Bitcoin Forum
September 19, 2019, 03:10:52 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.18.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 4254 4255 4256 4257 4258 4259 4260 4261 4262 4263 4264 4265 4266 4267 4268 4269 4270 4271 4272 4273 4274 4275 4276 4277 4278 4279 4280 4281 4282 4283 4284 4285 4286 4287 4288 4289 4290 4291 4292 4293 4294 4295 4296 4297 4298 4299 4300 4301 4302 4303 [4304] 4305 4306 4307 4308 4309 4310 4311 4312 4313 4314 4315 4316 4317 4318 4319 4320 4321 4322 4323 4324 4325 4326 4327 4328 4329 4330 4331 4332 4333 4334 4335 4336 4337 4338 4339 4340 4341 4342 4343 4344 4345 4346 4347 4348 4349 4350 4351 4352 4353 4354 ... 6787 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency  (Read 9543151 times)
qwizzie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2002
Merit: 1113



View Profile
March 13, 2015, 07:21:57 PM
 #86061

Everyone who sells right now is getting out of crypto not just darkcoin. This is the last real valuable project among all alts. I'm not selling. I do not want usd or euro , I prefer crypto

thats an excellent post, i had to unhide you to read it but i'm glad i did

Dash : News, Information and Discussion ->https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5115659.0
Dash : Price and Trade Discussion -> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1233119.0
Learn from the past, set detailed and vivid goals for the future and live in the only moment of time over which you have any control : now
1568862652
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1568862652

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1568862652
Reply with quote  #2

1568862652
Report to moderator
1568862652
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1568862652

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1568862652
Reply with quote  #2

1568862652
Report to moderator
PLAY NOW
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1568862652
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1568862652

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1568862652
Reply with quote  #2

1568862652
Report to moderator
1568862652
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1568862652

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1568862652
Reply with quote  #2

1568862652
Report to moderator
Freckleg
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 508
Merit: 500


View Profile
March 13, 2015, 07:22:58 PM
 #86062

its getting a bit funny, seeing them dump in that buy wall without any effect

The impenetrable wall of Otoh!
stonehedge
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1000


Decentralize Everything


View Profile WWW
March 13, 2015, 07:24:31 PM
 #86063

its getting a bit funny, seeing them dump in that buy wall without any effect

The impenetrable wall of Otoh!

I don't believe it is just Otoh.

Not to do Otoh a disservice...
Freckleg
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 508
Merit: 500


View Profile
March 13, 2015, 07:25:34 PM
 #86064

Think of it. Dash will be at least $100 a Dash in the future.

So selling a masternode (future value $100.000) now is something you can tell your grandchildren about (from the poorhouse that is  Roll Eyes)
GhostPlayer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1064
Merit: 1000


View Profile
March 13, 2015, 07:30:51 PM
 #86065


Here is another more thought out sketch my friend did.

etoque
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1778
Merit: 1000


View Profile
March 13, 2015, 07:31:39 PM
 #86066

Here we go,rebounce coming ?

Double floor and GO

Enough of this delusional trading,we can destroy altcoin market with all feature done,probably bitcoin too Roll Eyes
AizenSou
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 938
Merit: 1000


View Profile
March 13, 2015, 07:32:05 PM
 #86067



Of all the reasons I can think of for dumping your holdings, that's probably one of the more ludicrous. He would have been a "disaster in marketing" if he'd stayed with a name that's synonymous with being stuck in a dark corner.

I've spent the last 10 years writing eCommerce systems for highly competitive businesses where they are precious as hell about their SEO. Google has changed its trawling algos beyond recognition in the last few years. Just because you've got a year's worth of 'clicks' to your credit doesn't mean you can't be dropped in an instant or - conversely - that you can't capitalise on rankings that you've earned to date.

What the marketing team need to do is carefully use 301's to redirect the crawlers to the new domains. That will let the new domains capitalise on the ranking that the current sites have.

https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/93633?hl=en

At any rate, search engine rankings are only 1 aspect of a very big proposition - if anything it's why the name change needs to be done now and not when the project's been driven so far up the "dark" cul-de-sac that it doesn't have an option anymore.

Also, see this.....https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=421615.msg10740995#msg10740995


Thanks for pointing this out, Tok. Like I said I'm agree with rebranding but decide to go with DASH ( Evan is the one who almost decided everything) is foolish IMO.
None of your examples are world class brand. If you want to create the next Bitcoin, your brand name must be important enough too.

And I'm not the only one, look how many people hate this new name. Evan might be success in creating a most hatred cryptocoin, LOL.
Artoodeetoo
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500


View Profile
March 13, 2015, 07:32:28 PM
 #86068


Here is another more thought out sketch my friend did.



