|
Iamtutut
|
 |
May 31, 2019, 02:05:27 PM |
|
If BSV was a scam, why would
@CalvinAyre
invest $300 Million dollars into mining equipment that loses all its value in less than 2 years?
That’s $300 000 000. Take just 2 seconds to think about it.
Open your eyes people, the train is full steam ahead, so get on board!
He mines the shitcoin and sells it after pump to unknowing idiots. That's how he gets much more money from his investment. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Bitcoin network protocol was designed to be extremely flexible. It can be used to create timed transactions, escrow transactions, multi-signature transactions, etc. The current features of the client only hint at what will be possible in the future.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
sirsplashalot
|
You guys are pretty triggered by BSV. Craig Wright aside, How can we deny that the original protocol is NOT Bitcoin? Did you see all the applications being built on BSV? Attacking one character does not constitute a scam given there is a fair economic capitalist model of competition for the miners. When BTC shrinks the blocksize, where the hell do you think the miners are going to go on the next halveneing? Better get all your BTC on the third party lightning network fast boys.
|
Worried about my trust rating? I am too. Bitcointalk users ‘Lauda’ and ‘gmaxwell’ have abused their superior powers in trust system to align their views with the ‘correct views.’ In no legal system in any jurisdiction do we have a definition for what Bitcoin is, they do not have the power to tell us what it is based on the rule of law.
|
|
|
bones261
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1806
Merit: 1826
|
|
May 31, 2019, 03:18:33 PM |
|
When BTC shrinks the blocksize, where the hell do you think the miners are going to go on the next halveneing? Better get all your BTC on the third party lightning network fast boys.
Although there have been some notables that advocate for a blocksize decrease with BTC, this idea does not have enough traction to ever be implemented. Also, BSV is also going to have a halvening around the same time as BTC. In fact, BSV will probably go through a halvening before BTC. I don't see the increased block capacity making up for this difference since there is really no fee market in play with BSV. This especially is true since the BSV philosophy is to just hardfork and increase the block capacity. Isn't there talk to just drop the block capacity maximum all together? What incentive do people have to pay more than the absolute minimum fee possible? |
|
|
|
|
|
Cryptotourist
|
|
May 31, 2019, 03:25:23 PM |
|
You guys are pretty triggered by BSV.
No we are not. I'm not anyway. I'm disgusted by the filthy way your master handles things (lie, lie some more) & the potential (hypothetical) damage it could do to BTC. Fair enough? |
I have come here to chew bubblegum and kick ass ... and I'm all out of bubblegum.
|
|
|
|
Iamtutut
|
|
May 31, 2019, 03:26:20 PM |
|
You guys are pretty triggered by BSV. Craig Wright aside, How can we deny that the original protocol is NOT Bitcoin? Did you see all the applications being built on BSV? Attacking one character does not constitute a scam given there is a fair economic capitalist model of competition for the miners. When BTC shrinks the blocksize, where the hell do you think the miners are going to go on the next halveneing? Better get all your BTC on the third party lightning network fast boys.
CSW aside ? LMAO, he's the creator and the face of BSV. Applications built on BSV ? Well that's not Bitcoin, that's Ethereum. What is Bitcoin ? "Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System", period. Next Halving ? Much more expensive Bitcoin means much more reward (FIAT) per block, which compensates the lower number of blocks minted, that's exactly what Satoshi wanted, the real Satoshi. |
|
|
|
|
nutildah (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2968
Merit: 7940
|
|
May 31, 2019, 03:33:30 PM |
|
How can we deny that the original protocol is NOT Bitcoin?
Have you checked BSV's GitHub repository? BSV isn't the "original protocol" -- its a fork of a fork. Did you know that your code has edits made by Amaury Sechet (BCH) and Pieter Wuille (BTC)?  Did you see all the applications being built on BSV?
No, and nobody cares. Attacking one character does not constitute a scam given there is a fair economic capitalist model of competition for the miners.
It certainly does. It's quite evident that most of BSV's market cap is driven by the idea that Wright is Satoshi. Have you been paying attention? When BTC shrinks the blocksize, where the hell do you think the miners are going to go on the next halveneing? Better get all your BTC on the third party lightning network fast boys.
Why would BTC shrink its block size? You mean to less than 1 MB? Bitcoin has no problem attracting miners. In the 10 years since its inception, it never has. |
|
|
|
|
sirsplashalot
|
|
May 31, 2019, 03:45:52 PM |
|
Could I get a response for a miner who understands what I am talking about please?
BSV will implement gigabyte blocks in July, by then the mining reward will actually be less than the fees collected by the miners at that scale.
You see where I’m getting started? Time will tell, ive said all I’ve need to here.
Miners are NOT second rate citizens in this capitalist economic model. Lightning Network damn well won’t save you. Raise the blocks or get everyone’s BTC on the lightning Network.
