Bitcoin Forum
June 17, 2024, 08:41:18 AM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 [46] 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 ... 130 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN][CACH] CACHeCoin released based on scrypt-jane  (Read 224370 times)
Walrusbonzo
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 682
Merit: 500


View Profile
February 23, 2014, 11:30:59 AM
 #901

Diff down to 73. I'm wondering if many others have been caught out by the requirement to drop intensity.
Slipknot79
Copper Member
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658
Merit: 500


Blockchain Just Entered The Real World


View Profile WWW
February 23, 2014, 12:15:27 PM
 #902

Hashrates droped, why doesnt diff changing?

Walrusbonzo
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 682
Merit: 500


View Profile
February 23, 2014, 12:29:27 PM
 #903

Diff is dropping slowly.
vertoe
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 505


View Profile
February 23, 2014, 01:57:03 PM
 #904

Unlock means, disable password/encryption?
yes

how can i unlock it?
i secured my wallet with a password ... when i want to send coins i have to enter the password but imho thats only temporaly?

Help > Debug > Console > Enter:
Code:
walletpassphrase <secretkey> 9999999

This will unlock your wallet for 9999999 seconds (>100 days) or until you restart the client.

Sooo if I'm understanding this correctly...all I need to do is leave my wallet open and unlocked for PoS mining to take place?? Or is there anything else I need to do? Like any console commands or anything?
Yes thats all.

Has NFactor just gone up or something???

I've been mining for days at 1.2mh/s absolutely fine. But noticed that at some point this morning my hashrate had halved and that I was now getting lots of HW errors.

I've had to drop the intensity from 13 to 12 to stop the HW errors.

I know it's not a hardware fault as other coins mine absolutely fine with the settings I've always used.

Same here.

me to had to lower I to get rid of HWs...
I went from 2.8 to 1.4 Mhs, that was somewhat expected because of new N, but having to lower I to get it to mine properly i didn't expect.
New nFactor this morning, make sure your GPU has at least 2GB memory...

Hashrates droped, why doesnt diff changing?
It already dropped by 10%.
Sukarti
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 53
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 23, 2014, 02:47:43 PM
 #905

N factor murdered my hash rates. Had to adjust down to eliminate hardware errors, most my miners crashed overnight.

280x dropped Intensity to 12 getting around 300-310 kh/s

290 no intensity change but dropped hash to 330-345 kh/s

290x no Intensity change but dropped hash to 330. (Not tuned very well, in a mixed rig)

Are wallet nodes also down? I can't seem to sync last 20 blocks.

Was a 50% hash rate reduction expected? Or do I need to re-tune all my cards?



Edit: Read back through some posts, it looks like 50% was to be expected, is every N factor adjustment a linear drop in hash rate?

Is there an estimate on how many blocks must be solved before we see proper diff adjustments?
Sukarti
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 53
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 23, 2014, 02:59:26 PM
 #906

Anyone have additional node lists other than the 2 on first posts?
Sukarti
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 53
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 23, 2014, 03:06:09 PM
 #907

Seems like the total network hashrate is a bit high still after the N adjustment?

It's still sitting at 450MH/s or is that because many miners are sending huge numbers of errors skewing the numbers?

Sorry for all the questions, curious how these N factor adjustments really affect the coin and mining.
mr.pj
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 258
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 23, 2014, 03:16:36 PM
 #908

Sukarti

please update your wallet - see https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=400389.msg5205666#msg5205666
then it will sync again - no more nodes needed - posted nodes are already up2date!

For Hashrate reduction: it was expected - finetuning your cards might lead to higher hashrate - but fine tuning goes below just decreasing intensity from 13 to 12. As I wrote earlier, there are different cgminer release that offer finer granularity for finetuning (but you gotta figure out this for yourself)

About the difficulty:
 it will decrease slowly and increase slowly to puffer for coin hopping multipools - around tomorrow we should be around the proper difficulty according to hashrate again. But keep in mind - it still fluctuates a lot since there are a lot of people jumping ship since this is not a pump&dump

About hashrate - the new clients shows the average hashrate of the last 10 blocks instead of the last one .. this will give you a  more accurate assumption on hashrate - but in all clients there is no 100% of knowing the network hashrate, they are all based on assumptions made by difficulty and time between blocks ...

