[ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency

[chaeplin]

Can we please have 500 dark rewards on the regular server?      This is niiiiiice1!

seriously, though.  I'm stupid, I don't know how to direct my gpu miner to the wallet in tetnet, could someone please explain?  do I do another config in testnet folder?

I think someone setup stratum earlier? I'll point my GPU at it if they give the creds and address

to test

-o stratum+tcp://asia02.mine.nu:13990  -u anyname -p 1

testnet stratum

-o stratum+tcp://asia02.mine.nu:13990  -u anyname -p 1

has no web front, db. It's used for solo mining.

[TanteStefana]

Where is everyone?  there is no talk here!

[goin2mars]

Where is everyone?  there is no talk here!

Hooking up to the testnet of course!

Just finished starting a bunch of 290's on it. Got so many of those now gonna take em straight to market!

Yeah it did get quiet though . .

On another note . . it's probably just a glitch or something in the sw . . has anyone using sgminer ever opened it and have it reject all shares from one gpu and be completely okay with the shares from another?

That just happened when i was connecting to the testnet . . and I've never seen it before so I figured i'd ask.

[goin2mars]

does anyone have good config settings for r9 290?

been looking all over but can't seem to find any settings for it.

there is a list on darkcointalk.org

Juste burn one R9 290. Never find good setting for this one.
i have better mh/s with R9  280X than 290X and 290.

push coreclock to 1140-1170 and memclock 1250

I cant go over 980 for coreclock

Do they actaully run stable with an OC on the core and stock clock on the memory? Any time I've tried I usually try to OC both to some extent and it always bluescreens or crashes the driver. Even with core at stock and only a memory OC. I was going to try OC'ing just the core next and hold the mem in the 1250-1260 range next but I've been busy for the last couple weeks so I've just been running stock everything.

I meant 1040 CC 1250 MC 24550 TC I 20 r9 290 sapp hawaii pro

Yeah, all mine are ASUS . . mix of reference and the Direct CU2. I like the non-reference asus . . they run about 10-12C cooler than the reference asus. Probably not as cool as the sapp though.

But either way I've just been running them all at 947 core 1250 mem . . dont really see much effect on TC with this coin so not gonna list mine . . . and xI 555 based on the dev's own usage of that difficulty.

What kind of hashes are you seeing? Mine start aroun 2.3-2.4M and drop to 2.0-2.1 after time.

I'd love to see better stable speeds, but don't really want to spend another night messing with settings right now . . and won't want to for at least a week or two.

As i tel before one of my 290 OC memory burn on card with -I 20  coreclock 980 and memclock 1250. Temp at 66°C.

I have one more 290 OC just out of the box. I dont want burn it before i know how to setting them.

Yeah I hear ya. I almost burned a card before . . but it was because i used powered risers from multiple power supplies and hooked them up wrong . . while at the same time overclocking meadium to heavily with scrypt mining. Luckily I only destroyed a couple DVI ports on the card (melted traces), the fan can't be sensed in speedfan now . . not sure what that's about, and the risers themselves are clearly burned plus the mobo had a few pcie ports that don't work anymore due to 850w being directly pushed through the pcie ports. But overall the card itself is happy and has been running for weeks now. I'm guessing it survived because it's meant to handle around ~300w of power . . so in comparison to the motherboard that usually runs around 70w it at least had a chance.

Since then I've just played it safe and run them at the stock 947/1250 AMD clocks and an xintensity of 555. The only thing I changed was the intensity when I switched to sgminer. I'd like to push it further, but I think I've already used up any extra lives the card already had and I don't really want to find out with the new cards.

Edit: on a different note . . I just found the same testnet block on two different computers. Any takers on which one gets orphaned?

[eduffield]

Hard Fork Ahead, v9.0.0! Dark Gravity Wave goes into effect on block 34140 (Saturaday about 1PM).

I'm really happy with my current implementation of DGW, it seems to be vastly improved over KGW. It uses multiple exponential moving averages and a simple moving average to smoothly adjust the difficulty. We've had huge fluctuations in testnet and it's dealt with everything perfectly.

This implementation also fixes all known exploits with KGW, so no more 10k+ difficulty blocks out of nowhere.