You have now 1 month until 1 GIG blocks are implemented, and with OP return and all these applications being built on the OG protocol of BSV, it’s in the networks best interest to spam as many transactions as possible through as many applications as possible built on top of the original protocol (BSV)
A super computer that powerful with that much hashpower can destroy all the other blockchains. Time to understand the facts. I really, god honestly believe none of you guys understand Bitcoin.
|
Worried about my trust rating? I am too. Bitcointalk users ‘Lauda’ and ‘gmaxwell’ have abused their superior powers in trust system to align their views with the ‘correct views.’ In no legal system in any jurisdiction do we have a definition for what Bitcoin is, they do not have the power to tell us what it is based on the rule of law.
|
|
|
nutildah (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2968
Merit: 7940
|
Could I get a response for a miner who understands what I am talking about please?
Nobody understands what you're talking about because you're basing your conclusions on too many assumptions. BSV will implement gigabyte blocks in July, by then the mining reward will actually be less than the fees collected by the miners at that scale.
You're assuming that SV's blocks will be full by then. Currently, the average BSV block size is 153 KB. That's 0.12% of its max capacity of 128 MB. What good is raising the block size limit to 1 GB going to do when you're having such trouble filling its current blocks? You see where I’m getting started? Time will tell, ive said all I’ve need to here.
That would be fine but somehow I doubt its true. I welcome honest debate. However, you're not being honest with your calculations thus far. Miners are NOT second rate citizens in this capitalist economic model. Lightning Network damn well won’t save you. Raise the blocks or get everyone’s BTC on the lightning Network.
Bitcoin and Lightning are doing just fine, thanks for your concern. You have now 1 month until 1 GIG blocks are implemented, and with OP return and all these applications being built on the OG protocol of BSV, it’s in the networks best interest to spam as many transactions as possible through as many applications as possible built on top of the original protocol (BSV)
That's like building a super-sized Wal-Mart in the middle of the desert. Have at it, it's not my money. A super computer that powerful with that much hashpower can destroy all the other blockchains.
With its relatively piddly hash rate BSV will fall to this problem well before BTC. Time to understand the facts. I really, god honestly believe none of you guys understand Bitcoin.
You don't understand the difference between an original protocol and a fork. You should probably take the time to learn that difference before you start giving lectures. |
|
|
|
|
sirsplashalot
|
|
May 31, 2019, 04:11:49 PM |
|
I wholeheartedly disagree with all your points, your facts, and your hostile attitude.
Only time will tell. Seems as though I’ve made a much better investment since we started arguing. Those facts don’t lie.
I’ve said all I’ve need to here, read and interpret as you wish.
Spectators, please do your own research and understand these BTC maximalists have ALOT to lose.
|
Worried about my trust rating? I am too. Bitcointalk users ‘Lauda’ and ‘gmaxwell’ have abused their superior powers in trust system to align their views with the ‘correct views.’ In no legal system in any jurisdiction do we have a definition for what Bitcoin is, they do not have the power to tell us what it is based on the rule of law.
|
|
|
nutildah (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2968
Merit: 7940
|
|
May 31, 2019, 04:17:14 PM |
|
I wholeheartedly disagree with all your points, your facts, and your hostile attitude.
Only time will tell. Seems as though I’ve made a much better investment since we started arguing. Those facts don’t lie.
I don't think we'll ever agree as we apparently have different definitions of the word "fact." I do agree with you on one point: only time will tell. See ya later chief. |
|
|
|
yogg
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2464
Merit: 3158
|
|
May 31, 2019, 04:24:24 PM
Last edit: May 31, 2019, 04:40:42 PM by yogg |
|
BSV will implement gigabyte blocks in July
You have now 1 month until 1 GIG blocks are implemented,
So this is a matter of size ? Which can be rooted down to a matter of transaction per second. Well, you have your opinion and it is fair. The opinion of most of the people here is different, and I agree with them. There is only one Bitcoin, no wonder it is called Core. The Core will function inexorably, may you like it or not. You are wasting your time preaching to the wrong people. You guys couldn't even get it right with Ver & Bitcoin Cash, what are you thinking ?
My opinion is that Craig Wright is a fraud. Who gives a talk about Bitcoin and tells the audience that he got more money than their country ? Craig Wright does in Rwanda ! (10s after the timestamp of that linked video) What a psycho. And we are supposed to believe he is Satoshi Nakamoto ? |
|
|
|
|
Phinnaeus Gage
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1918
Merit: 1570
Bitcoin: An Idea Worth Spending
|
|
May 31, 2019, 04:49:11 PM |
|
BSV will implement gigabyte blocks in July
You have now 1 month until 1 GIG blocks are implemented,
So this is a matter of size ? Which can be rooted down to a matter of transaction per second. Well, you have your opinion and it is fair. The opinion of most of the people here is different, and I agree with them. There is only one Bitcoin, no wonder it is called Core. The Core will function inexorably, may you like it or not. You are wasting your time preaching to the wrong people. You guys couldn't even get it right with Ver & Bitcoin Cash, what are you thinking ?
My opinion is that Craig Wright is a fraud. Who gives a talk about Bitcoin and tells the audience that he got more money than their country ? Craig Wright does in Rwanda ! (10s after the timestamp of that linked video)What a psycho. And we are supposed to believe he is Satoshi Nakamoto ?  "Stay in line. No pushing or shoving. Satoshi has enough BTC for all Rwandans.
