Anon136
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1217
|
|
January 17, 2014, 05:42:44 AM |
|
The only problem that I'm having with the idea of writing a paper about it is that i pretty much communicated everything that i needed to communicate in a paragraph >.< While at the same time I cant say, "hey guys i wrote a paragraph, everyone check out my awesome paragraph!"
best paragraph I read this year. Thank you! I love this nxt community. You guys never fail to say things that brighten my day.
|
Rep Thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=381041If one can not confer upon another a right which he does not himself first possess, by what means does the state derive the right to engage in behaviors from which the public is prohibited?
|
|
|
opticalcarrier
|
|
January 17, 2014, 05:47:40 AM |
|
nxt really is the model for distributed autonomous corporations. Inorder to have thousands or millions of blockchains that are all secure it is imperative that they not be in competition with one another for the resources that make them secure. with mining, the strength of one blockchain is the weakness of another. Or put differently, every hash/s on blockchain a is a hash/s that is not available to secure blockchain b. with the nxt framework we can have an almost infinite number of secure blockchains. this is a prerequisite for a vibrant ecosystem of distributed autonomous corporations.
*edit* i may write a paper about this
Would be great. I was going to implement Parallel Blockchains by April, but I see that u already got the same idea (" or put differently, every hash/s on blockchain a is a hash/s that is not available to secure blockchain b. with the nxt framework we can have an almost infinite number of secure blockchains"), so I'll focus on other things. The only problem that I'm having with the idea of writing a paper about it is that i pretty much communicated everything that i needed to communicate in a paragraph >.< While at the same time I cant say, "hey guys i wrote a paragraph, everyone check out my awesome paragraph!" Plz expound, i do not grasp concept of 'parallel secure blockchains' much less how they correlate with dac
|
|
|
|
Anon136
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1217
|
|
January 17, 2014, 05:51:00 AM |
|
nxt really is the model for distributed autonomous corporations. Inorder to have thousands or millions of blockchains that are all secure it is imperative that they not be in competition with one another for the resources that make them secure. with mining, the strength of one blockchain is the weakness of another. Or put differently, every hash/s on blockchain a is a hash/s that is not available to secure blockchain b. with the nxt framework we can have an almost infinite number of secure blockchains. this is a prerequisite for a vibrant ecosystem of distributed autonomous corporations.
*edit* i may write a paper about this
Would be great. I was going to implement Parallel Blockchains by April, but I see that u already got the same idea (" or put differently, every hash/s on blockchain a is a hash/s that is not available to secure blockchain b. with the nxt framework we can have an almost infinite number of secure blockchains"), so I'll focus on other things. The only problem that I'm having with the idea of writing a paper about it is that i pretty much communicated everything that i needed to communicate in a paragraph >.< While at the same time I cant say, "hey guys i wrote a paragraph, everyone check out my awesome paragraph!" Plz expound, i do not grasp concept of 'parallel secure blockchains' much less how they correlate with dac I wasn't talking about parallel blockchains. I was talking about totally distinct blockchains.
|
Rep Thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=381041If one can not confer upon another a right which he does not himself first possess, by what means does the state derive the right to engage in behaviors from which the public is prohibited?
|
|
|
msin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1004
|
|
January 17, 2014, 05:52:18 AM |
|
0.5.8 running so smooth, and much faster! Thanks JLP.
|
|
|
|
msin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1004
|
|
January 17, 2014, 05:57:35 AM |
|
I would like to offer a personal 100k bounty for anyone who can develop a Nxt torrent function using AM. I believe we could also develop a decentralized marketplace using the same model, I need SR back! But seriously, I'm sure the community would reward in addition to my bounty. I can start a separate thread as well.
|
|
|
|
punkrock
|
|
January 17, 2014, 06:24:15 AM |
|
I am living in the wrong timezone. Anyway:
|
|
|
|
2Kool4Skewl (OP)
|
|
January 17, 2014, 06:32:43 AM |
|
I am living in the wrong timezone. Anyway: AWESOME!!!
|
|
|
|
xyzzyx
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 490
Merit: 250
I don't really come from outer space.
|
|
January 17, 2014, 06:40:03 AM |
|
I wasn't talking about parallel blockchains. I was talking about totally distinct blockchains.
What's the functional difference? Edit: I mean, I don't see any difference between parallel blockchains and distinct blockchains with the exception that parallel blockchains may have pointers/references to data contained in the other while distinct blockchains won't.
|
"An awful lot of code is being written ... in languages that aren't very good by people who don't know what they're doing." -- Barbara Liskov
|
|
|
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1009
Newbie
|
|
January 17, 2014, 06:41:55 AM |
|
I wasn't talking about parallel blockchains. I was talking about totally distinct blockchains.
What's the functional difference? I see now. I was talking about distinct blockchains where checkpoints of slave chains r written into the master chain.
|
|
|
|
landomata
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2184
Merit: 1000
|
|
January 17, 2014, 06:42:52 AM |
|
I am living in the wrong timezone. Anyway: AWESOME!!! NXTER's.....I see you on Mars
|
|
|
|
Anon136
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1217
|
|
January 17, 2014, 06:44:50 AM |
|
I wasn't talking about parallel blockchains. I was talking about totally distinct blockchains.