Here's the commit if you're interested:

https://github.com/evan82/darkcoin/commit/07c99052edc617975cdcbe4482e02c52e2d1fbf5

To update, just download one of these:

Source: http://www.github.com/evan82/darkcoin
Windows QT: http://www.darkcoin.io/downloads/darkcoin-qt.exe
Ubuntu QT: http://www.darkcoin.io/downloads/darkcoin-qt
Ubuntu Daemon: http://www.darkcoin.io/downloads/darkcoind

I'll start messaging all of the pool operators, exchanges and everything. Thanks!

** Edit: Apparently the block explorer isn't updating and I calculated the target block using that, so it's a day sooner. Sorry about that **

[goin2mars]

Hard Fork Ahead! Dark Gravity Wave goes into effect on block 34140 (Sunday about 7PM).

I'm really happy with my current implementation of DGW, it seems to be vastly improved over KGW. It uses multiple exponential moving averages and a simple moving average to smoothly adjust the difficulty. We've had huge fluctuations in testnet and it's dealt with everything perfectly.

Here's the commit if you're interested:

https://github.com/evan82/darkcoin/commit/07c99052edc617975cdcbe4482e02c52e2d1fbf5

To update, just download one of these:

Source: http://www.github.com/evan82/darkcoin
Windows QT: http://www.darkcoin.io/downloads/develop/darkcoin-qt.exe
Ubuntu QT: http://www.darkcoin.io/downloads/develop/darkcoin-qt
Ubuntu Daemon: http://www.darkcoin.io/downloads/develop/darkcoind

I'll start messaging all of the pool operators, exchanges and everything. Thanks!

Cool! Soooo you're done with the testnet now?

[eduffield]

Hard Fork Ahead! Dark Gravity Wave goes into effect on block 34140 (Sunday about 7PM).

I'm really happy with my current implementation of DGW, it seems to be vastly improved over KGW. It uses multiple exponential moving averages and a simple moving average to smoothly adjust the difficulty. We've had huge fluctuations in testnet and it's dealt with everything perfectly.

Here's the commit if you're interested:

https://github.com/evan82/darkcoin/commit/07c99052edc617975cdcbe4482e02c52e2d1fbf5

To update, just download one of these:

Source: http://www.github.com/evan82/darkcoin
Windows QT: http://www.darkcoin.io/downloads/develop/darkcoin-qt.exe
Ubuntu QT: http://www.darkcoin.io/downloads/develop/darkcoin-qt
Ubuntu Daemon: http://www.darkcoin.io/downloads/develop/darkcoind

I'll start messaging all of the pool operators, exchanges and everything. Thanks!

Cool! Soooo you're done with the testnet now?

Yep, it works perfect.

[goin2mars]

Hard Fork Ahead! Dark Gravity Wave goes into effect on block 34140 (Sunday about 7PM).

I'm really happy with my current implementation of DGW, it seems to be vastly improved over KGW. It uses multiple exponential moving averages and a simple moving average to smoothly adjust the difficulty. We've had huge fluctuations in testnet and it's dealt with everything perfectly.

Here's the commit if you're interested:

https://github.com/evan82/darkcoin/commit/07c99052edc617975cdcbe4482e02c52e2d1fbf5

To update, just download one of these:

Source: http://www.github.com/evan82/darkcoin
Windows QT: http://www.darkcoin.io/downloads/develop/darkcoin-qt.exe
Ubuntu QT: http://www.darkcoin.io/downloads/develop/darkcoin-qt
Ubuntu Daemon: http://www.darkcoin.io/downloads/develop/darkcoind

I'll start messaging all of the pool operators, exchanges and everything. Thanks!

Cool! Soooo you're done with the testnet now?

Yep, it works perfect.

Awesome, back to lottery then. Glad to hear it works.

[tifozi]

I try to install wallet on ubuntu.

I use this http://wiki.darkcoin.fr/index.php?title=Installer_Porte-Monnaie_Linux

I have this error message :

make: *** [build/bitcoin.o] Erreur 1

After which step? GUI Wallet or src/?

git clone https://github.com/evan82/darkcoin.git
qmake "USE_QRCODE=1 USE_DBUS=1"
make (error at the end of make)

Seems like you are missing some packages and it will help if you can pastebin your full error stack. At a minimum just install these packages via apt

Code:

libboost-all-dev libcurl4-openssl-dev libdb++-dev libleveldb-dev libminiupnpc-dev libssl-dev

[tifozi]

Awesome, back to lottery then. Glad to hear it works.

