|
JGCMiner
|
 |
September 13, 2014, 10:11:53 AM
Last edit: September 13, 2014, 11:26:57 AM by JGCMiner |
|
See 10,000 DRK going through DarkMix and DarkSend, for free
*snip*
Can we stop with the "Darkmix" thing unless there is something official? Communication has already been to distant second to tech development with DRK and many people have gotten confused on many occasions. I have no problem with the focus on tech, but let's not exacerbate the communication issue by randomly changing/adding new banding. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you see garbage posts (off-topic, trolling, spam, no point, etc.), use the "report to moderator" links. All reports are investigated, though you will rarely be contacted about your reports.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
qwizzie
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 2548
Merit: 1245
|
|
September 13, 2014, 10:16:16 AM
Last edit: September 13, 2014, 10:40:03 AM by qwizzie |
|
First two new testers on Testnet can get 20.000 tDRK from me to test.....one condition ... set amount to keep anonymized to 19.000 and the Darksend Rounds to 8 Just provide me with your testaddress from Testnet. Resources : https://darkcointalk.org/threads/sticky-testnet-tools-resources.1768/ (here you will also find latest RC5 downloads for Windows, MAC, Linux just make sure you pick the v0.10.etc and run it with testnet=1) |
Learn from the past, set detailed and vivid goals for the future and live in the only moment of time over which you have any control : now
|
|
|
mmitech
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1001
things you own end up owning you
|
|
September 13, 2014, 10:39:14 AM |
|
Darkcoin Stats:yes 990 DRK won at one roll.
|
|
|
|
|
safepalm
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
|
|
September 13, 2014, 10:49:59 AM |
|
Test DarkMix Here
Hi, where can I read more about DarkMix? Is it a new secret feature in RC5? |
|
|
|
|
|
kattekop
|
|
September 13, 2014, 10:55:46 AM |
|
Asking myself which coin ppl will buy for xmas, DRK will be one of them..
I'm looking longterm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
JGCMiner
|
|
September 13, 2014, 11:02:47 AM
Last edit: September 13, 2014, 11:27:18 AM by JGCMiner |
|
*snip*
Hi, where can I read more about DarkMix? Is it a new secret feature in RC5? *sigh* and this is the problem... Some people just took to renaming Darksend+. RC5 brings better usability, enforcement, and faster (as well as stronger) anonymization. It is a pretty big improvement over RC4, but there are no brand new features. |
|
|
|
|
|
tombtc
|
|
September 13, 2014, 11:15:41 AM |
|
I hope the name will stay the same - Darksend+
Darkmix will confuse a lot of people and sound crap.
|
|
|
|
|
safepalm
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
|
|
September 13, 2014, 11:16:30 AM |
|
Test DarkMix Here
Hi, where can I read more about DarkMix? Is it a new secret feature in RC5? *sigh* and this is the problem... Some people just took to renaming Darksend+. RC5 brings better usability, enforcement, and faster (as well as stronger) anonymization. It is a pretty big improvement over RC4, but there are no brand new features. OK, thanks for the feedback. Darksend+ sounds awesome enough to me; not so sure about DarkMix. |
|
|
|
|
|
JGCMiner
|
|
September 13, 2014, 11:25:10 AM |
|
OK, thanks for the feedback. Darksend+ sounds awesome enough to me; not so sure about DarkMix.
I wouldn't(edit) worry about it changing as the idea didn't come from or been endorsed by the dev team. It was just a passing idea of a couple community members. |
|
|
|
|
Minotaur26
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 13, 2014, 11:25:32 AM |
|
Evan was very clear on Jira about avoiding any other references to the technology. Our brand is Darksend. If you could check it out and edit your posts it woild be nice.
|
|
|
|
|
|
RenegadeMan
|
|
September 13, 2014, 11:29:02 AM |
|
OK, thanks for the feedback. Darksend+ sounds awesome enough to me; not so sure about DarkMix.
I would worry about it changing as the idea didn't come from or been endorsed by the dev team. It was just a passing idea of a couple community members. I think you mean "I wouldn't worry about it changing" (the other thing, apart from people making on-the-fly branding changes, that drives me batty is when someone get's their wouldn't/couldn't/shouldn't mixed up thereby changing the entire meaning of the sentence!) |
BTC: 1KjAPEa3WvhmDGT4jmT9i5P3UPFdFH629e
DASH: Xdr6U5qcAdbuKRrr3xKBb1ySoPq7MKERnB
|
|
|
|
JGCMiner
|
|
September 13, 2014, 11:29:28 AM |
|
Evan was very clear on Jira about avoiding any other references to the technology. Our brand is Darksend. If you could check it out and edit your posts it woild be nice.
