✅ SwCPoker.club ♣️ BITCOIN POKER SINCE 2015 🏆 24/7 BTC Tournaments & Cash Games

[dougpolka]

Client is super bugged since last update (which as far as I can tell didn't solve any of the old bugs):

New bugs:
Can't see my own cards after folding
resizing table often freezes it and I have to close it and reopen
Enter key doesn't work in notes, can only write in one long line

Old bugs:
If I call a bet on turn and river goes check check, I don't get to see opponent hole cards
When moving into time bank bet size is reset
Alerts are sounding for players other than me
Alerts are sounding when they shouldn't (if I am waiting for time bank, I will get 2 alerts of one type and 2 alerts of another type... 2 of one type is enough)
With chips already on the table, I can't add chips, unless it's to a certain minimum (table minimum or previous highest stack). Minimum should only apply when I have zero chips. Previous highest should not apply if I lost the chips I had.

Nice to haves:
Allow editing notes in replayer
Add street buttons in replayer (click in street to move to start of street)
Give some reward for krill 50, as far as I can tell you get nothing for it now (no rake improvement and no freerolls)
Make the color labeling a bit more distinct in the UI

[1Braindead]

Nice to haves:
Allow editing notes in replayer
Add street buttons in replayer (click in street to move to start of street)
Give some reward for krill 50, as far as I can tell you get nothing for it now (no rake improvement and no freerolls)
Make the color labeling a bit more distinct in the UI

Yeah, the hand replayer is dire and IMO it cannot be fixed in the current form, it has to be rewritten from scratch.

Some points

• Jump buttons to streets and showdown according to game type (Preflop/Flop/Turn/River/Showdown in HE and Omaha, betting and drawing rounds in draw games, streets in stud games ...)
• Display all known cards, final pot size and outcome (win/loss tally for each player) at any point during the replay. You can add a "hide spoilers" option but IMO it's more useful to know these things in order to decide whether the hand is worth reviewing or not).
  
• Navigate back and forth and jump to preset points quickly, without having to endure any animations or delays. The "movie mode" replay where you click a play button and wait for stuff to happen is the worst. It may be useful to some but it should never be the default.
• Database browser where you can sort, search and filter hands according to game type, pot size, outcome, hole cards, players involved, whether the hand went to showdown and if not the street where it ended etc.

I concur with the color coding suggestion, one more thing: the color choice is uninspired, for example Violet and Fuchsia look about the same.

[TimtheYoutuber]

Good luck to everyone in the Big BTC tournament, I might hop in the mix

[Crypt0xxx]

Hand history is like live poker with regards to folded hands.  

But still you could have that option to see you own folded hand

Guaranteed tourneys need a certain amount of people to run.  So if ur the only one registered they can’t just say ‘welp, he registered so let’s give him the guaranteed prize’

I cannot be sure it was really cancelled before proper time or no, even though I think it was. So never mind. I am sorry if I was mistaken.

You want lower stakes but not free rolls or rake free micros cause that’s ‘nothing’ but wait I thought everyone wasn’t rich.  

Off course I want freerolls.
I just want more people on the site, so I suggest the ways as I see it. May be I am wrong. But lower stakes must be ether rake free or not IMHO
But first priority must be is fixing the bugs, especially one with that check/fold check/call mark, just f... move to the left side there it should be, and the speed of the game will raise a lot. Also one with time bank and blinds. It's slowing everything. I don't understand why the people who design and code don't go spend some time playing.

And another 'bug' - on web you actually can't use the mode which automatically bring up active table, because it's very dangerous as well. So nobody probably use it. Another issue which is slowing all the games...

The post takes a psychological nose dive when u end it thinking they might give you a free ticket or reward for your post.   The haha but then a 😐 emoji is like hey hey I’m kidding but I’m not.  

I’m gonna bet they don’t give u a reward for your post.

Nobody is perfect and so am I.
I don't really care if I get reward or not. Don't know why did I decide to share my experience in the first place. Just want to improve situation.

