[ANN][POW][CLO] Callisto Network - Cold Staking & Security Audits

[GraBitCoin]

Here is what I read on github:

yuriy77k commented 13 hours ago
If you interesting in audit this project http://tradelize.com you can ask their team to make request for our free audit. If it's not a scam they will agree, in other way no audit needed.

 @AmirSlavo
 
AmirSlavo commented an hour ago
@yuriy77k They will tell me that the audit is conducted and will give a link to their company of auditors or which they bought. And what would you advise further, oh my "smart" friend? Maybe you're an expert in the audit, but as an analyst you're shit.
Free advice. Order the research in a good analytical company. Let them advise you, programming geniuses, on what clients you need to count on. Several hundred developers or several hundred thousand investors? If for you the answer is unobvious!

Order a market research from specialists. You have the means.

In my understanding, the investor is right. They are more than a thousand times. This investors are the main customers of this project!

Or did you decide to make a school of programmers? And your goal is to point out the mistakes of newcomers and thereby increase the number of good specialists?

P.S.
I'll make a last effort to work with you. I'll order contextual advertising. If, after orders from there, you refuse to pay under the pretext that it is not the developers ordered, then I'm sorry, I'll write everything that I think about it.

As it was mentioned on our white paper, and on our site: We doing audits for developers not for investors.

We can't and won't audit smart contracts without direct connection with the developer. Our disclosure policy clearly states that critical vulnerabilities should be reported to the smart contract developer.

When you asking us for the audit of smart contact for the third party, you basically pushing us to help hackers doing free security research and making them available for the general public.

To make it clear: we do not audit smart contracts by third-party requests.

So stimulating the use of CLO to speed up the audit of smart contracts is not your priority?

P.S.
About github.
I know for sure that the developers sent 3 smart contracts, which the senders of  can confirm by sending ETH from the addresses of the creators. They do not have and never had a github account. They have registered specifically for this.
If you had more desire to find clients, then you would have found out with them in the correspondence.
I will not invite anyone else (until you figure it out).

I've told you many times, in plain English. Our priority - security for blockchain ecosystem, in particular: free smart contract audits for developers.


Are you kidding? Smart contract developer running ICO, and never had a GitHub account?


I would rather block your affiliate account for fraudulent attempts, then believe in such bs.


 

They did not use it and are not going to do it in the future.

And I'm not going to work with an unprofessional partner program you have made.
You have big problems with strategy. There's no point in wasting energy on this coin.
Only time has lost, a pancake.

[osipov_oksnik]

As far as I remember, this project did not have much success before. But now it has become a very useful project for earning our wallet and a high price for BTC.

[Dabll_kilDaRk0]

Here is what I read on github:

yuriy77k commented 13 hours ago
If you interesting in audit this project http://tradelize.com you can ask their team to make request for our free audit. If it's not a scam they will agree, in other way no audit needed.

 @AmirSlavo
 
AmirSlavo commented an hour ago
@yuriy77k They will tell me that the audit is conducted and will give a link to their company of auditors or which they bought. And what would you advise further, oh my "smart" friend? Maybe you're an expert in the audit, but as an analyst you're shit.
Free advice. Order the research in a good analytical company. Let them advise you, programming geniuses, on what clients you need to count on. Several hundred developers or several hundred thousand investors? If for you the answer is unobvious!

Order a market research from specialists. You have the means.

In my understanding, the investor is right. They are more than a thousand times. This investors are the main customers of this project!

Or did you decide to make a school of programmers? And your goal is to point out the mistakes of newcomers and thereby increase the number of good specialists?

P.S.
I'll make a last effort to work with you. I'll order contextual advertising. If, after orders from there, you refuse to pay under the pretext that it is not the developers ordered, then I'm sorry, I'll write everything that I think about it.

As it was mentioned on our white paper, and on our site: We doing audits for developers not for investors.

We can't and won't audit smart contracts without direct connection with the developer. Our disclosure policy clearly states that critical vulnerabilities should be reported to the smart contract developer.

When you asking us for the audit of smart contact for the third party, you basically pushing us to help hackers doing free security research and making them available for the general public.

To make it clear: we do not audit smart contracts by third-party requests.

So stimulating the use of CLO to speed up the audit of smart contracts is not your priority?

P.S.
About github.
I know for sure that the developers sent 3 smart contracts, which the senders of  can confirm by sending ETH from the addresses of the creators. They do not have and never had a github account. They have registered specifically for this.
If you had more desire to find clients, then you would have found out with them in the correspondence.
I will not invite anyone else (until you figure it out).

I've told you many times, in plain English. Our priority - security for blockchain ecosystem, in particular: free smart contract audits for developers.


Are you kidding? Smart contract developer running ICO, and never had a GitHub account?


I would rather block your affiliate account for fraudulent attempts, then believe in such bs.


 

They did not use it and are not going to do it in the future.

And I'm not going to work with an unprofessional partner program you have made.
You have big problems with strategy. There's no point in wasting energy on this coin.
Only time has lost, a pancake.

