Legko
|
|
November 09, 2014, 07:53:13 AM |
|
TMB needs no-extranonce true right?
|
|
|
|
boki15
|
|
November 09, 2014, 01:21:50 PM |
|
I lost all DRK on pool.trademybit today, WTF?
Do not know about you, I lost 52 DRK (which would never be 52 if we did not mine on a fork, it would be maybe 5, not more). That happens, actually happens quite often in cryptoworld. I hope you did not rent a hashing power, because that would be for you a real loss.
|
|
|
|
Xenocyde
|
|
November 10, 2014, 06:15:31 PM |
|
When can we expect a multi-multi port for Neoscrypt?
|
|
|
|
merc82 (OP)
|
|
November 11, 2014, 11:49:11 PM |
|
When can we expect a multi-multi port for Neoscrypt?
4014 is now up for the Neoscrypt Multi-Multi
|
Rent some Hash @ MiningRigRentals!Lease out your rig, or rent some extra hash today! Live Hashrate graphs, multiple backup pools, many algos and fast and friendly support as well
|
|
|
TimC
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1022
|
|
November 12, 2014, 01:30:23 AM Last edit: November 12, 2014, 02:05:14 AM by TimC |
|
When can we expect a multi-multi port for Neoscrypt?
4014 is now up for the Neoscrypt Multi-Multi So I've been running on the Multi-Multi port with no problems and now I've added the TMB_Multi-Multi_NEO to my config. { "name": "TMB_Multi-Multi_NEO", "url": "stratum+tcp://east01.us.trademybit.com:4014", "algorithm": "neoscrypt", "intensity": "16", "user": "USERNAME.WORKERNAME", "pass": "x" }, But now it seems to never change off the TMB_Multi-Multi_X11 port. Edit: When the pool goes to neoscrypt coin my miners end up on the TMB_X11_Backup_East port. Port 4014 does not seem to be working.
|
|
|
|
jammer81
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 25
Merit: 0
|
|
November 12, 2014, 02:25:31 AM |
|
When can we expect a multi-multi port for Neoscrypt?
4014 is now up for the Neoscrypt Multi-Multi Edit: When the pool goes to neoscrypt coin my miners end up on the TMB_X11_Backup_East port. Port 4014 does not seem to be working. I have the same issue, i remedied it by setting the 8880 static pool after the 4014 pool, thus achieving the same thing anyway, but yes, 4014 seems dead when it should not be. So switch your X11static backup pool to 8880 Neoscrypt, that will solve the problem until merc82 fixes this. Hope that helps
|
|
|
|
merc82 (OP)
|
|
November 12, 2014, 02:31:40 AM |
|
When can we expect a multi-multi port for Neoscrypt?
4014 is now up for the Neoscrypt Multi-Multi Edit: When the pool goes to neoscrypt coin my miners end up on the TMB_X11_Backup_East port. Port 4014 does not seem to be working. I have the same issue, i remedied it by setting the 8880 static pool after the 4014 pool, thus achieving the same thing anyway, but yes, 4014 seems dead when it should not be. So switch your X11static backup pool to 8880 Neoscrypt, that will solve the problem until merc82 fixes this. Hope that helps This is repaired, 4014 should work properly.. Sorry about that
|
Rent some Hash @ MiningRigRentals!Lease out your rig, or rent some extra hash today! Live Hashrate graphs, multiple backup pools, many algos and fast and friendly support as well
|
|
|
Xenocyde
|
|
November 12, 2014, 09:58:37 AM Last edit: November 12, 2014, 11:19:39 AM by Xenocyde |
|
Thanks for the multi port, merc What options do you guys have in the Neoscrypt profile? I have 2 Sapphire R9 280X Dual-X. L.E.: I added what TimC suggested to my config file, but miner won't switch to neoscrypt if it's the most profitable one. It sees X15 for some time, but when neo is more profitable it just waits for work. Otherwise, if neo is most profitable when i start the miner, it just times out saying adresses are wrong. What do I need to do? I'm connecting through am02.eu.
|
|
|
|
TimC
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1022
|
|
November 12, 2014, 12:33:50 PM |
|
When can we expect a multi-multi port for Neoscrypt?
4014 is now up for the Neoscrypt Multi-Multi Edit: When the pool goes to neoscrypt coin my miners end up on the TMB_X11_Backup_East port. Port 4014 does not seem to be working. I have the same issue, i remedied it by setting the 8880 static pool after the 4014 pool, thus achieving the same thing anyway, but yes, 4014 seems dead when it should not be. So switch your X11static backup pool to 8880 Neoscrypt, that will solve the problem until merc82 fixes this. Hope that helps This is repaired, 4014 should work properly.. Sorry about that It still looks like it is not working since when the pool changes over to NeoScrypt my miners still go to the backup pools.
|
|
|
|
Xenocyde
|
|
November 12, 2014, 03:59:39 PM |
|
I decided to use port 8880 to test out settings.