What's the functional difference? Like bitcoin and litecoin. Different blockchains, same technology.
|
Rep Thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=381041If one can not confer upon another a right which he does not himself first possess, by what means does the state derive the right to engage in behaviors from which the public is prohibited?
|
|
|
Anon136
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1217
|
|
January 17, 2014, 06:46:14 AM |
|
I wasn't talking about parallel blockchains. I was talking about totally distinct blockchains.
What's the functional difference? I see now. I was talking about distinct blockchains where checkpoints of slave chains r written into the master chain. I'm going to have to spend some time pondering this. I do not, atleast immediately, understand how such a thing would work. Would this be similar to emu blocktrees? I never have been able to understand that either.
|
Rep Thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=381041If one can not confer upon another a right which he does not himself first possess, by what means does the state derive the right to engage in behaviors from which the public is prohibited?
|
|
|
pandaisftw
|
|
January 17, 2014, 06:47:13 AM |
|
Dang, I was here at 999, went to dinner and missed 1000 Anyhow, let's keep up the good work!
|
NXT: 13095091276527367030
|
|
|
xyzzyx
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 490
Merit: 250
I don't really come from outer space.
|
|
January 17, 2014, 06:48:30 AM |
|
I see now. I was talking about distinct blockchains where checkpoints of slave chains r written into the master chain.
Interesting. I'll have to think about this since my conception -- the model I was playing with in my head -- was different, I believe. Do you have an example of checkpointing of slave chains?
|
"An awful lot of code is being written ... in languages that aren't very good by people who don't know what they're doing." -- Barbara Liskov
|
|
|
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1009
Newbie
|
|
January 17, 2014, 06:56:49 AM |
|
I wasn't talking about parallel blockchains. I was talking about totally distinct blockchains.
What's the functional difference? I see now. I was talking about distinct blockchains where checkpoints of slave chains r written into the master chain. I'm going to have to spend some time pondering this. I do not, atleast immediately, understand how such a thing would work. Would this be similar to emu blocktrees? I never have been able to understand that either. I don't know how eMu works. Imagine master blockchain (MASTER) and 2 slave chains - for payments and for storage - (PAYMENTS and STORAGE). If a forger can't handle so much traffic, he could choose only MASTER + PAYMENTS only. This is the sketch of the idea.
|
|
|
|
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1009
Newbie
|
|
January 17, 2014, 06:57:49 AM |
|
I see now. I was talking about distinct blockchains where checkpoints of slave chains r written into the master chain.
Interesting. I'll have to think about this since my conception -- the model I was playing with in my head -- was different, I believe. Do you have an example of checkpointing of slave chains? Merged mining could be similar to this...
|
|
|
|
Anon136
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1217
|
|
January 17, 2014, 07:04:14 AM |
|
I wasn't talking about parallel blockchains. I was talking about totally distinct blockchains.
What's the functional difference? I see now. I was talking about distinct blockchains where checkpoints of slave chains r written into the master chain. I'm going to have to spend some time pondering this. I do not, atleast immediately, understand how such a thing would work. Would this be similar to emu blocktrees? I never have been able to understand that either. I don't know how eMu works. Imagine master blockchain (MASTER) and 2 slave chains - for payments and for storage - (PAYMENTS and STORAGE). If a forger can't handle so much traffic, he could choose only MASTER + PAYMENTS only. This is the sketch of the idea. The more i think about these ideas the more i am reminded of the advantages of the devision of labor in a market economy. Since blockchains are so limited in general in scalability it is probably best to have an entirely distinct blockchain for each intended use. Now that never would have been the case with proof of work, because of the reasons mentioned earlier about chains competing for security resources, but with proof of stake it becomes practical. And of course it could be one client to access all of the totally distinct blockchains. Master and slave is really useful in pow, but with pos i think it may just be needlessly restrictive. *edit* its should be noted that im not at all confident that i am right about this, just thinking out loud *edit2* with that being said, master and slave is still definitely better than cramming transactions and storage on the same chain.
|
Rep Thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=381041If one can not confer upon another a right which he does not himself first possess, by what means does the state derive the right to engage in behaviors from which the public is prohibited?
|
|
|
pinarello
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 266
Merit: 100
NXT is the future
|
|
January 17, 2014, 07:09:28 AM |
|
I would like to offer a personal 100k bounty for anyone who can develop a Nxt torrent function using AM. I believe we could also develop a decentralized marketplace using the same model, I need SR back! But seriously, I'm sure the community would reward in addition to my bounty. I can start a separate thread as well.
+1 willing to help you with this project. Pin
|
|
|
|
|
pinarello
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 266
Merit: 100
NXT is the future
|
|
January 17, 2014, 07:43:31 AM |
|
Hi apenz, sorry about the link fixed it. Altough maybe you have 0 votes you will receive a reward anyway. not happy with that? Pin
|
|
|
|
|