[ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency

[Equate]

700 BTC buy order ! What you are going to say about that !?

I am also curious about this , which exchange ?

[drkwarrior]

did someone just dump their btcd for drk??  

[Rux]

nice jump/hump

what are we waiting? take while its still cheap... you do understand that Darkcoin is in that state that so little can bring him back to 0.01 ... so why risk it and wait for drop?

[Terzo]

Someone was just testing us .. I saw big buy order in cryptsy and mintpal . They were canceled and the price started to rise form 0.0046 to 0.0052  on all markets .

[KryptoFoo]

hell yeah drk feeling pumpish

[Lauda]

No,i am stupid i dont know what a developer does,my god man are you fucking stupid??Evan and his team founders and owners of the Darkcoin brand,they also control the marketing side of course like any other brand does.

They need to focus on the marketing now,the coin does what they say it can do get the word out now,develop the darknet thing seperate from the coin,dont mix them up.
It's like they are creating streams of income and use of having a masternode instead of working on the coin itself.

You obviously have no idea.
Darkcoin is not a company. You can market it as well, stop being a lazy bagholder and do something rather than just complain. 

700 BTC buy order ! What you are going to say about that !?

I am also curious about this , which exchange ?

Someone should have made an SS, that's quite some money.

[gadado]

Hmm seems no one is bringing this up so I do:

jl777's SuperNET:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=762346.0

I see an opportunity for DarkCoin to take part of it as as possible core coin if it's wanted.

I have no clue if this would be possible or good or bad for DarkCoin especially becasue DarkCoin ahs its own net but if they haven't already I suggest Evan and the DarkCoin Team should read it and make their thoughts about it.

[valentino007]

No,i am stupid i dont know what a developer does,my god man are you fucking stupid??Evan and his team founders and owners of the Darkcoin brand,they also control the marketing side of course like any other brand does.

They need to focus on the marketing now,the coin does what they say it can do get the word out now,develop the darknet thing seperate from the coin,dont mix them up.
It's like they are creating streams of income and use of having a masternode instead of working on the coin itself.

You obviously have no idea.
Darkcoin is not a company. You can market it as well, stop being a lazy bagholder and do something rather than just complain. 

700 BTC buy order ! What you are going to say about that !?

I am also curious about this , which exchange ?

Someone should have made an SS, that's quite some money.

i sold a few 100 and bought back in lower

[Rux]

every time i start wallet it search for password, like 1st time when it goes to denom...

i have XX anonymized... and X still not... is there way for me to force those X to go anon?

EDIT
Question: Has anyone ever anonymized a single coin with DS+

[AlexGR]

Hmm seems no one is bringing this up so I do:

jl777's SuperNET:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=762346.0

I see an opportunity for DarkCoin to take part of it as as possible core coin if it's wanted.

I have no clue if this would be possible or good or bad for DarkCoin especially becasue DarkCoin ahs its own net but if they haven't already I suggest Evan and the DarkCoin Team should read it and make their thoughts about it.

Question: Has anyone ever anonymized a single coin with "teleport"?

Question 2: Why would BBR need "teleport" as it has a CN backend?

Question 3: Why would any coin need to be a part of a "supernetwork"? Why such emphasis on price pumping and coin valuation instead of what it would actually do as a service?

[gadado]

Hmm seems no one is bringing this up so I do:

jl777's SuperNET:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=762346.0

I see an opportunity for DarkCoin to take part of it as as possible core coin if it's wanted.

I have no clue if this would be possible or good or bad for DarkCoin especially becasue DarkCoin ahs its own net but if they haven't already I suggest Evan and the DarkCoin Team should read it and make their thoughts about it.

Question: Has anyone ever anonymized a single coin with "teleport"?

Question 2: Why would BBR need "teleport" as it has a CN backend?

Question 3: Why would any coin need to be a part of a "supernetwork"? Why such emphasis on price pumping and coin valuation instead of what it would actually do as a service?

Don't ask me.
Read it make your own mind.

It's not about price pumping. It's about a possible oportunity which is to investigate and evaluate and if its nothing for DarkCoin than it's nothing.
I don't care about price.

[Propulsion]

Hmm seems no one is bringing this up so I do:

jl777's SuperNET:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=762346.0

I see an opportunity for DarkCoin to take part of it as as possible core coin if it's wanted.

I have no clue if this would be possible or good or bad for DarkCoin especially becasue DarkCoin ahs its own net but if they haven't already I suggest Evan and the DarkCoin Team should read it and make their thoughts about it.

Question: Has anyone ever anonymized a single coin with "teleport"?

Question 2: Why would BBR need "teleport" as it has a CN backend?

Question 3: Why would any coin need to be a part of a "supernetwork"? Why such emphasis on price pumping and coin valuation instead of what it would actually do as a service?

Don't ask me.
Read it make your own mind.

It's not about price pumping. It's about a possible oportunity which is to investigate and evaluate and if its nothing for DarkCoin than it's nothing.
I don't care about price.

This is awful it's crap.

[AlexGR]

Hmm seems no one is bringing this up so I do:

jl777's SuperNET:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=762346.0

I see an opportunity for DarkCoin to take part of it as as possible core coin if it's wanted.

I have no clue if this would be possible or good or bad for DarkCoin especially becasue DarkCoin ahs its own net but if they haven't already I suggest Evan and the DarkCoin Team should read it and make their thoughts about it.

Question: Has anyone ever anonymized a single coin with "teleport"?

