Bitcoin Forum
April 30, 2024, 05:08:46 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 [156] 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 ... 2557 »
  Print  
Author Topic: NXT :: descendant of Bitcoin - Updated Information  (Read 2761529 times)
starik69
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1367
Merit: 1000


View Profile
December 12, 2013, 08:56:41 AM
 #3101

They don't run their nodes,
You made it impossible to run it under NAT.  Angry
they don't support bounties
I wanted to participate in some bounty yesterday but didnt find its addresses in two topics on this forum.  Roll Eyes
they don't take part in Nxt promotion.
You cannot expect everyone to be a good promoter. Sad
he can quit this project and join other cryptocoin
This blackmail thing is very sad Cry

To be angry because of this - is like to be angry because of stars on the sky. The things that are completely out of your control. I think it is a symptom.
The Bitcoin network protocol was designed to be extremely flexible. It can be used to create timed transactions, escrow transactions, multi-signature transactions, etc. The current features of the client only hint at what will be possible in the future.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
ParmaBTC
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218
Merit: 1002



View Profile WWW
December 12, 2013, 08:57:41 AM
 #3102

Finally managed to have the hallmark done and decoded correctly, after manually encoding all special characters.

Yes, you have to url-encode at least # and &, that I can think of. You can't even fix it on the server side because in the case of # I don't think the string after the hash gets submitted to the server at all. So, people with special characters in the password will have to encode them manually, see e.g. table here:
http://www.w3schools.com/tags/ref_urlencode.asp
Or do a simple javascript page that does the encoding in javascript on the client. Obviously, don't submit your passwords to any online services that offer url-encoding.

Warning:
After doing this request, http://localhost:7874/nxt?requestType=markHost&secretPhrase=MY_SECRET&host=MY_HOST&weight=HOST_WEIGHT&date=CURRENT_DATE
your secret passphrase is stored in clear text in your browsing history! Remember to securely delete your browsing history after doing this task.


this is true, but you can use Anonymous mode of your browser, and nothing is stored
 
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2142
Merit: 1009

Newbie


View Profile
December 12, 2013, 09:01:28 AM
 #3103

They don't run their nodes,
You made it impossible to run it under NAT.  Angry

I bet u can afford to pay 10$ per month for VPS.


they don't support bounties
I wanted to participate in some bounty yesterday but didnt find its addresses in two topics on this forum.  Roll Eyes

That's good, the others didn't even try.


they don't take part in Nxt promotion.
You cannot expect everyone to be a good promoter. Sad

True.
NxtChoice
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 12, 2013, 09:03:54 AM
 #3104

Wow!

If the fundraising limit to everyone to be 0.05 BTC at most, then there will be more stakeholders involved and the coin distribution should be better than now.

Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2142
Merit: 1009

Newbie


View Profile
December 12, 2013, 09:04:55 AM
 #3105

I've got a private message from one of the stakeholders who asked to remove my post about bad news. Sorry, guys, BCNext asked me to post this and it will stay there.

I see 2 scenarios there:
- Stakeholders will start doing anything and Nxt will grow
- Stakeholders will sell their coins to those who do something and Nxt will grow

Both scenarios look good to me.
omo
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 147
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 12, 2013, 09:07:27 AM
 #3106

