|
|
|
|
Spendulus
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1386
|
 |
April 18, 2016, 11:20:36 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
olarsson
|
|
April 19, 2016, 01:19:59 AM |
|
Global warming is a political scam that is invented and created by the people who have power över this world to be able to more efficiently enslave and fleece the sheeple.
|
|
|
|
|
hdbuck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1002
|
|
April 19, 2016, 11:36:26 AM |
|
Global warming is a political scam that is invented and created by the people who have power över this world to be able to more efficiently enslave and fleece the sheeple.
and experiment on weather whilst spraying gas and other particles in the atmosphere to poison y'all. |
|
|
|
|
Wilikon (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
minds.com/Wilikon
|
|
April 19, 2016, 03:20:42 PM |
|
Isn't refreshing to share what one feels about the climate on a forum, without the fear of being targeted by the Global Warming Stasi? You are all welcome.  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wilikon (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
minds.com/Wilikon
|
|
April 24, 2016, 02:30:14 PM |
|
Obama’s Global Warming Plan Cost Poor Americans $44 Billion, Raises Taxes By 166%… President Obama’s global warming plan would cost America’s poorest families billions annually, according to a report published Thursday by the Manhattan Institute. The study estimates that Obama’s global warming plan would increase the costs of living for the poorest American families an additional $19 billion per year, equivalent to increasing their taxes by 166 percent. The tax increase would also raise taxes on other poor families by an extra $25 billion, equal to a 33 percent tax increase. Living costs for the richest households would only increase by 4 percent.Obama wants to implement the Enviromental Protection Agency’s Clean Power Plan, which would effectively tax four-fifths of American carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions and be similar in scope to an economy-wide carbon tax. In addition, Obama has proposed a $10.25-per-barrel oil tax. Neither plan would have a large impact on global warming. Data modeling created by the EPA and run by the libertarian Cato Institute shows that the Clean Power Plan would only have adverted 0.019° Celsius of warming by the year 2100, an amount so small it couldn’t be detected. “The greatest tragedy of the Democrats’ climate agenda is not how little it will accomplish but rather how costly it will be for those least able to afford it,” Oren Cass, a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute who authored the study, told The Daily Caller News Foundation. http://dailycaller.com/2016/04/23/obamas-global-warming-plan-cost-poor-americans-44-billion-raises-taxes-by-166/ |
|
|
|
|
Spendulus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1386
|
|
April 24, 2016, 02:34:03 PM |
|
President Obama’s global warming plan would cost America’s poorest families billions annually, according to a report published Thursday by the Manhattan Institute.
The study estimates that Obama’s global warming plan would increase the costs of living for the poorest American families an additional $19 billion per year, equivalent to increasing their taxes by 166 percent. ....
Make 'em all into beggars. They're so much easier to please! Their votes are cheaper to buy! |
|
|
|
|
hdbuck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1002
|
|
April 24, 2016, 05:18:42 PM |
|
President Obama’s global warming plan would cost America’s poorest families billions annually, according to a report published Thursday by the Manhattan Institute.
The study estimates that Obama’s global warming plan would increase the costs of living for the poorest American families an additional $19 billion per year, equivalent to increasing their taxes by 166 percent. ....
Make 'em all into beggars. They're so much easier to please! Their votes are cheaper to buy! pareto optimality at its leftist-ness. make em squeak! |
|
|
|
|
notbatman
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038
|
|
April 24, 2016, 05:29:39 PM |
|
President Obama’s global warming plan would cost America’s poorest families billions annually, according to a report published Thursday by the Manhattan Institute.
The study estimates that Obama’s global warming plan would increase the costs of living for the poorest American families an additional $19 billion per year, equivalent to increasing their taxes by 166 percent. ....
Make 'em all into beggars. They're so much easier to please! Their votes are cheaper to buy! pareto optimality at its leftist-ness. make em squeak! I'm fairly certain with some effort I could dig up official statements from the UN saying that poor people have a lower carbon footprint and that they're actively working to reduce wages uh... globally. |
|
|
|
|
mOgliE
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1344
Merit: 1251
|
|
April 25, 2016, 01:03:50 PM |
|
Isn't refreshing to share what one feels about the climate on a forum, without the fear of being targeted by the Global Warming Stasi? You are all welcome. What the fuck are you even talking about? Like you re persecuted sure... you just say suit so it's normal that people treat you this way. But don't go like you re harrassed by people or anything. You ve always been free to argue about everything! You re not some kind of resistant don't get too arrogant... |
|
|
|
mOgliE
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1344
Merit: 1251
|
|
April 25, 2016, 01:09:52 PM |
|
BELIEVE WHAT WE BELIEVE OR BURN IN HELL!