Meanwhile, every sing ...
21 million bottles of Neft on the wall
21 million bottles of Neft
Take one down
Pass it around
20 million, 9 hundred thousand ..." |
|
|
|
|
Dig Bicks
Member
Offline
Activity: 348
Merit: 22
|
Heres a tip , for the haters against Dr. Wright and SV. By talking about him you are making him even more famous and helping his coin to pump even more. The best option for the opposition is to simply not talk about him.
|
|
|
|
|
Goxten
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 43
Merit: 1
|
|
May 31, 2019, 06:12:52 PM |
|
Why is this shitcoin already worth more than 200$ Can someone explain to me? Who buys it and why? Why encourage scam-coin?
Ripple is ranked #3 and its even more of a shitcoin than bitcoin sv. Eos is a super centralized shitcoin and its ranked #5 right now. Why do people buy those shitcoins as well? Yeah, right. These coins are also very doubtful, but this topic is dedicated to shitcoinSV (BSV) and I have questions about this ShitcoinSV (BSV). It seems to me that many people buy it thinking that this is a real Bitcoin. I feel sorry for them. I want them to make no mistakes and know that the real Bitcoin is https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/bitcoin/ |
|
|
|
|
bones261
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1806
Merit: 1826
|
|
May 31, 2019, 06:37:17 PM |
|
Heres a tip , for the haters against Dr. Wright and SV. By talking about him you are making him even more famous and helping his coin to pump even more. The best option for the opposition is to simply not talk about him.
Unfortunately, he won't just go away if the community remains silent. He will just keep spreading his lies and bullshit with no counterpoint. Although this situation is not nearly as grave as AIDS was in the 80's and 90s, I think the same principle behind the statement "Silence=Death." applies. |
|
|
|
|
|
chimk
|
|
May 31, 2019, 11:16:01 PM
Last edit: May 31, 2019, 11:34:23 PM by chimk Merited by nutildah (1), ABCbits (1) |
|
it does not matter who the inventor is, him is considered the one who first registered the patent for the invention
Look around, no one considers him the creator. Fake Satoshi does not understand the principles of anonymity and decentralization. Satoshi staying anonymous is a #Bitcoin feature. If I had logs which narrowed the anonymity set towards Satoshi's identity, I would delete/shred them. https://twitter.com/adam3us/status/1118663810439471104As a general rule, when the Copyright Office receives an application for registration, the claimant certifies as to the truth of the statements made in the submitted materials. The Copyright Office does not investigate the truth of any statement made.
A registration represents a claim to an interest in a work protected by copyright law, not a determination of the truth of the claims therein. It is possible for multiple, adverse claims to be registered at the Copyright Office. The Copyright Office does not have an opposition procedure for copyright registrations, such as the procedures available at the Patent and Trademark Office for patents and trademark registrations. Disputes over the claims in a registration may be heard before federal courts, including disputes over authorship of a work. Someone who intentionally includes false information in an application may be subject to criminal penalties.
The examination process is primarily focused on determining whether a deposited work is eligible for protection under the Copyright Act and whether the application satisfies the requirements of registration. The Copyright Office will correspond with the claimant to clear up any obvious inconsistencies. The Copyright Office may similarly correspond with a claimant if a deposited work seems to include portions a well-known work whose author is known.
In a case in which a work is registered under a pseudonym, the Copyright Office does not investigate whether there is a provable connection between the claimant and the pseudonymous author. https://www.copyright.gov/press-media-info/press-updates.html?loclr=twcop |
|
|
|
|
alevlaslo
|
|
June 01, 2019, 12:06:11 AM |
|
no one can refute, so the patent will remain
also keep in mind that btc is a threat to the government because the hashrate is not centralized, and bsv made a centralized hashrate
if the government disappears there will be no one to protect us from crime, this can not be allowed, so the bsv is better. The meaning of bitcoin in the protection against emissions, and do not fight with the government!
|
Sale the first NFT of the first foto
|
|
|
|
|
|
sirsplashalot
|
|
June 01, 2019, 12:32:47 PM |
|
|
Worried about my trust rating? I am too. Bitcointalk users ‘Lauda’ and ‘gmaxwell’ have abused their superior powers in trust system to align their views with the ‘correct views.’ In no legal system in any jurisdiction do we have a definition for what Bitcoin is, they do not have the power to tell us what it is based on the rule of law.
|
|
|
Phinnaeus Gage
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1918
Merit: 1570
Bitcoin: An Idea Worth Spending
|
|
June 01, 2019, 01:15:41 PM |
|
https://twitter.com/tweetybirdbrain/status/1133961303167557632?s=21There's some hilarious comments within. My favorite is ... And Craig gave Moses the Ten Commandments but altered its content prior to him coming down from the mountain and presenting it to the Cryptonites. When asked if Moses truly spoke with Craig, he explained in great detail how in Craig's lofty office the Ten Commandments were unlocked with a private key that he alone possessed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
