[ActiveMining] Official Shareholder Discussion Thread [Moderated]

[minerpart]

I think this deserves a countdown timer?

[ActM Thread]

There are two, easy to follow rules for posting in this thread which can be found in the original post.

They are:

1. Please do not post image macros.
2. Please do not post highly offensive or hurtful remarks. (swearing to express oneself is not an issue)

In addition to that, all trolling posts will be removed no matter who posts them and all posts made by well known trolls are automatically deleted.  If suspicious posts are made the posting history is examined and if necessary a warning is given to that person.  If they continue to troll they are asked to stop posting in the thread and if they ignore that instruction they are reported to the bitcointalk.org moderators who can then take action.

ActM Thread does not want to censor anyone and certainly doesn't want to have that reputation, however for the sake of genuine shareholders who deserve a clean thread it is necessary to continue to remove posts which don't follow these simple rules.

Regards,

ActM Thread

[klondike_bar]

There are two, easy to follow rules for posting in this thread which can be found in the original post.

They are:

1. Please do not post image macros.
2. Please do not post highly offensive or hurtful remarks. (swearing to express oneself is not an issue)

In addition to that, all trolling posts will be removed no matter who posts them and all posts made by well known trolls are automatically deleted.  If suspicious posts are made the posting history is examined and if necessary a warning is given to that person.  If they continue to troll they are asked to stop posting in the thread and if they ignore that instruction they are reported to the bitcointalk.org moderators who can then take action.

ActM Thread does not want to censor anyone and certainly doesn't want to have that reputation, however for the sake of genuine shareholders who deserve a clean thread it is necessary to continue to remove posts which don't follow these simple rules.

Regards,

ActM Thread

I have been censored from the thread countless times, and I dont think any of the posts were for trolling.

I own[ed] ACTM shares on btct, but sold them off when the trading went down. Looking back, I am glad I did so because there has been ZERO progress in the past (four?) months.

Initial proof of ACTM hashrate; competitor systems deployed in an actm datacenter  not a vote of confidence in your own stuff
55nm chips that are to be sold to 3rd parties and also mined with in ACTM's own data center? : cancelled all that work and investment down the drain - unless there was only a $1000 investment loss as suggested a few pages back?
28nm chips : announced as what seems like a delay and pacification tactic after the failure to create a working 55nm chip

I am trying hard to not be offensive and to stay on-topic. The problem is that ACTM is so far behind on all of its promises that there is little or no visible value to the company. At best, there are a few guys who have half-developed designs for a 55nm chip and perhaps a 1/4 scale drawing of it which they have labelled '28nm revision'

This is not trolling. This is asking for answers, proof, documents, ANYTHING BUT 'its covered by an NDA'

[chsados]

Ken, we have been waiting on chips since the end of last year. You have kept us largely in the dark as our competition has been ramping up. Remember that you started ACTM so that you could provide a quicker solution to bitcoin mining? Is this going to happen? Or is all of the money going to drain out of this company before it does? Ken, get your act together. Get help where you need help to get this project completed promptly, or liquidate the public shares. Get people involved that have a passion for bitcoin mining and pay them with the company's half of the shares. I know that there have been a lot of mishaps and things out of your control. That's partly how the bitcoin world is right now, everything moves so fast. Either you can handle the task at hand in this environment and provide a return to the investors or you cannot. Do you have what it takes? If not, throw in the towel. If so, get us something to show for all this time and money.

Well written, so do I have what it takes you ask, well ask again in about 14 days.

Lol the new famous two weeks!

Ken, I'm going to once again shut my mouth for now - I am sure that you already are aware that nearly all shareholders have lost all faith and hopefully you can restore it with physical evidence and not just words.

[zumzero]

...nil illegitimus caborundum as they say, looking forward to hearing something good.

+1

[chsados]

Timer removed. End time: 2014-04-01+00:00:00UTC  

Until we get some sufficient evidence, information, shares, etc else I will be filing a complaint here once above timer ends.

I have made initial contact with this law firm as well in preparation.  If this "news" in "two weeks" is the same old words of little value then I will proceed further.