The New Leftist Collectors Edition in stores now.
Says the guy insulting anyone who understands there is absolutely no proof that gun freedom helps society in any way and that all data collected until now tends to proof otherwise.  |
|
|
|
Wilikon (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
minds.com/Wilikon
|
|
April 25, 2016, 02:41:01 PM |
|
Isn't refreshing to share what one feels about the climate on a forum, without the fear of being targeted by the Global Warming Stasi? You are all welcome.
Like you re persecuted sure... you just say suit so it's normal that people treat you this way. But don't go like you re harrassed by people or anything. You ve always been free to argue about everything! You re not some kind of resistant don't get too arrogant...Not once I assumed you represented the Global Warming Stasi Army all by yourself. Not once. There is no reason for you to feel you were lonely, targeted by my statement... You are all welcome. |
|
|
|
|
|
TPTB_need_war
|
|
April 25, 2016, 03:15:29 PM |
|
Read all the 27 comments at the provided link. You can't just be lazy to read only what I commented here. I can't copy this entire linked page of comments into this thread. There is no science of man-made global warming. Period. The comments at the linked thread are irrefutable. Never in millions of years of cycles has temperature risen after CO2 does. Temperate always rises at least 600 years before C02 does. So C02 can't be the cause. Duh! Al Gore lied. He didn't show his chart zoomed in. 5427 Blog/Uncategorized Posted Apr 25, 2016 by Martin Armstrong New-York-Under-Water QUESTION: Mr. Armstrong; I have read your thesis on global warming and that this is only part of a natural cycle. I admit that you have persuaded me whereas the claims are false especially that New York City should have been under water by now according Al Gore. You mentioned that there was global warming which enabled the Vikings to reach America because the ice melted. My question is rather blunt. If we are headed now into a global cooling period, what is the historical evidence that society also declines?
Thank you in advance
PD
ANSWER: I have reported that the peat fires in Borneo and Sumatra have now exceeded all the emissions from the entire U.S. economy. This whole movement is simply to raise taxes on the bogus theory of global warming. We are not so powerful to alter the course of cyclical movement of the planet. Bouts of global cooling (ice ages) as well as warming periods predate the combustion engine and mankind. It is rather questionable analysis to claim we have altered the climate. We are capable of polluting things, true. But actually altering the climate is something beyond our power.
Volcanoes are a major issue in climate change. Yes, studies reveal that the Hawaiian Kilauea volcanoe eruption discharges between 8,000 and 30,000 metric tonnes of CO2 into the atmosphere each day, which has been going on for more than 20 years. However, gas studies worldwide by volcanologists have calculated that global volcanic CO2 production on land and under the sea release a total of about 200 million tonnes of CO2 annually. But this is really in the absence of any real catastrophic eruptions. Volcanoes emit also Sulfur dioxide SO2 which automobiles emit very little. When Mount St. Helens erupted on May 18th, 1980, it produced 1.5 million metric tons of sulfur dioxide on that one day and about 2 million metric tons for the entire event far more than automobiles.
Moreover, volcanic production of CO2 is by far not really the issue in climate change. Instead of global warming from CO2, it is the plume of ash in the sky which actually blocks the sun and reverses the climate from warm to cold like sitting under an umbrella at the beach. I have discussed Mount Tambora which erupted in 1815 and threw into the air so much ash that it snowed during the summer of 1816 in New York City. It became known as 18-hundred-and-froze-to-death. I have shown the correlation of that eruption to wheat prices.
I have also written about the Maunder Minimum (<--- returning again in 2030!) which sent the Earth into a cold period 300 years ago from the perspective of the cycle energy output from the Sun. I have also gone into the evolution of science which has been set in motion by the very discovery of a frozen woolly rhinoceros which altered science in many fields. I have explain how the temperature at the time of the American Revolution was at its lowest point in the cycle.
