starik69
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1367
Merit: 1000
|
|
December 12, 2013, 08:56:41 AM |
|
They don't run their nodes, You made it impossible to run it under NAT. they don't support bounties I wanted to participate in some bounty yesterday but didnt find its addresses in two topics on this forum. they don't take part in Nxt promotion. You cannot expect everyone to be a good promoter. he can quit this project and join other cryptocoin
This blackmail thing is very sad To be angry because of this - is like to be angry because of stars on the sky. The things that are completely out of your control. I think it is a symptom.
|
|
|
|
ParmaBTC
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1002
|
|
December 12, 2013, 08:57:41 AM |
|
Finally managed to have the hallmark done and decoded correctly, after manually encoding all special characters. Yes, you have to url-encode at least # and &, that I can think of. You can't even fix it on the server side because in the case of # I don't think the string after the hash gets submitted to the server at all. So, people with special characters in the password will have to encode them manually, see e.g. table here: http://www.w3schools.com/tags/ref_urlencode.aspOr do a simple javascript page that does the encoding in javascript on the client. Obviously, don't submit your passwords to any online services that offer url-encoding. Warning: After doing this request, http://localhost:7874/nxt?requestType=markHost&secretPhrase=MY_SECRET&host=MY_HOST&weight=HOST_WEIGHT&date=CURRENT_DATE your secret passphrase is stored in clear text in your browsing history! Remember to securely delete your browsing history after doing this task.this is true, but you can use Anonymous mode of your browser, and nothing is stored
|
|
|
|
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
|
|
December 12, 2013, 09:01:28 AM |
|
They don't run their nodes, You made it impossible to run it under NAT. I bet u can afford to pay 10$ per month for VPS.they don't support bounties I wanted to participate in some bounty yesterday but didnt find its addresses in two topics on this forum. That's good, the others didn't even try.they don't take part in Nxt promotion. You cannot expect everyone to be a good promoter. True.
|
|
|
|
NxtChoice
|
|
December 12, 2013, 09:03:54 AM |
|
Wow!
If the fundraising limit to everyone to be 0.05 BTC at most, then there will be more stakeholders involved and the coin distribution should be better than now.
|
|
|
|
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
|
|
December 12, 2013, 09:04:55 AM |
|
I've got a private message from one of the stakeholders who asked to remove my post about bad news. Sorry, guys, BCNext asked me to post this and it will stay there.
I see 2 scenarios there: - Stakeholders will start doing anything and Nxt will grow - Stakeholders will sell their coins to those who do something and Nxt will grow
Both scenarios look good to me.
|
|
|
|
omo
|
|
December 12, 2013, 09:07:27 AM |
|
I updated the client from 0.3.16 to 0.3.18 on a centos box, I got the following errors: java -Xms512m -Xmx1024m -jar start.jar 2013-12-12 16:58:15.412:INFO:oejs.Server:main: jetty-9.1.0.v20131115 2013-12-12 16:58:15.438:INFO:oejdp.ScanningAppProvider:main: Deployment monitor [file:/home/nxt/nxt/webapps/] at interval 1 [2013-12-12 16:58:15.568] Nxt 0.3.18 started. [2013-12-12 16:58:15.568] "blockchainStoragePath" set to "blockchain.nrs" [2013-12-12 16:58:15.571] "myAddress" set to "" [2013-12-12 16:58:15.572] "myHallmark" set to "" [2013-12-12 16:58:15.572] "wellKnownPeers" set to "134.119.3.19; 146.185.168.142; 162.243.145.83; 162.243.232.67; 64.22.108.120; 69.146.88.14; 76.74.212.230; 85.17.190.73; 88.198.210.245; nxt.airdns.org" [2013-12-12 16:58:15.572] "allowedUserHosts" set to "*" [2013-12-12 16:58:15.572] "allowedBotHosts" set to "*" [2013-12-12 16:58:15.572] "blacklistingPeriod" set to "300" [2013-12-12 16:58:15.572] "logPeerCommunication" set to "false" [2013-12-12 16:58:15.573] Loading transactions... [2013-12-12 16:58:15.735] ...Done [2013-12-12 16:58:15.735] Loading peers... [2013-12-12 16:58:15.738] 10: java.io.InvalidClassException: Nxt$Account; class invalid for deserialization 2013-12-12 16:58:15.738:INFO:oejsh.ContextHandler:main: Started o.e.j.w.WebAppContext@7cf27a6e{/,file:/home/nxt/nxt/webapps/root/,AVAILABLE}{/root} 2013-12-12 16:58:15.745:WARN:oejuc.AbstractLifeCycle:main: FAILED ServerConnector@1c76b9da{HTTP/1.1}{0.0.0.0:7874}: java.net.BindException: address already in use java.net.BindException: address already in use at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind0(Native Method) at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind(Net.java:444) at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind(Net.java:436) at sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketChannelImpl.bind(ServerSocketChannelImpl.java:214) at sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketAdaptor.bind(ServerSocketAdaptor.java:74) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.ServerConnector.open(ServerConnector.java:279) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.AbstractNetworkConnector.doStart(AbstractNetworkConnector.java:80) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.ServerConnector.doStart(ServerConnector.java:218) at org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.AbstractLifeCycle.start(AbstractLifeCycle.java:69) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.Server.doStart(Server.java:336) at org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.AbstractLifeCycle.start(AbstractLifeCycle.java:69) at org.eclipse.jetty.xml.XmlConfiguration$1.run(XmlConfiguration.java:1250) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at org.eclipse.jetty.xml.XmlConfiguration.main(XmlConfiguration.java:1174) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606) at org.eclipse.jetty.start.Main.invokeMain(Main.java:297) at org.eclipse.jetty.start.Main.start(Main.java:706) at org.eclipse.jetty.start.Main.main(Main.java:103) 2013-12-12 16:58:15.746:WARN:oejuc.AbstractLifeCycle:main: FAILED ServerConnector@36a3a5cf{SSL-http/1.1}{0.0.0.0:7875}: java.net.BindException: address already in use java.net.BindException: address already in use at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind0(Native Method) at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind(Net.java:444) at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind(Net.java:436) at sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketChannelImpl.bind(ServerSocketChannelImpl.java:214) at sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketAdaptor.bind(ServerSocketAdaptor.java:74) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.ServerConnector.open(ServerConnector.java:279) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.AbstractNetworkConnector.doStart(AbstractNetworkConnector.java:80) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.ServerConnector.doStart(ServerConnector.java:218) at org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.AbstractLifeCycle.start(AbstractLifeCycle.java:69) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.Server.doStart(Server.java:336) at org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.AbstractLifeCycle.start(AbstractLifeCycle.java:69) at org.eclipse.jetty.xml.XmlConfiguration$1.run(XmlConfiguration.java:1250) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at org.eclipse.jetty.xml.XmlConfiguration.main(XmlConfiguration.java:1174) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606) at org.eclipse.jetty.start.Main.invokeMain(Main.java:297) at org.eclipse.jetty.start.Main.start(Main.java:706) at org.eclipse.jetty.start.Main.main(Main.java:103) 2013-12-12 16:58:15.746:WARN:oejuc.AbstractLifeCycle:main: FAILED org.eclipse.jetty.server.Server@31dad50f: MultiException[java.net.BindException: address already in use, java.net.BindException: address already in use] MultiException[java.net.BindException: address already in use, java.net.BindException: address already in use] at org.eclipse.jetty.server.Server.doStart(Server.java:302) at org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.AbstractLifeCycle.start(AbstractLifeCycle.java:69) at org.eclipse.jetty.xml.XmlConfiguration$1.run(XmlConfiguration.java:1250) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at org.eclipse.jetty.xml.XmlConfiguration.main(XmlConfiguration.java:1174) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606) at org.eclipse.jetty.start.Main.invokeMain(Main.java:297) at org.eclipse.jetty.start.Main.start(Main.java:706) at org.eclipse.jetty.start.Main.main(Main.java:103) java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606) at org.eclipse.jetty.start.Main.invokeMain(Main.java:297) at org.eclipse.jetty.start.Main.start(Main.java:706) at org.eclipse.jetty.start.Main.main(Main.java:103) Caused by: MultiException[java.net.BindException: address already in use, java.net.BindException: address already in use] at org.eclipse.jetty.server.Server.doStart(Server.java:302) at org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.AbstractLifeCycle.start(AbstractLifeCycle.java:69) at org.eclipse.jetty.xml.XmlConfiguration$1.run(XmlConfiguration.java:1250) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at org.eclipse.jetty.xml.XmlConfiguration.main(XmlConfiguration.java:1174) ... 7 more
|
BTC:1Fu4TNpVPToxxhSXBNSvE9fz6X3dbYgB8q
|
|
|
mvag
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 44
Merit: 0
|
|
December 12, 2013, 09:09:30 AM |
|
- Stakeholders will start doing anything and Nxt will grow
The fundraising was anonymous -- how can BCNext tell who of the contributing people is a stakeholder?