I updated the client from 0.3.16 to 0.3.18 on a centos box,
 I got the following errors:
Code:
java -Xms512m -Xmx1024m -jar start.jar
2013-12-12 16:58:15.412:INFO:oejs.Server:main: jetty-9.1.0.v20131115
2013-12-12 16:58:15.438:INFO:oejdp.ScanningAppProvider:main: Deployment monitor [file:/home/nxt/nxt/webapps/] at interval 1
[2013-12-12 16:58:15.568] Nxt 0.3.18 started.
[2013-12-12 16:58:15.568] "blockchainStoragePath" set to "blockchain.nrs"
[2013-12-12 16:58:15.571] "myAddress" set to ""
[2013-12-12 16:58:15.572] "myHallmark" set to ""
[2013-12-12 16:58:15.572] "wellKnownPeers" set to "134.119.3.19; 146.185.168.142; 162.243.145.83; 162.243.232.67; 64.22.108.120; 69.146.88.14; 76.74.212.230; 85.17.190.73; 88.198.210.245; nxt.airdns.org"
[2013-12-12 16:58:15.572] "allowedUserHosts" set to "*"
[2013-12-12 16:58:15.572] "allowedBotHosts" set to "*"
[2013-12-12 16:58:15.572] "blacklistingPeriod" set to "300"
[2013-12-12 16:58:15.572] "logPeerCommunication" set to "false"
[2013-12-12 16:58:15.573] Loading transactions...
[2013-12-12 16:58:15.735] ...Done
[2013-12-12 16:58:15.735] Loading peers...
[2013-12-12 16:58:15.738] 10: java.io.InvalidClassException: Nxt$Account; class invalid for deserialization
2013-12-12 16:58:15.738:INFO:oejsh.ContextHandler:main: Started o.e.j.w.WebAppContext@7cf27a6e{/,file:/home/nxt/nxt/webapps/root/,AVAILABLE}{/root}
2013-12-12 16:58:15.745:WARN:oejuc.AbstractLifeCycle:main: FAILED ServerConnector@1c76b9da{HTTP/1.1}{0.0.0.0:7874}: java.net.BindException: address already in use
java.net.BindException: address already in use
        at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind0(Native Method)
        at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind(Net.java:444)
        at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind(Net.java:436)
        at sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketChannelImpl.bind(ServerSocketChannelImpl.java:214)
        at sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketAdaptor.bind(ServerSocketAdaptor.java:74)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.server.ServerConnector.open(ServerConnector.java:279)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.server.AbstractNetworkConnector.doStart(AbstractNetworkConnector.java:80)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.server.ServerConnector.doStart(ServerConnector.java:218)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.AbstractLifeCycle.start(AbstractLifeCycle.java:69)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.server.Server.doStart(Server.java:336)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.AbstractLifeCycle.start(AbstractLifeCycle.java:69)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.xml.XmlConfiguration$1.run(XmlConfiguration.java:1250)
        at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.xml.XmlConfiguration.main(XmlConfiguration.java:1174)
        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
        at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
        at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.start.Main.invokeMain(Main.java:297)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.start.Main.start(Main.java:706)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.start.Main.main(Main.java:103)
2013-12-12 16:58:15.746:WARN:oejuc.AbstractLifeCycle:main: FAILED ServerConnector@36a3a5cf{SSL-http/1.1}{0.0.0.0:7875}: java.net.BindException: address already in use
java.net.BindException: address already in use
        at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind0(Native Method)
        at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind(Net.java:444)
        at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind(Net.java:436)
        at sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketChannelImpl.bind(ServerSocketChannelImpl.java:214)
        at sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketAdaptor.bind(ServerSocketAdaptor.java:74)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.server.ServerConnector.open(ServerConnector.java:279)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.server.AbstractNetworkConnector.doStart(AbstractNetworkConnector.java:80)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.server.ServerConnector.doStart(ServerConnector.java:218)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.AbstractLifeCycle.start(AbstractLifeCycle.java:69)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.server.Server.doStart(Server.java:336)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.AbstractLifeCycle.start(AbstractLifeCycle.java:69)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.xml.XmlConfiguration$1.run(XmlConfiguration.java:1250)
        at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.xml.XmlConfiguration.main(XmlConfiguration.java:1174)
        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
        at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
        at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.start.Main.invokeMain(Main.java:297)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.start.Main.start(Main.java:706)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.start.Main.main(Main.java:103)
2013-12-12 16:58:15.746:WARN:oejuc.AbstractLifeCycle:main: FAILED org.eclipse.jetty.server.Server@31dad50f: MultiException[java.net.BindException: address already in use, java.net.BindException: address already in use]
MultiException[java.net.BindException: address already in use, java.net.BindException: address already in use]
        at org.eclipse.jetty.server.Server.doStart(Server.java:302)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.AbstractLifeCycle.start(AbstractLifeCycle.java:69)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.xml.XmlConfiguration$1.run(XmlConfiguration.java:1250)
        at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.xml.XmlConfiguration.main(XmlConfiguration.java:1174)
        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
        at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
        at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.start.Main.invokeMain(Main.java:297)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.start.Main.start(Main.java:706)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.start.Main.main(Main.java:103)
java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
        at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
        at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.start.Main.invokeMain(Main.java:297)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.start.Main.start(Main.java:706)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.start.Main.main(Main.java:103)
Caused by: MultiException[java.net.BindException: address already in use, java.net.BindException: address already in use]
        at org.eclipse.jetty.server.Server.doStart(Server.java:302)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.AbstractLifeCycle.start(AbstractLifeCycle.java:69)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.xml.XmlConfiguration$1.run(XmlConfiguration.java:1250)
        at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.xml.XmlConfiguration.main(XmlConfiguration.java:1174)
        ... 7 more