Have to say prefer the other logo... The arrow looks a bit rubbish.

DASH #DashDC #DashIntoDigitalCash
valentino007
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 150
Merit: 100


View Profile
March 13, 2015, 07:33:31 PM
 #86069

Think of it. Dash will be at least $100 a Dash in the future.

So selling a masternode (future value $100.000) now is something you can tell your grandchildren about (from the poorhouse that is  Roll Eyes)

Or they will buy twice as much in a dump!
BlockaFett
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 364
Merit: 250

@blockafett


View Profile WWW
March 13, 2015, 07:34:00 PM
 #86070


ok seriously people are worried about pumping the price right now?  Make the most of it!!  Roll Eyes Smiley

etoque
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1778
Merit: 1000


View Profile
March 13, 2015, 07:34:14 PM
 #86071



Of all the reasons I can think of for dumping your holdings, that's probably one of the more ludicrous. He would have been a "disaster in marketing" if he'd stayed with a name that's synonymous with being stuck in a dark corner.

I've spent the last 10 years writing eCommerce systems for highly competitive businesses where they are precious as hell about their SEO. Google has changed its trawling algos beyond recognition in the last few years. Just because you've got a year's worth of 'clicks' to your credit doesn't mean you can't be dropped in an instant or - conversely - that you can't capitalise on rankings that you've earned to date.

What the marketing team need to do is carefully use 301's to redirect the crawlers to the new domains. That will let the new domains capitalise on the ranking that the current sites have.

https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/93633?hl=en

At any rate, search engine rankings are only 1 aspect of a very big proposition - if anything it's why the name change needs to be done now and not when the project's been driven so far up the "dark" cul-de-sac that it doesn't have an option anymore.

Also, see this.....https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=421615.msg10740995#msg10740995


Thanks for pointing this out, Tok. Like I said I'm agree with rebranding but decide to go with DASH ( Evan is the one who almost decided everything) is foolish IMO.
None of your examples are world class brand. If you want to create the next Bitcoin, your brand name must be important enough too.

And I'm not the only one, look how many people hate this new name. Evan might be success in creating a most hatred cryptocoin, LOL.

Digital cash - Your grand mother will probably well understand what is it now,more easy friendly name than bitcoin I found Smiley
etoque
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1778
Merit: 1000


View Profile
March 13, 2015, 07:35:11 PM
 #86072

Pumping ? This is not XMR

We deserve a better price.
Terzo2
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 100


View Profile
March 13, 2015, 07:35:23 PM
 #86073

Everyone who sells right now is getting out of crypto not just darkcoin. This is the last real valuable project among all alts. I'm not selling. I do not want usd or euro , I prefer crypto

thats an excellent post, i had to unhide you to read it but i'm glad i did
That is the real situation in my point of view. Some people are selling to pay the bills. I'm here not just to pay the bills , but to get rich . You can see what big money(like otoh) are doing . And there are these little guys telling me darkcoin/ dashcoin is no good, I prefer not to listen to them.
aigeezer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1444
Merit: 1013


Cryptanalyst castrated by his government, 1952


View Profile
March 13, 2015, 07:37:06 PM
 #86074

Something we won't have to worry about - LMFAO

http://cointelegraph.com/news/113697/garzik-signs-space-deal-ibm-working-on-bitcoin-rival

-------------------------------------
Blockchain may be under sybil attack from a “compliance” monitoring group
Users on Bitcointalk have noticed a “regulatory compliance” company, Chainalysis, running nodes on the blockchain aimed at absorbing transaction data to be sold to clients seeking to trace funds. The action puts the anonymity of Bitcoin transactions further at stake. /r/bitcoin user 321432 explains:

“These fake nodes have been observed for quite a while now, around 5% of the total listening 'nodes' in the network are owned by this company. They do nothing but aggressively announce themselves to attract more people to connect to them and de-anonymise themselves. For all we know they own even more nodes than this, it's impossible to know how deeply they have sybil attacked the network.”



Very interesting thread about it here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=978088.0
Minotaur26
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1078
Merit: 1000


View Profile
March 13, 2015, 07:37:46 PM
 #86075

Whether people like it or not the name change is the trigger for this... Whatever the tech, its all wrapped up in the brand, tech and community.. If google suddenly changed their name to wobble then it would cause some consternation, we are seeing the same...

If the new name does not work out, like other coins Dark will die.. I dont think that will happen, I subscribe to the more positive view, but the risks did just get greater and for some people those risks may not be ones they can tolerate.....

I dont think this is all down to traders....

Lets see what happens..

