make a lot of money

[Israel712]

Calling for regulation will not be in favour of those neither developers nor miners as more entries mean wider coverage for their business. However, the more efficient you are the more chance of making profits even if the entire world joins the bounty campaign.

[Twilvin]

Yes, now the bounty is very popular and I try not to participate in the bounty where there are a lot of participants.  It's a waste of time.

I think that the bounty managers will be strict for joining bounty campaigns especially in social media campaigns, i think that there is a limit in joining social media campaigns, like the maximum participants are 1000 or 1500 only.

[BravO_o]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

Sometimes there is a small way out of this situation. Most often it happens that the tokens that have just entered the exchange are cheaper than the ICO. After the listing, you can immediately buy coins and in the end your profit will be more

[msycitizen]

In my personal opinion there's nothing wrong in what more participants joining bounty campaigns, because this is really easy money for so many people for not so hard work.

[dollurs]

Yes. when the participants amount is high the rewards are less. that's true. But how can we filter the best participants ?. What should be the method. I think it is impossible. Only possible way is to select higher bitcointalk rankers. But guess if they choose only full members and above. then you ?. and all others ?.

[supernva]

I  don't like bounties much. But sometimes I'm in. Now I participate only in NagriCoin bounty. I think that you should choose a bounty program to join the same way as you're chosing a project to invest in. Maybe you're not investing money buy you invest your time. Noone wants to spend their time on a skam. And if you are an influencer, you put you reputation under risk. There are lots of bounty hunters, so bounties become not effective, as for me.

[IntraCoin]

I  don't like bounties much. But sometimes I'm in. Now I participate only in NagriCoin bounty. I think that you should choose a bounty program to join the same way as you're chosing a project to invest in. Maybe you're not investing money buy you invest your time. Noone wants to spend their time on a skam. And if you are an influencer, you put you reputation under risk. There are lots of bounty hunters, so bounties become not effective, as for me.

Agreed. Bounties should be approached as an investment. That would prevent people dumping it as soon as possible, driving down the price as well.

[Bill_Cipher]

I  don't like bounties much. But sometimes I'm in. Now I participate only in NagriCoin bounty. I think that you should choose a bounty program to join the same way as you're chosing a project to invest in. Maybe you're not investing money buy you invest your time. Noone wants to spend their time on a skam. And if you are an influencer, you put you reputation under risk. There are lots of bounty hunters, so bounties become not effective, as for me.

All of us who were joining the bounty programs just want to have some other source of income and I think it would be unfair to those who are just like us.

[Sendah]

Yes. when the participants amount is high the rewards are less. that's true. But how can we filter the best participants ?. What should be the method. I think it is impossible. Only possible way is to select higher bitcointalk rankers. But guess if they choose only full members and above. then you ?. and all others ?.

It will be unfair to those have a low rank, we all know how it hard to have a merit for ranking up, so how about the jr. Members and members if all the bounty will select the high rank only.

[turmera]

bounties are getting more strict already. they just look the numbers of followers. that's not a quality at all.

[Wasaisisi]

Maybe because bounty campaign is one way to earn coins and profits without spending capital. Therefore many people follow him.

[mynamehere]

I do not understand those who join the company of generosity with a large number of participants. Spending your time and knowing that not you, not others, the more agile, who joined earlier, will not receive a significant reward. I refuse a small reward. and I will wait for a company with a limited number of participants.

[InGODweTrast3]

Yes, definitely need to do something about it! I see that some project administrators already limit participants to the rank of the forum

[yaoye0o]

As you see in the bounty campaign, there are rules to follow. If you are not qualified, you can't join, so how can you say that they need to choose the best participants, the more participants in the bounty campaign, the more successful participants are because they help the project to get to know.