Sukarti
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 53
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 23, 2014, 03:48:11 PM
 #909

Thanks for the explanations PJ.

I'll work on tuning, dropping the Intensity was just to temporarily remove the HW errors being generated.
kalgecin (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 819
Merit: 1000


View Profile
February 23, 2014, 04:15:35 PM
 #910

Yes, NFactor increased, gpu mining was expected to be hit hard. Some cards with low amount of ram or low ram speed are estimated to be unprofitable for mining at the moment. Amount of hashrate reduced from gpu depends on the gpu, it's different for most.






██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
███████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████▄▄▄███████████████████████
███████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████▀▀▀████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████





...INTRODUCING WAVES........
...ULTIMATE ASSET/CUSTOM TOKEN BLOCKCHAIN PLATFORM...






khois87
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 14
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 23, 2014, 05:24:34 PM
 #911

I Like coin CacheCoin  Grin

CVphnqPLLRuBGzuRytgDMGjXqDo9c4MfP9   Wink Wink
ammi84
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462
Merit: 251


View Profile
February 23, 2014, 07:03:28 PM
 #912

what is wrong?
i downloaded the latest qt-version but it won't sync ...

jumps from 43 block, 3 blocks to 23 blocks remaining etc ... ?! Sad
singula
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462
Merit: 251



View Profile
February 23, 2014, 07:18:03 PM
 #913

The Stale rate you see is also including nodes that are running not the right p2pool software. These nodes will still connect to the network but not provide proper shares. Yet the Stale rate is still accounted to the total rate of p2pool.

Someone using obsolete/misconfigured p2pool nodes?

I've been observing this the past week, that all of a sudden a hashrate of 12mh appears with Stale/Dead on Arrival shares. Yet scanning over all the public pools revealed, that all nodes were running fine and local stale rate was below 1%.

That is not what I see when looking at the stats:
q30.qhor.net: 3.53MH/s (Stale: 14%) from 13 users
cach.cryptoprojects.eu: 3.94 MH/s (DOA NaN H/s / NaN%) - local DOA stats does not work ...
p2cache.syware.de:11.2MH/s (Stale: 11%) from 15 users
185.8.164.16: 0.00H/s (NaN% DOA) - this one is empty
p2pool.cachecoin.org: 1.12MH/s (0.16% DOA) - this one has smallest DOA rate from all the non-empty pools.
p2pool-miner.info: 1.40MH/s (Stale: 17%) from 1 users
46.4.96.166: 6.99kH/s (0.0% DOA) - almost empty

seems some small pools have DOA under 1 %, but the largest pool has 11% stales and from the 7 public pools, 3 of them have stales over 10% (and one unknown)

That is also not correct - the amount of coins found depends on the amount of blocks found by the pool. In the past week users on your pools were observing a higher return since the pool rate was most of the networks rate and thus was finding more blocks than the average block time of 15minutes... since the hashrate of 1/3 to 2/3 favoring your pool during this low difficulty high hashrate period were in favor for your pool. (But leading to possible security threads on the coin)
The payout right now on p2pool and a traditional pool will be averageing over 24hours.

Whoever finds the block has advantage for the next block, as he can begin computations on the next block immediately, but rest of the network need to wait for that block to be received by the network. This gives few seconds advantage to the block submitter and may be quite noticable on coins with less than a minute blocks, but with the block time increasing, the significance of this advantage decreases and for block times around 15 minutes it is quite insignificant (less than 1% advantage for pool nearing 100% of the hashrate).

As for PPLNS vs. PROP:
Vardiff on both my pools is set up so that one share is submitted every 45 (first pool) or 25 (second pool) seconds. This means that shares are coming (approximately) at the same rate from everybody, though share from someone with 10Mh/s has bigger value and in average block time a miner should submit (in average) 20 or 36 shares (1st/2nd pool) - therefore risk of miner not finding a share in the duration of a block (so he would be left from payout on it) is very low with current configuration.

