🔥 BC.Game - Casino & Sportsbook | Official sponsor of O'Higgins FC

[Sanitough]

Some casino doesn’t want some glare or blurred on the even on the edge of the ID picture so editing it first to make it clear is much better.

I don't know if Bc.game has a third party to complete KYC? Because what I know in the past at Stake.com casino did not use a third party and when the ID image was blurry it still received verification successfully.

When was the last time you completed that KYC?
I honestly can’t believe a very popular casino would accept a blurry photo.

They’re pretty strict with KYC these days, which means they want to make sure all submitted data is correct, readable, and matches the documents they’re asking for.

[topbitcoin]

Have you guys already received the New Year bonus hereon bcgame x15 rollover?
I got $50, but as usual I could not meet the rollover requirements. Never in my entire playing here in bcgame meet those bonuses. How about you, were you able to complete those bonus rollover? I only managed to reach around x5 before my balance was gone.
What is the most advisable way to meet this kind of rollover requirement? Do you prefer house games (original games) or slots? If slots which provider do you recommend?

The last time I got a bonus with this rollover it was only during Christmas and during New Year I didn't get any email.
It seems that only some people get it and this may also be due to the activity of the gambling account considering that I personally don't play at BC.Game so I consider this to be normal.

For those who get a bonus, make good use of it because of course with the bonus you have, it can make us at least get entertainment even though it may not be able to complete the rollover.

[memehunter]

Have you guys already received the New Year bonus hereon bcgame x15 rollover?
I got $50,

Yes I noticed the email today and opted the no deposit bonus. I got only $15. The maximum you can get is $60 as per the email so $50 is not that bad.

but as usual I could not meet the rollover requirements. Never in my entire playing here in bcgame meet those bonuses. How about you, were you able to complete those bonus rollover? I only managed to reach around x5 before my balance was gone.

Lol, same story here. I played a little carelessly though but I think achieving a 15x is not that difficult on house games. 

.
When I tried to log in, I did not have access to 2FA but BC.game let me log in through the last 5 digits of my ID (which I submitted for KYC). IMO, it is a security flaw as it is super easy to get hold of that info if you know someone, or an internal issue (like we have seen recently at another big casino). I did not check the cashout though, is it possible to cashout also without 2fa?
Since Bc.game has PvP game (poker) also, this can easily be exploited and affected player will not even get the notification of cashout let alone the requirement of reenabling 2FA.   

[Vaculin]

When I tried to log in, I did not have access to 2FA but BC.game let me log in through the last 5 digits of my ID (which I submitted for KYC). IMO, it is a security flaw as it is super easy to get hold of that info if you know someone, or an internal issue (like we have seen recently at another big casino). I did not check the cashout though, is it possible to cashout also without 2fa?
Since Bc.game has PvP game (poker) also, this can easily be exploited and affected player will not even get the notification of cashout let alone the requirement of reenabling 2FA.   

How were you able to communicate with them if you couldn’t access the account because of 2FA issue.
Did you email support and actually get a response?

Honestly I can’t really relate since I don’t use 2FA on my account. I just access the casino through the email login link and I’m in. For me it doesn’t feel too risky as long as I take care of my email and make sure it doesn’t get hacked.

[memehunter]

How were you able to communicate with them if you couldn’t access the account because of 2FA issue.
Did you email support and actually get a response?

There was not even a need to contact CS (I can think of many possible scenarios where it is necessary), you can just bypass 2FA if you know your password and KYC ID submitted. It asks for last five digits of that ID.   

I don’t use 2FA on my account.

It is more risky and one must use 2FA. Ofc, the choice is yours 

[tbct_mt2]

Just take a photo in the daytime then the quality will be good, while taking a photo at night will be famous for the reflection of the lights and sometimes it is difficult to be verified by the casino.

It's very basic for taking a good photo with enough light and the photo quality would be good enough to use for many purposes. If you don't have enough supplementary tools like professional flash light, taking a photo or record a video at night mostly results in very low quality photo or video. With KYC purpose, such low quality photo or video will not be accepted for KYC verification.

I don't have much experience with KYC at casinos, and if you want to do KYC just do it during the day.

It's same for KYC at casinos or centralized exchanges as the verification team, even an internal team of the company or a third-party company hired for KYC task, will not likely accept low quality photo or video taken with terrible light conditions.

[Vaculin]

How were you able to communicate with them if you couldn’t access the account because of 2FA issue.
Did you email support and actually get a response?

There was not even a need to contact CS (I can think of many possible scenarios where it is necessary), you can just bypass 2FA if you know your password and KYC ID submitted. It asks for last five digits of that ID.   

Thanks, that’s actually new to me. Like I said, I don’t use 2FA on casinos, I only use 2FA on exchanges.

I don’t use 2FA on my account.

It is more risky and one must use 2FA. Ofc, the choice is yours 

I know there’s a risk but I think I can manage it, I mean the most I can probably lose there is like $100 hehe.
I also don’t really see scammers targeting my account since I’m pretty aware of phishing links and I just ignore them.

