[ANN]🔴Deviant Coin🔴[DEV] DEVX Airdrop soon! [🔥DEX + H/W wallet coming up🔥]

[guarino]

Correctly, I will not trust the project until the end, until the developers provide a working version of their application and wallets, which in turn may be vulnerable

This is absurd! How are you going to prove the vulnerability of wallets? Only if you try to crack one of the user's wallets, and then point out the vulnerability of the development team

Why should I do this? The team has their own testers who receive money for their work. Why should I help the development team, if in the end I do not even get a bonus?

[1714828666]

1714828666

[bonksnp2]

Correctly, I will not trust the project until the end, until the developers provide a working version of their application and wallets, which in turn may be vulnerable

This is absurd! How are you going to prove the vulnerability of wallets? Only if you try to crack one of the user's wallets, and then point out the vulnerability of the development team

Why should I do this? The team has their own testers who receive money for their work. Why should I help the development team, if in the end I do not even get a bonus?

It's your safety! If you think that it is not enough, then you can try to improve it with the help of the development team, if you are capable of it!

[12coins]

It seems that you completely forgot that this is one of the most protected projects of the whole community, there is no reason to believe that the user's wallet is unprotected!

[bonksnp2]

It seems that you completely forgot that this is one of the most protected projects of the whole community, there is no reason to believe that the user's wallet is unprotected!

He's right! This factor is for many a key when choosing a project for investment! In this way, you can share with your colleagues a project for which there will be no doubt about security

[guarino]

It seems that you completely forgot that this is one of the most protected projects of the whole community, there is no reason to believe that the user's wallet is unprotected!

He's right! This factor is for many a key when choosing a project for investment! In this way, you can share with your colleagues a project for which there will be no doubt about security

You can continue to believe in these statements, or try chatting with qualified experts in the field of cryptography, and all of you will be told that even the system with Masternodes at this stage of technology development is weak

[12coins]

It seems that you completely forgot that this is one of the most protected projects of the whole community, there is no reason to believe that the user's wallet is unprotected!

He's right! This factor is for many a key when choosing a project for investment! In this way, you can share with your colleagues a project for which there will be no doubt about security

You can continue to believe in these statements, or try chatting with qualified experts in the field of cryptography, and all of you will be told that even the system with Masternodes at this stage of technology development is weak

Give an example of the recall of such a specialist, in which he will say about the weak protection of this project. I can not believe your words, since they are quite empty

[vladimir54]

An excellent and very interesting project! Tell me, please, what standard will be for your token?

[GraBitCoin]

Dev! Take off the order for spam! do not turn people away from the coin! All this is visible and disgusting to look at how the idiots make them!

[bonksnp2]

From this project I expect very high speed, as this would play a competitive role for the entire crypto-currency community.

[Tiny_Prism]

From this project I expect very high speed, as this would play a competitive role for the entire crypto-currency community.

At the moment, the transmission speed is not so important as the security of the channel, I'm sure of it. There is no point in increasing the speed, creating a vulnerability for transactions

[bonksnp2]

From this project I expect very high speed, as this would play a competitive role for the entire crypto-currency community.

At the moment, the transmission speed is not so important as the security of the channel, I'm sure of it. There is no point in increasing the speed, creating a vulnerability for transactions

Channel security is a relative concept. The fact is that not so long ago each project spoke about the degree of its protection, which is confirmed by the use of appropriate algorithms

[Tiny_Prism]

From this project I expect very high speed, as this would play a competitive role for the entire crypto-currency community.

At the moment, the transmission speed is not so important as the security of the channel, I'm sure of it. There is no point in increasing the speed, creating a vulnerability for transactions

Channel security is a relative concept. The fact is that not so long ago each project spoke about the degree of its protection, which is confirmed by the use of appropriate algorithms

How do you think the situation has changed? At the moment, as well as always, each project is protected in its own way, as a rule, the protection level is really high

[bonksnp2]

This is far from the case, but nevertheless, with a conditionally identical level of security of projects, each of them works in its own way. And the difference is only in the speed of individual projects!

[Tiny_Prism]

This is far from the case, but nevertheless, with a conditionally identical level of security of projects, each of them works in its own way. And the difference is only in the speed of individual projects!

The speed of the transaction depends on which algorithm is used and what computational tools the project team uses. This is the key!

[bonksnp2]

This is far from the case, but nevertheless, with a conditionally identical level of security of projects, each of them works in its own way. And the difference is only in the speed of individual projects!

The speed of the transaction depends on which algorithm is used and what computational tools the project team uses. This is the key!

you are absolutely right, the project team decided that using traditional methods for transactions is not the most effective way to solve the problem

[Tiny_Prism]

This is far from the case, but nevertheless, with a conditionally identical level of security of projects, each of them works in its own way. And the difference is only in the speed of individual projects!

The speed of the transaction depends on which algorithm is used and what computational tools the project team uses. This is the key!

you are absolutely right, the project team decided that using traditional methods for transactions is not the most effective way to solve the problem

And what did they propose? I do not see in the description of the project innovative methods for accelerating transactions, the project operates on the basis of masternodes - this is the only factor that accelerates transactions

[guarino]

The system that runs on the basis of Masternode - does not give a strong gain in work, since this factor is a replacement for the previous generation of computers!

[bonksnp2]

The system that runs on the basis of Masternode - does not give a strong gain in work, since this factor is a replacement for the previous generation of computers!

Do you also think that the platform does not have a significant increase in speed? Unlike other projects, there is a manual and the necessary software for the confident operation of the system!

[Tiny_Prism]

The system that runs on the basis of Masternode - does not give a strong gain in work, since this factor is a replacement for the previous generation of computers!

I totally agree with you! I think that the new algorithm on the old computing platform would give a larger increase in transaction speed than the new platform!

[bonksnp2]

Colleagues, the fact is that in addition to the fact that Masternodes work more stable and better than other types of computer technology, it requires a new algorithm