zacho56
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
May 12, 2013, 10:22:32 PM |
|
Tenebrix was a very good concept and I only wish it had succeeded better. RIP Tenebrix.
|
"I have a dream" - Martin Luther King JR
|
|
|
Tomatocage
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1554
Merit: 1222
brb keeping up with the Kardashians
|
|
May 12, 2013, 10:33:00 PM |
|
Per every other alt coin: WTS 10,000 TBX for 15 LTC per 1K
|
|
|
|
iAmAYacoin
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
|
|
May 12, 2013, 10:34:43 PM |
|
So tenebrix was actually... litecoin? It implements a proof-of-work scheme based on scrypt, a cryptographic construct specifically designed to resist creation of efficient GPU, FPGA and even ASIC implementations. You can find more about scrypt and how it can improve your stamina, masculine appeal and performance here how funny this seems today
|
|
|
|
Hydroponica
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
fml
|
|
May 12, 2013, 11:11:25 PM |
|
And people think YACoin will make it
|
|
|
|
Tranz
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1060
May the force bit with you.
|
|
May 12, 2013, 11:29:57 PM |
|
How did this die? Just no interest? Bug?
|
|
|
|
markm
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2996
Merit: 1121
|
|
May 12, 2013, 11:41:09 PM Last edit: May 13, 2013, 01:17:33 AM by markm |
|
How did this die? Just no interest? Bug?
It is ancient code, based on multicoin. Coblee then made Fairbrix, which also seems to be maybe based on multicoin code, but hacking the code instead of putting all the details such as genesis block into the config file like multicoin did. Then he made Litecoin using bitcoin code instead of multicoin code I think. Fairbrix only has a GUI version, no daemon. Tenebrix has a daemon and a QT GUI, if you use Lolcust's Tenebrix-QT repo to build it. His other repos seem to be out of date and maybe even broken so the -QT is the one to use. But they are still running, some day we'll get around to updating the code, in the meantime they serve, like BBQcoin did for so long, as a way for CPU miners to quietly mine month after month... Very fair method of distribution, giving plenty of time for anyone who wants some to get some before they follow BBQcoin into the limelight... -MarkM-
|
|
|
|
Tranz
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1060
May the force bit with you.
|
|
May 12, 2013, 11:44:08 PM |
|
Thanks markm always enjoy your posts.
|
|
|
|
mistercoin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1048
Merit: 1000
https://r.honeygain.me/XEDDM2B07C
|
|
August 25, 2013, 04:53:09 PM |
|
Any chance of someone updating the code to the new bitcoin version? Id like to give this currency a stab if a few would join.
|
|
|
|
Adamlm
|
|
August 25, 2013, 05:36:17 PM |
|
Any chance of someone updating the code to the new bitcoin version? Id like to give this currency a stab if a few would join.
This would be interesting. I have a portable version of Tenebrix client for Windows (I don't remember its source...) The client synchronizes with TBX network without any problems. But tenebrix was premined, that's its problem...
|
|
|
|
ewibit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2955
Merit: 1050
|
|
August 25, 2013, 06:59:02 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
mistercoin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1048
Merit: 1000
https://r.honeygain.me/XEDDM2B07C
|
|
August 25, 2013, 08:00:34 PM |
|
Yeah but fairbrix (i cant find anyway) a working GUI windows exe and not sure about the BC. Hmm..
|
|
|
|
worldinacoin
|
|
August 26, 2013, 04:39:18 AM |
|
Same problem as Ixcoin, thats why I0coin comes about.
|
|
|
|
dE_logics
|
|
August 26, 2013, 04:50:19 AM |
|
And yes, I abhor the %insert_word%coin naming scheme. Is there any possibility of a non-Windows client?
|
|
|
|
David Latapie
|
|
April 14, 2014, 09:29:08 PM |
|
This is the first time I hear from Tenebrix. 2011, wow, Sort of nostalgia of olden times (that I never knew, by the way).
|
|
|
|
Propulsion
|
|
April 14, 2014, 10:59:59 PM |
|
This is the first time I hear from Tenebrix. 2011, wow, Sort of nostalgia of olden times (that I never knew, by the way).
Holy bump batman!
|
|
|
|
MarketNeutral
|
|
April 15, 2014, 12:19:11 AM |
|
The Tenebrix network is weak, but still functioning. I've sent and received TBX as recently as this year.
I usually sync the blockchain with my wallet every 6 months or so, usually during computer spring cleaning time, during which I delete all the junk crypto files that accumulate. I could never bring myself to delete my TBX files, however. Altcoins come and go and are nearly all rubbish, but the original alts like TBX seem worth saving for the lulz, the nostalgia, or the history.
The Fairbrix network is a bit stronger, I've noticed, but not by much. Of the old altcoins, Liquidcoin has the most spotty network and is the only one I can't consistently sync. I was able to mine LQC until the end of last year, but the network has become extremely weak since then.
I see no reason why Tenebrix code couldn't be updated. IXCoin and I0Coin have been updated, indirectly because they have benefited from being merge mined all these years, which not only secured their networks but also kept the coins in the crypto-consciousness; whereas the non-MM coins like TBX and FBX have been relegated to mostly leftover PCs and slow CPUs. Yet it wasn't long ago that IXCoin and I0Coin seemed just as ancient as TBX.
|
|
|
|
markm
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2996
Merit: 1121
|
|
April 15, 2014, 02:07:25 AM |
|
Well maybe in updating Tenebrix and Fairbrix, merged mining could be implemented?
Though the fact that Litecoin and DOGE do not seem to be intending to be merged mined together leads me to think the whole scrypt arena might just be too fragmented and self-destructive to be worth bothering with. Basically coins that are determined not be be seucre a an insult to the users and investors, like hey you idiots this crap is garbage, we have no intention of ever securing your money, the whole point is to rip you off so why the heck would we care that our blockchains are insecure, only idiots would waste money on this crap anyway so obviously any users are out to lose their money anyway so to heck with security, no one cares about that, its all about ripping you off, idiot...
-MarkM-
|
|
|
|
kelsey
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1876
Merit: 1000
|
|
April 15, 2014, 02:24:17 AM |
|
Well maybe in updating Tenebrix and Fairbrix, merged mining could be implemented?
Though the fact that Litecoin and DOGE do not seem to be intending to be merged mined together leads me to think the whole scrypt arena might just be too fragmented and self-destructive to be worth bothering with. Basically coins that are determined not be be seucre a an insult to the users and investors, like hey you idiots this crap is garbage, we have no intention of ever securing your money, the whole point is to rip you off so why the heck would we care that our blockchains are insecure, only idiots would waste money on this crap anyway so obviously any users are out to lose their money anyway so to heck with security, no one cares about that, its all about ripping you off, idiot...
-MarkM-
yes yes broken down record we know why you want to merge mine and it has nothing to do with securing the blockchain.
|
|
|
|
MarketNeutral
|
|
April 16, 2014, 01:17:34 PM |
|
Tenebrix network is flaking on me presently. Fairbrix seems stable, though. Who's mining these coins?
|
|
|
|
jubalix
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2632
Merit: 1023
|
|
April 16, 2014, 02:00:33 PM |
|
Tenebrix network is flaking on me presently. Fairbrix seems stable, though. Who's mining these coins? now that is the question.....I mine primecoin, for the first few days and it became unprofitable really quick...who mine anything for so long beats the $%$% out of me....
|
|
|
|
|