|
|
|
|
Hampuz
|
|
December 12, 2013, 09:11:24 AM |
|
Could someone sell me some NXT? Can pay in BTC/LTC/$$
|
|
|
|
pinarello
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 266
Merit: 100
NXT is the future
|
|
December 12, 2013, 09:11:54 AM |
|
They don't run their nodes, You made it impossible to run it under NAT. they don't support bounties I wanted to participate in some bounty yesterday but didnt find its addresses in two topics on this forum. they don't take part in Nxt promotion. You cannot expect everyone to be a good promoter. he can quit this project and join other cryptocoin
This blackmail thing is very sad To be angry because of this - is like to be angry because of stars on the sky. The things that are completely out of your control. I think it is a symptom. Wouldn’t you be angry when 71 people taking advantage of you and none participate to promote your child… Sick of lame excuses “did not found the address” maybe look in de signature. Did you even try looking for it? You all forget people working there but of for this to succeed, but near to zero involvement from the early adaptors. I completely understand BCnext and this is no blackmail, if nothing change and we get no serious involvement from that accounts with more than 50M coins on it it will be over and out. So what will it be hoarders?
|
|
|
|
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
|
|
December 12, 2013, 09:12:47 AM |
|
I updated the client from 0.3.16 to 0.3.18 on a centos box, I got the following errors: java -Xms512m -Xmx1024m -jar start.jar 2013-12-12 16:58:15.412:INFO:oejs.Server:main: jetty-9.1.0.v20131115 2013-12-12 16:58:15.438:INFO:oejdp.ScanningAppProvider:main: Deployment monitor [file:/home/nxt/nxt/webapps/] at interval 1 [2013-12-12 16:58:15.568] Nxt 0.3.18 started. [2013-12-12 16:58:15.568] "blockchainStoragePath" set to "blockchain.nrs" [2013-12-12 16:58:15.571] "myAddress" set to "" [2013-12-12 16:58:15.572] "myHallmark" set to "" [2013-12-12 16:58:15.572] "wellKnownPeers" set to "134.119.3.19; 146.185.168.142; 162.243.145.83; 162.243.232.67; 64.22.108.120; 69.146.88.14; 76.74.212.230; 85.17.190.73; 88.198.210.245; nxt.airdns.org" [2013-12-12 16:58:15.572] "allowedUserHosts" set to "*" [2013-12-12 16:58:15.572] "allowedBotHosts" set to "*" [2013-12-12 16:58:15.572] "blacklistingPeriod" set to "300" [2013-12-12 16:58:15.572] "logPeerCommunication" set to "false" [2013-12-12 16:58:15.573] Loading transactions... [2013-12-12 16:58:15.735] ...Done [2013-12-12 16:58:15.735] Loading peers... [2013-12-12 16:58:15.738] 10: java.io.InvalidClassException: Nxt$Account; class invalid for deserialization 2013-12-12 16:58:15.738:INFO:oejsh.ContextHandler:main: Started o.e.j.w.WebAppContext@7cf27a6e{/,file:/home/nxt/nxt/webapps/root/,AVAILABLE}{/root} 2013-12-12 16:58:15.745:WARN:oejuc.AbstractLifeCycle:main: FAILED ServerConnector@1c76b9da{HTTP/1.1}{0.0.0.0:7874}: java.net.BindException: address already in use java.net.BindException: address already in use at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind0(Native Method) at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind(Net.java:444) at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind(Net.java:436) at sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketChannelImpl.bind(ServerSocketChannelImpl.java:214) at sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketAdaptor.bind(ServerSocketAdaptor.java:74) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.ServerConnector.open(ServerConnector.java:279) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.AbstractNetworkConnector.doStart(AbstractNetworkConnector.java:80) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.ServerConnector.doStart(ServerConnector.java:218) at org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.AbstractLifeCycle.start(AbstractLifeCycle.java:69) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.Server.doStart(Server.java:336) at