[ANN][POOL] Mining Pool Hub - Multipool. Multialgo, Auto Exchange to any coin.

[maczadus]

Can you exchange out of BTC after its already been auto exchanged? If so, where do I do that?

[Lercker]

Can you exchange out of BTC after its already been auto exchanged? If so, where do I do that?

Once it is on the exchange it is there until it has been exchanged. Also if you mean exchange btc back into another coin the answer is no. The BTC wallet is not actually active on the auto exchange, just a final destination. Unless MPH has changed that since the last time that was asked.

[Lercker]

So i tried your MultiPoolMiner.

Hmm, been mining Monacoin over the night and my hash rates were 68MH/s with a single 1080ti. I only used one card to test your script.
Yet the pool only reports 35MH/s. Care to share where the rest went to. Donation is switched off. Not that I wouldn't donate, but for testing purposes it was set to off. Please explain to me why I only see half the hash rates on the pool. Your script chose Palgins CCminer, but my other rigs use Nahashi and the hash rates are normal.

Also, even though I entered my username in the start bat file, there are still over 30 files that contain your workernames in them and they are being used when bench-marked.

MPM actually has Nanashi, two versions actually. You can disable Palgin by going into the miners folder and select the Palgin ccminer and right click and select edit, and place a # in front of Lyra2v2. You can then do the same to enable both Nanashi's, just remove the #.

[ProFlyer]

How to check my workers is connected and its hashrate on miningpool hub?

Miner's working with no result on MPH

EWBF's Zcash CUDA miner. 0.3.4b

Current pool: europe.equihash-hub.miningpoolhub.com:17023
INFO: Selected pools: 1
INFO: Solver: Auto.
INFO: Devices: All.
INFO: Temperature limit: 90
INFO: Api: Listen on 0.0.0.0:4028

08:52:33: GPU1 Accepted share 43ms [A:7, R:0]
Temp: GPU0: 56C GPU1: 59C GPU2: 59C GPU3: 63C GPU4: 60C
GPU0: 472 Sol/s GPU1: 472 Sol/s GPU2: 472 Sol/s GPU3: 477 Sol/s GPU4: 439 Sol/s
Total speed: 2332 Sol/s
INFO: Detected new work: 670e

[jp1981]

So i tried your MultiPoolMiner.

Hmm, been mining Monacoin over the night and my hash rates were 68MH/s with a single 1080ti. I only used one card to test your script.
Yet the pool only reports 35MH/s. Care to share where the rest went to. Donation is switched off. Not that I wouldn't donate, but for testing purposes it was set to off. Please explain to me why I only see half the hash rates on the pool. Your script chose Palgins CCminer, but my other rigs use Nahashi and the hash rates are normal.

Also, even though I entered my username in the start bat file, there are still over 30 files that contain your workernames in them and they are being used when bench-marked.

MPM actually has Nanashi, two versions actually. You can disable Palgin by going into the miners folder and select the Palgin ccminer and right click and select edit, and place a # in front of Lyra2v2. You can then do the same to enable both Nanashi's, just remove the #.

Thank you for your reply. However, why does the miner report 68MH/s yet only half of it ends on the pool? Where is the rest going?

[Cryptographertm]

So were all leaving MPH then?

Whats the next best pool? Ive only ever used one, just started. But if people are being stolen from Im going to have to look around I guess.

What? nobody is leaving MPH, stolen from???!!! What are you talking about lol. just an issue they're having with lyra2re2

It's not their problem. It's miner's/algo's problem - I got pretty much identical results from both MPH  and Suprnova. I'm now mining equihash with EWBF and so far I'm happy with what I see (hash rate is what I expect).

This.
I have switched to equihash and it seems closer to the expected.
It is still early to say 100% I will report in a couple of days

very strange to see so many accounts with less than 10 posts all registered around the same date and only having posted in this thread.

All of them saying only good things about MPH.

I think maybe MPH is these accounts. Even more weird.