With intensity 16 and 13, my cards give hardware errors and max hashrate I get is 116 kh/s per card. I haven't yet made a profile.
What settings do you guys use for neoscrypt?
|
|
|
|
bvoid
Member
Offline
Activity: 77
Merit: 10
|
|
November 12, 2014, 09:57:20 PM |
|
Pools still look offline?
|
|
|
|
em5
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
|
|
November 14, 2014, 11:58:43 AM Last edit: November 16, 2014, 01:09:47 PM by em5 |
|
Neoscrypt seems to have a normalization multiplier of 0.32. But I can only get 130kH/s out of my massivly undervolted 7970 (core 880MHz, mem 750MHz). Am I missing something? I cant find anyone else with a better result either. Nicehash uses a multiplier 0.15 that seems more consistent with my hashrate...
edit: found the new kernal. Now my 280x:s are making over 300KH/s^^
|
|
|
|
Xenocyde
|
|
November 17, 2014, 02:59:05 PM Last edit: November 18, 2014, 10:18:09 AM by Xenocyde |
|
em5 or somebody else who knows this, please share your settings and sgminer 5 version for 300+kh/s with 280X I found a kernel that allows me to get around 220 kh/s per 280X but can't eliminate hardware errors... L.E.: I had catalyst 14.9 and that seemed to limit the performance. I installed 14.6 rc2 and now i get 285 kh/s per card with no hardware errors. Still not 300 but I can live with that for now
|
|
|
|
Eliovp
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1293
Huh?
|
|
November 18, 2014, 11:05:27 PM |
|
em5 or somebody else who knows this, please share your settings and sgminer 5 version for 300+kh/s with 280X I found a kernel that allows me to get around 220 kh/s per 280X but can't eliminate hardware errors... L.E.: I had catalyst 14.9 and that seemed to limit the performance. I installed 14.6 rc2 and now i get 285 kh/s per card with no hardware errors. Still not 300 but I can live with that for now Here's my bin, https://mega.co.nz/#!5xN3mI5L!52dOwMHymYHJcBZ8J1MSW__lAut7mgdpPPMqGsMjfEk Tahiti I'm personally getting 300 with this one Posted this in the sgminer5 thread also, others been very happy with it .. Good luck!
|
|
|
|
Xenocyde
|
|
November 19, 2014, 09:20:51 AM |
|
The mega file needs decryption key, can you please provide that too, Eliovp? Also, can you post some settings for R9 280X cards?
|
|
|
|
Eliovp
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1293
Huh?
|
|
November 19, 2014, 11:22:30 AM |
|
The mega file needs decryption key, can you please provide that too, Eliovp? Also, can you post some settings for R9 280X cards? I just tried to download it on another computer and i can just download it.. so i don't know what the problem is mate..
|
|
|
|
Xenocyde
|
|
November 19, 2014, 11:28:08 AM Last edit: November 19, 2014, 12:13:55 PM by Xenocyde |
|
Ah nevermind, I was pasting the Tahiti part too, my bad. I'll try it now and see if it's any better.
L.E.: I'm only getting 255 kh/s with your bin... Thing is I can't force my gpu above 1020 and memories above 1500 because I have Sapphire Dual-X version. I use VDDC 1137 and if I force gpu and memories I either get HW errors or driver crashes. I believe only Hynix memories can achieve 300+kh/s, I only have Elpida versions.
|
|
|
|
em5
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
|
|
November 19, 2014, 02:41:11 PM |
|
I'm squeezing my way over 300KH/s with a kernal compied on win8.1 and 14.4 drivers with a engine of 1150 MHz. VDDC 1225. (mem 1500). What happens if your raise the vddc on that sapphire by modding its bios instead of setting it by software?
|
|
|
|
Xenocyde
|
|
November 19, 2014, 03:08:00 PM Last edit: November 19, 2014, 04:42:52 PM by Xenocyde |
|
I won't risk modding the bios (even if it has secondary bios) for just 15 kh/s per card My understanding is that the boost doesn't come from tuning gpu and ram frequencies, but from the ram brand itself, whereas Hynix is the best, but mine have Elpida. You can confirm this by telling us what brand your ram is L.E.: I tried with vddc 1225, gpu 1150 and ram 1500 (through Sapphire TRIXX) and I got around 3 kh/s more.
|
|
|
|
jimlite
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1848
Merit: 1018
|
|
November 20, 2014, 04:28:29 AM |
|
You will probably get about 290kh/s with elpida and 300kh/s with hynix memory on a 280x, unless you flash to stilt bios, but I agree, unless you know what you are doing, it is not worth flashing for 10kh/s. I just used the same 280x config as X11/X13 and it got me there.
|
|
|
|
|