org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.AbstractLifeCycle.start(AbstractLifeCycle.java:69) at org.eclipse.jetty.xml.XmlConfiguration$1.run(XmlConfiguration.java:1250) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at org.eclipse.jetty.xml.XmlConfiguration.main(XmlConfiguration.java:1174) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606) at org.eclipse.jetty.start.Main.invokeMain(Main.java:297) at org.eclipse.jetty.start.Main.start(Main.java:706) at org.eclipse.jetty.start.Main.main(Main.java:103) 2013-12-12 16:58:15.746:WARN:oejuc.AbstractLifeCycle:main: FAILED ServerConnector@36a3a5cf{SSL-http/1.1}{0.0.0.0:7875}: java.net.BindException: address already in use java.net.BindException: address already in use at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind0(Native Method) at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind(Net.java:444) at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind(Net.java:436) at sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketChannelImpl.bind(ServerSocketChannelImpl.java:214) at sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketAdaptor.bind(ServerSocketAdaptor.java:74) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.ServerConnector.open(ServerConnector.java:279) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.AbstractNetworkConnector.doStart(AbstractNetworkConnector.java:80) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.ServerConnector.doStart(ServerConnector.java:218) at org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.AbstractLifeCycle.start(AbstractLifeCycle.java:69) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.Server.doStart(Server.java:336) at org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.AbstractLifeCycle.start(AbstractLifeCycle.java:69) at org.eclipse.jetty.xml.XmlConfiguration$1.run(XmlConfiguration.java:1250) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at org.eclipse.jetty.xml.XmlConfiguration.main(XmlConfiguration.java:1174) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606) at org.eclipse.jetty.start.Main.invokeMain(Main.java:297) at org.eclipse.jetty.start.Main.start(Main.java:706) at org.eclipse.jetty.start.Main.main(Main.java:103) 2013-12-12 16:58:15.746:WARN:oejuc.AbstractLifeCycle:main: FAILED org.eclipse.jetty.server.Server@31dad50f: MultiException[java.net.BindException: address already in use, java.net.BindException: address already in use] MultiException[java.net.BindException: address already in use, java.net.BindException: address already in use] at org.eclipse.jetty.server.Server.doStart(Server.java:302) at org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.AbstractLifeCycle.start(AbstractLifeCycle.java:69) at org.eclipse.jetty.xml.XmlConfiguration$1.run(XmlConfiguration.java:1250) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at org.eclipse.jetty.xml.XmlConfiguration.main(XmlConfiguration.java:1174) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606) at org.eclipse.jetty.start.Main.invokeMain(Main.java:297) at org.eclipse.jetty.start.Main.start(Main.java:706) at org.eclipse.jetty.start.Main.main(Main.java:103) java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606) at org.eclipse.jetty.start.Main.invokeMain(Main.java:297) at org.eclipse.jetty.start.Main.start(Main.java:706) at org.eclipse.jetty.start.Main.main(Main.java:103) Caused by: MultiException[java.net.BindException: address already in use, java.net.BindException: address already in use] at org.eclipse.jetty.server.Server.doStart(Server.java:302) at org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.AbstractLifeCycle.start(AbstractLifeCycle.java:69) at org.eclipse.jetty.xml.XmlConfiguration$1.run(XmlConfiguration.java:1250) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at org.eclipse.jetty.xml.XmlConfiguration.main(XmlConfiguration.java:1174) ... 7 more
Delete "peers.nxt" and run again.
