Bitcoin Forum
December 07, 2016, 06:35:07 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.13.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 [56] 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 ... 150 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] Litecoin - a lite version of Bitcoin. Launched!  (Read 784185 times)
CAMOPEJB
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 127



View Profile
November 14, 2011, 11:21:25 PM
 #1101

hello,
could someone this 283-live-solidcoin24-and-btc-e-data-in-sierrachart software for e-btc ltc / ltc btc / usd modify?
cu
Here ya go: http://www.megaupload.com/?d=XRSUMTBF
If you're on Win you need first to install Python 2.7 (Not 3.xx !)
http://www.python.org/ftp/python/2.7.2/python-2.7.2.msi
Then start cmd and type:
PATH C:\Python27;%PATH%
To start script you type:
Python C:\src\solidchartfeed.py -s btceBTC -a 10
or
Python C:\src\solidchartfeed.py -s btceUSD -a 10
wow ... it works without problems. Thank you.
NP - just modified two numbers in source  Cool
Njoy  Wink
1481135707
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481135707

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481135707
Reply with quote  #2

1481135707
Report to moderator
1481135707
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481135707

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481135707
Reply with quote  #2

1481135707
Report to moderator
1481135707
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481135707

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481135707
Reply with quote  #2

1481135707
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1481135707
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481135707

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481135707
Reply with quote  #2

1481135707
Report to moderator
1481135707
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481135707

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481135707
Reply with quote  #2

1481135707
Report to moderator
1481135707
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481135707

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481135707
Reply with quote  #2

1481135707
Report to moderator
CAMOPEJB
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 127



View Profile
November 16, 2011, 11:05:34 AM
 #1102

hahaha! Someone is feeling threatened by LTC.....

http://blockexplorer.sytes.net/address/LgFZdGwKdwD4jN6i6Uh8Tom5bDJQtFxkRb

https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Litecoin&action=history

 Cheesy
tomba
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 81


View Profile
November 16, 2011, 12:29:26 PM
 #1103

I don't get what they are trying to achieve spamming those 0.00000001 sends, but the Wiki edits are priceless Smiley Luke-jr probably invested in some other cryptocoin Wink

If you appreciate my posts you can donate any number of Coins you like at
BTC 16MPWTomba4GUN1FU98DWmUKvVUr5ms3rs
LTC Lg15AdU4cYhfUttyd1n2LQYGNANkdqGWQ9
Matoking
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 352

Firstbits: 1m8xa


View Profile WWW
November 16, 2011, 06:35:59 PM
 #1104

Block chain updating.

I've got about 1700 transactions with the value of one 0.00000001 LTC and it's still increasing. Someone must've been REALLY bored.

BTC : 1CcpmVDLvR7DgA5deFGScoNhiEtiJnh6H4 - LTC : LYTnoXAHNsemMB2jhCSi1znQqnfupdRkSy
Bitcoin-otc
BitBin - earn bitcoins with your pastes!
ElectricMucus
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1540


Drama Junkie


View Profile
November 16, 2011, 06:49:37 PM
 #1105

While LTCs value finally seems to have gotten more stable something must be wrong with the reported difficulty.

I haven't gotten a block since almost 2 weeks, am I just unlucky?

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they keep laughing, then they start choking on their laughter, and then they go and catch their breath. Then they start laughing even more.
boonies4u
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 826



View Profile
November 16, 2011, 08:02:17 PM
 #1106

While LTCs value finally seems to have gotten more stable something must be wrong with the reported difficulty.

I haven't gotten a block since almost 2 weeks, am I just unlucky?

You must be solo mining, so yes, probably.
kano
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1932


Linux since 1997 RedHat 4


View Profile
November 16, 2011, 09:02:49 PM
 #1107

LOL ah Luke is a moron sometimes ... that's funny.
Maybe you should just ban him from editing the wiki since he's just being destructive and isn't that a reason for banning an account?

Pool: https://kano.is BTC: 1KanoiBupPiZfkwqB7rfLXAzPnoTshAVmb
CKPool and CGMiner developer, IRC FreeNode #ckpool and #cgminer kanoi
Help keep Bitcoin secure by mining on pools with Stratum, the best protocol to mine Bitcoins with ASIC hardware
Schwede65
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 309


View Profile
November 17, 2011, 09:07:32 AM
 #1108


Is it possible to get rid of these spammings?