[maczadus]

so i have read people wanna to leave MPH and some people showing some tests. Is this pool ligit or are people running for the hills?

I raised my power two days ago on 19 MH/s. Instead of increasing my profits, I get less coins than before. The whole network did not grow in capacity. So it is not necessary to say here that the coin network itself is to blame for this. So the pool steals and does not act honestly. This is the coin of XZC.

for me too with zcoin. From the 9th of December the number of coins mined fell about 20-25%.

2 farms (~173mh\s and ~75mh\s) in different locations, the result is the same, the loss of 20-25% of coins

Please don't assume it's stealing. There are many reasons for losses in real pools.

So i tried your MultiPoolMiner.

Hmm, been mining Monacoin over the night and my hash rates were 68MH/s with a single 1080ti. I only used one card to test your script.
Yet the pool only reports 35MH/s. Care to share where the rest went to. Donation is switched off. Not that I wouldn't donate, but for testing purposes it was set to off. Please explain to me why I only see half the hash rates on the pool. Your script chose Palgins CCminer, but my other rigs use Nahashi and the hash rates are normal.

Also, even though I entered my username in the start bat file, there are still over 30 files that contain your workernames in them and they are being used when bench-marked.

I was directed here from some reddit forums suggested as a nicehash alternative. My non-profitable GTX 680 (I ordered some new cards) is showing inconsistent results like posted here. Digibyte-Skein Pool page says 21.47 MH/S, but Ive consistently been around 70MH/S. I'd say 10-20% I wouldnt even question, but less than 50% is pretty huge. What steps can we take to trousbleshoot? Switch coins, switch miners? I'm using ccminer-x64-2.2.3-cuda9.

From website

Code:

Hashrate
21.47
MH/s
0
43

Miner log:

Code:

[2017-12-12 23:57:58] accepted: 1/1 (diff 18.163), 69.15 MH/s yes!

[Cryptographertm]

I am also missing about 50% of the coin Ive mined there.

It went to auto exchange the other day and vanished from balance, I received about half back, the other half is just gone. Been a couple days now.

Also my payouts have been progressively less since the day I started. Same hashrate in console, yet getting half the coin.

[Lercker]

somebody can explain to me where is my balance going on?
i mine BTG with autoexchange to BTC
1. i recive BTG to unconfirmed (Credited for Auto Exchange)
2. then it become confirmed
3. after that i see my balance on BTG (On Exchange)
4. AND NOW, i already 5 hours look at situation that BTG (On Exchange) = 0 and BTC - not changed,
and not have any additional information, where is my money now
are it is in the transefer now? i didnt undestood...

pls help me somebody who already undestand how it works

Sometimes there is a delay on the balance page and the coins are still actually on the exchange. Everything is done as a group buy, so the pool may have sold some BTG but not all that went at that time. When that happens it can make coins look like there are in limbo. If no BTC has shown up by the 12 hour mark (do actually check your BTC wallet not the balance page), or BTG does not pop back up as on exchange email MPH(contact@miningpoolhub.com).

[Lercker]

How to check my workers is connected and its hashrate on miningpool hub?

Miner's working with no result on MPH

EWBF's Zcash CUDA miner. 0.3.4b

Current pool: europe.equihash-hub.miningpoolhub.com:17023
INFO: Selected pools: 1
INFO: Solver: Auto.
INFO: Devices: All.
INFO: Temperature limit: 90
INFO: Api: Listen on 0.0.0.0:4028

08:52:33: GPU1 Accepted share 43ms [A:7, R:0]
Temp: GPU0: 56C GPU1: 59C GPU2: 59C GPU3: 63C GPU4: 60C
GPU0: 472 Sol/s GPU1: 472 Sol/s GPU2: 472 Sol/s GPU3: 477 Sol/s GPU4: 439 Sol/s
Total speed: 2332 Sol/s
INFO: Detected new work: 670e

You need to check the dashboard of the coin you are mining. Check the what coin the hub is mining on the main page and hope it is up to date and/or you have not switched already. It can be a pain, but MPH is working on a universal dashboard.