 

Network is running very clean now since all pools have been patched. Nice, clean payouts in p2p since suchpool got cleaned. Last few days were indeed a nightmare with all the fake hashes and artificially stupid difficulty and what not.

Still a lottery, but I am liking the odds now 

[chaeplin]

I got block 116, testnet server still 111.


e@e-H87-HD3:~/.darkcoin$ ./darkcoind getmininginfo
{
    "blocks" : 116,
    "currentblocksize" : 1000,
    "currentblocktx" : 0,
    "difficulty" : 0.48572869,
    "errors" : "",
    "generate" : false,
    "genproclimit" : -1,
    "hashespersec" : 0,
    "networkhashps" : 27656,
    "pooledtx" : 0,
    "testnet" : true
}
e@e-H87-HD3:~/.darkcoin$ ./darkcoind getpeerinfo
[
    {
        "addr" : "54.83.59.220:19999",
        "services" : "00000003",
        "lastsend" : 1394856342,
        "lastrecv" : 1394856343,
        "bytessent" : 864,
        "bytesrecv" : 203,
        "blocksrequested" : 0,
        "conntime" : 1394856341,
        "version" : 70002,
        "subver" : "/Satoshi:0.9.0/",
        "inbound" : false,
        "startingheight" : 111,
        "banscore" : 0,
        "syncnode" : true
    }
]

[eduffield]

I got block 116, testnet server still 111.


e@e-H87-HD3:~/.darkcoin$ ./darkcoind getmininginfo
{
    "blocks" : 116,
    "currentblocksize" : 1000,
    "currentblocktx" : 0,
    "difficulty" : 0.48572869,
    "errors" : "",
    "generate" : false,
    "genproclimit" : -1,
    "hashespersec" : 0,
    "networkhashps" : 27656,
    "pooledtx" : 0,
    "testnet" : true
}
e@e-H87-HD3:~/.darkcoin$ ./darkcoind getpeerinfo
[
    {
        "addr" : "54.83.59.220:19999",
        "services" : "00000003",
        "lastsend" : 1394856342,
        "lastrecv" : 1394856343,
        "bytessent" : 864,
        "bytesrecv" : 203,
        "blocksrequested" : 0,
        "conntime" : 1394856341,
        "version" : 70002,
        "subver" : "/Satoshi:0.9.0/",
        "inbound" : false,
        "startingheight" : 111,
        "banscore" : 0,
        "syncnode" : true
    }
]

Looks like testnet is on block 126 now.

[eduffield]

There is an offcial wallet for ubuntu 32bit (bin)

http://www.darkcoin.io/downloads/darkcoin-qt , I suppose that's 64x though. You'll have to compile it for 32bit

[goin2mars]

does anyone have good config settings for r9 290?

been looking all over but can't seem to find any settings for it.

there is a list on darkcointalk.org

Juste burn one R9 290. Never find good setting for this one.
i have better mh/s with R9  280X than 290X and 290.

push coreclock to 1140-1170 and memclock 1250

I cant go over 980 for coreclock

Do they actaully run stable with an OC on the core and stock clock on the memory? Any time I've tried I usually try to OC both to some extent and it always bluescreens or crashes the driver. Even with core at stock and only a memory OC. I was going to try OC'ing just the core next and hold the mem in the 1250-1260 range next but I've been busy for the last couple weeks so I've just been running stock everything.

I meant 1040 CC 1250 MC 24550 TC I 20 r9 290 sapp hawaii pro

Yeah, all mine are ASUS . . mix of reference and the Direct CU2. I like the non-reference asus . . they run about 10-12C cooler than the reference asus. Probably not as cool as the sapp though.

But either way I've just been running them all at 947 core 1250 mem . . dont really see much effect on TC with this coin so not gonna list mine . . . and xI 555 based on the dev's own usage of that difficulty.

What kind of hashes are you seeing? Mine start aroun 2.3-2.4M and drop to 2.0-2.1 after time.

I'd love to see better stable speeds, but don't really want to spend another night messing with settings right now . . and won't want to for at least a week or two.

As i tel before one of my 290 OC memory burn on card with -I 20  coreclock 980 and memclock 1250. Temp at 66°C.

I have one more 290 OC just out of the box. I dont want burn it before i know how to setting them.