|
|
|
|
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
|
|
December 12, 2013, 09:13:50 AM |
|
- Stakeholders will start doing anything and Nxt will grow
The fundraising was anonymous -- how can BCNext tell who of the contributing people is a stakeholder? Dunno.
|
|
|
|
coco23
|
|
December 12, 2013, 09:15:57 AM |
|
Anybody have large amounts on DGEX?
How long does it take for a payout to go through the system? Tried to get some NXT out yesterday but they haven't arrived...
|
|
|
|
laowai80
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
December 12, 2013, 09:18:37 AM |
|
How long does it take for a payout to go through the system? Tried to get some NXT out yesterday but they haven't arrived...
24 hours, more or less, just wait a bit more, or post your account id in the dgex thread, they can look into it faster maybe.
|
|
|
|
bizz
|
|
December 12, 2013, 09:19:23 AM |
|
- Stakeholders will start doing anything and Nxt will grow
The fundraising was anonymous -- how can BCNext tell who of the contributing people is a stakeholder? Everyone who owns some is. But I bet he means founders. Leaving nxt would screw the most people who invested time & money in NXT later after that initial fundraising - and I think everyone agree those are the ones doing most promotion. Have to agree with BCnext though. Big stakeholders are doing nothing. At least they could send some to bounties. Takes few seconds.
|
|
|
|
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
|
|
December 12, 2013, 09:19:52 AM |
|
Btw, if any of the founders don't like the latest BCNext's statement they can sell me their NXTs at the initial rate (50M ~ 1 BTC) and leave the project without loss.
Edit: This is a time-limited offer.
|
|
|
|
NxtChoice
|
|
December 12, 2013, 09:20:23 AM |
|
Actually, those top stakeholders are participating Nxt. They are just mining for profit. Too greedy.
If they sold 80% of what they have now, the price will climb and the wealth they own doesn't decrease.
The bad news has effect on the price. Now the price at DGEX jump from 800 to 500.
|
|
|
|
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
|
|
December 12, 2013, 09:21:14 AM |
|
Actually, those top stakeholders are participating Nxt. They are just mining for profit. Too greedy.
If they sold 80% of what they have now, the price will climb and the wealth they own doesn't decrease.
The bad news has effect on the price. Now the price at DGEX jump from 800 to 500.
http://87.230.14.1/nxt/nxt.cgi?action=40Only 10% r mining blocks.
|
|
|
|
laowai80
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
December 12, 2013, 09:22:21 AM |
|
C-f-B, maybe stakeholders don't want to hallmark their NXT, that's all? I mean, if the NXT running on a dedicated IP is not hallmarked, is it of any use?
|
|
|
|
klee
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1000
|
|
December 12, 2013, 09:22:29 AM |
|
Actually, those top stakeholders are participating Nxt. They are just mining for profit. Too greedy.
If they sold 80% of what they have now, the price will climb and the wealth they own doesn't decrease.
The bad news has effect on the price. Now the price at DGEX jump from 800 to 500.
http://87.230.14.1/nxt/nxt.cgi?action=40Only 10% r mining blocks. CfB I am sure you know them - did you try to communicate with them?
|
|
|
|
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
|
|
December 12, 2013, 09:23:31 AM |
|
C-f-B, maybe stakeholders don't want to hallmark their NXT, that's all? I mean, if the NXT running on a dedicated IP is not hallmarked, is it of any use?
They r not forced to mark their nodes. Nodes without hallmark still help a lot.
|
|
|
|
|