[Lercker]

So i tried your MultiPoolMiner.

Hmm, been mining Monacoin over the night and my hash rates were 68MH/s with a single 1080ti. I only used one card to test your script.
Yet the pool only reports 35MH/s. Care to share where the rest went to. Donation is switched off. Not that I wouldn't donate, but for testing purposes it was set to off. Please explain to me why I only see half the hash rates on the pool. Your script chose Palgins CCminer, but my other rigs use Nahashi and the hash rates are normal.

Also, even though I entered my username in the start bat file, there are still over 30 files that contain your workernames in them and they are being used when bench-marked.

MPM actually has Nanashi, two versions actually. You can disable Palgin by going into the miners folder and select the Palgin ccminer and right click and select edit, and place a # in front of Lyra2v2. You can then do the same to enable both Nanashi's, just remove the #.

Thank you for your reply. However, why does the miner report 68MH/s yet only half of it ends on the pool? Where is the rest going?

The short answer is it is a ccminer stratum issue with the Lyra aglos. Some play nicely better than others. Some pools stratums are set up differently too.

[Lercker]

I was directed here from some reddit forums suggested as a nicehash alternative. My non-profitable GTX 680 (I ordered some new cards) is showing inconsistent results like posted here. Digibyte-Skein Pool page says 21.47 MH/S, but Ive consistently been around 70MH/S. I'd say 10-20% I wouldnt even question, but less than 50% is pretty huge. What steps can we take to trousbleshoot? Switch coins, switch miners? I'm using ccminer-x64-2.2.3-cuda9.

From website

Code:

Hashrate
21.47
MH/s
0
43

Miner log:

Code:

[2017-12-12 23:57:58] accepted: 1/1 (diff 18.163), 69.15 MH/s yes!

This is just a guess, but since you have a low hash rate a lot your shares are not making it through. You can try a static diff if you are mining Digibyte (only some pools have static diff at MPH, most only have vardiff). Just put sd=18(?) in your password (I don't know what number for you to use).

[Cryptographertm]

owner will not reply to emails about my missing funds or hash rate. FYI

[Minerdc]

So were all leaving MPH then?

Whats the next best pool? Ive only ever used one, just started. But if people are being stolen from Im going to have to look around I guess.

What? nobody is leaving MPH, stolen from???!!! What are you talking about lol. just an issue they're having with lyra2re2

It's not their problem. It's miner's/algo's problem - I got pretty much identical results from both MPH  and Suprnova. I'm now mining equihash with EWBF and so far I'm happy with what I see (hash rate is what I expect).

This.
I have switched to equihash and it seems closer to the expected.
It is still early to say 100% I will report in a couple of days

very strange to see so many accounts with less than 10 posts all registered around the same date and only having posted in this thread.

All of them saying only good things about MPH.

I think maybe MPH is these accounts. Even more weird.

Did you hear about nicehash hack?
Lol

[johnnix]

Hello all,

Can anyone please advice a newbie how to check the real hashrate as the one reported from ccminer is different than the one I see on MinningPoolHub. I was mining VTC for a while and both reported rates were pretty much close but now that I switched to ZCoin there is a great difference.

I am very sorry if this question has been already answered.

Regards

[nazzer]

Can anyone please advice a newbie how to check the real hashrate as the one reported from ccminer is different than the one I see on MinningPoolHub. I was mining VTC for a while and both reported rates were pretty much close but now that I switched to ZCoin there is a great difference.

Loads of people who moved in from Nicehash it seems ...

Short answer:
Most pools have problems with ZCoin. Suprnova had a warning: this coin is a nightmare.

Longer answer:
There seems to be quite a few versions of CCMiner around. Most of them have issues with ZCoin and Mona/VTC.

