Invest wisely

[green.grass38]

when you want to invest, of course, the pursuit is profit and no loss, therefore when deciding to invest in one of ICO we must be really wise in determining the nominal amount to invest, with a good analysis in marketcap is one way for us be wise in investing.

[Fedor2018]

You can't trust the hype and the ratings of the company . It is necessary to approach with a good analysis of the project, ideas, achievements . It is better to spend time on analysis-than to work for nothing or to spend money

[vidiep100100]

I am absolutely agree with this statement . As for bounty hunters there are plenty of failed projects. Repux didn't payed out the same amount as they claimed, Livestars payed 4 times less, a lot of scam as well. Nowadays we should select projects deliberately

[Luntop]

I also believe that investing should be very reasonable , we should choose the best projects

[Thiekungan]

A very good suggestion and reminds peoples that every platform that trying to promote some ICO might not objective in reviews because they are able being paid for the good ratings.

[briana samomingkir]

I agree with you, the ICO rating is not to be used as a benchmark in choosing ICO, but ICO rating is only one of several classifications that help us in knowing ICO that have good quality. Although there is an ICO rating you also have to pay attention to other aspects of ICO selection, the effort is done so you do not get stuck on a scam ICO.

[Wearegoodfrends]

As an interested and engaged bounty, I confirm your words. It is necessary to choose projects very carefully. Especially in the current falling market, many projects risk not getting on the stock market at all.

[Ostonian]

I think that many just do not invest. Each investor does not want to lose his money, so they carefully check every project, before investing in it.

[Volk-05]

Yes!  All right.  To refer to ICO rating alone is not prudent, every project needs to be studied in more detail!

[celakkenyang]

is the rating of an ico project manipulated? besides i see my rating also see advisor and partner of ico project. the most important thing of an ico project is an experienced team and advisor.

[aces777]

There is no better way that anyone could say this. Always make sure that you are investing wisely. Only invest when you are ready to do so not when someone tells you that you should invest into some project. Do your own research, make up your own mind, don't follow the hive mind and buy a coin just because you see a lot of people talking about it

[Avatar2030]

Of course, without a thorough analysis of the idea and potential of the project, it is impossible to make a decision about investing. Among the large number of possible options, it is better to focus on 2-3 and devote as much time as possible to collecting information about them and their development prospects. Many ICO are now a failure but there are some worthy of attention among them. I'm waiting for ICO Eloncity which on the general background is the most promising.

[Gringoblin67]

It's getting ridiculous here. People are now investing just because of the hype or just from watching the scores given by Icobench, ICOratings etc.

You're doing it wrong. You should look at the team and the experience they have, whether this project exists already (e.g we have Monaco, TenX, Centra, MoxyOne and many others) and none of them actually delivered 100% what they promised etc. so unless you really see the potentials on the project, you really shouldn't invest. Ignore the moon bullshit they are trying to feed you.

This is valid for both bounty hunters (because they are wasting their time) and ICO participants (wasting money).

ICObench was my main go-to site to get ratings and reviews, but it turns out that they can also be bribed or something since some of their reviews don't check out (not even close). Hopefully, Menlo.one will not be a dissapointment when it launches this July. In an interview with their CEO, he claims to have a solution to issues that investors encounter with ICOs which are scams, false reviews, censored bad reviews due to bribes. Link to their white paper: https://www.menlo.one/

[jerimarsella]

There are some sites that help to determine the choice of ICO. But I have to do checks resetting so that the ICO that I can totally real and best. The ICO and many tokens could not be sold because it does not have a value because the team could not develop the project.

[rapsonic1337]

ICO ratings that provided by some ICO ratings website are helpful, they give the traders an idea if the projects that are launch are good to invest. Your topic that invest wisely is should be done and practice to avoid the any loss.

[Abu Shadow]

That's true. Invest wisely as this is a high risk investment and you need to do your own research and don't rely on those hype projects with no concrete plan on the implementation of the product. Be a responsible investors.

[BooMoon]

Yes, we need to analyze whether each project has future development prospects. This is very important for our investors because it will affect whether our investment can be profitable.

[gordonsam32]

A very good suggestion and reminds peoples that every platform that trying to promote some ICO might not objective in reviews because they are able being paid for the good ratings.

That's the downside of ICO websites like icobench, etc...Luckily, an ICO marketplace called Menlo.one is launching soon wherein reviews are incentivized no matter positive or negative as long as they are valid and are helpful to the community. It seemed impossible at first, but their whitepaper was quite convincing https://www.menlo.one/.

[Paul95]

It's getting ridiculous here. People are now investing just because of the hype or just from watching the scores given by Icobench, ICOratings etc.

You're doing it wrong. You should look at the team and the experience they have, whether this project exists already (e.g we have Monaco, TenX, Centra, MoxyOne and many others) and none of them actually delivered 100% what they promised etc. so unless you really see the potentials on the project, you really shouldn't invest. Ignore the moon bullshit they are trying to feed you.

This is valid for both bounty hunters (because they are wasting their time) and ICO participants (wasting money).

You said Centra, but take a look what scam it is, a lot of people have lost a lot of money here. But I know Centra looked good, but scam always looks good.

[dianikusuma]

many people are reluctant and getting lazy to analyze and they rely solely on information from the website rating like that. Indeed can't blame completely, but what is in the rating is not entirely correct. If analyze it yourself I think it would be better and certainly better know about what worked and what was invested.