[EtEos]

Here is what I read on github:

yuriy77k commented 13 hours ago
If you interesting in audit this project http://tradelize.com you can ask their team to make request for our free audit. If it's not a scam they will agree, in other way no audit needed.

 @AmirSlavo
 
AmirSlavo commented an hour ago
@yuriy77k They will tell me that the audit is conducted and will give a link to their company of auditors or which they bought. And what would you advise further, oh my "smart" friend? Maybe you're an expert in the audit, but as an analyst you're shit.
Free advice. Order the research in a good analytical company. Let them advise you, programming geniuses, on what clients you need to count on. Several hundred developers or several hundred thousand investors? If for you the answer is unobvious!

Order a market research from specialists. You have the means.

In my understanding, the investor is right. They are more than a thousand times. This investors are the main customers of this project!

Or did you decide to make a school of programmers? And your goal is to point out the mistakes of newcomers and thereby increase the number of good specialists?

P.S.
I'll make a last effort to work with you. I'll order contextual advertising. If, after orders from there, you refuse to pay under the pretext that it is not the developers ordered, then I'm sorry, I'll write everything that I think about it.

As it was mentioned on our white paper, and on our site: We doing audits for developers not for investors.

We can't and won't audit smart contracts without direct connection with the developer. Our disclosure policy clearly states that critical vulnerabilities should be reported to the smart contract developer.

When you asking us for the audit of smart contact for the third party, you basically pushing us to help hackers doing free security research and making them available for the general public.

To make it clear: we do not audit smart contracts by third-party requests.

So stimulating the use of CLO to speed up the audit of smart contracts is not your priority?

P.S.
About github.
I know for sure that the developers sent 3 smart contracts, which the senders of  can confirm by sending ETH from the addresses of the creators. They do not have and never had a github account. They have registered specifically for this.
If you had more desire to find clients, then you would have found out with them in the correspondence.
I will not invite anyone else (until you figure it out).

I've told you many times, in plain English. Our priority - security for blockchain ecosystem, in particular: free smart contract audits for developers.


Are you kidding? Smart contract developer running ICO, and never had a GitHub account?


I would rather block your affiliate account for fraudulent attempts, then believe in such bs.


 

Why loud words? Your concern was to increase the price of the CLO. There will be no price - there will not be your work.

[cryptojackcoin]

Only the prospect of growth keeps investors. Now it is clear that we do not have any sense to expect growth.

HitBTC will not help out here.

[GraBitCoin]

🚀[ANN][PoSToken]First PoS Smart Contract Token[Lending Platform Available]
August 22, 2017, 01:40:52 PM
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2110712.0
https://github.com/PoSToken

[coloseum]

Today, Callisto Network fell below 100 satoshi.
Honesly, I feel very negatively about those current downward movements of Callisto Network.

[Thoth1046]

Four months old project.
The progress looks good to me.

[GlockCoin]

Four months old project.
The progress looks good to me.

Are you kidding? Not progress, but regress. A highly specialized project, as it turned out. 6 000 000 000 coins for this small auditor organization is too much.

[TitiKamal]

Callisto Network is a decentralized crypto open source platform based on the Go-Ethereum source code with its own 'CLO' cryptocurrency. Callisto researches and develops reference implementation of the blockchain ecosystem and develops an independent, independent and self-funded environment.

[GraBitCoin]

Four months old project.
The progress looks good to me.

Are you kidding? Not progress, but regress. A highly specialized project, as it turned out. 6 000 000 coins for this small auditor organization is too much.

Progress can be if there is:

1. Free creation of smart contracts for ANY customer who has CLO on his account.
2. Free audit of smart contracts at the request of ANY community member who has CLO on his account.
3. Holding 1000 meetups in 1000 cities around the world where like-minded people should conduct a brainstorm and draw up a technical assignment for a smart contract of an arbitrary kind. All CLO holders should receive some preferences in these smart contracts.
4. Reimbursement of expenses to those organizers of meetups who will submit the terms of reference for the smart contract and photo / video content about the meetup.

+ it is necessary to reduce the appetites of the founders

[CoinFocus]

Hi team!

We just launched a new ICO platform in Korea called CoinFocus.

We are offering FREE listing and banner services for soft launch promotion. Get in touch with us on Telegram or via our services page! The ICO packages are right now +60% off!

Good luck on your token sale!! 

Very best,
Katherine from CoinFocus

[Moshaid]

The callisto network has been made with a lot of trust from developers globally that are working to make underlying blockchain technology faster, stronger, and more efficient in ways that they have never been, or are yet to be expressed in the past. Callisto leverages this constantly improving infrastructure by developing product-focused interactions around blockchain technology that can offer tangible benefits to financial services applications. The project has been researched, designed and undergone several implementation of a self-governed, self-sustained, and self-funded blockchain ecosystem.

[GraBitCoin]

Here is what I read on github:

yuriy77k commented 13 hours ago
If you interesting in audit this project http://tradelize.com you can ask their team to make request for our free audit. If it's not a scam they will agree, in other way no audit needed.