Question 2: Why would BBR need "teleport" as it has a CN backend?

Question 3: Why would any coin need to be a part of a "supernetwork"? Why such emphasis on price pumping and coin valuation instead of what it would actually do as a service?

Don't ask me.
Read it make your own mind.

It's not about price pumping. It's about a possible oportunity which is to investigate and evaluate and if its nothing for DarkCoin than it's nothing.
I don't care about price.

See how the thread starts. First thing it mentions is how BBR was pumped and how other coins will be pumped if they are in the Supercoin network, all the while establishing "pumping" credentials for the OP who supposedly has the magic wand of coin valuations. Doesn't sound right at all.

The order that humans create success is something like this:

Vision => creation / doing what you do best => success

If you start with pumping motives, it's a broken formula resembling a pyramid.

My .02 DRKs.

[coins101]

Sounds a bit like DarkTor / MasterNet 

[Joshuar]

I don't get the point of bitcoindark's "Supernet" that provides anonymity to all alt-coins...

In the end, only a few alt-coins will be leader/co-leaders of certain niches in the cryptocurrency sector, which renders a Supernet useless...

Supernet just seems like a marketing ticket to a pump and dump.

I'm more much interested in a TOR like structure that Darkcoin proposes, that would provide decentralized anonymity when browsing the web online, or something similar, thats the real deal.

[coins101]

People that announce IPOs and take money from US citizens are asking for trouble.

SEC Charges Bitcoin Entrepreneur With Offering Unregistered Securities
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
2014-111

Washington D.C., June 3, 2014 — The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged the co-owner of two Bitcoin-related websites for publicly offering shares in the two ventures without registering them.

An SEC investigation found that Erik T. Voorhees published prospectuses on the Internet and actively solicited investors to buy shares in SatoshiDICE and FeedZeBirds.  But he failed to register the offerings with the SEC as required under the federal securities laws.  Investors paid for their shares using Bitcoin, a virtual currency that can be used to purchase real-world goods and services and exchanged for fiat currencies on certain online exchanges.  The profits ultimately earned by Voorhees through the unregistered offerings totaled more than $15,000.

Voorhees agreed to settle the SEC’s charges by paying full disgorgement of the $15,843.98 in profits plus a $35,000 penalty for a total of more than $50,000.

http://www.sec.gov/News/PressRelease/Detail/PressRelease/1370541972520#.VAN0xvldVWW

[splawik21]

People that announce IPOs and take money from US citizens are asking for trouble.

SEC Charges Bitcoin Entrepreneur With Offering Unregistered Securities
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
2014-111

Washington D.C., June 3, 2014 — The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged the co-owner of two Bitcoin-related websites for publicly offering shares in the two ventures without registering them.

An SEC investigation found that Erik T. Voorhees published prospectuses on the Internet and actively solicited investors to buy shares in SatoshiDICE and FeedZeBirds.  But he failed to register the offerings with the SEC as required under the federal securities laws.  Investors paid for their shares using Bitcoin, a virtual currency that can be used to purchase real-world goods and services and exchanged for fiat currencies on certain online exchanges.  The profits ultimately earned by Voorhees through the unregistered offerings totaled more than $15,000.

Voorhees agreed to settle the SEC’s charges by paying full disgorgement of the $15,843.98 in profits plus a $35,000 penalty for a total of more than $50,000.

http://www.sec.gov/News/PressRelease/Detail/PressRelease/1370541972520#.VAN0xvldVWW

Finaly, I hate IPO ICO and alll this stuff...

[thelonecrouton]

People that announce IPOs and take money from US citizens are asking for trouble.

SEC Charges Bitcoin Entrepreneur With Offering Unregistered Securities
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
2014-111

Washington D.C., June 3, 2014 — The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged the co-owner of two Bitcoin-related websites for publicly offering shares in the two ventures without registering them.

An SEC investigation found that Erik T. Voorhees published prospectuses on the Internet and actively solicited investors to buy shares in SatoshiDICE and FeedZeBirds.  But he failed to register the offerings with the SEC as required under the federal securities laws.  Investors paid for their shares using Bitcoin, a virtual currency that can be used to purchase real-world goods and services and exchanged for fiat currencies on certain online exchanges.  The profits ultimately earned by Voorhees through the unregistered offerings totaled more than $15,000.

Voorhees agreed to settle the SEC’s charges by paying full disgorgement of the $15,843.98 in profits plus a $35,000 penalty for a total of more than $50,000.

http://www.sec.gov/News/PressRelease/Detail/PressRelease/1370541972520#.VAN0xvldVWW

Big banking gets away with billion$ in fraud every day and the SEC wastes taxpayer money on some guy trying to earn a few bucks off his own initiative - I guess if you're earning shitloads with your rich banking buddies  you can afford the right bribes.

Government: stealing your money and using it to pay armies of useless shitbags to steal more of your money!

I suppose the SEC will be coming after me next for the two Masternode shares I run.

[r-ando]

Thought these were interesting videos and wanted to share them. I am convinced we can make the world a better place if we work together, stay true to one another and stay true to freedom, wherever we be. Darkcoin, live free.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=daNr_TrBw6E

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3BKP5iNof5M

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gETF0_SOXcg

[coins101]

I suppose the SEC will be coming after me next for the two Masternode shares I run.

"IPO" is a very specific offering of securities to the public to become investors / shareholders.

I don't think you were seeking investors, just budding up. I doubt its in the same league.