For ZCoin - using djm34 version of ccminer seems to do the trick (GTX1070, intensity 20, Linux) for me.

https://github.com/djm34/ccminer-msvc2015

For Mona/VTC:

Using the Nanashi version appears to work well for Windows (1070, 1050ti).

https://github.com/Nanashi-Meiyo-Meijin/ccminer/releases/tag/v2.2-mod-r2

Hashing reporting rate on MPH tends to be a lot more inaccurate (and workers sometimes don't get registered properly).

Don't worry about hashing rate - instead, mine for 1 hour, take a look at transactions coming in and compare that against hash rate calculators. +/- 10% and you're golden.

Other ccminer versions:

ccminer-2.2.2 / 2.2.3 trpruvot seems to work most times.

ccminer-klaust -- this one doesn't work for me.


YMMV

[banec]

Auto Exchange and frontend work properly ?

[nazzer]

Auto Exchange and frontend work properly ?

I've seen Musicoin pop up after a week and credited to my BTC account ...

[johnnix]

Can anyone please advice a newbie how to check the real hashrate as the one reported from ccminer is different than the one I see on MinningPoolHub. I was mining VTC for a while and both reported rates were pretty much close but now that I switched to ZCoin there is a great difference.

Loads of people who moved in from Nicehash it seems ...

Short answer:
Most pools have problems with ZCoin. Suprnova had a warning: this coin is a nightmare.

Longer answer:
There seems to be quite a few versions of CCMiner around. Most of them have issues with ZCoin and Mona/VTC.

For ZCoin - using djm34 version of ccminer seems to do the trick (GTX1070, intensity 20, Linux) for me.

https://github.com/djm34/ccminer-msvc2015

For Mona/VTC:

Using the Nanashi version appears to work well for Windows (1070, 1050ti).

https://github.com/Nanashi-Meiyo-Meijin/ccminer/releases/tag/v2.2-mod-r2

Hashing reporting rate on MPH tends to be a lot more inaccurate (and workers sometimes don't get registered properly).

Don't worry about hashing rate - instead, mine for 1 hour, take a look at transactions coming in and compare that against hash rate calculators. +/- 10% and you're golden.

Other ccminer versions:

ccminer-2.2.2 / 2.2.3 trpruvot seems to work most times.

ccminer-klaust -- this one doesn't work for me.


YMMV

Thank you very much for your reply!

I am actually mining from the latest version of ethOS which I am not so sure about the ccminer version it offers, however mining VTC was no problem at all. Switching to ZCoin I noticed that my 1080ti's dropped 10 degrees Celsius in temperature (today I dropped fan speed to 40% and still no increase in temps), 30% down with power consumption and a reported 20 MH/s from ccminer. In the pool I see an average of 14 MH/s so this is why I have some concerns. Today around 5 pm I will have a full 24 hours of mining so I will compare the actual earnings with the ones reported by hash rate calculators and see how it goes?

[crypper]

I started recently mining VTC and MONA on Mining pool Hub and noticed that while my hash rate is around 210MH/s, on mining pool hub it is keeping on fluctuating between 60 and 90 MH/s only

Is this big fluctuation normal ?

If you using ccminer, yes it's normal as ccminer does not do well with lyra2re2.  Suggest replace with an optimised fork e.g. http://cryptomining-blog.com/9166-latest-ccminer-2-2-fork-by-nanashi-meiyo-meijin-for-monacoin-mining/

I'm already using the optimized nanashi fork

I'd watch out with the cryptomining-blog ccminer link.  Comments on the page show it comes up as virus (same for me) and people had coins stolen after using this download.

Yeah it gets virus flagged so I'm taking a risk making an exception for it.  But I think it's very likely a false positive and if it isn't I won't lose too much.  I'm seeing much better real hashrates on the site so it is definitely working better.  

It's quite common for miners to pop up as viruses, however I wouldn't download anything from cryptomining-blog; download it from github. A few days ago someone posted a virus on cryptomining-blog as "a new version of EWBF miner" (that  doesn't exist). That was spotted and deleted rather quickly, but some people suffered: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1707546.5360