klee
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1000
|
 |
December 17, 2013, 05:27:06 PM |
|
We need a proper graph asap damnit... I will try to contact cryptocoincharts. I emailed Christian, we should ask him in this thread too: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=126796.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"The nature of Bitcoin is such that once version 0.1 was released, the
core design was set in stone for the rest of its lifetime." -- Satoshi
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
crazybonkers
Member
Offline
Activity: 75
Merit: 10
|
|
December 17, 2013, 05:58:10 PM |
|
I dont think that is the real answer to the question they were looking for. That is bitcoin and not Nxt. The real answer is probably yes to the question. Bitcoin early adopters still had to mine their coins. Nxt founders did not have to mine their coins. |
|
|
|
brooklynbtc
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 336
Merit: 250
AKA jefdiesel
|
|
December 17, 2013, 06:01:29 PM |
|
tweets with #nxt get confused with wrestling
hah
|
|
|
|
landomata
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2184
Merit: 1000
|
|
December 17, 2013, 06:06:58 PM |
|
Tomorrow I'll get code that allows to assign aliases to any URI (or to an arbitrary string). "Official" name of this system is Alias System, not (decentralized) DNS. We will be able to use it via API calls but this is not very convenient. If anyone is planning to create a client soft for Messaging, please, think if u can fit Alias System into it.
this sounds interesting |
|
|
|
abctc
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1038
|
|
December 17, 2013, 06:07:35 PM |
|
Nxt founders did not have to mine their coins.
- did you read original tread? particularly post #2? why you didn't invest into Nxt after such post? |
██████████████████████████████████████████████████
████████████████████████████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████████████████████████████
████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████ |
, the Next platform. Magis quam Moneta (More than a Coin) |
|
|
|
|
swansong
|
|
December 17, 2013, 06:08:42 PM |
|
I dont think that is the real answer to the question they were looking for. That is bitcoin and not Nxt. The real answer is probably yes to the question. Bitcoin early adopters still had to mine their coins. Nxt founders did not have to mine their coins. You could invest and mine for Bitcoins and you could invest and be a steakholder for NXT too. They both require an action. You can still mine or buy NXT tho while it is cheap. |
|
|
|
|
|
bybitcoin
|
|
December 17, 2013, 06:09:27 PM |
|
I dont think that is the real answer to the question they were looking for. That is bitcoin and not Nxt. The real answer is probably yes to the question. Bitcoin early adopters still had to mine their coins. Nxt founders did not have to mine their coins. Nxt founders risked some btc when your mouth has been busy trolling somewhere else! The amount btc early adopters had paid for mining something in existence and processing were almost the same amount in fiat, that we has paid for funding something which was not even clear to come out of the dark or not (and all of you had the same opportunity) So stop whining, buy some, or if you find it not useful, move over to another one fitting your preferences! |
|
|
|
|
ferment
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
IDEX - LIVE Real-time DEX
|
|
December 17, 2013, 06:15:34 PM |
|
Do genesis block owners still hold +50% of the total market cap?
The original 73 accounts from the genesis block transactions have a total balance of 286009248 nxt. |
|
|
|
crazybonkers
Member
Offline
Activity: 75
Merit: 10
|
|
December 17, 2013, 06:17:47 PM |
|
I dont think that is the real answer to the question they were looking for. That is bitcoin and not Nxt. The real answer is probably yes to the question. Bitcoin early adopters still had to mine their coins. Nxt founders did not have to mine their coins. Nxt founders risked some btc when your mouth has been busy trolling somewhere else! The amount btc early adopters had paid for mining something in existence and processing were almost the same amount in fiat, that we has paid for funding something which was not even clear to come out of the dark or not (and all of you had the same opportunity) So stop whining, buy some, or if you find it not useful, move over to another one fitting your preferences! YOU my friend are trolling me, I only answered a question that someone posted. Check yourself before flaming me for giving a truthful answer. Truth defends itself. |
|
|
|
|
bybitcoin
|
|
December 17, 2013, 06:23:07 PM |
|
I dont think that is the real answer to the question they were looking for. That is bitcoin and not Nxt. The real answer is probably yes to the question. Bitcoin early adopters still had to mine their coins. Nxt founders did not have to mine their coins. Nxt founders risked some btc when your mouth has been busy trolling somewhere else! The amount btc early adopters had paid for mining something in existence and processing were almost the same amount in fiat, that we has paid for funding something which was not even clear to come out of the dark or not (and all of you had the same opportunity) So stop whining, buy some, or if you find it not useful, move over to another one fitting your preferences! YOU my friend are trolling me, I only answered a question that someone posted. Check yourself before flaming me for giving a truthful answer. Truth defends itself. Typical! |
|
|
|
|
klee
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1000
|
|
December 17, 2013, 06:26:34 PM |
|
I dont think that is the real answer to the question they were looking for. That is bitcoin and not Nxt. The real answer is probably yes to the question. Bitcoin early adopters still had to mine their coins. Nxt founders did not have to mine their coins. Nxt founders risked some btc when your mouth has been busy trolling somewhere else! The amount btc early adopters had paid for mining something in existence and processing were almost the same amount in fiat, that we has paid for funding something which was not even clear to come out of the dark or not (and all of you had the same opportunity) So stop whining, buy some, or if you find it not useful, move over to another one fitting your preferences! YOU my friend are trolling me, I only answered a question that someone posted. Check yourself before flaming me for giving a truthful answer. Truth defends itself. Do genesis block owners still hold +50% of the total market cap?