BTC:1Fu4TNpVPToxxhSXBNSvE9fz6X3dbYgB8q
mvag
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 44
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 12, 2013, 09:09:30 AM
 #3107

- Stakeholders will start doing anything and Nxt will grow

The fundraising was anonymous -- how can BCNext tell who of the contributing people is a stakeholder?
Hampuz
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 140
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 12, 2013, 09:11:24 AM
 #3108

Could someone sell me some NXT? Can pay in BTC/LTC/$$
pinarello
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 100


NXT is the future


View Profile
December 12, 2013, 09:11:54 AM
 #3109

They don't run their nodes,
You made it impossible to run it under NAT.  Angry
they don't support bounties
I wanted to participate in some bounty yesterday but didnt find its addresses in two topics on this forum.  Roll Eyes
they don't take part in Nxt promotion.
You cannot expect everyone to be a good promoter. Sad
he can quit this project and join other cryptocoin
This blackmail thing is very sad Cry

To be angry because of this - is like to be angry because of stars on the sky. The things that are completely out of your control. I think it is a symptom.

 Wouldn’t you be angry when 71 people taking advantage of you and none participate to promote your child…

Sick of lame excuses “did not found the address” maybe look in de signature. Did you even try looking for it?

You all forget people working there but of for this to succeed, but near to zero involvement from the early adaptors.

I completely understand BCnext and this is no blackmail, if nothing change and we get no serious involvement from that accounts with more than 50M coins on it it will be over and out.

So what will it be hoarders?

Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2142
Merit: 1009

Newbie


View Profile
December 12, 2013, 09:12:47 AM
 #3110

I updated the client from 0.3.16 to 0.3.18 on a centos box,
 I got the following errors:
Code:
java -Xms512m -Xmx1024m -jar start.jar
2013-12-12 16:58:15.412:INFO:oejs.Server:main: jetty-9.1.0.v20131115
2013-12-12 16:58:15.438:INFO:oejdp.ScanningAppProvider:main: Deployment monitor [file:/home/nxt/nxt/webapps/] at interval 1
[2013-12-12 16:58:15.568] Nxt 0.3.18 started.
[2013-12-12 16:58:15.568] "blockchainStoragePath" set to "blockchain.nrs"
[2013-12-12 16:58:15.571] "myAddress" set to ""
[2013-12-12 16:58:15.572] "myHallmark" set to ""
[2013-12-12 16:58:15.572] "wellKnownPeers" set to "134.119.3.19; 146.185.168.142; 162.243.145.83; 162.243.232.67; 64.22.108.120; 69.146.88.14; 76.74.212.230; 85.17.190.73; 88.198.210.245; nxt.airdns.org"
[2013-12-12 16:58:15.572] "allowedUserHosts" set to "*"
[2013-12-12 16:58:15.572] "allowedBotHosts" set to "*"
[2013-12-12 16:58:15.572] "blacklistingPeriod" set to "300"
[2013-12-12 16:58:15.572] "logPeerCommunication" set to "false"
[2013-12-12 16:58:15.573] Loading transactions...
[2013-12-12 16:58:15.735] ...Done
[2013-12-12 16:58:15.735] Loading peers...
[2013-12-12 16:58:15.738] 10: java.io.InvalidClassException: Nxt$Account; class invalid for deserialization
2013-12-12 16:58:15.738:INFO:oejsh.ContextHandler:main: Started o.e.j.w.WebAppContext@7cf27a6e{/,file:/home/nxt/nxt/webapps/root/,AVAILABLE}{/root}
2013-12-12 16:58:15.745:WARN:oejuc.AbstractLifeCycle:main: FAILED ServerConnector@1c76b9da{HTTP/1.1}{0.0.0.0:7874}: java.net.BindException: address already in use
java.net.BindException: address already in use
        at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind0(Native Method)
        at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind(Net.java:444)
        at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind(Net.java:436)
        at sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketChannelImpl.bind(ServerSocketChannelImpl.java:214)
        at sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketAdaptor.bind(ServerSocketAdaptor.java:74)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.server.ServerConnector.open(ServerConnector.java:279)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.server.AbstractNetworkConnector.doStart(AbstractNetworkConnector.java:80)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.server.ServerConnector.doStart(ServerConnector.java:218)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.AbstractLifeCycle.start(AbstractLifeCycle.java:69)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.server.Server.doStart(Server.java:336)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.AbstractLifeCycle.start(AbstractLifeCycle.java:69)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.xml.XmlConfiguration$1.run(XmlConfiguration.java:1250)
        at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.xml.XmlConfiguration.main(XmlConfiguration.java:1174)
        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
        at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
        at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.start.Main.invokeMain(Main.java:297)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.start.Main.start(Main.java:706)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.start.Main.main(Main.java:103)
2013-12-12 16:58:15.746:WARN:oejuc.AbstractLifeCycle:main: FAILED ServerConnector@36a3a5cf{SSL-http/1.1}{0.0.0.0:7875}: java.net.BindException: address already in use
java.net.BindException: address already in use
        at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind0(Native Method)
        at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind(Net.java:444)
        at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind(Net.java:436)
        at sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketChannelImpl.bind(ServerSocketChannelImpl.java:214)
        at sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketAdaptor.bind(ServerSocketAdaptor.java:74)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.server.ServerConnector.open(ServerConnector.java:279)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.server.AbstractNetworkConnector.doStart(AbstractNetworkConnector.java:80)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.server.ServerConnector.doStart(ServerConnector.java:218)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.AbstractLifeCycle.start(AbstractLifeCycle.java:69)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.server.Server.doStart(Server.java:336)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.AbstractLifeCycle.start(AbstractLifeCycle.java:69)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.xml.XmlConfiguration$1.run(XmlConfiguration.java:1250)
        at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.xml.XmlConfiguration.main(XmlConfiguration.java:1174)
        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
        at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
        at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.start.Main.invokeMain(Main.java:297)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.start.Main.start(Main.java:706)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.start.Main.main(Main.java:103)
2013-12-12 16:58:15.746:WARN:oejuc.AbstractLifeCycle:main: FAILED org.eclipse.jetty.server.Server@31dad50f: MultiException[java.net.BindException: address already in use, java.net.BindException: address already in use]
MultiException[java.net.BindException: address already in use, java.net.BindException: address already in use]
        at org.eclipse.jetty.server.Server.doStart(Server.java:302)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.AbstractLifeCycle.start(AbstractLifeCycle.java:69)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.xml.XmlConfiguration$1.run(XmlConfiguration.java:1250)
        at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.xml.XmlConfiguration.main(XmlConfiguration.java:1174)
        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
        at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
        at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.start.Main.invokeMain(Main.java:297)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.start.Main.start(Main.java:706)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.start.Main.main(Main.java:103)
java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
        at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
        at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.start.Main.invokeMain(Main.java:297)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.start.Main.start(Main.java:706)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.start.Main.main(Main.java:103)
Caused by: MultiException[java.net.BindException: address already in use, java.net.BindException: address already in use]
        at org.eclipse.jetty.server.Server.doStart(Server.java:302)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.AbstractLifeCycle.start(AbstractLifeCycle.java:69)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.xml.XmlConfiguration$1.run(XmlConfiguration.java:1250)
        at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.xml.XmlConfiguration.main(XmlConfiguration.java:1174)
        ... 7 more

