SCAM: Bitcoin SV (BSV) - fake team member and plagiarized white paper

[BitcoinFX]

Censorship is censorship.

Fraud is not censorship.

Fraud is fraud.

Identity theft is not censorship.

Identity theft is identity theft.

Craig Wright is not Satoshi Nakamoto.

Satoshi Nakamoto is Satoshi Nakamoto.

William Shatner is William Shatner ...

Re: Project Anastasia: Bitcoiners Against Identity Theft [re: Craig Wright scam] ...
- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5215128.msg53817271#msg53817271

 

[1715542818]

1715542818

[1715542818]

1715542818

[1715542818]

1715542818

[1715542818]

1715542818

[AlexSimion]

This whole Craig Wright is Satoshi deal sounds to me a lot like The earth is flat theory.
You get the typical , "master degree" dudes who dispute any logic and evidence brought to them  ,   the typical answers ( I have proof , but do your own research ) , the typical media is manipulating everything etc .

So yeah , I think there's no point engaging any longer in this topic with the  clearly more highly educated people then ourselves shilling the fake Satoshi.

I'm sure even if the real Satoshi will pop up one day , sign-in addresses left and right , these dudes right here will still deny it , and lean more towards the irrefutable evidence that Craig is Satoshi , simply because he said so.

[Phinnaeus Gage]

Looks like He's due to make William Shatner an unperson too soon enough. He may find it a bit less forgiving to boldly go outside his personal cabal of masturbating zombies and into a strange new world filled with sentient beings.

[Iamtutut]

Fakatoshi gets burnt, again.

https://twitter.com/BryceWeiner/status/1227235589759459329

"Holy fuck I just heard CSW try to explain that you can't copy a Bitcoin because of math.

You can't copy a Bitcoin because "bitcoins" don't exist, unspent transaction values of an amount of Bitcoin exists.

He literally has no idea how Bitcoin works."

[Phinnaeus Gage]

Fakatoshi gets burnt, again.

https://twitter.com/BryceWeiner/status/1227235589759459329

"Holy fuck I just heard CSW try to explain that you can't copy a Bitcoin because of math.

You can't copy a Bitcoin because "bitcoins" don't exist, unspent transaction values of an amount of Bitcoin exists.

He literally has no idea how Bitcoin works."

https://twitter.com/BryceWeiner/

"Abbie Hoffman Craig Steven Wright is my spirit animal."

Aside: A drunk man walks out of a bar and says to two policemen, "I'm Jesus Christ Satoshi." The police ask him to prove it. They walk into the bar and the barman says, "Jesus Christ Satoshi!! Back so soon?"

[Stedsm]

Fakatoshi gets burnt, again.

https://twitter.com/BryceWeiner/status/1227235589759459329

"Holy fuck I just heard CSW try to explain that you can't copy a Bitcoin because of math.

You can't copy a Bitcoin because "bitcoins" don't exist, unspent transaction values of an amount of Bitcoin exists.

He literally has no idea how Bitcoin works."

Faketoshi's socks were looking like a warning sign which showed that whomsoever listens to him is going to get pissed by the Lord of crypto as they will likely be fried as fritters in hot oil just to believe that Faketoshi is the real Satoshi. He is creating more and more blunders while trying to prove himself to be the original copy, but you know what, he's not even a duplicate. 

[tmfp]

It would be so cheap to record enough information about all @Wikipedia interactions on the $BSV blockchain that you could probably eliminate all possible child porn distribution on it for very low fees. Think of the savings! 

We already store data. In a database. It works well. 

https://twitter.com/jimmy_wales/status/1226868636020805632

[BitcoinFX]

Sometimes I do wonder why any of us bother with any of this ...

...snip...

Twitter storm time ...

"Craig Wright has committed 'ID theft' of the #Bitcoin creator !?

I am 'BitcoinFX', registered user No. 30 - February 01, 2010, from the http://bitcointalk.org forum, one of the places the real Satoshi Nakamoto launched Bitcoin (#BTC).

- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5.msg188#msg188

1/12"
- https://twitter.com/BitcoinFX_BTC/status/1222878843704397826

...

"My Signed message thread:

- https://twitter.com/BitcoinFX_BTC/status/1221190086328492033

2/12"
- https://twitter.com/BitcoinFX_BTC/status/1222879101293297665

...

"I ran an early Bitcoin exchange service and contributed mainly on the forum to help the Bitcoin concept to flourish.

https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1222243021540020224

I communicated with the real Satoshi, yet Craig Wright seemingly avoids myself (and others) like the plague!

3/12"
- https://twitter.com/BitcoinFX_BTC/status/1222879327425060865

...