Honestly I can’t even think of how my account would get hacked. If it does happen, that’s on me, maybe that’ll be the moment I realize I should’ve enabled 2FA. 

[Beparanf]

Some casino doesn’t want some glare or blurred on the even on the edge of the ID picture so editing it first to make it clear is much better.

I don't know if Bc.game has a third party to complete KYC? Because what I know in the past at Stake.com casino did not use a third party and when the ID image was blurry it still received verification successfully.

When was the last time you completed that KYC?
I honestly can’t believe a very popular casino would accept a blurry photo.

They’re pretty strict with KYC these days, which means they want to make sure all submitted data is correct, readable, and matches the documents they’re asking for.

Maybe poor quality but not blurry. Or his term blurry is just for low quality but still all details are visible. Some casino is strict on KYC especially on quality but some also accept the KYC immediately if the details is visible using their automated KYC software.

In general, KYC should be complete easily if you have a valid ID and camera that can generate clear picture that will show ID details clearly.

[salad daging]

When was the last time you completed that KYC?

Last year when Stake required all users to KYC.

Maybe poor quality but not blurry. Or his term blurry is just for low quality but still all details are visible. Some casino is strict on KYC especially on quality but some also accept the KYC immediately if the details is visible using their automated KYC software.

In general, KYC should be complete easily if you have a valid ID and camera that can generate clear picture that will show ID details clearly.

YEah now it is easy to do KYC, for me I don't want to once the casino doesn't ask for it, there is no self-initiative for KYC as much as possible for me to still want no-KYC.

[Ryu_Ar1]

Maybe poor quality but not blurry. Or his term blurry is just for low quality but still all details are visible. Some casino is strict on KYC especially on quality but some also accept the KYC immediately if the details is visible using their automated KYC software.

In general, KYC should be complete easily if you have a valid ID and camera that can generate clear picture that will show ID details clearly.

YEah now it is easy to do KYC, for me I don't want to once the casino doesn't ask for it, there is no self-initiative for KYC as much as possible for me to still want no-KYC.

I also did the same thing. Because I think when KYC is done on a site for me it is the last choice that I have to do so as long as the site does not ask for it then I will play without KYC but when there is an urge to do it especially when it can be a condition as a withdrawal then inevitably I will do it because I don't want my gambling activities to be disturbed here.

Previously it was even worse when there was a KYC site even I would immediately leave it but now it seems that this is not too doable, although there are still some sites that do not require KYC in it but most of the others make KYC policies tightened so inevitably we have to do it.

[bitmover]

Maybe poor quality but not blurry. Or his term blurry is just for low quality but still all details are visible. Some casino is strict on KYC especially on quality but some also accept the KYC immediately if the details is visible using their automated KYC software.

In general, KYC should be complete easily if you have a valid ID and camera that can generate clear picture that will show ID details clearly.

YEah now it is easy to do KYC, for me I don't want to once the casino doesn't ask for it, there is no self-initiative for KYC as much as possible for me to still want no-KYC.

I also did the same thing. Because I think when KYC is done on a site for me it is the last choice that I have to do so as long as the site does not ask for it then I will play without KYC but when there is an urge to do it especially when it can be a condition as a withdrawal then inevitably I will do it because I don't want my gambling activities to be disturbed here.

Previously it was even worse when there was a KYC site even I would immediately leave it but now it seems that this is not too doable, although there are still some sites that do not require KYC in it but most of the others make KYC policies tightened so inevitably we have to do it.

You are right.

Kyc should only be completed if you really need. Handling out your documents is always risk, because your documents may leak from the casino database ...

we should always try to avoid sending our documents on the internet. To exchanges,  casinos, or any other service. We should do it only when requested.

[Wiwo]

When I tried to log in, I did not have access to 2FA but BC.game let me log in through the last 5 digits of my ID (which I submitted for KYC). IMO, it is a security flaw as it is super easy to get hold of that info if you know someone, or an internal issue (like we have seen recently at another big casino). I did not check the cashout though, is it possible to cashout also without 2fa?
Since Bc.game has PvP game (poker) also, this can easily be exploited and affected player will not even get the notification of cashout let alone the requirement of reenabling 2FA.   

Oh my this is a big risk for users account, having access to the log in if you provide last 5 digits of your ID number is indeed a big flaw.

We need to alert the team to work on that aspect and it shouldn't be alternative to 2FA.

If you lost access to your 2FA it should be another security process as a whole to get you disconnected and provide your the access to the account and with some 24 hours withdrawal restrictions on the account.

[Raflesia]

After the end of the year was not very good I tried at the beginning of the year and the result was the luck I got I wasn't too worried because the last game was Barcelona but that seemed to be the tense part of this multi because until the 80th minute even Barcelona couldn't score.

Luck was on my side and this was my first win of 2026.



This isn't really good to replicate but at the crucial time of the match I saw the odds were pretty good on Barcelona so I tried to add a bet and this made me double the profit from my multi and single bet again.

