Bounty and too many participants

[InGODweTrast3]

But unfortunately most SCAM projects and the main task of such projects is to steal as much money as possible, therefore they are interested in making as much noise as possible to steal as much as possible! I think if the project accepts participants of the rank below the Member, then this project or SCAM either does not care about its reputation.

[1715062933]

1715062933

[1715062933]

1715062933

[laphumzy01]

I think people are participating more in bounties now because of the risks involved in airdrops. Imo, bounties are better regulated and participants and not open to hacking as much as when you focus on airdrops . Imo

[popey]

Yes, there have been a lot of participants recently. It is necessary to search for projects where less than 1000 people participate, otherwise nothing can not be earned.

[deodecagone]

and the number of participants is growing every day! It is necessary to make rigid conditions of entry, then the profit will be greater

[Senkuli]

In my opinion, it is a natural thing, nowadays crypto world is getting popular, so is this bitcointalk forum.
There are many bounty programs are available in bitcointalk forums, more and more people are looking to participate in them, and for ICO marketing it is very encouraging, as more and more bounty participants, it will more easily ICO attracts many investors to contribute in it.
For bounty hunters, it certainly affects the less number of bounty rewards received. If you feel any objection to it, of course, you can choose a bounty program with limited participants or choose a bounty that few of its participants, so you do not have to worry about all this, just believe that each person's fortune is set by God according to its capacity.

[FilliDorros]

Maybe because bounty campaign is one way to earn coins and profits without spending capital. Therefore many people follow him.

Yes, but you spend a lot of time instead of spending your capital. You need to choose or time or money, many choose the first option

[Michail.]

If all projects in which we participate were not scammers, then I think there would be enough rewards for all participants.

[jpnl0002]

For me i would say its ok so long as the participants can keep up to the tasks its not a problem. the participants are the success story of the projects so the project will even prefer there are more participants so as to reach out to more people and also raise the required amount of fund desired.

[annicketucufaw]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

Good point of view, but it is really hard to regulate bounty campaigns, it really depends on the bounty manager. What I can see that it will help more earnings is to limit the participates per bounty. I have seen bounty campaigns that has a limit, for example, for twitter or facebook campaign, the maximum participants capacity is only 2000. With that rule, it will lessen the participants and will give more rewards.

[geyayy]

Actually if you look closely on popular campaigns and campaigns that are managed by known profiles, you'll notice that they are really picky on who can join on their campaign. It is almost like impossible to find a decent campaign and have it not have many participants because of the good profit that it proposes. If you think that campaigns are not regulated well enough then I think do your research like read carefully their bounty announcements.

[olumyd]

Actually if you look closely on popular campaigns and campaigns that are managed by known profiles, you'll notice that they are really picky on who can join on their campaign. It is almost like impossible to find a decent campaign and have it not have many participants because of the good profit that it proposes. If you think that campaigns are not regulated well enough then I think do your research like read carefully their bounty announcements.

I agree with you, most of the campaigns that are managed by experienced managers have a way of selecting high rewarding campaigns and scrutinize the participants to ensure quality bounty activities.

[arifteguhr]

Actually if you look closely on popular campaigns and campaigns that are managed by known profiles, you'll notice that they are really picky on who can join on their campaign. It is almost like impossible to find a decent campaign and have it not have many participants because of the good profit that it proposes. If you think that campaigns are not regulated well enough then I think do your research like read carefully their bounty announcements.

I agree with you, most of the campaigns that are managed by experienced managers have a way of selecting high rewarding campaigns and scrutinize the participants to ensure quality bounty activities.

with the presence of kyc and also the restrictions may be able to anticipate the increasing number of participants who join. one way that I think is good to be in practice

[gabagandalf]

Really? i have not noticed so far. the bounty campaign that i am currently in is almost empty. but as i just read, it is not empty everywhere. apparently some bounty campaigns are overrun and others are nearly empty.

[OriginTrain]

My opinion is that this is simply a complete lack of forethought by bounty managers and project teams. Sometimes I write serious, good quality articles, but only for campaigns that aren't flooded with too many shit articles diluting the stakes. As you can guess, I rarely write articles. If I see max stakes awarded to some 300 word foreign language post on SteemIt, you can be assured I'm not promoting that ICO. They can keep that content, and best of luck to them with it.

Bounties that don't limit participants will only attract the worst sorts. And at the moment this is most bounties. And at the moment most ICOs fail to reach their soft cap. See the pattern here? The real issue is a complete lack of professionalization within the ICO based cryptocommunity at the moment.

[Sithara007]

Really? i have not noticed so far. the bounty campaign that i am currently in is almost empty. but as i just read, it is not empty everywhere. apparently some bounty campaigns are overrun and others are nearly empty.

That may be because the bounty campaign in which you are participating is a bad one and is likely to offer you some worthless tokens in the end. You don't need to be mad at me, as I was just listing out a possibility. But it will be wrong to say that the bounty campaigns are not witnessing a swell in the number of participants.

[Redhead5]

Actually if you look closely on popular campaigns and campaigns that are managed by known profiles, you'll notice that they are really picky on who can join on their campaign. It is almost like impossible to find a decent campaign and have it not have many participants because of the good profit that it proposes. If you think that campaigns are not regulated well enough then I think do your research like read carefully their bounty announcements.

I agree with you, most of the campaigns that are managed by experienced managers have a way of selecting high rewarding campaigns and scrutinize the participants to ensure quality bounty activities.

Yes, I agree. Most bounty campaign are composed of legit and experienced development team members are the great chances that will pay high rewards at the end of the ICO. But payments will totally matter the numbers of participants who joined the campaign. The greater the number of the participants who participated the less the reward that is being distributed depending by each ranks stated points.

[gloporo]

There are already bounty companies that limit the number of participants and the rank of participants.  I advise you to participate in such bounty.

[paulus51]

There are already bounty companies that limit the number of participants and the rank of participants.  I advise you to participate in such bounty.

Most likely Bounty programs will limit the number of participants in certain campaigns. The main thing is not just to fixate on Twitter and Facebook, well, learn to write posts and translate

[bitcoin2048]

My main thought, that we need to confess - bounties will not cap the participants, the more people - the better advertisement they get

[djscreem01]

I think they have considered the sharing of bounty results, the more bounty ico participants are getting crowded and that's good, nothing is set up anymore...