Delete "peers.nxt" and run again.
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2142
Merit: 1009

Newbie


View Profile
December 12, 2013, 09:13:50 AM
 #3111

- Stakeholders will start doing anything and Nxt will grow

The fundraising was anonymous -- how can BCNext tell who of the contributing people is a stakeholder?

Dunno.
coco23
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1974
Merit: 856


View Profile
December 12, 2013, 09:15:57 AM
 #3112

Anybody have large amounts on DGEX?
How long does it take for a payout to go through the system? Tried to get some NXT out yesterday but they haven't arrived...
laowai80
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 98
Merit: 10


View Profile
December 12, 2013, 09:18:37 AM
 #3113

How long does it take for a payout to go through the system? Tried to get some NXT out yesterday but they haven't arrived...

24 hours, more or less, just wait a bit more, or post your account id in the dgex thread, they can look into it faster maybe.
bizz
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 492
Merit: 500


View Profile
December 12, 2013, 09:19:23 AM
 #3114

- Stakeholders will start doing anything and Nxt will grow

The fundraising was anonymous -- how can BCNext tell who of the contributing people is a stakeholder?

Everyone who owns some is. But I bet he means founders. Leaving nxt would screw the most people who invested time & money in NXT later after that initial fundraising - and I think everyone agree those are the ones doing most promotion.

Have to agree with BCnext though. Big stakeholders are doing nothing. At least they could send some to bounties. Takes few seconds.
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2142
Merit: 1009

Newbie


View Profile
December 12, 2013, 09:19:52 AM
 #3115

Btw, if any of the founders don't like the latest BCNext's statement they can sell me their NXTs at the initial rate (50M ~ 1 BTC) and leave the project without loss.

Edit: This is a time-limited offer.
NxtChoice
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 12, 2013, 09:20:23 AM
 #3116

Actually, those top stakeholders are participating Nxt. They are just mining for profit. Too greedy.

If they sold 80% of what they have now, the price will climb and the wealth they own doesn't decrease.

The bad news has effect on the price. Now the price at DGEX jump from 800 to 500.

Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2142
Merit: 1009

Newbie


View Profile
December 12, 2013, 09:21:14 AM
 #3117

Actually, those top stakeholders are participating Nxt. They are just mining for profit. Too greedy.

If they sold 80% of what they have now, the price will climb and the wealth they own doesn't decrease.

The bad news has effect on the price. Now the price at DGEX jump from 800 to 500.

http://87.230.14.1/nxt/nxt.cgi?action=40

Only 10% r mining blocks.
laowai80
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 98
Merit: 10


View Profile
December 12, 2013, 09:22:21 AM
 #3118

C-f-B, maybe stakeholders don't want to hallmark their NXT, that's all? I mean, if the NXT running on a dedicated IP is not hallmarked, is it of any use?
klee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1498
Merit: 1000



View Profile
December 12, 2013, 09:22:29 AM
 #3119

Actually, those top stakeholders are participating Nxt. They are just mining for profit. Too greedy.

If they sold 80% of what they have now, the price will climb and the wealth they own doesn't decrease.

The bad news has effect on the price. Now the price at DGEX jump from 800 to 500.

http://87.230.14.1/nxt/nxt.cgi?action=40

Only 10% r mining blocks.
CfB I am sure you know them - did you try to communicate with them?
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2142
Merit: 1009

Newbie


View Profile
December 12, 2013, 09:23:31 AM
 #3120

C-f-B, maybe stakeholders don't want to hallmark their NXT, that's all? I mean, if the NXT running on a dedicated IP is not hallmarked, is it of any use?

They r not forced to mark their nodes. Nodes without hallmark still help a lot.
Pages: « 1 ... 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 [156] 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 ... 2557 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!