The original 73 accounts from the genesis block transactions have a total balance of 286009248 nxt. 28.6% Satoshi still has about 8% of total BTC network after FIVE FUCKING YEARS!!! Now go buy some DOGEcoins or 'pre-order' some ASICs or waste money in GPU+electricity... |
|
|
|
|
crazybonkers
Member
Offline
Activity: 75
Merit: 10
|
|
December 17, 2013, 06:28:01 PM |
|
I dont think that is the real answer to the question they were looking for. That is bitcoin and not Nxt. The real answer is probably yes to the question. Bitcoin early adopters still had to mine their coins. Nxt founders did not have to mine their coins. Nxt founders risked some btc when your mouth has been busy trolling somewhere else! The amount btc early adopters had paid for mining something in existence and processing were almost the same amount in fiat, that we has paid for funding something which was not even clear to come out of the dark or not (and all of you had the same opportunity) So stop whining, buy some, or if you find it not useful, move over to another one fitting your preferences! YOU my friend are trolling me, I only answered a question that someone posted. Check yourself before flaming me for giving a truthful answer. Truth defends itself. Do genesis block owners still hold +50% of the total market cap?
The original 73 accounts from the genesis block transactions have a total balance of 286009248 nxt. 28.6% Satoshi still has about 8% of total BTC network after FIVE FUCKING YEARS!!! Now go buy some DOGEcoins or 'pre-order' some ASICs or waste money in GPU+electricity... Why are you guys so angry? |
|
|
|
klee
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1000
|
|
December 17, 2013, 06:31:37 PM |
|
I dont think that is the real answer to the question they were looking for. That is bitcoin and not Nxt. The real answer is probably yes to the question. Bitcoin early adopters still had to mine their coins. Nxt founders did not have to mine their coins. Nxt founders risked some btc when your mouth has been busy trolling somewhere else! The amount btc early adopters had paid for mining something in existence and processing were almost the same amount in fiat, that we has paid for funding something which was not even clear to come out of the dark or not (and all of you had the same opportunity) So stop whining, buy some, or if you find it not useful, move over to another one fitting your preferences! YOU my friend are trolling me, I only answered a question that someone posted. Check yourself before flaming me for giving a truthful answer. Truth defends itself. Do genesis block owners still hold +50% of the total market cap?
The original 73 accounts from the genesis block transactions have a total balance of 286009248 nxt. 28.6% Satoshi still has about 8% of total BTC network after FIVE FUCKING YEARS!!! Now go buy some DOGEcoins or 'pre-order' some ASICs or waste money in GPU+electricity... Why are you guys so angry? Because I hate cliches.. |
|
|
|
|
|
bybitcoin
|
|
December 17, 2013, 06:32:12 PM |
|
I dont think that is the real answer to the question they were looking for. That is bitcoin and not Nxt. The real answer is probably yes to the question. Bitcoin early adopters still had to mine their coins. Nxt founders did not have to mine their coins. Nxt founders risked some btc when your mouth has been busy trolling somewhere else! The amount btc early adopters had paid for mining something in existence and processing were almost the same amount in fiat, that we has paid for funding something which was not even clear to come out of the dark or not (and all of you had the same opportunity) So stop whining, buy some, or if you find it not useful, move over to another one fitting your preferences! YOU my friend are trolling me, I only answered a question that someone posted. Check yourself before flaming me for giving a truthful answer. Truth defends itself. Do genesis block owners still hold +50% of the total market cap?