Exactly, there is nothing gained in breeding unnecessary confusion. OK, thanks for the feedback. Darksend+ sounds awesome enough to me; not so sure about DarkMix.
I would worry about it changing as the idea didn't come from or been endorsed by the dev team. It was just a passing idea of a couple community members. I think you mean "I wouldn't worry about it changing" (the other thing, apart from people making on-the-fly branding changes, that drives me batty is when someone get's their wouldn't/couldn't/shouldn't mixed up thereby changing the entire meaning of the sentence!) Sorry about that. Doing several things at once here... |
|
|
|
|
coins101
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 13, 2014, 11:53:48 AM |
|
Evan was very clear on Jira about avoiding any other references to the technology. Our brand is Darksend. If you could check it out and edit your posts it woild be nice.
Satoshi was very clear, no central authority  Actually, this has brought up something that pissed me off when Kristov talked about Darkcoin recently. He called it an implementation of CoinJoin as proposed by gmaxwell. Really? gmaxwell has previously gone out of his way to say he didn't want Darkcoin implementation to be associated with his concept. Actually, I agree. It's nothing like it. It's a pre-mix. Much, much, order of 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000x better - because it works. gmaxwell did not come up with the idea of hiding amongst others. That concept was considered in the 80s. It led to the development of Tor: You can't hide alone, but you can hide if you mix with lots of others. DarkMix, a random pre-mix with many peers, is its own definition of mixing |
|
|
|
|
vipgelsi
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1736
Merit: 1001
|
|
September 13, 2014, 12:00:22 PM |
|
Just please don't change the name. Other then that keep up the good work.
|
|
|
|
|
|
JGCMiner
|
|
September 13, 2014, 12:27:00 PM |
|
Evan was very clear on Jira about avoiding any other references to the technology. Our brand is Darksend. If you could check it out and edit your posts it woild be nice.
Satoshi was very clear, no central authority Actually, this has brought up something that pissed me off when Kristov talked about Darkcoin recently. He called it an implementation of CoinJoin as proposed by gmaxwell. Really? gmaxwell has previously gone out of his way to say he didn't want Darkcoin implementation to be associated with his concept. Actually, I agree. It's nothing like it. It's a pre-mix. Much, much, order of 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000x better - because it works. gmaxwell did not come up with the idea of hiding amongst others. That concept was considered in the 80s. It led to the development of Tor: You can't hide alone, but you can hide if you mix with lots of others. DarkMix, a random pre-mix with many peers, is its own definition of mixing Sorry coins101 got to disagree here. Nobody is saying that Evan is the central authority who gets to decide all... we are saying that those who want to keep the name are the majority (the devs are part of this majority) and that some people calling it by another name is confusing and counterproductive. There have already been people wondering if darkmix refers to some new feature. There can be only ONE name. Now, if the current name is going to change then it should be done properly by first getting the majority to agree and then getting the devs onboard. Somehow I doubt you will gather a majority that want to change the name, but regardless, anything other method, especially one that has people randomly calling it whatever they want, only hurts the coin and hurts the brand. |
|
|
|
|
|
EfterlysT
|
|
September 13, 2014, 12:39:26 PM |
|
Darkmix sounds like something some shitcoin made up.
Darksend sound professional and i think we should stick to the name it had from start.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kai Proctor
|
|
September 13, 2014, 12:50:18 PM |
|
Darkmix sounds like something some shitcoin made up.
Darksend sound professional and i think we should stick to the name it had from start.
+1 Coin101, I understand that you like the name you come up with, but imagine if everyone was doing this... One promotes the coin by using the name "Darkmix", the other with "Darkpay" and an other with "Darksend" etc. |
|
|
|
|
coins101
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 13, 2014, 12:50:47 PM |
|
Darkmix sounds like something some shitcoin made up.
Darksend sound professional and i think we should stick to the name it had from start.
DarkMix Teleport on the SuperDarkNet DarkPay via Android Launch announcement imminent. |
|
|
|
|
ultradar
Member
Offline
Activity: 63
Merit: 10
|
|
September 13, 2014, 12:55:11 PM |
|
i cant believe another clone has shown up litecoindark....fuck all this shit developers copycat bastards....go fuck yourself and all those idiots suporting that shit i hope all of you get broke and see you under the bridge begging for 1 buck!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
zombie6
|
|
September 13, 2014, 01:16:54 PM |
|
i cant believe another clone has shown up litecoindark....fuck all this shit developers copycat bastards....go fuck yourself and all those idiots suporting that shit i hope all of you get broke and see you under the bridge begging for 1 buck!!!
you'd better believe this is just the start! just like bitcoin more and more darkcoin clones will emerge, until one clone (as dark is from btc) will improve on it's technology. |
|
|
|
|
|