Oh I am loving this,  at these prices more people have access to creating masternodes. Below 3,000 dollars is great pricing I am getting ready to get a couple more MNs.  This way new interested investors can create their nodes and no one can say it was too expensive to invest, this is the chance for Average Joe to invest in nodes.

How much revenue does a masternode generate a month approx.?

I will answer you in terms of DASH ROI, the value in FIAT will of course depend on the price.

Requirements

In order to run a Masternode, an investor needs to buy 1000 DRK/DASH as collateral. These coins remain in control of the investor, but he needs to put them into one of his addresses and associate that address with the node.  The network checks that the node is running and that the funds are not moved, this classifies as a valid Masternode and then it is eligible to get paid.  With each mined block on the network a Masternode from the active Masternode list is selected and gets a payment, when all masternodes on the list are paid, the payment cycle starts again.
When there are updates in the software the Masternode operators have 7 days to update to the latest version, after that, they are dropped from the active Masternode list and stop getting paid until they update.

DASH ROI

You can estimate like this:

- Currently Masternodes get 40% of the block reward.

- The minimum block reward in DASH(DRK) is 4.65 DASH at this moment. I will assume difficulty is high enough so that we are dealing with the minimum reward for a worst case scenario situation, sometimes there are blocks with higher rewards. The minimum DASH block reward decreases by 7% annually to avoid abrupt block halvings, that already happened earlier this year so 4.65 DASH will be valid until next year.

- Average block-time in DASH is 2.5 min, so there are ~576 blocks per day. So 576*4.65DASH*40% = 1071.36 DASH alloted for the whole masternode network currently, we need to divide this by the 2300MN active masternodes. This gives us

 ~Monthly masternode income = 13.97 DASH
 ~Current Minimum DASH Annual ROI = 17%*

*This will change and go up throughout this year as the masternode network reward share will continue to increase each month to incentivize node creation following this schedule:



IMPORTANT:

-So in the end it will really be more than my estimation above as the reward share will continue to increase each month until it reaches 60% March 2016.  

-Having said that the number of Masternodes will also likely increase so I think it is safe to say tha the minimum annual return for a node in DASH should be around 20-25 %

-Now the return in FIAT could be a lot more if the coins appreciate in value year to year.

- Finally, and very important you always retain control of your 1000DASH and are able to liquidate them at any point you wish, you would then obviously just stop getting paid.

I really hopes this helps.

splawik21
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1162
Merit: 1000


DASH is the future of crypto!


View Profile
March 13, 2015, 07:38:13 PM
 #86076

someone dumping on otohs wall  Huh
nooo, his wall is @ 0,01000000 and someone was dumping @ 0,010001 so there is a hidden wall Smiley wondering if it`s Otoh too Smiley))

BE SMART, USE DASH ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
AizenSou
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 938
Merit: 1000


View Profile
March 13, 2015, 07:40:54 PM
 #86077



Of all the reasons I can think of for dumping your holdings, that's probably one of the more ludicrous. He would have been a "disaster in marketing" if he'd stayed with a name that's synonymous with being stuck in a dark corner.

I've spent the last 10 years writing eCommerce systems for highly competitive businesses where they are precious as hell about their SEO. Google has changed its trawling algos beyond recognition in the last few years. Just because you've got a year's worth of 'clicks' to your credit doesn't mean you can't be dropped in an instant or - conversely - that you can't capitalise on rankings that you've earned to date.

What the marketing team need to do is carefully use 301's to redirect the crawlers to the new domains. That will let the new domains capitalise on the ranking that the current sites have.

https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/93633?hl=en

At any rate, search engine rankings are only 1 aspect of a very big proposition - if anything it's why the name change needs to be done now and not when the project's been driven so far up the "dark" cul-de-sac that it doesn't have an option anymore.

Also, see this.....https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=421615.msg10740995#msg10740995


Thanks for pointing this out, Tok. Like I said I'm agree with rebranding but decide to go with DASH ( Evan is the one who almost decided everything) is foolish IMO.
None of your examples are world class brand. If you want to create the next Bitcoin, your brand name must be important enough too.

And I'm not the only one, look how many people hate this new name. Evan might be success in creating a most hatred cryptocoin, LOL.

Digital cash - Your grand mother will probably well understand what is it now,more easy friendly name than bitcoin I found Smiley

Digital Cash sounds better than the stupid DASH. I prefer DigiCash or Dcash. Can't believe that you guys choose DCash. I should have listen to vertoe when he told me to dump at 0.012. Now no where to dump.
Freckleg
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 508
Merit: 500


View Profile
March 13, 2015, 07:41:26 PM
 #86078



Of all the reasons I can think of for dumping your holdings, that's probably one of the more ludicrous. He would have been a "disaster in marketing" if he'd stayed with a name that's synonymous with being stuck in a dark corner.

