Bitcoin Forum
December 07, 2016, 08:51:52 AM *
News: To be able to use the next phase of the beta forum software, please ensure that your email address is correct/functional.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 [17] 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 ... 150 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] Litecoin - a lite version of Bitcoin. Launched!  (Read 784063 times)
grod
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154


View Profile
October 13, 2011, 04:38:43 AM
 #321

Anyone else confirm/deny my observation of difficulty not going up?  Is the timestamp on the genesis block to blame here or should we be worried?
1481100712
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481100712

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481100712
Reply with quote  #2

1481100712
Report to moderator
1481100712
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481100712

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481100712
Reply with quote  #2

1481100712
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1481100712
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481100712

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481100712
Reply with quote  #2

1481100712
Report to moderator
1481100712
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481100712

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481100712
Reply with quote  #2

1481100712
Report to moderator
bulanula
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518



View Profile
October 13, 2011, 04:38:53 AM
 #322

Anybody wanna sell me 1000 LTC for 0.01 BTC !?
coblee
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1078


firstbits.com/1ce5j


View Profile WWW
October 13, 2011, 04:39:48 AM
 #323

Is it     "version" : 40100?  Not getting any new code from git pulls.


Sorry, I did not change version number.

Run this:

more src/main.cpp | grep "nHeight == 1500"

Does it give you something? If so, you have the latest code.

terrytibbs
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 560



View Profile
October 13, 2011, 04:40:11 AM
 #324

Anybody wanna sell me 1000 LTC for 0.01 BTC !?
We heard you the first time around.
coblee
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1078


firstbits.com/1ce5j


View Profile WWW
October 13, 2011, 04:40:34 AM
 #325

Anyone else confirm/deny my observation of difficulty not going up?  Is the timestamp on the genesis block to blame here or should we be worried?

Difficulty won't go up until block 4032. The timestamp from genesis block was more than 3.5 days ago.

grod
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154


View Profile
October 13, 2011, 04:42:10 AM
 #326

grep "nHeight == 1500" src/main.cpp
            (nHeight == 1500 && hash != uint256("0x841a2965955dd288cfa707a755d05a54e45f8bd476835ec9af4402a2b59a2967")))

Looks like git is correct.  I updated a few minutes into the mining and got a change.  Good to know.  So, how about that difficulty change (or lack thereof)?
twobits
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 336

Firstbits: 1a6taw


View Profile
October 13, 2011, 04:43:32 AM
 #327


make sure you also have 'server=1' in your config file.


ineededausername
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 784


bitcoin hundred-aire


View Profile
October 13, 2011, 04:44:17 AM
 #328

Crossed 1k LTC barrier!

(BFL)^2 < 0
ElectricMucus
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1540


Drama Junkie


View Profile
October 13, 2011, 04:45:59 AM
 #329

Crossed 1k LTC barrier!
agh still 0

how many connections does your daemon have?

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they keep laughing, then they start choking on their laughter, and then they go and catch their breath. Then they start laughing even more.
coblee
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1078


firstbits.com/1ce5j


View Profile WWW
October 13, 2011, 04:47:36 AM
 #330

grep "nHeight == 1500" src/main.cpp
            (nHeight == 1500 && hash != uint256("0x841a2965955dd288cfa707a755d05a54e45f8bd476835ec9af4402a2b59a2967")))

Looks like git is correct.  I updated a few minutes into the mining and got a change.  Good to know.  So, how about that difficulty change (or lack thereof)?

Already answered you.

Anyone else confirm/deny my observation of difficulty not going up?  Is the timestamp on the genesis block to blame here or should we be worried?

Difficulty won't go up until block 4032. The timestamp from genesis block was more than 3.5 days ago.

ripper234
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260


Ron Gross


View Profile WWW
October 13, 2011, 04:48:37 AM
 #331


I do.

Please do not pm me, use ron@bitcoin.org.il instead
Mastercoin Executive Director
Co-founder of the Israeli Bitcoin Association
Bobnova
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 210


View Profile
October 13, 2011, 04:48:58 AM
 #332

I'm at 7-8 connections, just hit a kLTC.

BTC:  1AURXf66t7pw65NwRiKukwPq1hLSiYLqbP
freequant
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 700


View Profile
October 13, 2011, 04:49:15 AM
 #333

Hey Coblee,

Can you please release a locked client on every retarget, starting 2016, then 4032 and so on?
At current difficulty, we have a lot of orphans that make the whole network loose a lot of time.
It's too easy for an attacker with even less than half the hashpower to catch up on his own branch where he gets no orphan blocks.
We need to prop up the security by locking in the retargets until the difficulty went high enough to make it unprofitable to forerun the chain.
twobits
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 336

Firstbits: 1a6taw


View Profile
October 13, 2011, 04:51:10 AM
 #334


Go back to using port 9332
9333 is the p2p port.

bulanula
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518



View Profile
October 13, 2011, 04:52:06 AM
 #335

Nobody wanna give me 1000 LTC for 0.01 BTC !?
Bobnova
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 210


View Profile
October 13, 2011, 04:53:07 AM
 #336

So where's the exchange? Cheesy

BTC:  1AURXf66t7pw65NwRiKukwPq1hLSiYLqbP
ElectricMucus
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1540


Drama Junkie


View Profile
October 13, 2011, 04:53:59 AM
 #337

Hmm it's the latency I guess  Huh
The most of the network is in the US and till my work gets there the block is orphaned. crap  Sad

Maybe such a fast network isn't optimal after all...

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they keep laughing, then they start choking on their laughter, and then they go and catch their breath. Then they start laughing even more.
bulanula
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518



View Profile
October 13, 2011, 04:55:58 AM
 #338

Hello Bitcointalk,

I'm back from the dead it appears.

Just wanted to say congrats to Coblee and I will not discuss anything related to Solidcoin in this thread.
This is the official Litecoin Thread and no reason to clutter it.

I have no LTC or have any involvement at all in the dev.

I have not mined Litecoin, yet and when I do I will so without EC2, meaning with real CPU's. I will not mine until the network has achieved diff/hash rate optimum.


Please if you guys want to discuss other topics, let's get with it in the other threads. Grin Grin Grin


~BCX~


Welcome back. Now tell us how much he paid you not to attack his scamchain and why you are so pro-LTC yet so anti Fairbrix. Thanks !
ripper234
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260


Ron Gross


View Profile WWW
October 13, 2011, 05:00:16 AM
 #339


Go back to using port 9332
9333 is the p2p port.


I switched to 9333 because I saw that the client was just not listening on port 9332, and was getting errors when I was trying to connec tto 9332.

Still, even running the client with gen=1 does not generate, the client is on 0% CPU.

Please do not pm me, use ron@bitcoin.org.il instead
Mastercoin Executive Director
Co-founder of the Israeli Bitcoin Association
coblee
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1078


firstbits.com/1ce5j


View Profile WWW
October 13, 2011, 05:00:32 AM
 #340

Hey Coblee,

Can you please release a locked client on every retarget, starting 2016, then 4032 and so on?
At current difficulty, we have a lot of orphans that make the whole network loose a lot of time.
It's too easy for an attacker with even less than half the hashpower to catch up on his own branch where he gets no orphan blocks.
We need to prop up the security by locking in the retargets until the difficulty went high enough to make it unprofitable to forerun the chain.


Will do. I can only check in new source and build windows client binary. I need help from twobits for windows daemon binary. But I will try to release at every diff change. Will wait for 4032 for next release.

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 [17] 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 ... 150 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!