All of that said, the ice core samples have revealed that there were two major volcanic eruptions in 536 and 540 AD which sent Europe into an ice age and wiped out the Roman civilization. Flavius Odoacer (433–493) was a soldier who in 476 became the first King of Italy (476–493) after deposing Romulus Augustus, the last official Roman emperor in the West.
Odoacer was overthrown by Theodoric the Great (454-526), the Ostrogoth. He was followed by Athalaric (526-534), and a few others then finally Baduila (541-552). So while Rome officially ends in the West with Romulus Augustus in 476AD, the Ostrogoths fade out after 552 due to the climate changes. In the East, the change in climate appears to have also possibly been linked to the Plague of Justinian (541–542) which was a pandemic that afflicted the Eastern Roman (Byzantine) Empire, especially its capital Constantinople, the Sassanid Empire, and port cities around the entire Mediterranean Sea. I have written about the political turmoil there in Byzantium which preceded the plague during the Nika Revolt of 532AD. I have also written about how empires die. It does seem that when temperatures decline, civil unrest rises and this increases the risk of revolutions.
When Thera erupted around 1645-1650BC, this created a climate change and marked the end of the Minoan civilization. They were conquered by the Mycenae who also captured Troy. As the weather turned cold, Greece goes into a Dark Age. The Greeks migrated and other places called them the “sea people” since they did not know where they came from as the invaded Northern Africa. Homer wrote about the period before the Dark Age known as the Heroic Period. Scholars thought this was fiction about Troy and Mycenae until Heinrich Schliemann (1822 – 1890) set out and discovered what Homer wrote about was history.
The historical evidence is rather extensive. It does appear that as we enter into a global cooling period, governments will fall, disease will increase, and the risk of Western Civilization declining sharply all become historically possible. |
|
|
|
Spendulus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1386
|
|
April 25, 2016, 04:10:18 PM |
|
Isn't refreshing to share what one feels about the climate on a forum, without the fear of being targeted by the Global Warming Stasi? You are all welcome. What the fuck are you even talking about? Like you re persecuted sure... you just say suit so it's normal that people treat you this way. But don't go like you re harrassed by people or anything. You ve always been free to argue about everything! You re not some kind of resistant don't get too arrogant... Quite the reverse. We all ARE THE BANNED FROM REDDIT. We are those who punched back twice as hard and only grew stronger. And don't complain - because your ideas are welcome too. |
|
|
|
|
mOgliE
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1344
Merit: 1251
|
|
April 25, 2016, 07:22:47 PM |
|
Isn't refreshing to share what one feels about the climate on a forum, without the fear of being targeted by the Global Warming Stasi? You are all welcome. What the fuck are you even talking about? Like you re persecuted sure... you just say suit so it's normal that people treat you this way. But don't go like you re harrassed by people or anything. You ve always been free to argue about everything! You re not some kind of resistant don't get too arrogant... Quite the reverse. We all ARE THE BANNED FROM REDDIT. We are those who punched back twice as hard and only grew stronger. And don't complain - because your ideas are welcome too. You're banned from reddit not because you defend climate denying. You're all banned from reddit as you should be banned from here simply because you keep giving out totally shitty sources and present them as reliable scientific sources. |
|
|
|
Spendulus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1386
|
|
April 25, 2016, 07:30:18 PM |
|
Isn't refreshing to share what one feels about the climate on a forum, without the fear of being targeted by the Global Warming Stasi? You are all welcome. What the fuck are you even talking about? Like you re persecuted sure... you just say suit so it's normal that people treat you this way. But don't go like you re harrassed by people or anything. You ve always been free to argue about everything! You re not some kind of resistant don't get too arrogant... Quite the reverse. We all ARE THE BANNED FROM REDDIT. We are those who punched back twice as hard and only grew stronger. And don't complain - because your ideas are welcome too. You're banned from reddit not because you defend climate denying. You're all banned from reddit as you should be banned from here simply because you keep giving out totally shitty sources and present them as reliable scientific sources. Try not to think lazy. I can do all kinds of sources. But then you are not in a position to take the moral high ground and from that high perch, with a booming voice proclaim to the heavens what is an acceptable source. You are the guy that refused to look at actual sourced satellite temperature data, IIRC. When I linked to the actual original satellite data, you found some excuse to disregard it. So what the fuck is your problem, dude? You don't win a scientific argument with insults, or with denials. Denying the satellite data... Wait, are you a Denier? |
|
|
|
|
|