I've spent the last 10 years writing eCommerce systems for highly competitive businesses where they are precious as hell about their SEO. Google has changed its trawling algos beyond recognition in the last few years. Just because you've got a year's worth of 'clicks' to your credit doesn't mean you can't be dropped in an instant or - conversely - that you can't capitalise on rankings that you've earned to date.

What the marketing team need to do is carefully use 301's to redirect the crawlers to the new domains. That will let the new domains capitalise on the ranking that the current sites have.

https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/93633?hl=en

At any rate, search engine rankings are only 1 aspect of a very big proposition - if anything it's why the name change needs to be done now and not when the project's been driven so far up the "dark" cul-de-sac that it doesn't have an option anymore.

Also, see this.....https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=421615.msg10740995#msg10740995


Thanks for pointing this out, Tok. Like I said I'm agree with rebranding but decide to go with DASH ( Evan is the one who almost decided everything) is foolish IMO.
None of your examples are world class brand. If you want to create the next Bitcoin, your brand name must be important enough too.

And I'm not the only one, look how many people hate this new name. Evan might be success in creating a most hatred cryptocoin, LOL.

I'm also selling my stash too. PM please.

uhhh you already sold your Dash why are you still here?
AizenSou
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 938
Merit: 1000


View Profile
March 13, 2015, 07:46:13 PM
 #86079



Of all the reasons I can think of for dumping your holdings, that's probably one of the more ludicrous. He would have been a "disaster in marketing" if he'd stayed with a name that's synonymous with being stuck in a dark corner.

I've spent the last 10 years writing eCommerce systems for highly competitive businesses where they are precious as hell about their SEO. Google has changed its trawling algos beyond recognition in the last few years. Just because you've got a year's worth of 'clicks' to your credit doesn't mean you can't be dropped in an instant or - conversely - that you can't capitalise on rankings that you've earned to date.

What the marketing team need to do is carefully use 301's to redirect the crawlers to the new domains. That will let the new domains capitalise on the ranking that the current sites have.

https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/93633?hl=en

At any rate, search engine rankings are only 1 aspect of a very big proposition - if anything it's why the name change needs to be done now and not when the project's been driven so far up the "dark" cul-de-sac that it doesn't have an option anymore.

Also, see this.....https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=421615.msg10740995#msg10740995


Thanks for pointing this out, Tok. Like I said I'm agree with rebranding but decide to go with DASH ( Evan is the one who almost decided everything) is foolish IMO.
None of your examples are world class brand. If you want to create the next Bitcoin, your brand name must be important enough too.

And I'm not the only one, look how many people hate this new name. Evan might be success in creating a most hatred cryptocoin, LOL.

I'm also selling my stash too. PM please.

uhhh you already sold your Dash why are you still here?

I'm DRK supporter from the beginning, don't mistake me for a troll. But this time is really ridiculous. Just imaging that someone just killed the coin you love the most, what do you think ? I have a broken heart here, seriously.
toknormal
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2016
Merit: 1157


View Profile
March 13, 2015, 07:46:51 PM
 #86080



None of your examples are world class brand. If you want to create the next Bitcoin, your brand name must be important enough too.

And I'm not the only one, look how many people hate this new name.

AizenSou -

I won't disrespect your opinion because it's clearly held in good faith, but I must just respond for the record.

It's been well argued that the name reflects the product more than the product reflects the name - specially if it's a name that doesn't carry too much weight of its own.

Names are a glass half full - glass half empty thing. A name can't "kill a coin" IMO but a coin can sure kill a name as we've seen with a whole flotilla over the last year. The power lies with the product and the name needs "work" which this one does IMO.

All the same, if it's not palatable for some I respect their right to follow their preferences - thats what markets are for and I definitely believe in the power of markets. I won't be selling though because for me, this type of action is exactly the reason I got into this coin.

I think it's necessary, constructive and brave.
Pages: « 1 ... 4254 4255 4256 4257 4258 4259 4260 4261 4262 4263 4264 4265 4266 4267 4268 4269 4270 4271 4272 4273 4274 4275 4276 4277 4278 4279 4280 4281 4282 4283 4284 4285 4286 4287 4288 4289 4290 4291 4292 4293 4294 4295 4296 4297 4298 4299 4300 4301 4302 4303 [4304] 4305 4306 4307 4308 4309 4310 4311 4312 4313 4314 4315 4316 4317 4318 4319 4320 4321 4322 4323 4324 4325 4326 4327 4328 4329 4330 4331 4332 4333 4334 4335 4336 4337 4338 4339 4340 4341 4342 4343 4344 4345 4346 4347 4348 4349 4350 4351 4352 4353 4354 ... 6787 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!