 @AmirSlavo
 
AmirSlavo commented an hour ago
@yuriy77k They will tell me that the audit is conducted and will give a link to their company of auditors or which they bought. And what would you advise further, oh my "smart" friend? Maybe you're an expert in the audit, but as an analyst you're shit.
Free advice. Order the research in a good analytical company. Let them advise you, programming geniuses, on what clients you need to count on. Several hundred developers or several hundred thousand investors? If for you the answer is unobvious!

Order a market research from specialists. You have the means.

In my understanding, the investor is right. They are more than a thousand times. This investors are the main customers of this project!

Or did you decide to make a school of programmers? And your goal is to point out the mistakes of newcomers and thereby increase the number of good specialists?

P.S.
I'll make a last effort to work with you. I'll order contextual advertising. If, after orders from there, you refuse to pay under the pretext that it is not the developers ordered, then I'm sorry, I'll write everything that I think about it.

As it was mentioned on our white paper, and on our site: We doing audits for developers not for investors.

We can't and won't audit smart contracts without direct connection with the developer. Our disclosure policy clearly states that critical vulnerabilities should be reported to the smart contract developer.

When you asking us for the audit of smart contact for the third party, you basically pushing us to help hackers doing free security research and making them available for the general public.

To make it clear: we do not audit smart contracts by third-party requests.

So stimulating the use of CLO to speed up the audit of smart contracts is not your priority?

[GlockCoin]

As it was mentioned on our white paper, and on our site: We doing audits for developers not for investors.

We can't and won't audit smart contracts without direct connection with the developer. Our disclosure policy clearly states that critical vulnerabilities should be reported to the smart contract developer.

When you asking us for the audit of smart contact for the third party, you basically pushing us to help hackers doing free security research and making them available for the general public.

To make it clear: we do not audit smart contracts by third-party requests.

In general, you are being pushed to action aimed at increasing the cost of CLO.
Your speculations about hackers are ridiculous! Hackers themselves will break what can be broken and get money, but at the beginning of the life of the project, no hackers need tokens that are still worthless. Therefore, in this situation, only investors benefit!

Requesting an audit of a smart contract must be the right of any CLO holder!

[tibinpro432]

You have good planning, many meetings are held in many places to help many people can trust and know more about the project. You are very smart, I do not know you have a better project development plan? You also know that a new project will be more likely to crash and risk if not prepared in advance. I do not know what plan you have to minimize the risk?

[GogiR]

Comining - an excellent multi-pool for mining more than 30 coins of current and profitable cryptocurrencies at the moment, technical support via chat in Telegram and Discord. Convenient, simplified registration and subsequent authorization through your Google account (to register click "log in with Google"), detailed statistics of your account, as well as Top miners. Servers in Europe, Japan, Singapore, USA and Russia.

Fee: 1%
Mining: PPLNT, Solo, and Prop reward for mining.

- Stable payments
- DDOS protection
- Great ping
- Support Nicehash
- Full stats with charts, rewards and earnings
- Telegram and Discord chat support.

Join the pool to mine Callisto ===> http://comining.me/callisto

[DnovorezoV_aA]

Why is there no information in the partner's private office about who orders a smart contract, as well as the reason for rejecting conversions?

[DioTol]

Guys, how do you see the price of CLO in 1 year?

[csKIRALY]

Here is what I read on github:

yuriy77k commented 13 hours ago
If you interesting in audit this project http://tradelize.com you can ask their team to make request for our free audit. If it's not a scam they will agree, in other way no audit needed.

 @AmirSlavo
 
AmirSlavo commented an hour ago
@yuriy77k They will tell me that the audit is conducted and will give a link to their company of auditors or which they bought. And what would you advise further, oh my "smart" friend? Maybe you're an expert in the audit, but as an analyst you're shit.
Free advice. Order the research in a good analytical company. Let them advise you, programming geniuses, on what clients you need to count on. Several hundred developers or several hundred thousand investors? If for you the answer is unobvious!

Order a market research from specialists. You have the means.

In my understanding, the investor is right. They are more than a thousand times. This investors are the main customers of this project!

Or did you decide to make a school of programmers? And your goal is to point out the mistakes of newcomers and thereby increase the number of good specialists?

P.S.
I'll make a last effort to work with you. I'll order contextual advertising. If, after orders from there, you refuse to pay under the pretext that it is not the developers ordered, then I'm sorry, I'll write everything that I think about it.

As it was mentioned on our white paper, and on our site: We doing audits for developers not for investors.

We can't and won't audit smart contracts without direct connection with the developer. Our disclosure policy clearly states that critical vulnerabilities should be reported to the smart contract developer.

When you asking us for the audit of smart contact for the third party, you basically pushing us to help hackers doing free security research and making them available for the general public.

To make it clear: we do not audit smart contracts by third-party requests.

You could, if the order for audit comes from the investor, do not publish the full report, but simply give answers to the questions posed.