"To date, Craig Stephen Wright has failed to sign a valid publicly verifiable Bitcoin message for any address:

Dan Kaminsky's:
- https://dankaminsky.com/2016/05/02/validating-satoshi-or-not/

Attempting (Failed) Verification of the Wright Signature:
- https://github.com/patio11/wrightverification

Also see:
- https://seekingsatoshi.weebly.com/fraud-timeline.html

4/12"
- https://twitter.com/BitcoinFX_BTC/status/1222879510271492096

...

"Signed and Verifiable messages in Bitcoin are very easy. The real Satoshi could also prove identity via PGP.

- https://web.archive.org/web/20090131115053/http://bitcoin.org/

At the base of the page, see PGP Key; Satoshi_Nakamoto.asc :

- https://bitcointalk.org/Satoshi_Nakamoto.asc

Financial privacy is not broken using PGP.

5/12"
- https://twitter.com/BitcoinFX_BTC/status/1222879720250990592

...

"Signed messages are a better proof-of-identity over not signing messages.

Bitcoin is financial cryptography software, after all.

Logging in to forum accounts and/or sending from original Satoshi email addresses is also feasible proof, for example.

6/12"
- https://twitter.com/BitcoinFX_BTC/status/1222879837834092544

...

"Whilst privacy and anonymity are quite different:

- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Privacy
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anonymity

Pseudonymity in Bitcoin has always allowed for people to be honest brokers and to pay taxes.

'Criminals' unfortunately utilize all forms of money. This is unavoidable.

7/12"
- https://twitter.com/BitcoinFX_BTC/status/1222879979563835392

...

"The real Satoshi Nakamoto remains 'anonymous' and used #Tor for safer communications.

Use of privacy and anonymity tools for internet circumvention etc., does not make you a 'criminal'.

https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1221778440950599681

8/12"
- https://twitter.com/BitcoinFX_BTC/status/1222880212125392896

...

"#BitcoinSV is NOT the original Bitcoin. #BSV is a fork of a fork of original #Bitcoin which is #BTC.

They copied Bitcoin --> Bitcoin Cash --> BitcoinSV

See the BSV license agreement:

- https://github.com/bitcoin-sv/bitcoin-sv/blob/master/LICENSE

One would imagine Satoshi to be lord of his own yard, right!

9/12"
- https://twitter.com/BitcoinFX_BTC/status/1222880593563869184

...

"Quote: ".. The Bitcoin SV blockchains are defined, for purposes of this license, as the Bitcoin blockchain containing block height #556767 with the hash "000000000000000001d956714215d96ffc00e0afda4cd0a96c96f8d802b1662b .."

Again, BitcoinSV is NOT Bitcoin, Bitcoin is BTC.

10/12"
- https://twitter.com/BitcoinFX_BTC/status/1222880754063101953

...

"Finally, big blocks in BitcoinSV are NOT a scaling 'solution', they are a scaling problem!

CSW is NOT Satoshi and BSV is NOT Bitcoin.

Prove me wrong! Still waiting!

I recommend following: @MyLegacyKit for more facts on this subject.

11/12"
- https://twitter.com/BitcoinFX_BTC/status/1222881013812137984

...

"Peace and love to all Bitcoin (BTC) supporters and to the honest folks of the fantastic crypto community twittersphere !

Not your private keys, not your coins!

Don't trust, verify!

☮️ ❤️ 🌮 🔐 ⚡️

12/12"
- https://twitter.com/BitcoinFX_BTC/status/1222882485295570944

...

BSV is NOT Bitcoin and Craig Wright is NOT Satoshi.

...

"Worthless and unenforceable patents !?

- https://opensource.stackexchange.com/questions/5960/can-i-patent-open-source-project

"You can not patent code. You can only patent an invention which is implemented in your code. An invention is a new and unique way of doing something..."

1/8"
- https://twitter.com/BitcoinFX_BTC/status/1222936773581594624

...

"... "... Most of all, it must be something nobody did before. If anyone used the same technique which you describe in your patent, that's called prior art and invalidates your patent..."

2/8"
- https://twitter.com/BitcoinFX_BTC/status/1222936939655041025

...

"... "... So trying to get a patent on something somebody else invented and implemented in code would be futile...."

- https://twitter.com/BitcoinFX_BTC/status/1222880754063101953

3/8"
- https://twitter.com/BitcoinFX_BTC/status/1222937111772397568

...

"Further,

- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5149062.msg52932888#msg52932888

Quote: "The bitcoin whitepaper was first distributed by Satoshi Nakamoto on the Cypherpunks mailing list. The mailing list has a Cypherpunks anti-License. http://cypherspace.org/CPL/ ... "

4/8"
- https://twitter.com/BitcoinFX_BTC/status/1222937305004068864

...

"... "Background ...

The CPL is written from a mindset which derides the very concept of Intellectual Property restrictions as being incompatible with a free society ..."

5/8"
- https://twitter.com/BitcoinFX_BTC/status/1222937500001415169

...