I can easily switch one or both pools to PPLNS too (this would be a simple configuration change), if I'd believe it will help something, but I think PROP is better, so I'm keeping it as it is now Smiley

Big brother is not watching you anymore. Big brother is telling you how to live.
singula
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462
Merit: 251



View Profile
February 23, 2014, 07:27:45 PM
 #914

Also, as the hashrate at the first pool (http://cach.catcoin.cz) is less than about 10% of the network hashrate (the network hashrate may be wrong, but anyway the pol hashrate is still less than 1/3 of p2pool hashrate, so it is very unlikely to be over 20% of real hashrate), the registrations are open on both pools (http://cach.catcoin.cz and http://pool.cachecoin.net).

kalgecin: Can you update first post?

Big brother is not watching you anymore. Big brother is telling you how to live.
Stenull
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 585
Merit: 500


View Profile
February 23, 2014, 08:14:10 PM
 #915

Quote from: singula
That is not what I see when looking at the stats:
q30.qhor.net: 3.53MH/s (Stale: 14%) from 13 users
cach.cryptoprojects.eu: 3.94 MH/s (DOA NaN H/s / NaN%) - local DOA stats does not work ...
p2cache.syware.de:11.2MH/s (Stale: 11%) from 15 users
185.8.164.16: 0.00H/s (NaN% DOA) - this one is empty
p2pool.cachecoin.org: 1.12MH/s (0.16% DOA) - this one has smallest DOA rate from all the non-empty pools.
p2pool-miner.info: 1.40MH/s (Stale: 17%) from 1 users
46.4.96.166: 6.99kH/s (0.0% DOA) - almost empty

Strange, i'm that only user on p2pool-miner.info and my personal stats shows stale 0.539%

Change...is in the air.
You know why
singula
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462
Merit: 251



View Profile
February 23, 2014, 08:42:02 PM
 #916

Strange, i'm that only user on p2pool-miner.info and my personal stats shows stale 0.539%

When I look at http://p2pool-miner.info:8336/static/ it shows "Local Node: 1.43MH/s (Stale: 17%) from 1 users"
And when I look at local user summary there, the only line is: "Ce9hvb5QAYvD1wpHa1hj5Hqc3cDceojJpF   1.41MH/s   0.194%"
So it seems at least one of these statistics is reported badly - if the pool reports 0.194% stale for single user but 17% stale for local node (comprising of that single user), it is strange. Either one of these two numbers is plain wrong, or they are different numbers with different meaning (one of them is stales between user and local node, the other stales between local node and rest of the network?). Can someone with more insight into that pool's frontend tell which number is correct, or explain how to interpret these numbers?

Big brother is not watching you anymore. Big brother is telling you how to live.
corygto
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 23, 2014, 09:05:55 PM
 #917

Unlock means, disable password/encryption?
yes

how can i unlock it?
i secured my wallet with a password ... when i want to send coins i have to enter the password but imho thats only temporaly?

Help > Debug > Console > Enter:
Code:
walletpassphrase <secretkey> 9999999

This will unlock your wallet for 9999999 seconds (>100 days) or until you restart the client.

Sooo if I'm understanding this correctly...all I need to do is leave my wallet open and unlocked for PoS mining to take place?? Or is there anything else I need to do? Like any console commands or anything?
Yes thats all.

Seems simple enough...however I've done that and I still don't see any coins under "Stake" in my wallet, and the coins are more than 7 days old. I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong.
lishbtc
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 184
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 23, 2014, 10:51:01 PM
 #918

I couldn't get it to sync even after upgrading to 5.0 - blockchain would just get stuck.

Backed up wallet.dat & renamed %appdata%\cachecoin, and launched 5.0 again to load the blockchain fresh.  Synced fine & restored wallet.dat - all OK.

Cheers

Sukarti
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 53
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 24, 2014, 01:12:55 AM
 #919

I couldn't get it to sync even after upgrading to 5.0 - blockchain would just get stuck.

Backed up wallet.dat & renamed %appdata%\cachecoin, and launched 5.0 again to load the blockchain fresh.  Synced fine & restored wallet.dat - all OK.

Cheers

I had to restart the wallet a few times to get it to sync after upgrade to 5.0. Not sure why but it worked after a few attempts. I did not have to re-download the block-chain though.
simonhard
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 66
Merit: 10


View Profile WWW
February 24, 2014, 05:23:57 AM
 #920

CACHeCoin has been added to cryptsy! Smiley
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 [46] 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 ... 130 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!