But I think the first thing is the attitude. For now I am not sure that is the idea. Just be one on the many low traffic rooms surviving or really willing to do the real thing.

[CryptoMaven]

Alerts are sounding for players other than me

Yeah, I often hear that low two-tone beep as other people are timing out. I'm thinking why am I being warned about other players inattentiveness.

[SwC_Poker]

SOON

[vavvio]

Site suggestions:

A option to show or hide balance, or have the balance switched so its in the cashier when you're playing in front of others.

A hand replayer similar to pokerstars where you can scroll through hands and go straight to the hand you want to view instead of clicking every hand to see one particular hand and maybe a highest to smallest pot view option.

Option to filter more than one stake.

Option to filter more then one game format.

Option to filter more then one seat.

Thx.

[Betwrong]

I was planning to play in 3 yesterday's satellites for the The BIG BTC!, but, unfortunately, couldn't make it to be online in the proper time. Congrats to all the 10 winners! Even the 10th place was awarded with a pretty good prize, 0.025 BTC! 95 players were enrolled this time, and considering that most of them were good players, it was surely not that easy to finish in the top 10.

[tokeweed]

Nice to haves:
Allow editing notes in replayer
Add street buttons in replayer (click in street to move to start of street)
Give some reward for krill 50, as far as I can tell you get nothing for it now (no rake improvement and no freerolls)
Make the color labeling a bit more distinct in the UI

And whatever feature Stars would be good to have at SWC.    No seriously.  Stars has still by far the best UI experience in the business.  I seem to play more hours in there than any other poker site.

[vavvio]

Why doesn't swcpoker get more traffic? I know i now bitcoin and anonymous owners, but no one is saying to deposit your whole bankroll on the site, deposit the amount of buyins you need to play and if you need more it takes less than 15 minutes to deposit more, is there a reason swcpoker don't have a rep on 2+2 and push their site more answer players questions? does it have anything to do with the legal bs? or is it more -> small poker site less hassle from the government as in they won't bother them, or is it if they become a bigger traffic site governments might take a interest and try to shut them down again? I see this question asked a lot by many players, could someone explain the reasoning why they don't advertise more?

I like the site and be cool to see more traffic and why i ask, but if this post is in anyway -EV for the site delete it.

[Betwrong]

~
Give some reward for krill 50, as far as I can tell you get nothing for it now (no rake improvement and no freerolls)
~

Yeah, having something for 50 Krill would be really nice, cause right now I'm approaching this mark.



I think another cash game with stakes 1/2 can get me there.

~ I seem to play more hours in there than any other poker site.

Me too! Great site. I used to play on betcoinpoker, but they have changed recently, and I don't like the current layout and disappearance of numerous daily tournaments. SWC poker is great in this regard, every time you visit the site you can either make a late registration or register for a tournament that will start in several minutes.

[BTCevo]

Why doesn't swcpoker get more traffic? I know i now bitcoin and anonymous owners, but no one is saying to deposit your whole bankroll on the site, deposit the amount of buyins you need to play and if you need more it takes less than 15 minutes to deposit more, is there a reason swcpoker don't have a rep on 2+2 and push their site more answer players questions? does it have anything to do with the legal bs? or is it more -> small poker site less hassle from the government as in they won't bother them, or is it if they become a bigger traffic site governments might take a interest and try to shut them down again? I see this question asked a lot by many players, could someone explain the reasoning why they don't advertise more?

I like the site and be cool to see more traffic and why i ask, but if this post is in anyway -EV for the site delete it.

Not just swcpoker but every poker sites have this kind of problem because first it takes times when we played. Second, you really need many players to make sure it will generate more money, the money flow will be good. If you compare to other games like dice then it is really hard to tell. But swcpoker do have big members before they relaunch. You should checked on their past history

[SwC_Poker]

We know our players want a bigger poker room and we want that too. SwC believes the path to a bigger site starts with improving the software. To capture a bigger share of the market our product must improve so when new players first play it there are no bugs. We will introduce Leaderboards soon and we will continue to run the promotions we are running today, but our focus will be on building better software, not marketing.