Yeah I hear ya. I almost burned a card before . . but it was because i used powered risers from multiple power supplies and hooked them up wrong . . while at the same time overclocking meadium to heavily with scrypt mining. Luckily I only destroyed a couple DVI ports on the card (melted traces), the fan can't be sensed in speedfan now . . not sure what that's about, and the risers themselves are clearly burned plus the mobo had a few pcie ports that don't work anymore due to 850w being directly pushed through the pcie ports. But overall the card itself is happy and has been running for weeks now. I'm guessing it survived because it's meant to handle around ~300w of power . . so in comparison to the motherboard that usually runs around 70w it at least had a chance.

Since then I've just played it safe and run them at the stock 947/1250 AMD clocks and an xintensity of 555. The only thing I changed was the intensity when I switched to sgminer. I'd like to push it further, but I think I've already used up any extra lives the card already had and I don't really want to find out with the new cards.

Edit: on a different note . . I just found the same testnet block on two different computers. Any takers on which one gets orphaned?

I give a try with your setting. Looks good ATM.
GPU 0:  65.0C 2559RPM | 2.026M/2.030Mh/s | R:  0.0% HW:0 WU:0.025/m xI:555

Do you already try update bios ?
I read alot, but not try yet.
Its look like for 290 and 290X oc to have over volt...

Do you mean unlock the 290 to a 290x? No. I looked into it, but none of my cards are unlockable based on the hawaiiinfo file I came across on Techpowerup (think this is where it was).

Because of that, I haven't played with the voltages with these cards. From what I've read, most people are trying to undervolt them in order to pull the best hash/watt ratio because it's less than the 280x . . while some are looking to do heavy overclocking.

With the stock core and mem clocks, you won't need to mess with the voltage for stability . . although it would be nice to pull it down a bit for power savings. But with this coin, I'm not all that worried about power right now.

Unless you mean there's a different bios?

[louiseth1]

http://Dark.SuchPool.pw wallet's has been updated to the latest version for the Hardfork Coming at block 34140.
DGW Implementation will happen, fixing the known vulnerabilities in KGW.

Source: https://github.com/evan82/darkcoin
Windows QT: http://www.darkcoin.io/downloads/develop/darkcoin-qt.exe
Ubuntu QT: http://www.darkcoin.io/downloads/develop/darkcoin-qt
Ubuntu Daemon: http://www.darkcoin.io/downloads/develop/darkcoind

[JGCMiner]

SuchPool's wallet is up to date and you can do so too.

Other pools owners, hurry up to patch your stratums!

[/size]

Uhh, far as I can tell by reading the thread SuchPool was the last major pool to patch this issue. Lotterymining, Coinmine, and the official pool have been OK for a couple of days now.

[louiseth1]

Uhh, far as I can tell by reading the thread SuchPool was the last major pool to patch this issue. Lotterymining, Coinmine, and the official pool have been OK for a couple of days now.

Haters gon' hate!

[feeleep]

Hard Fork Ahead, v9.0.0! Dark Gravity Wave goes into effect on block 34140 (Sunday about 7PM).

I'm really happy with my current implementation of DGW, it seems to be vastly improved over KGW. It uses multiple exponential moving averages and a simple moving average to smoothly adjust the difficulty. We've had huge fluctuations in testnet and it's dealt with everything perfectly.

This implementation also fixes all known exploits with KGW, so no more 10k+ difficulty blocks out of nowhere.

Here's the commit if you're interested:

https://github.com/evan82/darkcoin/commit/07c99052edc617975cdcbe4482e02c52e2d1fbf5

To update, just download one of these:

Source: http://www.github.com/evan82/darkcoin
Windows QT: http://www.darkcoin.io/downloads/darkcoin-qt.exe
Ubuntu QT: http://www.darkcoin.io/downloads/darkcoin-qt
Ubuntu Daemon: http://www.darkcoin.io/downloads/darkcoind

I'll start messaging all of the pool operators, exchanges and everything. Thanks!

wallet updated on https://www2.coinmine.pl/drk pool

feeleep

[eizh]

DarkSend question:

After a DarkSend, the change is sent back to a hidden change address to which I own the private key, but no one knows it's mine. But what if I later had to send an amount large enough that my wallet is forced to source it from multiple addresses including this change address? This could then reveal that the original sender address and the change address are connected. With the change amount known, the sent amount is also known and the recipient can be guessed more easily. Is this correct?

[anonymousxx1503]

Hey Evan - Is it Dark Gravity Well or Dark Gravity Wave - Here you said Wave, on twitter you said Well.