Now I'm going to sleep comfortably

[Bitcoin_Arena]

After the end of the year was not very good I tried at the beginning of the year and the result was the luck I got I wasn't too worried because the last game was Barcelona but that seemed to be the tense part of this multi because until the 80th minute even Barcelona couldn't score.

Luck was on my side and this was my first win of 2026.



This isn't really good to replicate but at the crucial time of the match I saw the odds were pretty good on Barcelona so I tried to add a bet and this made me double the profit from my multi and single bet again.

Now I'm going to sleep comfortably

Congratulations mate. That was quite a risk replicating the bet 
On another day, things could have ended quite differently, given the fact that it was even a derby, but Barcelona continues to show resilience. I would have also actually fallen for the live betting option during the match.

[Sanitough]

In general, KYC should be complete easily if you have a valid ID and camera that can generate clear picture that will show ID details clearly.

Yes of course, but in the end they’re the ones who decide whether what you submitted passes or not since they’re the evaluator. These days, submitting just an ID and a photo isn’t enough anymore.

KYC has become more advanced, you usually need to be online and take a live photo or video to prove it’s really you holding the ID. That makes it much harder to fake now, and even if it’s still possible, it’s definitely not something I’d recommend doing.

[SeriouslyGiveaway]

Yes of course, but in the end they’re the ones who decide whether what you submitted passes or not since they’re the evaluator. These days, submitting just an ID and a photo isn’t enough anymore.

KYC has become more advanced, you usually need to be online and take a live photo or video to prove it’s really you holding the ID. That makes it much harder to fake now, and even if it’s still possible, it’s definitely not something I’d recommend doing.

In the past, KYC is only taking a selfie photo, or two photos, no more but recent years with developments and applications of AIs, KYC verification now requires real-time video with different gestures like blinking eyes, shaking head, moving head right and left. KYC nowadays can be done in real time as well and there is no longer too long waiting as it was with manual KYC verification in the past.

With cases like security issues or higher levels of KYC, more requirements with documents and gestures in a video are needed and as users, people simply have to do all things asked by a company if they want to finish KYC and access full features on that platform.

[Wakate]

I understand this. What I’m doing is just enhancing the brightness to make it a document type by removing glares on the picture. There’s no sign that details and other information was edited.

But in case this will not work I can always try again to resubmit the same ID with it’s original quality.

I believe some user have problem on the re-upload of KYC is due to tampering KYC details or using different ID on the 2nd attempt.

Casinos that are using third party companies for KYC verification do have problem with users because of the tough procedures that needed to be followed by users and when it looks like the document is not bright enough making those words to be less visible, they mostly reject it. Stake does not use a third party company for their KYC which shows that they can handle users privacy strictly.

[freedomgo]

Casinos that are using third party companies for KYC verification do have problem with users because of the tough procedures that needed to be followed by users and when it looks like the document is not bright enough making those words to be less visible, they mostly reject it. Stake does not use a third party company for their KYC which shows that they can handle users privacy strictly.

Don’t they have some kind of standard to follow?
I think those third party verifiers are licensed as well, so it makes sense that they won’t approve anything that doesn’t meet the requirements.

Picture quality is honestly a simple issue that can be fixed if the user is really interested. The harder part is whether the document itself will pass, that’s where the real problem usually is.

[Sanitough]

Yes of course, but in the end they’re the ones who decide whether what you submitted passes or not since they’re the evaluator. These days, submitting just an ID and a photo isn’t enough anymore.

KYC has become more advanced, you usually need to be online and take a live photo or video to prove it’s really you holding the ID. That makes it much harder to fake now, and even if it’s still possible, it’s definitely not something I’d recommend doing.

In the past, KYC is only taking a selfie photo, or two photos, no more but recent years with developments and applications of AIs, KYC verification now requires real-time video with different gestures like blinking eyes, shaking head, moving head right and left. KYC nowadays can be done in real time as well and there is no longer too long waiting as it was with manual KYC verification in the past.

With cases like security issues or higher levels of KYC, more requirements with documents and gestures in a video are needed and as users, people simply have to do all things asked by a company if they want to finish KYC and access full features on that platform.

That’s already expected since regulations are getting stricter now. Before, crypto casinos weren’t really regulated, you could gamble anonymously with just an email, even a fake one, and start right away. Back then casinos weren’t scamming people because they cared about their reputation. Now these requirements are basically no different from fiat casinos, it’s just part of the shift as the space matures.

[Wakate]

Don’t they have some kind of standard to follow?
I think those third party verifiers are licensed as well, so it makes sense that they won’t approve anything that doesn’t meet the requirements.

This is not about standard to follow or anything strange you might think. Haven't you heard about most of these third parties companies being hacked and most users information stolen? This is what we get when we stick our information to third party companies.
Even though they are being regulated by the government, that does not stopped them from misappropriation of users information.

Picture quality is honestly a simple issue that can be fixed if the user is really interested. The harder part is whether the document itself will pass, that’s where the real problem usually is.

If the system is too strict, it will make verification hard for users to complete.