[mitchr4]

Why doesn't swcpoker get more traffic? I know i now bitcoin and anonymous owners, but no one is saying to deposit your whole bankroll on the site, deposit the amount of buyins you need to play and if you need more it takes less than 15 minutes to deposit more, is there a reason swcpoker don't have a rep on 2+2 and push their site more answer players questions? does it have anything to do with the legal bs? or is it more -> small poker site less hassle from the government as in they won't bother them, or is it if they become a bigger traffic site governments might take a interest and try to shut them down again? I see this question asked a lot by many players, could someone explain the reasoning why they don't advertise more?

I like the site and be cool to see more traffic and why i ask, but if this post is in anyway -EV for the site delete it.

Not just swcpoker but every poker sites have this kind of problem because first it takes times when we played. Second, you really need many players to make sure it will generate more money, the money flow will be good. If you compare to other games like dice then it is really hard to tell. But swcpoker do have big members before they relaunch. You should checked on their past history

I was an old player since they changed their name to SwC Poker. At that time, many poker players were seen from full tables, but did not know why Poker enthusiasts were decreasing, indeed this does not apply to SwC but other poker sites. It is possible that the emergence of several new Casino sites has made them switch to other games.

[tokeweed]

We know our players want a bigger poker room and we want that too. SwC believes the path to a bigger site starts with improving the software. To capture a bigger share of the market our product must improve so when new players first play it there are no bugs. We will introduce Leaderboards soon and we will continue to run the promotions we are running today, but our focus will be on building better software, not marketing.

Oh ok...  Thanks for making that clear.  But at least expand the BBJ to the 5/10 - 10/20 tables please.  That should help get more traffic to those stakes.

[Crypt0xxx]

Hello SwC_Poker  !
One question please...
Is it possible to download hand history of played hands ? Thanks.

[tokeweed]

^  I think you need to email them and make a request.

Anyway, I noticed that there's fewer traffic at the site now.  What happened?  I think making it harder to win the BBJ and expanding it down up to 2/4 might do the trick.  IMHO.

At least try it.

[SkyReVo]

^  I think you need to email them and make a request.

Anyway, I noticed that there's fewer traffic at the site now.  What happened?  I think making it harder to win the BBJ and expanding it down up to 2/4 might do the trick.  IMHO.

At least try it.

I don't have much skin in the game as I don't play NLHE much, but here's my perspective on why they might not want to lower the BBJ limits:

- They make like 20-50% of the rake they make off usual cashgame tables already, since you don't pay extra rake for the BBJ. If you lower that to 2/4, the absolute amount of rake they'd make would be absolutely miniscule and probably don't cover costs. Also, the BBJ would fill much more slowly.

- The games as of now are incredibly soft, and it is because lower stake people take shots to sit at these tables. If you lower the BBJ limit, the 25/50 games dry up and move lower. A shot at the BBJ tables costs $12 right now to participate in a ~$6000 jackpot.

- And lastly, it would be kind of unfair to the people contributing at the (much) higher stakes to share their chances at the jackpot with the (more frequent, because massively +EV) lower tables.

[tokeweed]

^

The BBJ tables should take extra rake.

That's the thing.  The rec players go broke much faster taking shots at 25/50.  You don't want that.  You want them to stay for as long as possible at lower stakes...  Attracting more traffic from there since it's more likely other rec players will rather play low than high.

And wait, a shot at 25/50 is 12 bucks?  BTC is at 12k.

[SkyReVo]

^

The BBJ tables should take extra rake.

That's the thing.  The rec players go broke much faster taking shots at 25/50.  You don't want that.  You want them to stay for as long as possible at lower stakes...  Attracting more traffic from there since it's more likely other rec players will rather play low than high.

And wait, a shot at 25/50 is 12 bucks?  BTC is at 12k.

No, it should not take extra rake, the concept is absolutely brilliant. What keeps lower stake players from sitting non-BBJ tables at lower stakes?

You can sit the BBJ tables with 1k chips ($12)