Is BTC protected against such things?

Client-update LTC?

ehmdjii
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350


View Profile
November 17, 2011, 09:29:54 AM
 #1109

is there a litecoin mining pool that allows connections on port 80? thanks!

BTC: 1LsD5HpnX1Kfyti7CnHiVB1rjUEXGqmR2H
LTC: LQbpdMZmYyJa9bJG6NweBNxkSTfgZorkrG
terrytibbs
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 560



View Profile
November 17, 2011, 09:31:38 AM
 #1110

is there a litecoin mining pool that allows connections on port 80? thanks!
Pool-X does: http://pool-x.eu/gettingstarted
tomba
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 81


View Profile
November 17, 2011, 10:31:07 AM
 #1111


Is it possible to get rid of these spammings?

Is BTC protected against such things?

Client-update LTC?


I'd like to see this fixed also. BTC-e.com has suspended deposits which leaves 111 of my LTC's in limbo...

If you appreciate my posts you can donate any number of Coins you like at
BTC 16MPWTomba4GUN1FU98DWmUKvVUr5ms3rs
LTC Lg15AdU4cYhfUttyd1n2LQYGNANkdqGWQ9
kano
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1932


Linux since 1997 RedHat 4


View Profile
November 17, 2011, 10:38:47 AM
 #1112

Meanwhile ... on the subject of the micro txn spam ...
Hmm I guess it must be someone who visits this forum.

Up to now, I've received just over 1,000 micro txn's and all to the address I list in my sig (none to any other address)
Does seem a rather odd way to do it.
If anyone wants addresses they can just look in the block-chain Tongue

For me, litecoind is working fine - no problems so far.
Apparently BTC-e is having trouble with it (according to comments in the chat box)
Though, with BTC-e they will just keep all the micro-txn's they get since they already keep any amount they receive below 0.0001 LTC

As I've said in the other thread, I don't really see an issue with it since Litecoin should be able to handle it.
However, is anyone considering actually posting in here a fee/txn limit like gmaxwell suggested (except his are way too high)
and I'm wondering if we'd need to pretty much shutdown everyone and restart to make sure there are no fork issues for people accepting or not accepting the txn's?

Certainly if the fee was implemented I'd suggest a much lower one - maybe like 0.001 for txn's under 1 LTC (with a definite review of those 2 numbers in a month if the value of LTC increases)

Pretty suspicious that gmaxwell posts that just before it happened.
Either he knew about it indirectly from the culprits or is involved in it.

Pool: https://kano.is BTC: 1KanoiBupPiZfkwqB7rfLXAzPnoTshAVmb
CKPool and CGMiner developer, IRC FreeNode #ckpool and #cgminer kanoi
Help keep Bitcoin secure by mining on pools with Stratum, the best protocol to mine Bitcoins with ASIC hardware
bulanula
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518



View Profile
November 17, 2011, 10:39:56 AM
 #1113

This needs to be fixed. Probably some SC trolls.
terrytibbs
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 560



View Profile
November 17, 2011, 10:40:36 AM
 #1114

Pretty suspicious that gmaxwell posts that just before it happened.
Either he knew about it indirectly from the culprits or is involved in it.
There is no doubt in my mind that gmaxwell is not the person spamming us with transactions.
kano
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1932


Linux since 1997 RedHat 4


View Profile
November 17, 2011, 10:46:13 AM
 #1115

Pretty suspicious that gmaxwell posts that just before it happened.
Either he knew about it indirectly from the culprits or is involved in it.
There is no doubt in my mind that gmaxwell is not the person spamming us with transactions.
Then he must have heard about it before it was going to happen.
I don't really care either way - just it would have been better to post his thread in here with comments for coblee (or you or whoever) to discuss and suggest a change - posting a code change in his own thread is pretty much pointless.
coblee around?
Anyone else have access to the git?
Any change should be agreed upon and be in the official git before anyone else starts posting changes anywhere else.

