Bounty and too many participants

[Step NOY]

yeah. popularity is going up day by day. it is not a good thing for participants actually. because the more participants there are, the less share they get. but on the other hand, crypto market is growing so fast and new icos coming everyday so it is still enough for everybody.

It is impossible to take a tasty piece from one plate from one plate. After all, a tasty piece of cake it is perfect, and pies without filling always enough.

[martirosyan666]

Bounty campaigns are very popular and the main and number one reason why btc and cryptocurrency is known and spreading. People are very smart and intelligent when it comes to money thats why they are making and finding way to earn money and they easiest way is the bounty campaigns with many participants, for me thats the problem too many participants in a bounty thats why they are making and implementing more bounties so the cryptocurrency is being relevant in that way.

[selivers]

Never going to happen, but what will happen is those who are in areas that have higher costs of living will cease to do them. It is like any industry, if you can't make enough money people move on. And this is no different, the equilibrium will be found constantly, and will always be evolving to find a new equilibrium.

Spot on, this is really just an issue for people who do already well. People in the porest conditions will benefit the most.

[Orsen]

This is a very big problem I have long suggested to do in all projects of the restriction, it will be qualitatively and logically, and that for a month of work, paying $ 7 is funny!

[mynamehere]

Too many inexperienced investors. They came to the crypt, not for the future, they came for a month. If they manage to earn a lot, then maybe in a couple of months will come again. They do not keep a lot of money in crypto allocations, but immediately go out of circulation, reducing capitalization.
Crisis of bloated expectations. Our expectations of rising prices have nothing to do with real progress in development. Many listen to experienced marketers, but really good projects without ads go unnoticed.

[Derelikt999]

Yes, bounty campaigns are more popular. But now it is not as easy as before to make big profits. This is good because we can be motivated to compete, So if new people want to achieve a satisfactory profit, he has to work hard for this. I do not think that would be a problem for us.

[Cryptobosslady]

I disagree cause most bounties I know have a number of participants the want in a project.

[griezmann]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

You're right, there are too many participants right now, so it's hard for us to gain so much tokens or altcoins, but don't you ever give, the only  solution is we just need to apply and participate in a lot of bounties (social media)

[efeyigit399]

bounty is the area where the largest number of participants in the crypto currency market is located. As this number increased, the amount of rewards increased. it was hard to find the right bounty.

[Aum Ram]

I think that in fact the problem of a large number of participants is not the biggest problem of the bounty. Much more important is that recently there are a lot of scam projects that are not going to pay anything to anyone.

[Melech]

Yes, now a lot of people participate in the bounty and so I advise you to find promising bounties with a small number of participants.

If the project is promising and does not have a limit on the number of participants, then at the end of the campaign there will be a huge number of participants. I think it's best to choose campaigns with a fixed number of bounty hunters.

[izza123]

the most pleasant name - Bounty - already speaks for itself. to participate in the bounty, it's enough to be an active Internet user, because the tasks revolve around social networks. posts, reposts, comments, subscriptions in social networks, commenting on specialized forums, translating information into certain languages, video reviews and newsletters. There is indeed a lot of way to get almost free coins, which explains the large number of participants

[temilade200]

Although, you cannot concluded that potential buyers have also joined bounty, which might not be an outright confirmation. Buyers are still buying ICO.
Talking about too many participants. That, you should not worry about. Just go about doing your own tasks and get your reward.

[bling-bling]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

It is possible that one of these days all projects will place a limit on the number of participants for each bounty. But many of the projects coming out today are doing this so as to control the participants. In Bountyhive for example, all of the projects have a limited slot. This is to make sure that each participant will be able to maximize their earnings. This is good because the bounty pool will be reasonably divided among participants and the result will be great!

[Gribovski]

I try not to participate in such bounty.  Because I will spend a lot of time, and I will get very few coins.  It is better to find a bounty with a small number of participants.

[Bitze]

with the popular campaign there are always very many participants.
but you can't make it dependent on that. of course it reduces the payout but the campaign can still be worthwhile 

[gwapaMe]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

Thats the crypto means earning money, joining bounty campaign for free, large participants for campaigns its not a big issue in fact the team still wants more participants to spread there platform so that they project will become succesfull.

[Perka]

Now a lot of people because it's a great option earnings but still not a lot of people earn as a lot involved in the platforms where there are only 1% and involved in 10 thousand people.And there is where to allocate 2-3 % and involved over 300 people

[Jake Virus]

with the popular campaign there are always very many participants.
but you can't make it dependent on that. of course it reduces the payout but the campaign can still be worthwhile 

Well right now there are a lot of bounty campaign that has  too many participants but not all the bounty that has many participants is becoming successful and paying a higher reward, for me it is better to participate on bounty campaign that doesn't have too many participants.

[ianthepcdoctor]

This is so very timely now. Bounty is also starting to become famous because even investors are joining to earn free more coins. It would be in favor of the project than to participants.