The original 73 accounts from the genesis block transactions have a total balance of 286009248 nxt. 28.6% Satoshi still has about 8% of total BTC network after FIVE FUCKING YEARS!!! Now go buy some DOGEcoins or 'pre-order' some ASICs or waste money in GPU+electricity... Why are you guys so angry? hehe, really typical! |
|
|
|
|
|
opticalcarrier
|
|
December 17, 2013, 07:16:05 PM
Last edit: December 17, 2013, 07:27:40 PM by opticalcarrier |
|
so regarding the TCP ports, it appears 7876 is not longer even listening for connections? It looks like 7876 is now gone and all APIs are now on the p2p port 7874? It also appears the non-secure http GUI is available on the p2p port. This is a bit disconcerting. Would it be possible to move the API and nonsecure GUI to 7876? That way people can still run public nodes w/o exposing their API and non-secure GUI. Also, as a usability feature, it may be a good idea for the verify token api to also return the website field in the data it returns along with the account number. This would make it much harder for someone to just copy a token and present it to someone as a short URL (that doesnt contain their userid/website in the display of the link) because then the person verifying the token may just look for the TRUE in the data that is returned. which brings me to this. EVERYONE NEEDS TO TRASH THEIR CURRENT TOKENS AND REDO IT USING THE FORMAT USERNAME@DOMAIN. THE CURRENT METHOD OF DOING IT WITH JUST USERNAME ISNT 100% SAFE ie opticalcarrier@bitcointalk.orgor opticalc@nextcoin.org |
|
|
|
|
|
Pablito89
|
|
December 17, 2013, 07:47:30 PM |
|
Anyone got an idea on the future price of 1 NXT, could it ever reach a BTC?  |
|
|
|
|
|
Pouncer
|
|
December 17, 2013, 08:03:31 PM |
|
What to do with "Too many open files"? at org.eclipse.jetty.server.AbstractConnector$Acceptor.run(AbstractConnector.java:466)
at org.eclipse.jetty.util.thread.QueuedThreadPool.runJob(QueuedThreadPool.java:607)
at org.eclipse.jetty.util.thread.QueuedThreadPool$3.run(QueuedThreadPool.java:536)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)
2013-12-17 13:14:21.693:WARN:oejs.ServerConnector:qtp9336124-29-acceptor-0-ServerConnector@f4e9d3{SSL-http/1.1}{0.0.0.0:7875}:
java.io.IOException: Too many open files
at sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketChannelImpl.accept0(Native Method)
at sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketChannelImpl.accept(Unknown Source)
at org.eclipse.jetty.server.ServerConnector.accept(ServerConnector.java:336)
at org.eclipse.jetty.server.AbstractConnector$Acceptor.run(AbstractConnector.java:466)
at org.eclipse.jetty.util.thread.QueuedThreadPool.runJob(QueuedThreadPool.java:607)
at org.eclipse.jetty.util.thread.QueuedThreadPool$3.run(QueuedThreadPool.java:536)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)
|
|
|
|
laowai80
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
December 17, 2013, 08:07:05 PM |
|
What to do with "Too many open files"? at org.eclipse.jetty.server.AbstractConnector$Acceptor.run(AbstractConnector.java:466)
at org.eclipse.jetty.util.thread.QueuedThreadPool.runJob(QueuedThreadPool.java:607)
at org.eclipse.jetty.util.thread.QueuedThreadPool$3.run(QueuedThreadPool.java:536)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)
2013-12-17 13:14:21.693:WARN:oejs.ServerConnector:qtp9336124-29-acceptor-0-ServerConnector@f4e9d3{SSL-http/1.1}{0.0.0.0:7875}:
java.io.IOException: Too many open files
at sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketChannelImpl.accept0(Native Method)
at sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketChannelImpl.accept(Unknown Source)
at org.eclipse.jetty.server.ServerConnector.accept(ServerConnector.java:336)
at org.eclipse.jetty.server.AbstractConnector$Acceptor.run(AbstractConnector.java:466)
at org.eclipse.jetty.util.thread.QueuedThreadPool.runJob(QueuedThreadPool.java:607)
at org.eclipse.jetty.util.thread.QueuedThreadPool$3.run(QueuedThreadPool.java:536)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)
check this out maybe: http://docs.basho.com/riak/latest/ops/tuning/open-files-limit/#Linux |
|
|
|
|
ferment
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
IDEX - LIVE Real-time DEX
|
|
December 17, 2013, 08:07:46 PM |
|
What to do with "Too many open files"?
This link is handy. Bash shell example for Ubuntu here. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