If anyone would like to join me feel free to PM me at the appropriate time (2014-04-01)

Your move Ken.


// I expect this to get censored.

[addi]

I don't want to wait 14 days on whatever news you got for me.

I want access to my shares. That is the big thing that concerns me above all. Colored coins isn't ready yet and it makes no sense at all to wait for that. Use direct shares or use havelock. Just do it.

[noah tall]

I want access to my shares.

crypto-trade.com is up and running great.  As an added bonus, ACTIVEMININGCORP is already set up to trade.

Ken, can you get the rest of the shares listed there and shut these people up (I mean respond favourably to customer requests)?

[finlof]

I want access to my shares.

crypto-trade.com is up and running great.  As an added bonus, ACTIVEMININGCORP is already set up to trade.

Ken, can you get the rest of the shares listed there and shut these people up (I mean respond favourably to customer requests)?

hell on that note he already listed some on https://cryptostocks.com/ so why not just put the shares there?

[keepinithamsta]

Ken, we have been waiting on chips since the end of last year. You have kept us largely in the dark as our competition has been ramping up. Remember that you started ACTM so that you could provide a quicker solution to bitcoin mining? Is this going to happen? Or is all of the money going to drain out of this company before it does? Ken, get your act together. Get help where you need help to get this project completed promptly, or liquidate the public shares. Get people involved that have a passion for bitcoin mining and pay them with the company's half of the shares. I know that there have been a lot of mishaps and things out of your control. That's partly how the bitcoin world is right now, everything moves so fast. Either you can handle the task at hand in this environment and provide a return to the investors or you cannot. Do you have what it takes? If not, throw in the towel. If so, get us something to show for all this time and money.

Well written, so do I have what it takes you ask, well ask again in about 14 days.

And then in 14 days, ask again in an additional 14 days because there will be another setback that makes no sense.

[damiano]

Havelock would be ideal.  I'm sure they would like the added volume.

Share verification should be easy

[addi]

Havelock would be ideal.  I'm sure they would like the added volume.

Share verification should be easy

Agreed

[Jasun7211]

C-T is fine.  They will be growing a lot over the next few months.  We probably won't be trading soon anyway.  The whole C-T situation was a moot point for us activemining shareholders.  If anything the whole ordeal gave me more confidence that they are the best fit for now.  They saw a problem, and acted proactively.  Their security flaw came eight after and due to them upgrading their site.  Who knows Havelock can be next with disasterous results. Ill take the C-T team anyday.

[Rodyland]

Well written, so do I have what it takes you ask, well ask again in about 14 days.

And then in 14 days, ask again in an additional 14 days because there will be another setback that makes no sense.

Quoted for truthyness and predictionability.

My 2 uBit, the non-update will be defended vehemently by those that were defending the last non-update and those that made excuses for shareholder news being broken to us by a third party news article.

I so very much want to be wrong.  On the plus side, the losses incurred by relatively paltry shareholding pale into insignificance compared to other dud investments I've made.

[Sahtor]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=106373.msg5605829#msg5605829
ChromaWallet runs on mainnet for the first time. Still not ready for use.

[knybe]

Well written, so do I have what it takes you ask, well ask again in about 14 days.

And then in 14 days, ask again in an additional 14 days because there will be another setback that makes no sense.

Quoted for truthyness and predictionability.

My 2 uBit, the non-update will be defended vehemently by those that were defending the last non-update and those that made excuses for shareholder news being broken to us by a third party news article.

I so very much want to be wrong.  On the plus side, the losses incurred by relatively paltry shareholding pale into insignificance compared to other dud investments I've made.

amen brother. we live we learn… and learn and learn and etc.

[knybe]

Colored coins development update

[st4nl3y]

Colored coins development update

seems like the lead dev doesn't want to lead the project anymore..  our shares should be listed on either havelock or CT.

[noah tall]

... our shares should be listed on either havelock or CT.

Crypto-Trade, it's the obvious choice.

[arousedrhino]

... our shares should be listed on either havelock or CT.

Crypto-Trade, it's the obvious choice.

Obvious how? What benefits does it have over Havelock? I for one don't see any unless you think its UI is better.