"... "... Cryptographically assured anonymity and anonymous use of Internet resources mean that denizens of cypherspace can ignore copyright, licenses attempting to control use and distribution of works, and patents on ideas..."

6/8"
- https://twitter.com/BitcoinFX_BTC/status/1222937618339573760

...

"... "... It is not possible to enforce IP laws by calls to government legal systems when the flaunter is strongly anonymous. ..."

7/8
- https://twitter.com/BitcoinFX_BTC/status/1222937735658426369

...

"CSW's and nChain's patents are likely Prior Art i.e. worthless and unenforceable without said cryptographically assured proof.

😎

8/8"
- https://twitter.com/BitcoinFX_BTC/status/1222938179579338752


Signed Message Thread ...

"Herewith, a Signed and Verifiable message from my (old) 2010 #Bitcoin (BTC) zero balance wallet address:

1JXFXUBGs2ZtEDAQMdZ3tkCKo38nT2XSEp

Why can't Craig Wright do this?

Not Your Private Keys, Not Your Bitcoin. 🔑

Don't trust, verify. 🧐

1 of 3"
- https://twitter.com/BitcoinFX_BTC/status/1221190086328492033

...

"
-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
@BitcoinFX_BTC on twitter.com
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
1JXFXUBGs2ZtEDAQMdZ3tkCKo38nT2XSEp
HN37ufAaK25q9kDIKB4ddMkd2LeT8Y/2hE3gWDPDEbvqBDWOLcHAIbFQqgnqVu+zqwOHC2rf1/M6op0wQrt08vY=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----

2 of 3"
- https://twitter.com/BitcoinFX_BTC/status/1221190088065011713

...

"Verify Signed Message - https://brainwalletx.github.io/#verify?vrAddr=1JXFXUBGs2ZtEDAQMdZ3tkCKo38nT2XSEp&vrMsg=%40BitcoinFX_BTC%20on%20twitter.com&vrSig=HN37ufAaK25q9kDIKB4ddMkd2LeT8Y%2F2hE3gWDPDEbvqBDWOLcHAIbFQqgnqVu%2BzqwOHC2rf1%2FM6op0wQrt08vY%3D

BitcoinTalk Account Backlink - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4630066.msg53701472#msg53701472

BTC Address - https://blockchain.com/btc/address/1JXFXUBGs2ZtEDAQMdZ3tkCKo38nT2XSEp

Still a bit nauseating ! 🤪

3 of 3"
- https://twitter.com/BitcoinFX_BTC/status/1221190101004406785

P.S. 'Found' Satoshi (again), on the clarinet at 2:51 - 2:56 ...

KLF - 3 a m eternal ...
- https://youtu.be/LXEOESuiYcA

 

[HardFireMiner]

Bullshit

Dude.. I am ready to bet 1 BTC that after 1 month BSV will be under $150. Do you have balls to accept my bet ?

Where is my BTC, mosprognoz?
You didn't get that right, didn't you?

8 months passed, BSV = 375$.

[nutildah]

So do all BSV shillers actually believe Craig is Satoshi ? Or are they literally trolling on a completely different level ?

I haven't exactly followed the hole Bsv shit-show , but how can these plebs actually believe Craig is Satoshi simply because he said so ??

There would be countless of ways to prove it , if infact he was ,  but he failed to provide any proof . So why do people actually believe it just cause that man is spreading this crap everywhere " I am Satoshi "

How? Maybe if you have master's degree in software engineering, bachelor in informatics and 15 years of experience as a software architect, then you can make your own educated decisions listening to the man himself rather than the social media? As a professional in my field (which many people simply are not) I can say with absolute certainty that Craig is Satoshi. So your whole assumption is wrong, no one on the BSV side is believing anyone "simply because he said so".  However, you on the other hand, very much show the attributes of a person who believes the anti-Craig propaganda simply because sociopaths such as OneMegGreg said so. Oh, and most importantly, I've got empirical evidence that Craig is Satoshi. You can't beat it with any other kind of evidence.

You want to see what it looks like to have empirical evidence, then watch this:

https://youtu.be/ji2p5pxURVs

You're certainly awful at realizing when you're being conned. None of your impressive education helped you become wiser in that regard.

I watched a minute and a half of your YouTube video and I thought the same thing I've always thought about Craig: holy shit, this guy is an absolute fucking fraud.

You look at this video and you claim it is "empirical evidence" that Craig is Satoshi.
I look at this video and use it to come to the exact opposite conclusion.

Do you see how useless your "empirical evidence" is yet?

Produce some real evidence and as I said earlier, I won't contest it. I will let it be evaluated by others. What you've produced so far is just jokes.

As for what Andresen actually believes regarding Craig, let's be fair. He said this in 2016, yet BSV shills continue to misrepresent his words:

Now that six months have gone past, I’m being asked if I still think Craig Wright was Satoshi.