Edit: yes this isn't SolidCoin 2.0 Cheesy no one should be dictating anything

Pool: https://kano.is BTC: 1KanoiBupPiZfkwqB7rfLXAzPnoTshAVmb
CKPool and CGMiner developer, IRC FreeNode #ckpool and #cgminer kanoi
Help keep Bitcoin secure by mining on pools with Stratum, the best protocol to mine Bitcoins with ASIC hardware
coblee
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1078


firstbits.com/1ce5j


View Profile WWW
November 17, 2011, 10:49:16 AM
 #1116

Pretty suspicious that gmaxwell posts that just before it happened.
Either he knew about it indirectly from the culprits or is involved in it.
There is no doubt in my mind that gmaxwell is not the person spamming us with transactions.

I'm guessing gmaxwell's post got someone to start thinking what would happen if there were a ton of these small transactions. And he's testing that out. The current fees for Litecoin is way too low because we are using the same fees as Bitcoin. But since the value of an LTC is about 1/200 of that of BTC, we would need to have fees about 200x that of Bitcoin to deter this behavior. I'm going to make the minimum transaction fee for Litecoin be 0.1 LTC for transactions that are large and low-priority.

This change will not fork the chain, because clients are not going to reject blocks with transactions containing too little fees. This just prevents transactions with too little fees to be propagted or put into blocks by clients/miners running this new code.

I'm working on testing out the code right now to make sure everything is ok. Will release the source and binary soon.

terrytibbs
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 560



View Profile
November 17, 2011, 10:52:23 AM
 #1117

I'm guessing gmaxwell's post got someone to start thinking what would happen if there were a ton of these small transactions. And he's testing that out. The current fees for Litecoin is way too low because we are using the same fees as Bitcoin. But since the value of an LTC is about 1/200 of that of BTC, we would need to have fees about 200x that of Bitcoin to deter this behavior. I'm going to make the minimum transaction fee for Litecoin be 0.1 LTC for transactions that are large and low-priority.

This change will not fork the chain, because clients are not going to reject blocks with transactions containing too little fees. This just prevents transactions with too little fees to be propagted or put into blocks by clients/miners running this new code.

I'm working on testing out the code right now to make sure everything is ok. Will release the source and binary soon.
This is not going to stop the spammer from confirming these transactions by himself, but it's a step in the right direction.
kano
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1932


Linux since 1997 RedHat 4


View Profile
November 17, 2011, 10:55:21 AM
 #1118

...
Edit: yes this isn't SolidCoin 2.0 Cheesy no one should be dictating anything
Your not even going to take input from anyone about it?
Wouldn't hurt to get other input on the subject from the forum users (i.e. give it a day for people to respond)

Pool: https://kano.is BTC: 1KanoiBupPiZfkwqB7rfLXAzPnoTshAVmb
CKPool and CGMiner developer, IRC FreeNode #ckpool and #cgminer kanoi
Help keep Bitcoin secure by mining on pools with Stratum, the best protocol to mine Bitcoins with ASIC hardware
terrytibbs
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 560



View Profile
November 17, 2011, 11:07:51 AM
 #1119

...
Edit: yes this isn't SolidCoin 2.0 Cheesy no one should be dictating anything
Your not even going to take input from anyone about it?
Wouldn't hurt to get other input on the subject from the forum users (i.e. give it a day for people to respond)
People respond by using, or not using, the new client.
coblee
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1078


firstbits.com/1ce5j


View Profile WWW
November 17, 2011, 11:10:59 AM
 #1120

...
Edit: yes this isn't SolidCoin 2.0 Cheesy no one should be dictating anything
Your not even going to take input from anyone about it?
Wouldn't hurt to get other input on the subject from the forum users (i.e. give it a day for people to respond)

I've been talking to a lot of people about this issue on IRC. At first, I wasn't going to do anything about it b/c the guy isn't totally malicious. He's actually donating coins to people. But it seems like he's not going to stop and the size of the chain is growing big. And since our fees are too low, he can keep doing this forever and it won't cost him much. So it makes sense to increase the fees to make it at least cost something to perform this DDoS spam attack.

Since I believe this change is pretty harmless, I didn't think we needed to have a long discussion about this. If you think 0.1 LTC is too little or too much or if you have another way to solve this problem, please post it. We can always put in a better fix later. But I think I need to act now to address this problem.

Pages: « 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 [56] 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 ... 150 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!