I think there are two possibilities.

Either he was Satoshi, but really wants the world to think he isn’t, so he created an impossible-to-untangle web of truths, half-truths and lies. And ruined his reputation in the process.

If he was Satoshi, we should respect his wish to remain anonymous, and ignore him.

The other possibility is he is a master scammer/fraudster who managed to trick some pretty smart people over a period of several years.

In which case everybody except the victims of his fraud and law enforcement working on behalf of those victims should ignore him.

So, either he was or he wasn’t. In either case, we should ignore him. I regret ever getting involved in the “who was Satoshi” game, and am going to spend my time on more fun and productive pursuits.

So Andresen believes there's an equal chance that Craig is a "master scammer." The narrative that he completely believes Wright is Satoshi has been bogus since before BSV was even an idea. Either way, he clearly says Wright should be ignored. And I accept an appeal to Andresen's authority on bitcoin over yours every day of the week.

Vitalik mic drop moment about Faketoshi: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2qLI3VIHuKU

[Zero1One0]

Vitalik mic drop moment about Faketoshi: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2qLI3VIHuKU

Spot on! What Vitalik said is the simplest way to prove that whomever is claiming to be Satoshi, just needs to send a signed transaction from one of the old addresses that can be traced backed to the genesis block.

Showing it to just a few people won't cut it.

[hv_]

Vitalik mic drop moment about Faketoshi: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2qLI3VIHuKU

Spot on! What Vitalik said is the simplest way to prove that whomever is claiming to be Satoshi, just needs to send a signed transaction from one of the old addresses that can be traced backed to the genesis block.

Showing it to just a few people won't cut it.

There is a reason why vitoolik said such - scammers want others to be seen as scammers

And sure - he is wrong, cause there is no easy legit proof

[BitcoinFX]

This one is absolutely hilarious ... complete bunkum and twaddle from CSW, mixing facts with fiction again, clearly demonstrating a total misunderstanding of anything Bitcoin or even digital cash ...

- https://twitter.com/C0inAlchemist/status/1227229901922742274

He continues to backtrack on what he says and twists the historical narrative to fit with his BSV agenda.

"... tokens ... !?!" ... "hashing is not cryptographic" ... "digital signature algorithms are not cryptographic" ... WTF! GTFO - SWIM

[xtraelv]

Having the private keys may may not provide conclusive proof of ownership.

But it certainly is more convincing than providing none.

[nutildah]

Having the private keys may may not provide conclusive proof of ownership.

But it certainly is more convincing than providing none.

It certainly seemed to matter when Craig was signing messages for Gavin back in 2016. Why would he bother doing that if private key ownership didn't matter?

[AlexSimion]

I remember reading some months back that Craig Scamtoshi was claiming one address with a high nr of bitcoin on it to be his , and after that the owner of the address signed a message proving Craig Shitoshi is a liar and a fraud .    What happened with that ? Is it confirmed ? Did anyone verify the message ?

[BitcoinFX]

I remember reading some months back that Craig Scamtoshi was claiming one address with a high nr of bitcoin on it to be his , and after that the owner of the address signed a message proving Craig Shitoshi is a liar and a fraud .    What happened with that ? Is it confirmed ? Did anyone verify the message ?

Literally 2 pages back in this very thread !

- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5149062.msg53806826#msg53806826

You should also read all of the WizSec posts here:

- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5149062.msg53783160#msg53783160

[AlexSimion]

I remember reading some months back that Craig Scamtoshi was claiming one address with a high nr of bitcoin on it to be his , and after that the owner of the address signed a message proving Craig Shitoshi is a liar and a fraud .    What happened with that ? Is it confirmed ? Did anyone verify the message ?

Literally 2 pages back in this very thread !

- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5149062.msg53806826#msg53806826

You should also read all of the WizSec posts here:

- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5149062.msg53783160#msg53783160

Oh thank you !!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Where is mr. master degree and empirical evidence to comment on this ?

[nutildah]

Where is mr. master degree and empirical evidence to comment on this ?

He's probably resting. Shilling so hard for a scam takes a lot out of oneself.

When he returns, he'll completely ignore all of this and keep focusing on trivial, unrelated matters. Probably will continue to insist we throw common sense out the window and take his word for everything. After all, he's a computer engineer with 15 years experience, doncha know.

[AlexSimion]

Where is mr. master degree and empirical evidence to comment on this ?

He's probably resting. Shilling so hard for a scam takes a lot out of oneself.

When he returns, he'll completely ignore all of this and keep focusing on trivial, unrelated matters. Probably will continue to insist we throw common sense out the window and take his word for everything. After all, he's a computer engineer with 15 years experience, doncha know.

Unrelated but somehow you've also managed to describe game-protect here  ( - the computer engineer part ) . Seems like scammy people share the same pattern .